1
|
Sheppard L, Alsubhi M, Brown V, Le H, Robinson K, Moodie M. What Interventions are Cost Effective in Reducing Violence Against Women? A Scoping Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:283-296. [PMID: 38279982 PMCID: PMC11021229 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00870-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically summarise the recent literature on the cost and cost effectiveness of interventions implemented to reduce violence against women (VAW) and decision frameworks guiding resource allocation. METHOD A scoping review of scholarly and grey literature on the cost-effectiveness and/or resource allocation for interventions addressing intimate partner violence (IPV), dating violence and non-partner sexual violence perpetrated against women aged 15 years and over. All settings and contexts were eligible, with papers published in English between 2010 and March 2023 included. RESULTS Nineteen papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria reporting the cost, cost savings and/or cost effectiveness of 24 interventions to prevent IPV and to a lesser extent, other forms of interpersonal violence. Among the 16 economic evaluation studies reviewed, four types of interventions were cost effective in multiple settings or studies, including community activism (Uganda, Ghana), gender transformative interventions with couples and individuals (Ethiopia, Rwanda), specific justice and law enforcement measures (USA) and a combined personnel training, support, and referral programme in General Practice in the UK. Other interventions were cost effective in a single study or had conflicting evidence. Three remaining papers conducted a partial evaluation or cost appraisal providing limited information on the cost or cost-savings of other implemented interventions. No frameworks on resource allocation for the prevention of VAW were identified. CONCLUSION While there is some evidence of cost effectiveness emerging for interventions implemented in specific contexts, overall, we find the recent evidence on costs and cost effectiveness of interventions for the prevention of VAW to be limited. Embedding economic evaluation in future effectiveness trials will build critical evidence needed to inform policy and resource allocation decisions based on the value-for-money of interventions. Modelling the benefits and costs of interventions to better understand the societal impacts of programmes at scale is a further research opportunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Sheppard
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| | - Moosa Alsubhi
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Vicki Brown
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Ha Le
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Kim Robinson
- Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Marj Moodie
- Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vyas S, Meinhart M, Troy K, Brumbaum H, Poulton C, Stark L. The Economic Cost of Violence Against Women and Girls in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. TRAUMA, VIOLENCE & ABUSE 2023; 24:44-55. [PMID: 33998339 DOI: 10.1177/15248380211016018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Evidence demonstrating the economic burden of violence against women and girls can support policy and advocacy efforts for investment in violence prevention and response programming. We undertook a systematic review of evidence on the costs of violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries published since 2005. In addition to understanding costs, we examined the consistency of methodological approaches applied and identified and assessed common methodological issues. Thirteen articles were identified, eight of which were from sub-Saharan Africa. Eight studies estimated costs associated with domestic or intimate partner violence, others estimated the costs of interpersonal violence, female genital cutting, and sexual assaults. Methodologies applied to estimate costs were typically based on accounting approaches. Our review found that out-of-pocket expenditures to individuals for seeking health care after an episode of violence ranged from US$29.72 (South Africa) to US$156.11 (Romania) and that lost productivity averaged from US$73.84 to US$2,151.48 (South Africa) per facility visit. Most studies that estimated provider costs of service delivery presented total programmatic costs, and there was variation in interventions, scale, and resource inputs measured which hampered comparability. Variations in methodological assumptions and data availability also made comparisons across countries and settings challenging. The limited scope of studies in measuring the multifaceted impacts of violence highlights the challenges in identifying cost metrics that extend beyond specific violence episodes. Despite the limited evidence base, our assessment leads us to conclude that the estimated costs of violence against women and girls are a fraction of its true economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Vyas
- Department of Population Health, 4906London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Meinhart
- 139058Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katrina Troy
- 51503Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hannah Brumbaum
- 51503Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Catherine Poulton
- Child Protection in Emergencies Division, 17096UNICEF, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lindsay Stark
- 51503Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torres-Rueda S, Ferrari G, Orangi S, Hitimana R, Daviaud E, Tawiah T, Prah RKD, Karmaliani R, Kapapa E, Barasa E, Jewkes R, Vassall A. What will it cost to prevent violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia. Health Policy Plan 2021; 35:855-866. [PMID: 32556173 PMCID: PMC7487331 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a global problem with profound consequences. Although there is a growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of VAWG prevention interventions, economic data are scarce. We carried out a cross-country study to examine the costs of VAWG prevention interventions in low- and middle-income countries. We collected primary cost data on six different pilot VAWG prevention interventions in six countries: Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia. The interventions varied in their delivery platforms, target populations, settings and theories of change. We adopted a micro-costing methodology. We calculated total costs and a number of unit costs common across interventions (e.g. cost per beneficiary reached). We used the pilot-level cost data to model the expected total costs and unit costs of five interventions scaled up to the national level. Total costs of the pilots varied between ∼US $208 000 in a small group intervention in South Africa to US $2 788 000 in a couples and community-based intervention in Rwanda. Staff costs were the largest cost input across all interventions; consequently, total costs were sensitive to staff time use and salaries. The cost per beneficiary reached in the pilots ranged from ∼US $4 in a community-based intervention in Ghana to US $1324 for one-to-one counselling in Zambia. When scaled up to the national level, total costs ranged from US $32 million in Ghana to US $168 million in Pakistan. Cost per beneficiary reached at scale decreased for all interventions compared to the pilots, except for school-based interventions due to differences in student density per school between the pilot and the national average. The costs of delivering VAWG prevention vary greatly due to differences in the geographical reach, number of intervention components and the complexity of adapting the intervention to the country. Cost-effectiveness analyses are necessary to determine the value for money of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Torres-Rueda
