Bipolar disorder: from families to genes

Longitudinal studies of bipolar patients and their families: translating findings to advance individualized risk prediction, treatment and research

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder is a broad diagnostic construct associated with significant phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity challenging progress in clinical practice and discovery research. Prospective studies of well-characterized patients and their family members have identified lithium responsive (LiR) and lithium non-responsive (LiNR) subtypes that hold promise for advancement.

METHOD

In this narrative review, relevant observations from published longitudinal studies of well-characterized bipolar patients and their families spanning six decades are highlighted. DSM diagnoses based on SADS-L interviews were decided in blind consensus reviews by expert clinicians. Genetic, neurobiological, and psychosocial factors were investigated in subsets of well-characterized probands and adult relatives. Systematic maintenance trials of lithium, antipsychotics, and lamotrigine were carried out. Clinical profiles that included detailed histories of the clinical course, symptom sets and disorders segregating in families were documented. Offspring of LiR and LiNR families were repeatedly assessed up to 20 years using KSADS-PL format interviews and DSM diagnoses and sub-threshold symptoms were decided by expert clinicians in blind consensus reviews using all available clinical and research data.

RESULTS

A characteristic clinical profile differentiated bipolar patients who responded to lithium stabilization from those who did not. The LiR subtype was characterized by a recurrent fully remitting course predominated by depressive episodes and a positive family history of episodic remitting mood disorders, and not schizophrenia. Response to lithium clustered in families and the characteristic clinical profile predicted lithium response, with the episodic remitting course being a strong correlate. There is accumulating evidence that genetic and neurobiological markers differ between LiR and LiNR subtypes. Further, offspring of bipolar parents subdivided by lithium response differed in developmental history, clinical antecedents and early course of mood disorders. Moreover, the nature of the emergent course bred true from parent to offspring, independent of the nature of emergent psychopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar disorders are heterogeneous and response to long-term lithium is associated with a familial subtype with characteristic course, treatment response, family history and likely pathogenesis. Incorporating distinctive clinical profiles that index valid bipolar subtypes into routine practice and research will improve patient outcomes and advance the development and translation of novel treatment targets to improve prevention and early intervention.

The Genetic Side of the Mood: A Scientometric Review of the Genetic Basis of Mood Disorders

Mood disorders are highly heritable psychiatric disorders. Over the years, many genetic polymorphisms have been identified to pose a higher risk for the development of mood disorders. To overview the literature on the genetics of mood disorders, a scientometric analysis was performed on a sample of 5342 documents downloaded from Scopus. The most active countries and the most impactful documents in the field were identified. Furthermore, a total of 13 main thematic clusters emerged in the literature. From the qualitative inspection of clusters, it emerged that the research interest moved from a monogenic to a polygenic risk framework. Researchers have moved from the study of single genes in the early 1990s to conducting genome-wide association studies around 2015. In this way, genetic overlaps between mood disorders and other psychiatric conditions emerged too. Furthermore, around the 2010s, the interaction between genes and environmental factors emerged as pivotal in understanding the risk for mood disorders. The inspection of thematic clusters provides a valuable insight into the past and recent trends of research in the genetics of mood disorders and sheds light onto future lines of research.

Neuroprogression in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Recent theories regarding the neuropathology of bipolar disorder suggest that both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes may play a role. While magnetic resonance imaging has provided significant insight into the structural, functional, and connectivity abnormalities associated with bipolar disorder, research assessing longitudinal changes has been more limited. However, such research is essential to elucidate the pathophysiology of the disorder. The aim of our review is to examine the extant literature for developmental and progressive structural and functional changes in individuals with and at risk for bipolar disorder.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review using MEDLINE and the following search terms: bipolar disorder, risk, child, adolescent, bipolar offspring, MRI, fMRI, DTI, PET, SPECT, cross-sectional, longitudinal, progressive, and developmental. Further relevant articles were identified by cross-referencing with identified manuscripts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence for developmental and progressive neurophysiological alterations in bipolar disorder, but the interpretation of correlations between neuroimaging findings and measures of illness exposure or age in cross-sectional studies must be performed with care. Prospective longitudinal studies placed in the context of normative developmental and atrophic changes in neural structures and pathways thought to be involved in bipolar disorder are needed to improve our understanding of the neurodevelopmental underpinnings and progressive changes associated with bipolar disorder.

