Preventive therapy in pediatric migraine

The Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Medically Refractory Pediatric Patients With Chronic Daily Headaches and Its Impact on the Quality of Life

Background: Chronic migraine in children has been a challenging condition to treat, prompting the investigation of alternative therapies. This retrospective single-center chart review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Botox injections for managing chronic migraine in children. Methods: The study included children with chronic daily headaches and chronic migraine who were medically refractory to previous treatments at OSF Healthcare/Illinois Neurological Institute, Peoria, between 2015 and 2021. Botox injections were administered quarterly following a specific protocol. Data were obtained from electronic medical records by manual review. Results: Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria (median age 15.4 years, 87% female). Comorbidities included depression (41.6%) and sleep disturbances (33.2%). Prior to Botox treatment, patients had been tried on a median number of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 4, 7) medications. Botox injections resulted in a significant reduction in headache frequency, with a mean difference (6 months vs pretreatment) in the Headache Impact Test (HIT 3) scores of -19.6 (95% CI -24.8, -14.3), P < .001, and mean difference in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores of -50.8 (95% CI -62.6, -39.0, P < .001). Subjective improvements included mood enhancement (13/24, 54.2%) and improved concentration (12/24, 50%). Treatment-related side effects were reported by 5/24 (20%) of patients and were mostly mild to moderate. Conclusions: Botox injections offer a promising therapeutic option for managing chronic migraine in children who have not responded to traditional medications. Future controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies are needed to further evaluate Botox treatment's benefits and adverse effects in children with chronic migraine.

A Randomized Trial to Evaluate OnabotulinumtoxinA for Prevention of Headaches in Adolescents With Chronic Migraine

OBJECTIVE

As a post-approval commitment, this dose-ranging study was undertaken to evaluate efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in adolescents.

BACKGROUND

In adolescents, migraine is often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed and can present unique management challenges. OnabotulinumtoxinA was approved for prevention of chronic migraine (CM) in adults in 2010.

METHODS

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized trial assessed a single treatment of onabotulinumtoxinA (155 U or 74 U) vs placebo (intramuscular saline) administered via the recommended fixed-dose fixed site paradigm in adolescents with CM aged 12 to <18 years. The primary efficacy measure was change in frequency of headache days from baseline at week 12; other measures included change in frequency of headache days at weeks 4 and 8 and change in frequency of severe headache days. Safety and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 125 randomized patients (onabotulinumtoxinA 155 U, n = 45; onabotulinumtoxinA 74 U, n = 43; placebo, n = 37), all were included in the primary efficacy analysis, and 115 (92.0%) completed the study. Lack of efficacy was the primary reason for discontinuing (n = 4; 3.2%); no patients discontinued because of adverse events. All treatments reduced frequency of headache days at week 12, with no significant differences between treatments. The mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline in the frequency of headache days during the 28-day period ending at week 12 (primary endpoint) were -6.3 (-8.5, -4.2), -6.4 (-8.8, -4.0), and -6.8 (-9.6, -4.1) days in the onabotulinumtoxinA 155 U, onabotulinumtoxinA 74 U, and placebo groups, respectively (P ≥ .474). All treatments reduced frequency of severe headache days and were well-tolerated; serious adverse events (n = 3) were considered unrelated to treatment and resolved without sequelae. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were neck pain (n = 8), upper respiratory tract infection (n = 7), migraine, and nasopharyngitis (n = 5 each).

CONCLUSION

Although this study did not meet its efficacy endpoints, onabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated in this adolescent population. Given previous data demonstrating the benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA in adults with CM, additional studies with design modifications, including adequate statistical power, to assess the efficacy of multiple treatment cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA for CM prevention in adolescents may be informative.