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Giulia Ferrari
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Stacey Orangi
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 - 00100, 197 Lenana Place, Off Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Regis Hitimana
- School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Remera Campus, P.O. Box 3286, Kigali KG 11 Avenue, Gasabo, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Emmanuelle Daviaud
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zyl Drive, Parow Valley, Cape Town 7503, South Africa
| | - Theresa Tawiah
- Kintampo Health Research Centre, P.O. Box 200, Kintampo North Municipality, Ghana
| | | | - Rozina Karmaliani
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Eleonah Kapapa
- National Institute of Public Administration, P.O Box 31990 Plot No. 4810, Dushanbe Road, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 - 00100, 197 Lenana Place, Off Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Rachel Jewkes
- Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Anna Vassall
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ranganathan M, Heise L, Peterman A, Roy S, Hidrobo M. Cross-disciplinary intersections between public health and economics in intimate partner violence research. SSM Popul Health 2021; 14:100822. [PMID: 34095429 PMCID: PMC8164083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has progressed in the last decade in the fields of public health and economics, with under-explored potential for cross-fertilisation. We examine the theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches that each discipline uses to conceptualise and study IPV and offer a perspective on their relative advantages. Public health takes a broad theoretical perspective anchored in the socio-ecological framework, considering multiple and synergistic drivers of IPV, while economics focuses on bargaining models which highlight individual power and factors that shape this power. These perspectives shape empirical work, with public health examining multi-faceted interventions, risk and mediating factors, while economics focuses on causal modelling of specific economic and institutional factors and economic-based interventions. The disciplines also have differing views on measurement and ethics in primary research. We argue that efforts to understand and address IPV would benefit if the two disciplines collaborated more closely and combined the best traditions of both fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghna Ranganathan
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Lori Heise
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E4644, 21205, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amber Peterman
- Department of Public Policy, Abernathy Hall CB #3435, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Shalini Roy
- Poverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 I St NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA
| | - Melissa Hidrobo
- Poverty Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 I St NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wagner GJ, Wanyenze RK, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Gwokyalya V, Hurley E, Mindry D, Finocchario-Kessler S, Nanfuka M, Tebeka MG, Saya U, Booth M, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Linnemayr S, Staggs VS, Goggin K. "Our Choice" improves use of safer conception methods among HIV serodiscordant couples in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating two implementation approaches. Implement Sci 2021; 16:41. [PMID: 33858462 PMCID: PMC8048255 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01109-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Safer conception counseling (SCC) to promote the use of safer conception methods (SCM) is not yet part of routine family planning or HIV care. Guidelines for the use of SCM have been published, but to date there are no published controlled evaluations of SCC. Furthermore, it is unknown whether standard methods commonly used in resource constrained settings to integrate new services would be sufficient, or if enhanced training and supervision would result in a more efficacious approach to implementing SCC. Methods In a hybrid, cluster randomized controlled trial, six HIV clinics were randomly assigned to implement the SCC intervention Our Choice using either a high (SCC1) or low intensity (SCC2) approach (differentiated by amount of training and supervision), or existing family planning services (usual care). Three hundred eighty-nine HIV clients considering childbearing with an HIV-negative partner enrolled. The primary outcome was self-reported use of appropriate reproductive method (SCM if trying to conceive; modern contraceptives if not) over 12 months or until pregnancy. Results The combined intervention groups used appropriate reproductive methods more than usual care [20.8% vs. 6.9%; adjusted OR (95% CI)=10.63 (2.79, 40.49)], and SCC1 reported a higher rate than SCC2 [27.1% vs. 14.6%; OR (95% CI)=4.50 (1.44, 14.01)]. Among those trying to conceive, the intervention arms reported greater accurate use of SCM compared to usual care [24.1% vs. 0%; OR (95% CI)=91.84 (4.94, 1709.0)], and SCC1 performed better than SCC2 [34.6% vs. 11.5%; OR (95% CI)=6.43 (1.90, 21.73)]. The arms did not vary on modern contraception use among those not trying to conceive. A cost of $631 per person was estimated to obtain accurate use of SCM in SCC1, compared to $1014 in SCC2. Conclusions More intensive provider training and more frequent supervision leads to greater adoption of complex SCM behaviors and is more cost-effective than the standard low intensity implementation approach. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03167879; date registered May 23, 2017. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01109-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn J Wagner
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 91105, USA.
| | - Rhoda K Wanyenze
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Mulago Specialised Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Violet Gwokyalya
- Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emily Hurley
- Children's Mercy Research Institute, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Medicine, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
| | - Deborah Mindry
- University of California Global Health Institute, Center for Women's Health and Empowerment, 1234 Sunny Oaks Circle, Altadena, CA, 91001, USA
| | - Sarah Finocchario-Kessler
- Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | | | - Mahlet G Tebeka
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 91105, USA
| | - Uzaib Saya
- Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 91105, USA
| | - Marika Booth
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 91105, USA
| | | | | | - Vincent S Staggs
- Children's Mercy Research Institute, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Medicine, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
| | - Kathy Goggin
- Children's Mercy Research Institute, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Medicine, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA
| |
Collapse
|