Effectiveness and tolerance of the hypericum extract LI 160 compared to maprotiline: a multicenter double-blind study

Current state of research on the clinical benefits of herbal medicines for non-life-threatening ailments

Herbal medicines are becoming increasingly popular among patients because they are well tolerated and do not exert severe side effects. Nevertheless, they receive little consideration in therapeutic settings. The present article reviews the current state of research on the clinical benefits of herbal medicines on five indication groups, psychosomatic disorders, gynecological complaints, gastrointestinal disorders, urinary and upper respiratory tract infections. The study search was based on the database PubMed and concentrated on herbal medicines legally approved in Europe. After applying defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 141 articles were selected: 59 for psychosomatic disorders (100% randomized controlled trials; RCTs), 20 for gynecological complaints (56% RCTs), 19 for gastrointestinal disorders (68% RCTs), 16 for urinary tract infections (UTI, 63% RCTs) and 24 for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) (79% RCTs). For the majority of the studies, therapeutic benefits were evaluated by patient reported outcome measures (PROs). For psychosomatic disorders, gynecological complaints and URTI more than 80% of the study outcomes were positive, whereas the clinical benefit of herbal medicines for the treatment of UTI and gastrointestinal disorders was lower with 55%. The critical appraisal of the articles shows that there is a lack of high-quality studies and, with regard to gastrointestinal disorders, the clinical benefits of herbal medicines as a stand-alone form of therapy are unclear. According to the current state of knowledge, scientific evidence has still to be improved to allow integration of herbal medicines into guidelines and standard treatment regimens for the indications reviewed here. In addition to clinical data, real world data and outcome measures can add significant value to pave the way for herbal medicines into future therapeutic applications.

A systematic review of St. John's wort for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

This systematic review evaluated St. John's wort (SJW) for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The objectives of this review are to (1) evaluate the efficacy and safety of SJW in adults with MDD compared to placebo and active comparator and (2) evaluate whether the effects vary by severity of MDD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Embase, AMED, MANTIS, Web of Science, and ICTRP and existing reviews to November 2014. Two independent reviewers screened the citations, abstracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of at least a 4-week administration of SJW on depression outcomes against placebo or active comparator in adults with MDD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and USPSTF criteria. Quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies examining 6993 patients met inclusion criteria; eight studies evaluated a hypericum extract that combined 0.3 % hypericin and 1-4 % hyperforin. The herb SJW was associated with more treatment responders than placebo (relative risk [RR] 1.53; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.19, 1.97; I(2) 79 %; 18 RCTs; N = 2922, moderate QoE; standardized mean differences [SMD] 0.49; CI 0.23, 0.74; 16 RCTs; I(2) 89 %, N = 2888, moderate QoE). Compared to antidepressants, SJW participants were less likely to experience adverse events (OR 0.67; CI 0.56, 0.81; 11 RCTs; moderate QoE) with no difference in treatment effectiveness (RR 1.01; CI 0.90, 1.14; 17 RCTs, I(2) 52 %, moderate QoE; SMD -0.03; CI -0.21, 0.15; 14 RCTs; I(2) 74 %; N = 2248, moderate QoE) in mild and moderate depression.

CONCLUSIONS

SJW monotherapy for mild and moderate depression is superior to placebo in improving depression symptoms and not significantly different from antidepressant medication. However, evidence of heterogeneity and a lack of research on severe depression reduce the quality of the evidence. Adverse events reported in RCTs were comparable to placebo and fewer compared with antidepressants. However, assessments were limited due to poor reporting of adverse events and studies were not designed to assess rare events. Consequently, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015016406 .

Medial temporal atrophy in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Late-onset and early-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD, EOAD) affect different neural systems and may be separate nosographic entities. The most striking differences are in the medial temporal lobe, severely affected in LOAD and relatively spared in EOAD. We assessed amygdalar morphology and volume in 18 LOAD and 18 EOAD patients and 36 aged-matched controls and explored their relationship with the hippocampal volume. Three-dimensional amygdalar shape was reconstructed with the radial atrophy mapping technique, hippocampal volume was measured using a manual method. Atrophy was greater in LOAD than EOAD: 25% versus 17% in the amygdala and 20% versus 13% in the hippocampus. In the amygdala, LOAD showed significantly greater tissue loss than EOAD in the right dorsal central, lateral, and basolateral nuclei (20%-30% loss, p < 0.03), all known to be connected to limbic regions. In LOAD but not EOAD, greater hippocampal atrophy was associated with amygdalar atrophy in the left dorsal central and medial nuclei (r = 0.6, p < 0.05) also part of the limbic system. These findings support the notion that limbic involvement is a prominent feature of LOAD but not EOAD.

