Incidental neuroimaging findings in nonacute headache

Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children

Importance

Incidental findings (IFs) are unexpected abnormalities discovered during imaging and can range from normal anatomic variants to findings requiring urgent medical intervention. In the case of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reliable data about the prevalence and significance of IFs in the general population are limited, making it difficult to anticipate, communicate, and manage these findings.

Objectives

To determine the overall prevalence of IFs in brain MRI in the nonclinical pediatric population as well as the rates of specific findings and findings for which clinical referral is recommended.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was based on the April 2019 release of baseline data from 11 810 children aged 9 to 10 years who were enrolled and completed baseline neuroimaging in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, the largest US population-based longitudinal observational study of brain development and child health, between September 1, 2016, and November 15, 2018. Participants were enrolled at 21 sites across the US designed to mirror the demographic characteristics of the US population. Baseline structural MRIs were centrally reviewed for IFs by board-certified neuroradiologists and findings were described and categorized (category 1, no abnormal findings; 2, no referral recommended; 3; consider referral; and 4, consider immediate referral). Children were enrolled through a broad school-based recruitment process in which all children of eligible age at selected schools were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were severe sensory, intellectual, medical, or neurologic disorders that would preclude or interfere with study participation. During the enrollment process, demographic data were monitored to ensure that the study met targets for sex, socioeconomic, ethnic, and racial diversity. Data were analyzed from March 15, 2018, to November 20, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Percentage of children with IFs in each category and prevalence of specific IFs.

Results

A total of 11 679 children (52.1% boys, mean [SD] age, 9.9 [0.62] years) had interpretable baseline structural MRI results. Of these, 2464 participants (21.1%) had IFs, including 2013 children (17.2%) assigned to category 2, 431 (3.7%) assigned to category 3, and 20 (0.2%) assigned to category 4. Overall rates of IFs did not differ significantly between singleton and twin gestations or between monozygotic and dizygotic twins, but heritability analysis showed heritability for the presence or absence of IFs (h2 = 0.260; 95% CI, 0.135-0.387).

Conclusions and Relevance

Incidental findings in brain MRI and findings with potential clinical significance are both common in the general pediatric population. By assessing IFs and concurrent developmental and health measures and following these findings over the longitudinal study course, the ABCD study has the potential to determine the significance of many common IFs.

Management of incidental brain tumors in children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Due to technical advancements and availability of neuroimaging, detection of incidental pediatric brain tumors (IPBT) is growing rapidly. The management of these asymptomatic lesions remains unclear; radiological, pathological, and clinical risk factors for further growth and malignant transformation (MT) are not well defined.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature on the dilemmas and management of IPBT suggestive of a low-grade brain tumor (LGBT). Keyword searches of the PubMed and Medline (NCBI) databases identified studies on IPBT describing the prevalence, neuroimaging, management, or risk of MT through July 2019. References of the identified articles were also reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 2021 records were screened. Fifty-nine full-text articles were reviewed, and 34 published studies were included. IPBT are diagnosed in 0.2-5.7% of children undergoing brain imaging for various reasons. The accepted approach for management of lesions showing radiological characteristics suggestive of LGBT is radiological follow-up. The rate at which additional intervention is required during follow-up for these apparently low-grade lesions is 9.5%. Nevertheless, the dilemma of early surgical resection or biopsy vs. clinical and radiological follow-up of IPBT is still unresolved. The risk in these cases is missing a transformation to a higher grade tumor. However, MT of pediatric LGBT is very rare, occurring in less than 3% of the cases of proven low-grade gliomas in children. The risk of future MT in pediatric low-grade gliomas seems to be greater in the presence of specific molecular markers such as BRAF V-600E, CDKN2A, and H3F3A K27M.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history, management, and prognosis of IPBT remain ambiguous. It seems that lesions suggestive of LGBT can initially be followed, since many of these lesions remain stable over time and MT is rare. However, controversy among centers concerning the ideal approach still exists. Further observational and prospective cohort studies, focusing on potential clinical and radiological characteristics or risk factors suggestive of high-grade tumors, tumor progress, or MT of IPBT, are needed.