Factors Associated with Favorable Outcome of Topiramate Migraine Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are few studies that have investigated predictive factors related to migraine prophylaxis of which produced inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to identify factors that can predict the treatment response to topiramate prophylaxis in pediatric patients with migraine.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen patients who were older than 7 years and received topiramate for at least 3 months were recruited from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital outpatient clinic from 2005 to 2014. A positive response was defined as a reduction of more than 50% in the number of migraine episodes after topiramate treatment. Proposed predictive factors such as migraine characteristics including severity and frequency were assessed, as were other data on sex, disease duration, associated symptoms, family history, and impairment of daily activities.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (61.9%) responded to prophylactic treatment with topiramate. Patients who experienced significant impairment in daily activities showed significant benefit from the treatment (p=0.004). Sex, the severity, frequency, and duration of migraine episodes, disease duration, treatment duration, age at onset, and associated symptoms were not significantly related to a response to topiramate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine characteristics and associated symptoms were not significantly related to a response to topiramate treatment. However, patients with significant impairment in daily activities showed significant benefit from the treatment, and so prophylactic topiramate treatment should be strongly encouraged in this patient group.

Preventive drugs in childhood and adolescent migraine

While headaches in children are quite common, the study and characterization of headache disorders in the pediatric age group has historically been limited. In the absence of controlled studies on prophylactic treatment of the primary headache disorders in this age group, the diagnosis of childhood migraine rests on criteria similar to those in adults. Data from adult studies are often extrapolated and applied to children as well. Although it appears that many preventive agents are safe in children, none are currently FDA-approved for this age group. As a result, despite experiencing significant disability, the vast majority of children who present to their physician with migraine headache do not receive prophylactic therapy. Furthermore, controlled clinical trials investigating the use of both abortive and preventive medications in children have suffered from high placebo response rates. The shorter duration of headaches and other characteristic features seen in children are such that designing randomized controlled trials in this age group is more problematic and limiting. As such, treatment practices vary widely, even among specialists, due to the absence of evidence-based guidelines from clinical trials.

A randomized trial of propranolol versus sodium valproate for the prophylaxis of migraine in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Migraine is the most common of the paroxysmal disorders to affect the brain in the pediatric population. Both propranolol and sodium valproate (valproic acid) have been advocated as prophylactic agents for childhood migraine.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of propranolol and sodium valproate in the prevention of migraine in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Sixty-three children (aged 5-15 years) with migraine without aura, as defined by the 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, were included in this prospective, double-blind clinical trial and were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n = 32 patients) received propranolol 3 mg/kg/day and group B (n = 31 patients) received sodium valproate 30 mg/kg/day, with at least 6 months of follow up. The propranolol dosage was adjusted to 2 mg/kg/day and the sodium valproate dosage to 15 mg/kg/day, after the first follow-up visit. Participants were evaluated by using a detailed questionnaire that asked about the features of headaches and general health characteristics. The study endpoints were successful treatment for a 4- to 6-month period; 3 months of a persistent unsuccessful or incomplete response to treatment; intolerable side effects; and/or patient non-adherence. All data were analyzed longitudinally by comparing baseline data with data from each follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients completed the full headache prophylaxis period. The baseline headache frequency was reduced by more than 50% in 83% of propranolol recipients and in 63% of sodium valproate recipients (statistically not significant); the overall reduction of baseline headache frequency per month was better in group A (p = 0.044). The mean headache frequency per month was reduced from 13.86 +/- 2.11 to 4.23 +/- 3.24 in group A, and from 13.23 +/- 2.43 to 5.83 +/- 4.04 in group B; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The mean headache duration per week was decreased from 9.9 +/- 7.4 hours to 3.2 +/- 5.9 hours in group A, and from 9.1 +/- 6.9 hours to 3.7 +/- 5.0 hours in group B; although there was no statistically significant difference between propranolol and sodium valproate, headache duration was markedly improved with each drug (p < 0.002). Reduction of headache severity by at least one grade was seen in 64% of patients in group A and in 56% in group B, and complete cessation of headache attacks occurred in 14% of patients in group A and 10% in group B (not significant). Minor side effects appeared to be fairly well tolerated by patients in both groups, with no significant difference in side effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study supports the efficacy of propranolol and sodium valproate as prophylaxis for pediatric migraine without aura, based on IHS criteria. There were no significant differences between these two drugs in all evaluated parameters except for the mean headache frequency per month, which was lower with propranolol than with sodium valproate.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in pediatric subjects 12 to 17 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Currently, no drugs are Food and Drug Administration-approved for migraine prophylaxis in pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate for migraine prevention in adolescents.