Kava and St. John's Wort: current evidence for use in mood and anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND

Mood and anxiety disorders pose significant health burdens on the community. Kava and St. John's wort (SJW) are the most commonly used herbal medicines in the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review of kava and SJW, to review any evidence of efficacy, mode of action, pharmacokinetics, safety and use in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, seasonal affective disorder (SAD), generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia (SP), panic disorder (PD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library during late 2008. The search criteria involved mood and anxiety disorder search terms in combination with kava, Piper methysticum, kavalactones, St. John's wort, Hypericum perforatum, hypericin, and hyperforin. Additional search criteria for safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics were employed. A subsequent forward search was conducted of the papers using Web of Science cited reference search.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports the use of SJW in treating mild-moderate depression, and for kava in treatment of generalized anxiety. In respect to the other disorders, only weak preliminary evidence exists for use of SJW in SAD. Currently there is no published human trial on use of kava in affective disorders, or in OCD, PTSD, PD, or SP. These disorders constitute potential applications that warrant exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence for herbal medicines in the treatment of depression and anxiety only supports the use of Hypericum perforatum for depression, and Piper methysticum for generalized anxiety.

Frontal-executive versus posterior-perceptual mental status deficits in early-onset dementias

BACKGROUND

Compared to late-onset dementias, early-onset dementias (EODs) may have greater focal cognitive involvement with differences in frontal-executive compared to posterior-perceptual deficits.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated whether mental status screening based on this frontal-posterior axis can distinguish EODs.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients each with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (eAD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), or subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD), and 20 normal controls underwent the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and the Perceptual Assessment Battery (PAB).

RESULTS

Compared to controls, SIVD and FTD groups were impaired on the FAB whereas eAD and SIVD groups were impaired on the PAB. The FAB/PAB ratio further differentiated the groups (F(3,85) = 26.49, P < .001). For sensitivities and specificities of 93%, a cut-off score of 1.25 on the FAB/PAB distinguished eAD, and a cut-off of 0.83 distinguishing FTD.

CONCLUSION

Although preliminary, this study indicates that mental status screening based on frontal versus posterior cortical functions may help clinicians diagnose EODs.

St John's wort for major depression

BACKGROUND

In some countries extracts of the plant Hypericum perforatum L. (popularly called St. John's wort) are widely used for treating patients with depressive symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether extracts of hypericum are more effective than placebo and as effective as standard antidepressants in the treatment of major depression; and whether they have fewer adverse effects than standard antidepressant drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were searched in computerised databases, by checking bibliographies of relevant articles, and by contacting manufacturers and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they: (1) were randomised and double-blind; (2) included patients with major depression; (3) compared extracts of St. John's wort with placebo or standard antidepressants; (4) included clinical outcomes assessing depressive symptoms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two independent reviewers extracted information from study reports. The main outcome measure for assessing effectiveness was the responder rate ratio (the relative risk of having a response to treatment). The main outcome measure for adverse effects was the number of patients dropping out due to adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 29 trials (5489 patients) including 18 comparisons with placebo and 17 comparisons with synthetic standard antidepressants met the inclusion criteria. Results of placebo-controlled trials showed marked heterogeneity. In nine larger trials the combined response rate ratio (RR) for hypericum extracts compared with placebo was 1.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.49) and from nine smaller trials was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.22 to 2.87). Results of trials comparing hypericum extracts and standard antidepressants were statistically homogeneous. Compared with tri- or tetracyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), respectively, RRs were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.15; 5 trials) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.11; 12 trials). Both in placebo-controlled trials and in comparisons with standard antidepressants, trials from German-speaking countries reported findings more favourable to hypericum. Patients given hypericum extracts dropped out of trials due to adverse effects less frequently than those given older antidepressants (odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46) or SSRIs (OR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.34-0.83).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that the hypericum extracts tested in the included trials a) are superior to placebo in patients with major depression; b) are similarly effective as standard antidepressants; c) and have fewer side effects than standard antidepressants. The association of country of origin and precision with effects sizes complicates the interpretation.