Preventative strategies for early-onset bipolar disorder: towards a clinical staging model

Bipolar disorder is a chronic and typically recurring illness with significant psychosocial morbidity. Although the aetiological factors that contribute to the onset of mania, and by definition bipolar I disorder, are poorly understood, it most commonly occurs during the adolescent period. Putative risk factors for developing bipolar disorder include having a first-degree relative with a mood disorder, physical/sexual abuse and other psychosocial stressors, substance use disorders, psychostimulant and antidepressant medication exposure and omega-3 fatty acid deficiency. Prominent prodromal clinical features include episodic symptoms of depression, anxiety, hypomania, anger/irritability and disturbances in sleep and attention. Because prodromal mood symptoms precede the onset of mania by an average of 10 years, and there is low specificity of risk factors and prodromal features for mania, interventions initiated prior to onset of the disorder (primary prevention) or early in the course of the disorder (early or secondary prevention) must be safe and well tolerated upon long-term exposure. Indeed, antidepressant and psychostimulant medications may precipitate the onset of mania. Although mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotic medications exhibit efficacy in youth with bipolar I disorder, their efficacy for the treatment of prodromal mood symptoms is largely unknown. Moreover, mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics are associated with prohibitive treatment-emergent adverse effects. In contrast, omega-3 fatty acids have neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties and have been found to be efficacious, safe and well tolerated in the treatment of manic and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Together, extant evidence endorses a clinical staging model in which subjects at elevated risk for developing mania are treated with safer interventions (i.e. omega-3 fatty acids, family-focused therapy) in the prodromal phase, followed by pharmacological agents with potential adverse effects for nonresponsive cases and secondary prevention. This approach warrants evaluation in prospective longitudinal trials in youth determined to be at ultra-high risk for bipolar I disorder.

Lithium: a key to the genetics of bipolar disorder

Since the 1950s, lithium salts have been the main line of treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), both as a prophylactic and as an episodic treatment agent. Like many psychiatric conditions, BD is genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous, but evidence suggests that individuals who respond well to lithium treatment have more homogeneous clinical and molecular profiles. Response to lithium seems to cluster in families and can be used as a predictor for recurrence of BD symptoms. While molecular studies have provided important information about possible genes involved in BD predisposition or in lithium response, neither the mechanism of action of this drug nor the genetic profile of bipolar disorder is, as yet, completely understood.

Prevention of bipolar disorder in at-risk children: theoretical assumptions and empirical foundations

This article examines how bipolar symptoms emerge during development, and the potential role of psychosocial and pharmacological interventions in the prevention of the onset of the disorder. Early signs of bipolarity can be observed among children of bipolar parents and often take the form of subsyndromal presentations (e.g., mood lability, episodic elation or irritability, depression, inattention, and psychosocial impairment). However, many of these early presentations are diagnostically nonspecific. The few studies that have followed at-risk youth into adulthood find developmental discontinuities from childhood to adulthood. Biological markers (e.g., amygdalar volume) may ultimately increase our accuracy in identifying children who later develop bipolar I disorder, but few such markers have been identified. Stress, in the form of childhood adversity or highly conflictual families, is not a diagnostically specific causal agent but does place genetically and biologically vulnerable individuals at risk for a more pernicious course of illness. A preventative family-focused treatment for children with (a) at least one first-degree relative with bipolar disorder and (b) subsyndromal signs of bipolar disorder is described. This model attempts to address the multiple interactions of psychosocial and biological risk factors in the onset and course of bipolar disorder.

