Circadian Physiology Is a Toxicity Target of the Anticancer Drug Gemcitabine in Mice

Paclitaxel chemotherapy disrupts behavioral and molecular circadian clocks in mice

Cancer patients experience circadian rhythm disruptions in activity cycles and cortisol release that correlate with poor quality of life and decreased long-term survival rates. However, the extent to which chemotherapy contributes to altered circadian rhythms is poorly understood. In the present study, we examined the extent to which paclitaxel, a common chemotherapy drug, altered entrained and free-running circadian rhythms in wheel running behavior, circulating corticosterone, and circadian clock gene expression in the brain and adrenal glands of tumor-free mice. Paclitaxel injections delayed voluntary wheel running activity onset in a light-dark cycle (LD) and lengthened the free-running period of locomotion in constant darkness (DD), indicating an effect on inherent suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) pacemaker activity. Paclitaxel attenuated clock gene rhythms in multiple brain regions in LD and DD. Furthermore, paclitaxel disrupted circulating corticosterone rhythms in DD by elevating its levels across a 24-hour cycle, which correlated with blunted amplitudes of Arntl, Nr1d1, Per1, and Star rhythms in the adrenal glands. Paclitaxel also shortened SCN slice rhythms, increased the amplitude of adrenal gland oscillations in PER2::luciferase cultures, and increased the concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines released from the SCN. These findings indicate that paclitaxel disrupts clock genes and behavior driven by the SCN, other brain regions, and adrenal glands, which were associated with chemotherapy-induced inflammation. Together, this preclinical work demonstrates that chemotherapy disrupts both central and peripheral circadian rhythms and supports the possibility that targeted circadian realignment therapies may be a novel and non-invasive way to improve patient outcomes after chemotherapy.

Valproic acid disrupts the oscillatory expression of core circadian rhythm transcription factors

Valproic acid (VPA) is a well-established therapeutic used in treatment of seizure and mood disorders as well as migraines and a known hepatotoxicant. About 50% of VPA users experience metabolic disruptions, including weight gain, hyperlipidemia, and hyperinsulinemia, among others. Several of these metabolic abnormalities are similar to the effects of circadian rhythm disruption. In the current study, we examine the effect of VPA exposure on the expression of core circadian transcription factors that drive the circadian clock via a transcription-translation feedback loop. In cells with an unsynchronized clock, VPA simultaneously upregulated the expression of genes encoding core circadian transcription factors that regulate the positive and negative limbs of the feedback loop. Using low dose glucocorticoid, we synchronized cultured fibroblast cells to a circadian oscillatory pattern. Whether VPA was added at the time of synchronization or 12h later at CT12, we found that VPA disrupted the oscillatory expression of multiple genes encoding essential transcription factors that regulate circadian rhythm. Therefore, we conclude that VPA has a potent effect on the circadian rhythm transcription-translation feedback loop that may be linked to negative VPA side effects in humans. Furthermore, our study suggests potential chronopharmacology implications of VPA usage.

Molecular Aspects of Circadian Pharmacology and Relevance for Cancer Chronotherapy

The circadian timing system (CTS) controls various biological functions in mammals including xenobiotic metabolism and detoxification, immune functions, cell cycle events, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Although the importance of the CTS is well known in the pharmacology of drugs, it is less appreciated at the clinical level. Genome-wide studies highlighted that the majority of drug target genes are controlled by CTS. This suggests that chronotherapeutic approaches should be taken for many drugs to enhance their effectiveness. Currently chronotherapeutic approaches are successfully applied in the treatment of different types of cancers. The chronotherapy approach has improved the tolerability and antitumor efficacy of anticancer drugs both in experimental animals and in cancer patients. Thus, chronobiological studies have been of importance in determining the most appropriate time of administration of anticancer agents to minimize their side effects or toxicity and enhance treatment efficacy, so as to optimize the therapeutic ratio. This review focuses on the underlying mechanisms of the circadian pharmacology i.e., chronopharmacokinetics and chronopharmacodynamics of anticancer agents with the molecular aspects, and provides an overview of chronotherapy in cancer and some of the recent advances in the development of chronopharmaceutics.