Prevalence and causes of infantile nystagmus in a large population-based Danish cohort

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to provide a population-based estimate on the prevalence of infantile nystagmus and to describe the causes in the Capital Region of Denmark.

METHODS

Review of medical records of children with infantile nystagmus born in the period 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2017 and living in the Capital Region of Denmark. We used birth registry data from Statistics Denmark and the National Danish Birth Registry to calculate the prevalence of nystagmus in children born at term and prematurely.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (52 males/51 females) with infantile nystagmus were included. The overall prevalence of infantile nystagmus was 6.1 per 10 000 live births. It was higher in premature children (28.4/10 000 live births) than children born at term (4.4/10 000), p < 0.0001, and highest in children born extremely preterm, (97.3/10 000). The most common cause of infantile nystagmus was ocular disease (44%) followed by idiopathic nystagmus (32%), neurological disorders and genetic syndromes (20%) and prematurity without retinopathy of prematurity as the only cause (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we provide the prevalence of infantile nystagmus based on national medical records in which all residents are accounted for. Our findings show a prevalence of 6.1 per 10 000 live births but six times higher among children born preterm than born at term. Ocular disease was the leading cause of infantile nystagmus with albinism and ocular malformations as the most frequent. In 1/3 of patients, no cause could be identified.

Pediatric headache and neuroimaging: experience of two tertiary centers

INTRODUCTION

Headache is a frequent complaint in children and adolescents. Decision-making for neuroimaging should take into account the cost and the need for sedation in young children.

AIM

To evaluate the yield of MRI in pediatric headache patients seen in two large tertiary hospitals.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patient records (n = 613) and neuroimaging reports. Headache was classified according to International Headache Society guidelines.

RESULTS

There were 346 children with imaging studies (MRI n = 281, CT n = 65). Of patients who had at least one MRI study, 29% demonstrated an abnormal finding. Findings altering the management were obtained in 21 (7%) patients: the majority (n = 17, 80%) had headache for less than 3 months. On the other hand, four patients with headache longer than 3 months (19%) and 12 patients with normal neurological examination (57%) had significant MRI results affecting management. None of the children in whom the diagnosis of migraine could be made on clinical grounds (n = 40) had a significant MRI finding.

CONCLUSION

Neuroimaging should be performed selectively in children with headache seen in pediatric neurology clinics, especially in headache of short duration (< 3 months) and features atypical for migraine. A normal neurological examination should not reassure the clinician.

Incidental brain tumors in children: an international neurosurgical, oncological survey

PURPOSE

Incidental pediatric brain tumors (IPBT) are increasingly being diagnosed. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the need and timing of their treatment. In the current study, we identify trends among pediatric neurosurgeons and oncologists with regard to IPBT management and approval of growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT).

METHODS

A questionnaire presenting six different cases of IPBT was emailed to all members of several leading societies in pediatric neurosurgery and oncology. Collected data included basic information concerning the responders (profession, experience, continent of practice), as well as responses to multiple questions regarding treatment of the lesion, permission to supply GHRT, and free text for comments.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three responses were eligible for analysis (92 neurosurgeons, 51 oncologists, from a total of 6 continents). Initial recommendations for each case were heterogeneous. However, a few consistent trends were identified: Lesions that were stable over time lead to a common shift in treatment recommendation to a more conservative one. Growing lesions were commonly treated more aggressively. Neither profession nor experience had a consistent impact on recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Management recommendations for IPBT varied among the responders and seem to be influenced by many factors. However, stable lesions lead to a shift in management towards a "watch and wait" approach, while in growing lesions responders tended towards a "biopsy" or "resection" approach. This highlights the need for better understanding of the natural course of incidental brain tumors in children, as well as evaluating the potential risk for malignant transformation.