The accurate diagnosis of early-onset dementia

Early-onset dementia (EOD, < 65 years at onset) is a relatively common and frequently misdiagnosed condition. One reason for misdiagnosis is that EOD has a more varied differential diagnosis than late-onset dementia (LOD). For example, Alzheimer's disease (AD), the preponderant LOD, makes up only about one-third of EODs; the rest are due to vascular dementias, frontotemporal lobar degenerations, traumatic head injury, alcohol-related dementia, and a great many other conditions. Another reason for misdiagnosis is that early-onset AD may have predominant cognitive deficits other than memory loss and a potential familial inheritance with spastic paraparesis, seizures, or myoclonus. A third reason is that EOD often presents with neuropsychiatric features out-of-proportion to any cognitive deficits. Despite these obstacles, it is important to accurately diagnose EODs, particularly because they differ in management and course. Clinicians can successfully diagnose most EODs with careful cognitive and family histories, mental status and neurological examinations, and neuroimaging.

Cognitive differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Although neuropathologic studies showed that early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EAD) and "senile dementia" were indistinguishable, clinical studies suggested that EAD and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LAD) were cognitively distinct. We sought to investigate whether EAD and LAD are cognitively different by comparing patients at the extremes of the ages of onset in order to maximize features that might separate them. We compared 44 men with EAD (age of onset less than 65 years) with 44 men with LAD (age of onset 84 years or older) on an intake cognitive screening examination on initial presentation. The EAD and LAD groups did not differ on dementia or most cognitive variables. Compared with EAD, the LAD group had worse verbal fluency and motor-executive functions. These differences disappeared when age differences were taken into account. We conclude that Alzheimer's disease is a clinically heterogeneous disorder whose manifestations can vary with age of onset. These differences indicate age-related vulnerabilities in this disease.

The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease

Clinical observations have suggested that the neuropsychological profile of early and late onset forms of Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD) differ in that neocortical functions are more affected in the former and learning in the latter, suggesting that they might be different diseases. The aim of this study is to assess the brain structural basis of these observations, and test whether neocortical areas are more heavily affected in EOAD and medial temporal areas in LOAD. Fifteen patients with EOAD and 15 with LOAD (onset before and after age 65; Mini Mental State Examination 19.8, SD 4.0 and 20.7, SD 4.2) were assessed with a neuropsychological battery and high-resolution MRI together with 1:1 age- and sex-matched controls. Cortical atrophy was assessed with cortical pattern matching, and hippocampal atrophy with region-of-interest-based analysis. EOAD patients performed more poorly than LOAD on visuospatial, frontal-executive and learning tests. EOAD patients had the largest atrophy in the occipital [25% grey matter (GM) loss in the left and 24% in the right hemisphere] and parietal lobes (23% loss on both sides), while LOAD patients were remarkably atrophic in the hippocampus (21 and 22% loss). Hippocampal GM loss of EOAD (9 and 16% to the left and right) and occipital (12 and 14%) and parietal (13 and 12%) loss of LOAD patients were less marked. In EOAD, GM loss of 25% or more was mapped to large neocortical areas and affected all lobes, with relative sparing of primary sensory, motor, and visual cortex, and anterior cingulate and orbital cortex. In LOAD, GM loss was diffusely milder (below 15%); losses of 15-20% were confined to temporoparietal and retrosplenial cortex, and reached 25% in restricted areas of the medial temporal lobe and right superior temporal gyrus. These findings indicate that EOAD and LOAD differ in their typical topographic patterns of brain atrophy, suggesting different predisposing or aetiological factors.

St John's wort for depression: Time for a different perspective?

OBJECTIVES

To review the development of the evidence on the herbal remedy, St John's wort (SJW) (Hypericum perforatum), in the treatment of depression.

METHODS

Searches of major biomedical and specialist databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED and HerbMed were conducted. Searches aimed to identify quantitative research (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) and relevant qualitative studies. Data were extracted systematically.

RESULTS

Systematic reviews have been published regularly over the past 10 years. Methodology has varied resulting in differing estimates of effectiveness but overall findings have been positive when compared with placebo for mild to moderate depression. Recent reviews have focused on adverse effects and interactions. One qualitative study focusing on SJW in depression was retrieved.