Does bipolar disorder exist in children? A selected review

Although there is increasing recognition that a substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) experience an onset of illness in adolescence, significant controversy remains over the validity of the diagnosis in very young children. In careful studies of adult patients dating from Kraepelin, first mood episodes not uncommonly occurred during adolescence. Some of these early-onset patients experienced subthreshold mood disturbances or predisposing temperaments earlier in childhood. Earlier onsets of BD have been reported in more recent clinical and community samples of children. Several factors possibly contributed to these earlier onsets, including exposure to psychotropics, bias in favour of a mood rather than a psychotic diagnosis, and recognition of softer-spectrum BDs. However, the validity of the diagnosis of BD in impulsive, irritable, labile, or behaviourally dysregulated children remains to be proven. Studies of high-risk children of well-characterized parents with BD have demonstrated that BD most often debuts as a depressive episode in mid to late adolescence and that activated episodes are rare prior to age 12 years. Some children manifest antecedent nonspecific psychopathology in early childhood. Therefore, as currently diagnosed, BD does not manifest as such typically until at least adolescence.

The psychopathology and treatment of bipolar disorder

In this chapter we review research on the diagnosis, course, etiology, and pharmacological and psychosocial treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). BD is a highly recurrent and severe illness, with high rates of suicidality and functional impairment. The disorder is heritable and appears to share susceptibility genes with schizophrenia. It is characterized by dysregulation in the dopamine and serotonin systems and by pathology in the brain systems involved in regulating emotion. Psychosocial stressors, notably life events and familial expressed emotion, significantly influence the course of the illness in the context of these vulnerabilities. Findings of randomized clinical trials indicate that psychosocial interventions enhance long-term outcomes when added to pharmacotherapy. Much remains to be clarified about the interactive contributions of genetic, neurobiological, and psychosocial factors to the course of the disorder, and the moderators and mediators of treatment effects.

Multiple dimensions of familial psychopathology affect risk of mood disorder in children of bipolar parents

The aim of our study was to determine whether familial loading of unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder, and substance use disorder are associated with DSM-IV mood disorders in adolescents at risk for bipolar disorder. One hundred and forty adolescents aged 12-21 years of 86 bipolar parents participated in the study. Lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses of the bipolar offspring were assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (SADS-PL). Parents were interviewed using the Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC) which were used to calculate a continuous familial loading score (FL) for unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder, and for substance use disorder in first- and second-degree relatives of the adolescents. FL for unipolar disorder and substance use disorder were strong and independent predictors for lifetime mood disorders in the adolescents. The gender adjusted hazard ratios for mood disorders in the children were 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.0) for FL of unipolar disorder and 1.8 (95% CI = 1.3-2.4) for FL of substance use disorder. Expression of mood disorders in children of bipolar parents varies with the degree of additional FL of unipolar disorder and substance use disorder in the extended family.

Psychiatric diagnoses in the context of genetic studies of bipolar disorder

Precise definition of the phenotype is an issue of critical importance for the future success of genetic studies of bipolar disorders. So far, an uncertain phenotypic spectrum and genetic heterogeneity are realities that have hampered progress in genetic studies. While recognition of a broader spectrum of related illnesses is important for some applications, for genetic studies a narrow spectrum of illness closely tied to the genotype is paramount. This paper highlights current dilemmas and trends associated with phenotype specification and traces historical approaches. Finally, we explore a number of strategic directions in the diagnostic approach to bipolar disorders that may better serve genetic studies.

Measures of attention and hyperactivity symptoms in a high-risk sample of children of bipolar parents

BACKGROUND

To determine whether significant symptoms of inattention were present among the offspring of well-characterized bipolar parents.

METHODS

We included 53 offspring of 30 parents meeting DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder diagnosed by consensus on the basis of a SADS-L interview and a wealth of longitudinal clinical data. The unaffected parent had no lifetime history of a major psychiatric illness. Offspring, prospectively followed for up to 5 years, completed psychometric measures of attention and mood when judged to be at a good level of functioning (well, remitted or treated).