Relevance of internal time and circadian robustness for cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Adequate circadian timing of cancer treatment schedules (chronotherapy) can enhance tolerance and efficacy several-fold in experimental and clinical situations. However, the optimal timing varies according to sex, genetic background and lifestyle. Here, we compute the individual phase of the Circadian Timing System to decipher the internal timing of each patient and find the optimal treatment timing.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (11 male; 13 female), aged 36 to 77 years, with advanced or metastatic gastro-intestinal cancer were recruited. Inner wrist surface Temperature, arm Activity and Position (TAP) were recorded every 10 min for 12 days, divided into three 4-day spans before, during and after a course of a set chronotherapy schedule. Pertinent indexes, I < O and a new biomarker, DI (degree of temporal internal order maintenance), were computed for each patient and period.

RESULTS

Three circadian rhythms and the TAP rhythm grew less stable and more fragmented in response to treatment. Furthermore, large inter- and intra-individual changes were found for T, A, P and TAP patterns, with phase differences of up to 12 hours among patients. A moderate perturbation of temporal internal order was observed, but the administration of fixed chronomodulated chemotherapy partially resynchronized temperature and activity rhythms by the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated variable TAP, together with the asynchrony among rhythms revealed by the new biomarker DI, would help in the personalization of cancer chronotherapy, taking into account individual circadian phase markers.

Dosing-Time Makes the Poison: Circadian Regulation and Pharmacotherapy

Daily rhythms in physiology significantly modulate drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics according to the time-of-day, a finding that has led to the concept of chronopharmacology. The importance of biological clocks for xenobiotic metabolism has gained increased attention with the discovery of the molecular circadian clockwork. Mechanistic understanding of the cell-autonomous molecular circadian oscillator and the circadian timing system as a whole has opened new conceptual and methodological lines of investigation to understand first, the clock's impact on a specific drug's daily variations or the effects/side effects of environmental substances, and second, how clock-controlled pathways are coordinated within a given tissue or organism. Today, there is an increased understanding of the circadian modulation of drug effects. Moreover, several molecular strategies are being developed to treat disease-dependent and drug-induced clock disruptions in humans.

Thoracic surface temperature rhythms as circadian biomarkers for cancer chronotherapy

The disruption of the temperature circadian rhythm has been associated with cancer progression, while its amplification resulted in cancer inhibition in experimental tumor models. The current study investigated the relevance of skin surface temperature rhythms as biomarkers of the Circadian Timing System (CTS) in order to optimize chronotherapy timing in individual cancer patients. Baseline skin surface temperature at four sites and wrist accelerations were measured every minute for 4 days in 16 patients with metastatic gastro-intestinal cancer before chronotherapy administration. Temperature and rest-activity were recorded, respectively, with wireless skin surface temperature patches (Respironics, Phillips) and an actigraph (Ambulatory Monitoring). Both variables were further monitored in 10 of these patients during and after a 4-day course of a fixed chronotherapy protocol. Collected at baseline, during and after therapy longitudinal data sets were processed using Fast Fourier Transform Cosinor and Linear Discriminant Analyses methods. A circadian rhythm was statistically validated with a period of 24 h (p < 0.05) for 49/61 temperature time series (80.3%), and 15/16 rest-activity patterns (93.7%) at baseline. However, individual circadian amplitudes varied from 0.04 °C to 2.86 °C for skin surface temperature (median, 0.72 °C), and from 16.6 to 146.1 acc/min for rest-activity (median, 88.9 acc/min). Thirty-nine pairs of baseline temperature and rest-activity time series (75%) were correlated (r > |0.7|; p < 0.05). Individual circadian acrophases at baseline were scattered from 15:18 to 6:05 for skin surface temperature, and from 12:19 to 15:18 for rest-activity, with respective median values of 01:10 (25-75% quartiles, 22:35-3:07) and 14:12 (13:14-14:31). The circadian patterns in skin surface temperature and rest-activity persisted or were amplified during and after fixed chronotherapy delivery for 5/10 patients. In contrast, transient or sustained disruption of these biomarkers was found for the five other patients, as indicated by the lack of any statistically significant dominant period in the circadian range. No consistent correlation (r < |0.7|, p ≥ 0.05) was found between paired rest-activity and temperature time series during fixed chronotherapy delivery. In conclusion, large inter-patient differences in circadian amplitudes and acrophases of skin surface temperature were demonstrated for the first time in cancer patients, despite rather similar rest-activity acrophases. The patient-dependent coupling between both CTS biomarkers, and its possible alteration on a fixed chronotherapy protocol, support the concept of personalized cancer chronotherapy.