Malignant transformation of a conservatively managed incidental childhood cerebral mass lesion: controversy regarding management paradigm

BACKGROUND

Incidental findings on neuroimaging in the pediatric population are an emerging treatment challenge. Treatment options for these incidental childhood brain mass lesions, which radiologically may be assumed to be low-grade gliomas (LGG), vary, ranging from careful conservative "wait and scan" treatment to surgical biopsy, gross total resection, and upfront radiation and/or chemotherapy. As malignant transformation of LGG in children is extremely rare, some series advocate careful conservative management of these lesions; however, universal treatment protocols are not totally agreed upon.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

We present the case of a 10-year-old boy with a fronto-basal incidental cerebral mass lesion, suspected to be a low-grade glial neoplasm. Initially, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to rule out a pathology causing his growth to be delayed. A treatment with growth hormone was initiated. After close clinical and radiological follow-up of this asymptomatic lesion for 6 years, a minimal growth of the lesion was seen, which we decided to continue following. After 7 years, a clear growth with new contrast enhancement was seen on routine MRI. At this point, the lesion was surgically resected. The diagnosis was, surprisingly, glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV, BRAF V-600E mutation).

DISCUSSION

Malignant transformation of LGGs in children is a very rare phenomenon. This is to our knowledge the first well-documented case describing malignant transformation of a suspected benign pediatric cerebral mass lesion, which did not undergo radiation, in a patient without a cancer predisposition syndrome (e.g., neurofibromatosis), with the transformation occurring after such a long follow-up period. The management of these lesions is still controversial. Unfortunately, radiological risk factors for malignant transformation of such lesions in the pediatric age group are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment of incidental cerebral mass lesions in children seems a valid option. These lesions should probably be followed indefinitely, while carefully watching for changes in imaging characteristics.

Spectrum of intracranial incidental findings on pediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging: What clinician should know?

Intracranial incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain continue to generate interest in healthy control, research, and clinical subjects. However, in clinical practice, the discovery of incidental findings acts as a “distractor”. This review is based on existing heterogeneous reports, their clinical implications, and how the results of incidental findings influence clinical management. This draws attention to the followings: (1) the prevalence of clinically significant incidental findings is low; (2) there is a lack of a systematic approach to classification; and discusses (3) how to deal with the detected incidental findings based a proposed common clinical profile. Individualized neurological care requires an active discussion regarding the need for neuroimaging. Clinical significance of incidental findings should be decided based on lesion’s neuroradiologic characteristics in the given clinical context. Available evidence suggests that the outcome of an incidentally found “serious lesion in children” is excellent. Future studies of intracranial incidental findings on pediatric brain MRI should be focused on a homogeneous population. The study should address this clinical knowledge based review powered by the statistical analyses.

Indications for the performance of neuroimaging in children

Pediatric neurology relies on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. CT prevails in acute neurologic presentations, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), nontraumatic coma, stroke, and status epilepticus, because of easy availability, with images of diagnostic quality, e.g., to exclude hemorrhage, usually completed quickly enough to avoid sedation. Concerns over the risks of ionizing radiation mean re-imaging and higher-dose procedures, e.g., arteriography and venography, require justification. T1/T2-weighted imaging (T1/T2-WI) MR with additional sequences (arteriography, venography, T2*, spectroscopy, diffusion tensor, perfusion, diffusion- (DWI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)) often clarifies the diagnosis, which may alter management in acute settings, as well as chronic conditions, e.g., epilepsy. Clinical acumen remains essential to avoid imaging, e.g., in genetic epilepsies or migrainous headaches responding to treatment, or to target sequences to specific diagnosis, e.g., T1/T2-WI for shunt dysfunction (with SWI for TBI); DWI, arteriography including neck vessels, and venography for acute hemiplegia or coma; coronal temporal cuts for partial epilepsy; or muscle imaging for motor delay. The risk of general anesthesia is low; "head-only" scanners may allow rapid MRI without sedation. Timely and accurate reporting, with discrepancy discussion between expert neuroradiologists, is important for management of the child and the family's expectations.