CONCLUSIONS

SJW has received intensive and continued attention since initial indications of its potential effectiveness for depression. The focus appears to be moving from effectiveness to safety but the patient's perspective has received less attention and may prove a valuable avenue for future studies.

The effect of St John's wort extracts on CYP3A: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the quality and outcomes of clinical trials investigating the effect of St John's wort extracts on the metabolism of drugs by CYP3A.

METHODS

Prospective clinical trials assessing the effect of St John's wort (SJW) extracts on metabolism by CYP3A were identified through computer-based searches (from their inception to May 2005) of Medline, Cinahl, PsycINFO, AMED, Current Contents and Embase, hand-searches of bibliographies of relevant papers and consultation with manufacturers and researchers in the field. Two reviewers selected trials for inclusion, independently extracted data and recorded details on study design.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the eligibility criteria. More than two-thirds of the studies employed a before-and-after design, less than one-third of the studies used a crossover design, and only three studies were double-blind and placebo controlled. In 12 studies the SJW extract had been assayed, and 14 studies stated the specific SJW extract used. Results from 26 studies, including all of the 19 studies that used high-dose hyperforin extracts (>10 mg day(-1)), had outcomes consistent with CYP3A induction. The three studies using low-dose hyperforin extracts (<4 mg day(-1)) demonstrated no significant effect on CYP3A.

CONCLUSION

There is reasonable evidence to suggest that high-dose hyperforin SJW extracts induce CYP3A. More studies are required to determine whether decreased CYP3A induction occurs after low-dose hyperforin extracts. Future studies should adopt study designs with a control phase or control group, identify the specific SJW extract employed and provide quantitative analyses of key constituents.

A Phase II study of St. John's Wort for smoking cessation

OBJECTIVES

To examine the feasibility and efficacy of St. John's Wort (SJW) for smoking cessation.

DESIGN

This one-arm Phase II study utilized an exact two-stage group sequential design with a 1-week run-in period between the start of SJW treatment and the designated quit date. A total of 37 smokers (ages 18-65 years, smoking > or = 10 cigarettes/day) were started on SJW. Thirteen failed to make a verified quit attempt on the predesignated date and were taken off study resulting in 24 evaluable subjects.

SETTING

Smokers completed clinic visits at a cancer center with interval telephone calls and mailings.

INTERVENTION

Standardized SJW, 450 mg capsules taken orally twice daily along with cessation counseling messages.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Subjects completed validated surveys and a focused physical examination at baseline. Evaluable subjects were defined as those subjects who made a confirmed quit attempt on their "quit date" 1 week following initiation of SJW. Smoking status was determined through self-report and bioverification using carbon monoxide (CO) testing.

RESULTS

Among evaluable subjects, the 12-week quit rate was 37.5% (9/24). Quitters had no significant change in weight from baseline to 12-weeks cessation. Use of SJW was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon these results (which suggest that SJW may be effective in maintaining smoking cessation) and the high compliance and few AEs, we conclude that SJW demonstrates feasibility for use in smoking cessation. If SJW proves to be effective in larger controlled studies, it could represent a less expensive, more readily accessible and well-tolerated agent to promote tobacco cessation.