The circadian rest-activity rhythm, a potential safety pharmacology endpoint of cancer chemotherapy

The robustness of the circadian timing system (CTS) was correlated to quality of life and predicted for improved survival in cancer patients. However, chemotherapy disrupted the CTS according to dose and circadian timing in mice. A continuous and repeated measures longitudinal design was implemented here to characterize CTS dynamics in patients receiving a fixed circadian-based chemotherapy protocol. The rest-activity rhythm of 49 patients with advanced cancer was monitored using a wrist actigraph for 13 days split into four consecutive spans of 3-4 days each, i.e., before, during, right after and late after a fixed chronotherapy course. The relative amount of activity in bed vs. out of bed (I<O, main endpoint), the autocorrelation coefficient r24, the relative 24-hr amplitude (Amp), interdaily stability (IS) and intradaily variability (IV) were compared according to study span. Circadian disruption (I<O ≤ 97.5%) resulted from the administration of the fixed chronotherapy protocols, with all five rest-activity rhythm parameters being worsened in the whole group of patients (p < 0.05). Mean parameter values subsequently recovered to near baseline values. The occurrence of circadian disruption on chemotherapy was associated with a higher risk of clinically relevant fatigue (p = 0.028) or body weight loss (p = 0.05). Four CTS dynamic patterns characterized treatment response including no change (9.5% of the patients); improvement (14.3%); alteration and complete recovery (31%) or sustained deterioration (45%), possibly due to inadequate chronotherapy dosing and/or timing. Improved clinical tolerability could result from the minimization of circadian disruption through the personalization of chronotherapy delivery.

Sex and dosing-time dependencies in irinotecan-induced circadian disruption

Circadian disruption accelerates malignant growth; thus, it should be avoided in anticancer therapy. The circadian disruptive effects of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, was investigated according to dosing time and sex. In previous work, irinotecan achieved best tolerability following dosing at zeitgeber time (ZT) 11 in male and ZT15 in female mice, whereas worst toxicity corresponded to treatment at ZT23 and ZT3 in male and female mice, respectively. Here, irinotecan (50 mg/kg intravenous [i.v.]) was delivered at the sex-specific optimal or worst circadian timing in male and female B6D2F1 mice. Circadian disruption was assessed with rest-activity, body temperature, plasma corticosterone, and liver mRNA expressions of clock genes Rev-erbα, Per2, and Bmal1. Baseline circadian rhythms in rest-activity, body temperature, and plasma corticosterone were more prominent in females as compared to males. Severe circadian disruption was documented for all physiology and molecular clock endpoints in female mice treated at the ZT of worst tolerability. Conversely, irinotecan administration at the ZT of best tolerability induced slight alteration of circadian physiology and clock-gene expression patterns in female mice. In male mice, irinotecan produced moderate alterations of circadian physiology and clock-gene expression patterns, irrespective of treatment ZT. However, the average expression of Rev-erbα, Per2, and Bmal1 were down-regulated 2- to 10-fold with irinotecan at the worst ZT, while being minimally or unaffected at the best ZT, irrespective of sex. Corticosterone secretion increased acutely within 2 h with a sex-specific response pattern, resulting in a ZT-dependent phase-advance or -delay in both sex. The mRNA expressions of irinotecan clock-controlled metabolism genes Ce2, Ugt1a1, and Top1 were unchanged or down-regulated according to irinotecan timing and sex. This study shows that the circadian timing system represents an important toxicity target of irinotecan in female mice, where circadian disruption persists after wrongly timed treatment. As a result, the mechanisms underling cancer chronotherapeutics are expectedly more susceptible to disruption in females as compared to males. Thus, the optimal circadian timing of chemotherapy requires precise determination according to sex, and should involve the noninvasive monitoring of circadian biomarkers.