Incidental findings on brain and spine imaging in children

In recent years, the utilization of diagnostic imaging of the brain and spine in children has increased dramatically, leading to a corresponding increase in the detection of incidental findings of the central nervous system. Patients with unexpected findings on imaging are often referred for subspecialty evaluation. Even with rational use of diagnostic imaging and subspecialty consultation, the diagnostic process will always generate unexpected findings that must be explained and managed. Familiarity with the most common findings that are discovered incidentally on diagnostic imaging of the brain and spine will assist the pediatrician in providing counseling to families and in making recommendations in conjunction with a neurosurgeon, when needed, regarding additional treatments and prognosis.

Managing incidental findings and disclosure of results in a paediatric research cohort - the LIFE Child Study cohort

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of incidental findings (IFs) in the population-based "Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE) Child Study" within 1 year.

METHODS

From July 2011 to June 2012, 969 children participated in the study. The IFs were analysed with respect to age, gender, type of examination and clinical action taken.

RESULTS

The IFs were detected in 63 participants (6.5%), including five children who presented with two IFs simultaneously. Eleven children received a new, hence previously unknown, clinical diagnosis. Alternatively, 18 IFs could not be confirmed or were of a transient and self-limiting condition. The frequency of IFs varied widely depending on the type of examination, but did not differ by gender.

CONCLUSION

Although IFs were common events, there was no finding with a profound clinical impact on the subject's life. Our current IF management protocol may be useful in creating management plans for other cohort studies.

Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making

MRI is used routinely in research with children to generate new knowledge about brain development. The detection of unexpected brain abnormalities (incidental findings; IFs) in these studies presents unique challenges. While key issues surrounding incidence and significance, duty of care, and burden of disclosure have been addressed substantially for adults, less empirical data and normative analyses exist for minors who participate in minimal risk research. To identify ethical concerns and fill existing gaps, we conducted a comprehensive review of papers that focused explicitly on the discovery of IFs in minors. The discourse in the 21 papers retrieved for this analysis amply covered practical issues such as informed consent and screening, difficulties in ascertaining clinical significance, the economic costs and burden of responsibility on researchers, and risks (physical or psychological). However, we found little discussion about the involvement of minors in decisions about disclosure of IFs in the brain, especially for IFs of low clinical significance. In response, we propose a framework for managing IFs that integrates practical considerations with explicit appreciation of rights along the continuum of maturity. This capacity-adjusted framework emphasizes the importance of involving competent minors and respecting their right to make decisions about disclosure.

Incidental findings of mass lesions on neuroimages in children

Increasing use of neuroimaging in children has led to more incidental findings of CNS mass lesions, the management of which is uncertain. The authors' aims in this study are to describe these mass lesions and their evolution, as well as to discuss the management options and determine the prevalence of incidental CNS mass lesions at their pediatric clinic. A retrospective study was undertaken in children with primary CNS tumors who were younger than 18 years old and were admitted to the University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland, between January 1995 and December 2010. In 19 (5.7%) of 335 patients with newly diagnosed CNS tumors, the diagnosis of a CNS mass lesion was an incidental finding. Reasons for obtaining neuroimages in these 19 patients were head trauma (in 6 patients); research protocols (in 3); nasal/orbital malformations (in 2); endocrinological and psychiatric evaluations (in 2); and vertebral bone anomaly without neurological signs, absence seizures, congenital ataxia, recurrent vomiting, developmental delay, and "check-up" at the explicit request of the parents (in 1 patient each). Seven patients underwent immediate surgery for low-grade glioma (4 patients) and craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, and choroid plexus papilloma (1 patient each); and 12 were treated conservatively or were observed. Ten of 12 conservatively treated patients remained stable (median follow-up time 1.8 years) and the other 2 underwent delayed surgery because of tumor progression (medulloblastoma in one patient and fibrillary astrocytoma in the other). Clinicians are increasingly challenged by the discovery of incidental CNS mass lesions. A subgroup of such lesions (with typical imaging patterns such as tectal glioma and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor) can be monitored conservatively, clinically, and radiographically. Future prospective studies are needed to define optimal management strategies based on larger collections of natural histories, as well as to assess the true prevalence of incidental CNS mass lesions.