St John's wort for depression

BACKGROUND

Extracts of the plant Hypericum perforatum L. (popularly called St. John's wort) have been used in folk medicine for a long time for a range of indications including depressive disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether extracts of hypericum are more effective than placebo and as effective as standard antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders in adults; and whether they have have less adverse effects than standard antidepressant drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were searched in computerized databases (Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Group Clinical Trials Registers; PubMed); by checking bibliographies of pertinent articles; and by contacting manufacturers and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they: (1) were randomized and double-blind; (2) included patients with depressive disorders; (3) compared extracts of St. John's wort with placebo or standard antidepressants; and (4) included clinical outcomes such as scales assessing depressive symptoms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Information on patients, interventions, outcomes and results was extracted by at least two independent reviewers using a standard form. The main outcome measure for comparing the effectiveness of hypericum with placebo and standard antidepressants was the responder rate ratio (responder rate in treatment group/responder rate in control group). The main outcome measure for adverse effects was the number of patients dropping out for adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 37 trials, including 26 comparisons with placebo and 14 comparisons with synthetic standard antidepressants, met the inclusion criteria. Results of placebo-controlled trials showed marked heterogeneity. In trials restricted to patients with major depression, the combined response rate ratio (RR) for hypericum extracts compared with placebo from six larger trials was 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.29) and from six smaller trials was 2.06 (95% CI, 1.65 to 2.59). In trials not restricted to patients with major depression, the RR from six larger trials was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.40-2.09) and from five smaller trials was 6.13 (95% CI, 3.63 to 10.38). Trials comparing hypericum extracts and standard antidepressants were statistically homogeneous. Compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tri- or tetracyclic antidepressants, respectively, RRs were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.85-1.12; six trials) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.93-1.14; seven trials). Patients given hypericum extracts dropped out of trials due to adverse effects less frequently than those given older antidepressants (Odds ratio (OR) 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.45); such comparisons were in the same direction, but not statistically significantly different, between hypericum extracts and SSRIs (OR 0.60, 95% CI, 0.31-1.15).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence regarding hypericum extracts is inconsistent and confusing. In patients who meet criteria for major depression, several recent placebo-controlled trials suggest that the tested hypericum extracts have minimal beneficial effects while other trials suggest that hypericum and standard antidepressants have similar beneficial effects. As the preparations available on the market might vary considerably in their pharmaceutical quality, the results of this review apply only to the products tested in the included studies.

Open-label pilot study of St. John's wort in adolescent depression

AIM

Clinical experience suggests the use of alternative remedies, such as St. John's Wort (SJW), in adolescents with affective disorders is increasing. In view of the paucity of documented, well-established, and safe antidepressant medications for children and adolescents, it was important to investigate the potential usefulness of SJW in adolescents with major depressive disorders (MDD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

An 8-week, open-label study evaluated the potential efficacy and safety of SJW (300 mg TID) in adolescents with MDD. Twenty-six patients, 12-17 years of age (mean age, 14.8 years) were enrolled in the study. Of the 11 patients who completed the study, 9 patients (82%) showed significant clinical improvement based on Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) change scores (treatment response was indicated by a clinical improvement rating of either very much improved or much improved at the final visit). Of the 15 patients (58%) who did not complete the study, 8 patients were noncompliant and 7 patients were discontinued because of persisting or worsening depression. Of the 8 noncompliant patients, at week 8, 2 patients (25%) remained unchanged, 1 patient (12.5%) was minimally improved, 4 patients (75%) were much improved, and 1 patient (12.5%) was very much improved, based on the CGI change score.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings suggest that SJW is well tolerated and may be clinically effective in the treatment of some adolescents with mild depression. Controlled trials of SJW in adolescents with MDD are suggested.

Acute treatment of moderate to severe depression with hypericum extract WS 5570 (St John's wort): randomised controlled double blind non-inferiority trial versus paroxetine

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of hypericum extract WS 5570 (St John's wort) compared with paroxetine in patients with moderate to severe major depression.

DESIGN

Randomised double blind, double dummy, reference controlled, multicentre non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

21 psychiatric primary care practices in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

251 adult outpatients with acute major depression with total score > or = 22 on the 17 item Hamilton depression scale.

INTERVENTIONS

900 mg/day hypericum extract WS 5570 three times a day or 20 mg paroxetine once a day for six weeks. In initial non-responders doses were increased to 1800 mg/day hypericum or 40 mg/day paroxetine after two weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in score on Hamilton depression scale from baseline to day 42 (primary outcome). Secondary measures were change in scores on Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale, clinical global impressions, and Beck depression inventory.

RESULTS

The Hamilton depression total score decreased by mean 14.4 (SD 8.8) points, corresponding to 56.6% (SD 34.3%) of the baseline value, in the hypericum group and by 11.4 (SD 8.6) points (44.8% (SD 33.5%) of baseline value) in the paroxetine group (intention to treat analysis; similar results were observed in the per protocol analysis). The intention to treat analysis (lower one sided 97.5% confidence limit 1.5 points for the difference hypericum minus paroxetine) and the per protocol analysis (lower confidence limit 0.7 points) showed non-inferiority of hypericum and statistical superiority over paroxetine. The lower limits in both cases exceeded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -2.5 points and the superiority margin of 0. The incidence of adverse events was 0.035 and 0.060 events per day of exposure for hypericum and paroxetine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of moderate to severe major depression, hypericum extract WS 5570 is at least as effective as paroxetine and is better tolerated.

