Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who are neutropenic following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of bacterial infections but not in reducing mortality rates. Our systematic review from 2006 also showed a reduction in mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This updated review aimed to evaluate whether there is still a benefit of reduction in mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), abstracts of conference proceedings and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic, to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.1 software.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and nine trials (involving 13,579 patients) that were conducted between the years 1973 to 2010 met the inclusion criteria. When compared with placebo or no intervention, antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of death from all causes (46 trials, 5635 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79) and the risk of infection-related death (43 trials, 5777 participants; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). The estimated number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one death was 34 (all-cause mortality) and 48 (infection-related mortality).Prophylaxis also significantly reduced the occurrence of fever (54 trials, 6658 participants; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87), clinically documented infection (48 trials, 5758 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.76), microbiologically documented infection (53 trials, 6383 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.62) and other indicators of infection.There were no significant differences between quinolone prophylaxis and TMP-SMZ prophylaxis with regard to death from all causes or infection, however, quinolone prophylaxis was associated with fewer side effects leading to discontinuation (seven trials, 850 participants; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87) and less resistance to the drugs thereafter (six trials, 366 participants; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients significantly reduced all-cause mortality. In our review, the most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis outweighed the harm such as adverse effects and the development of resistance since all-cause mortality was reduced. As most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, we strongly recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for these patients, preferably with a quinolone. Prophylaxis may also be considered for patients with solid tumours or lymphoma.

Granulocyte transfusions for pediatric patients and the establishment of national treatment guidelines and donor registry

G-CSF/dexamethasone stimulated donor derived granulocyte transfusion (GTX) has been shown in non-randomized studies to be a useful co-therapy in immune-compromised patients unresponsive to conventional antimicrobial treatments. Reports of GTX are however usually single institution adult experiences. Substantiated pediatric data, other than in neonates, is less common.

Effective storage of granulocytes collected by centrifugation leukapheresis from donors stimulated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor

BACKGROUND

Donor stimulation with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has increased the number of neutrophils (PMNs) that can be collected for granulocyte transfusion therapy. Clinical utility, however, has been limited by the inability to store functional PMNs ex vivo. This study was conducted to determine whether granulocyte products from G-CSF-stimulated donors could be effectively stored at reduced temperature (22 degrees C vs. 10 degrees C) with maintenance of functional properties in vitro and in vivo.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nine normal subjects received G-CSF (600 microg subcutaneously) 12 hours before centrifugation leukapheresis. Granulocyte products were divided and stored for 24 and 48 hours under four conditions: 1) 22 degrees C; 2) 22 degrees C, with supplemental G-CSF (100 ng/mL); 3) 10 degrees C; and 4) 10 degrees C, with supplemental G-CSF. Functional PMN activity during ex vivo storage was assessed in vitro and in vivo by the skin-window technique for granulocytes stored at 10 degrees C for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Surface expression of CD11b/CD18, CD14, CD16, CD32, and CD64 was maintained during 48-hour storage at reduced temperature. Inducible respiratory burst activity, bactericidal activity, and fungicidal activity were preserved during storage for 48-hour storage at 10 degrees C. Proinflammatory cytokine production was decreased in product stored at 10 degrees C. Supplemental G-CSF ex vivo did not substantially improve functional activity during storage. After storage at 10 degrees C for 24 hours, in vitro chemotactic potential was maintained, and transfused granulocytes retained capacity to circulate and migrate appropriately in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Granulocyte product collected by centrifugation leukapheresis from G-CSF-stimulated donors can be effectively stored at subphysiologic temperature for 24 hours with preservation of functional activity. Storage at 10 degrees C appears to be slightly superior to storage at 22 degrees C.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of bacterial infections, but not in reducing mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients reduced mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches on The Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to 2004) and abstracts of conference proceedings; references of identified studies; the first author of each included trial was contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Relative risks (RR) or average differences, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred trials (10,274 patients) performed between the years 1973 to 2004 met inclusion criteria. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk for death when compared with placebo or no intervention (RR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.81]). The authors estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) in order to prevent 1 death from all causes as 60 (95% CI 34 to 268). Prophylaxis resulted in a significant decrease in the risk of infection-related death, RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.74) and in the occurrence of fever, RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.82). A reduction in mortality was also evident when the more recently conducted quinolone trials were analysed separately. Quinolone prophylaxis reduced the risk for all-cause mortality, RR 0.52 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.84).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated that prophylaxis significantly reduced all-cause mortality. The most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefit demonstrated in our review outweighs harm, such as adverse effects, and development of resistance, since all-cause mortality is reduced. Since most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, prophylaxis, preferably with a quinolone, should be considered for these patients.

Clinical applications of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an update and summary

The discovery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its potential to regulate neutrophil production and function in the inflammatory process has opened an exciting new era for the supportive care of patients with hematological and malignant diseases. Extensive experience has been gained worldwide with G-CSF therapy, and G-CSF is widely employed clinically, primarily because the safety profile appears to be fairly innocuous. A broad consensus has emerged regarding the clinical utility of G-CSF in neutropenic conditions due to chemotherapy. Furthermore, much interest has focused on the use of G-CSF to mobilize CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells from the marrow to the peripheral blood for use in hematopoietic transplantation. The promising results with G-CSF have promoted further studies, e.g., in immunocompetent patients or in granulocyte transfusion therapy. Here, we review the potential clinical role of G-CSF and describe its future perspectives.

Granulocyte transfusion therapy: update on potential clinical applications

The clinical usefulness of granulocyte transfusions for treatment or prevention of life-threatening bacterial and fungal infections remains controversial. Clinical benefit has long been limited by insufficient donor stimulation regimens and suboptimal leukapheresis techniques. Methodologic progress, in particular mobilization of neutrophils in healthy donors by administration of G-CSF, has significantly enhanced leukapheresis yields. A newly published study indicates that unrelated community donors can be effectively and safely used as an alternative to related family donors. Furthermore, several recent studies suggest that it may be possible to store granulocyte concentrates for 24 to 48 hours with adequate preservation of neutrophil function. This review summarizes the current role of granulocyte transfusion therapy in infectious diseases and highlights important recent advances.

Supportive therapies for cancer chemotherapy patients and the role of the oncology nurse

Cancer chemotherapy often causes severe side effects, such as neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, and oral complications, which adversely affect patients' quality of life and may interfere with treatment success. A number of supportive therapies, such as colony stimulating-growth factors and antiemetics, have been developed to ameliorate these side effects, however, but often are underutilized. Oncology nurses, who serve as liaisons between oncologists and patients, can have a positive effect on patients' quality of life by educating them about potential side effects and the availability of supportive therapies, and by bringing patients' quality of life concerns and priorities to the attention of physicians. This article reviews the side effects of chemotherapy and the supportive therapies currently available to treat them and explores the role of oncology nurses as advocates for improved quality of life for chemotherapy patients.