RESULTS

Those offspring with any lifetime psychiatric diagnosis endorsed more subjective problems with attention. However, there was no measurable difference on tasks of sustained attention between those with and those without a lifetime psychiatric illness including affective disorder. There was a significant association between self-reported symptoms of depression and inattention, but no association between either self-report measure and an objective measure of sustained attention.

LIMITATIONS

This study was not intended to be a comprehensive neuropsychological investigation of at risk offspring.

CONCLUSIONS

In this high-risk population, subjective difficulty with attention appeared to be state-dependent, associated with the degree of subjective distress related to an underlying psychiatric illness.

Genetic basis of schizophrenia: trinucleotide repeats. An update

1. Recent developments in technologies permit systematic screening of the entire human genome as a strategy for identification of susceptibility genes of small effect that influence risk to complex traits, like schizophrenia (Schz), inflammatory bowel disease, bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) etc. 2. Schizophrenia is known to have a high heritability and a complex inheritance pattern. Several studies provide evidence that both genes and environment play a role in the etiology of schizophrenia. Linkage studies have observed racial and sex bias in the genetic constitution of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia also manifests clinical anticipation and genomic imprinting. 3. "Dynamic mutations" or "tandem repeat expansions" in DNA, explain a number of observations associated with clinical anticipation and genomic imprinting. In patient populations, the repeat expands well beyond the normal range, altering the biological function of the gene. These sequence are unstable and increase in size between family members in successive generations, giving rise to greater severity of disease. 4. Several workers have reported an association of trinucleotide repeat length with adult- and child-onset schizophrenia. One such expanded allele has been found at the CTG18.1 locus on the 18th chromosome. Other genes known to have similar mutation are SEF2-1, which codes for a helix-loop-helix protein, hSKCa3 gene, which codes for a calcium-activated potassium channel and the transthyretin gene. In schizophrenic patients, significant difference in allele frequency distribution of these genes has been reported. 5. Population based genetic research would not only help identify different subgroups of this of schizophrenia.

Toward effective early intervention and prevention strategies for major affective disorders: a review of antecedents and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To review critically the literature pertaining to risk factors and antecedent symptoms and syndromes in order to determine an empirically based strategy for early treatment and prevention of major mood episodes.

METHOD

The relevant literature is summarized, with particular emphasis on early-onset (child and adolescent) mood disorders.

RESULTS

A complex interaction between biological, psychological, and sociological factors contributes to the development of a major mood disorder. Having a positive family history of mood disorder (bipolar and unipolar) and being female (unipolar) are the strongest, most reliable risk factors. There is continuity between adolescent and adult mood disorders, and subsyndromal mood disturbance in adolescents has clinical and public health significance. However, more longitudinal study is required to reliably map the course and predictive importance of mood disorders in very young children.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial evidence supports the effectiveness of early intervention and prevention efforts in children at risk for mood disorders (identified as having affected family members) and in adolescents manifesting significant mood symptoms and syndromes (especially if associated with a positive family history). However, the current level of understanding regarding the etiological significance and mechanism of risk factors associated with mood disorders does not support broad community-based primary prevention strategies in unselected populations.

Transtorno bipolar

Os resultados de estudos de famílias sugerem que o transtorno bipolar tenha uma base genética. Essa hipótese foi reforçada em estudos de adoção e de gêmeos. A herança do transtorno bipolar é complexa, envolve vários genes, além de apresentar heterogeneidade e interação entre fatores genéticos e não-genéticos. Achados, que já foram replicados, já implicaram os cromossomos 4, 12, 18 e 21, entre outros, na busca por genes de suscetibilidade. Os resultados mais promissores foram obtidos através de estudos de ligação. Por outro lado, os estudos de associação geraram dados interessantes, mas ainda vagos. Os estudos de populações de pacientes homogêneos e a melhor definição do fenótipo deverão contribuir para avanços futuros. A identificação dos genes relacionados ao transtorno bipolar irá permitir o melhor entendimento e tratamento dessa doença.