METHODS

Adolescents (12-17 years of age) with a >/=6-month history of migraine were assigned randomly to receive 16 weeks of daily treatment with topiramate (50 or 100 mg/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the percent reduction in monthly migraine attacks, with the use of the 48-hour rule, from the prospective baseline period to the last 12 weeks of the double-blind phase. The 48-hour rule defined a single migraine episode as all recurrences of migraine symptoms within 48 hours after onset. Several secondary efficacy measures were evaluated, including the reduction from baseline in the monthly migraine day rate and the 50% responder rate. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 29 (83%) of 35 subjects treated with topiramate at 50 mg/day, 30 (86%) of 35 subjects treated with topiramate at 100 mg/day, and 26 (79.0%) of 33 placebo-treated subjects completed double-blind treatment. Topiramate at 100 mg/day, but not 50 mg/day, resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the monthly migraine attack rate from baseline versus placebo (median: 72.2% vs 44.4%) during the last 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. Topiramate at 100 mg/day, but not 50 mg/day, also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the monthly migraine day rate from baseline versus placebo. The responder rate favored topiramate at 100 mg/day (83% vs 45% for placebo). Upper respiratory tract infection, paresthesia, and dizziness occurred more commonly in the topiramate groups than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 100 mg/day topiramate group demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of migraine in pediatric subjects. Overall, topiramate treatment was safe and well tolerated.

Melatonin to prevent migraine or tension-type headache in children

We designed a 3-month open label trial of melatonin prophylaxis in children with primary headache. After a one month baseline period without receiving preventive drugs, all children received a 3-month course of melatonin, 3 mg, administered orally, at bedtime. A total of 22 children were enrolled (10 boys, mean age 12.2+/-2.6 years, age range 6-16 years), 13 had recurrent migraine without aura, 1 with aura and 8 had chronic tension-type headache. When the trial ended, 14 of the 21 subjects reported that the headache attacks had decreased by more than 50% in respect to baseline and 4 of them reported having no headache attacks. After receiving melatonin for one month one subject dropped out because of excessive daytime sleepiness. Our promising results warrant randomized placebo-controlled trials in children to assess the real effectiveness of melatonin in preventing primary headache.

Pediatric migraine: pharmacologic agents for prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To identify and evaluate the data regarding medication use for migraine prophylaxis in the pediatric population.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was obtained through searches in PubMed (Mid 1950s-March 2007), Iowa Drug Information Service/Web (1966-February 2007), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-February 2007), and the Cochrane Library. The terms migraine, prophylaxis, child, and children were used and cross referenced with all drug names. Reference citations from publications identified were also reviewed and included.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Only trials that evaluated migraine headaches in the pediatric population were included. Trials including adolescent and adult populations are briefly listed, but not reviewed. Trials involving non-prescription medication were also included in the evaluation. Due to the limited information, all clinical trials, retrospective reviews, and abstracts evaluated were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Few controlled clinical trials regarding prophylaxis therapy are available. Currently, no medications are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for prophylaxis of migraines in children. Seventeen drugs were identified and included in the review. Of the drugs with available data, topiramate, valproic acid, flunarizine, amitriptyline, and cyproheptadine have shown efficacy in decreasing migraine frequency and duration in children. However, larger clinical trials are necessary to validate the utility of these agents. Conflicting data exist for propranolol and pizotifen, and additional data are needed for gabapentin, levetiracetam, zonisamide, naproxen, and trazodone. In clinical trials, nimodipine, clonidine, and natural supplements have shown a lack of efficacy versus placebo for prophylaxis of migraines in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate, valproic acid, and amitriptyline have the most data on their use for prophylaxis of migraines in children. Numerous agents have limited data in this population and several agents lack efficacy. Prospective, well designed, controlled clinical trials that include quality-of-life and functional outcomes are needed for guiding therapy of migraine prophylaxis for children.