Statistical methods for detecting and comparing periodic data and their application to the nycthemeral rhythm of bodily harm: A population based study

BACKGROUND

Animals, including humans, exhibit a variety of biological rhythms. This article describes a method for the detection and simultaneous comparison of multiple nycthemeral rhythms.

METHODS

A statistical method for detecting periodic patterns in time-related data via harmonic regression is described. The method is particularly capable of detecting nycthemeral rhythms in medical data. Additionally a method for simultaneously comparing two or more periodic patterns is described, which derives from the analysis of variance (ANOVA). This method statistically confirms or rejects equality of periodic patterns. Mathematical descriptions of the detecting method and the comparing method are displayed.

RESULTS

Nycthemeral rhythms of incidents of bodily harm in Middle Franconia are analyzed in order to demonstrate both methods. Every day of the week showed a significant nycthemeral rhythm of bodily harm. These seven patterns of the week were compared to each other revealing only two different nycthemeral rhythms, one for Friday and Saturday and one for the other weekdays.

Circadian Timing in Cancer Treatments

The circadian timing system is composed of molecular clocks, which drive 24-h changes in xenobiotic metabolism and detoxification, cell cycle events, DNA repair, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The cellular circadian clocks are coordinated by endogenous physiological rhythms, so that they tick in synchrony in the host tissues that can be damaged by anticancer agents. As a result, circadian timing can modify 2- to 10-fold the tolerability of anticancer medications in experimental models and in cancer patients. Improved efficacy is also seen when drugs are given near their respective times of best tolerability, due to (a) inherently poor circadian entrainment of tumors and (b) persistent circadian entrainment of healthy tissues. Conversely, host clocks are disrupted whenever anticancer drugs are administered at their most toxic time. On the other hand, circadian disruption accelerates experimental and clinical cancer processes. Gender, circadian physiology, clock genes, and cell cycle critically affect outcome on cancer chronotherapeutics. Mathematical and systems biology approaches currently develop and integrate theoretical, experimental, and technological tools in order to further optimize and personalize the circadian administration of cancer treatments.

Liver circadian clock, a pharmacologic target of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor seliciclib

Circadian disruption accelerates malignant growth and shortens survival, both in experimental tumor models and cancer patients. In previous experiments, tumor circadian disruption was rescued with seliciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). This effect occurred at a selective dosing time and was associated with improved antitumor activity. In the current study, seliciclib altered robust circadian mRNA expression of the clock genes Rev-erb alpha, Per2, and Bmal1 in mouse liver following dosing at zeitgeber time (ZT) 3 (i.e., 3 h after the onset of the 12 h light span), when mice start to rest, but not at ZT19, near the middle of the 12 h dark span, when mice are most active. However, liver exposure to seliciclib, as estimated by the liver area under the concentration x time curve (AUC), was approximately 80% higher at ZT19 than at ZT3 (p = 0.049). Circadian clock disruption was associated with increased serum liver enzymes and modified glycogen distribution in hepatocytes, as revealed by biochemical determinations and optic and electronic microscopy. The extent of increase in liver enzymes was most pronounced following dosing at ZT3, as compared to ZT19 (p < 0.04). Seliciclib further up-regulated the transcriptional activity of c-Myc, a cell cycle gene that promotes cell cycle entry and G1-S transition (p < 0.001), and down-regulated that of Wee1, which gates cell cycle transition from G2 to M (p < 0.001). These effects did not depend upon drug dosing time. Overall, the results suggest the circadian time of seliciclib delivery is more critical than the amount of drug exposure in determining its effects on the circadian clock. Seliciclib-induced disruption of the liver molecular clock could account for liver toxicity through the resulting disruption of clock-controlled detoxification pathways. Modifications of cell cycle gene expression in the liver likely involve other mechanisms. Circadian clocks represent relevant targets to consider for optimization of therapeutic schedules of CDK inhibitors.