A review of clinical and experimental observations about antidepressant actions and side effects produced by Hypericum perforatum extracts

Hypericum perforatum is an herbaceous perennial plant, also known as "St. John's wort", used popularly as a natural antidepressant. Although some clinical and experimental studies suggest it has some properties similar to conventional antidepressants, the proposed mechanism of action seems to be multiple: a non-selective blockade of the reuptake of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine; an increase in density of serotonergic and dopaminergic receptors and an increased affinity for GABAergic receptors; moreover, the inhibition of monoaminoxidase enzyme activity has been involved. In any case, the increase of monoamine concentrations in the synaptic cleft resembles several actions exerted by clinically effective antidepressants. In the present article, we review some of the controversial evidence derived from clinical and experimental studies suggesting that H. perforatum exerts antidepressant-like actions, and we also review some of its side effects, such as nausea, rash, fatigue, restlessness, photosensitivity, acute neuropathy, and even episodes of mania and serotonergic syndrome when administered simultaneously with other antidepressant drugs. All of the foregoing suggests that H. perforatum extracts appear to exert potentially significant pharmacological activity involving several neurotransmission systems supposed to be involved in the pathophysiology of depression. However, little information regarding the safety of H. perforatum is available, including potential herb-drug interactions. There is a need for additional research on the pharmacological and biochemical activity of H. perforatum, as well as its side-effects and its several bioactive constituents to further elucidate the mechanisms of antidepressant actions.

Clinical trials with hypericum extracts in patients with depression--results, comparisons, conclusions for therapy with antidepressant drugs

By the spring of 2002, results from 34 controlled, double-blind trials of Hypericum extracts in some 3000 patients, predominantly with mild to moderate forms of depression, had been published. An overview is given of the studies conducted since 1990. In the majority of them, the efficacy criterion (primary endpoint) was the score and/or response rate on the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HAMD). In ten studies, based on extracts prepared with 50% or 60% ethanol in water (V/V), the dosages ranged from 300 mg to 1050 mg of extract per day. Five of the ten studies were placebo-controlled and in all five cases, the Hypericum extract was shown to be significantly superior. Results with Hypericum were as good or even better than with imipramine or fluoxetine. In the period since 1990, a total of twelve controlled trials have been published with one particular extract prepared with 80% methanol in water (V/V), of which six were placebo-controlled, two compared Hypericum with imipramine and one each with maprotiline, amitriptyline, sertraline or light therapy. Dosages ranged from 450-1200 mg extract per day. Statistical analysis of the total Hamilton scores showed significant differences between Hypericum extract and placebo in four of the six placebo-controlled studies and a trend in favour of the active treatment in the other two. Of the five comparative trials against four different synthetic antidepressants, amitriptyline was significantly superior to Hypericum after six weeks of therapy, whilst there were no significant differences in treatment outcome between Hypericum and the other synthetics in the remaining four studies. The results of the trials conducted to date show no major differences in efficacy of the alcoholic extracts. Taking all the results into account, it can be assumed that the threshold dose for efficacy against individual symptoms and complaints that occur in the course of the depressive illness could be about 300 mg of extract per day. In the medically supervised treatment of mild to moderate depression, doses of approximately 500-1000 mg of extract per day of these preparations of St. John's Wort are of comparable efficacy to synthetic antidepressants in their normally prescribed dosages.

St. John's wort and depression: efficacy, safety and tolerability-an update

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) is a medicinal plant traditionally used, both externally and internally, in all Europe for many pathologies. Paracelsus named it "arnica of the nerves" because of its empirical use in nervous diseases. In the last two decades many studies have proved the efficacy of some St. John's wort extracts in mild to moderate depression and it has been successful as an antidepressant both in Europe and the US. Its high efficacy and tolerability is unquestionable and from the clinical studies the activity is comparable to other antidepressants while lacking major side effects, making it a safe antidepressant.However, recently its potential to induce the metabolism of co-administered medications has been reported because it may potentate certain enzymes of the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. This resulted in a lowering of serum concentration of a number of concomitant drugs, including warfarin, digoxin, theophylline, cyclosporin, and indinavir. Many drugs and also several common foods and drinks can influence this enzyme system. So, even if its safety has been well established, physicians should be aware that St. John's wort administration might significantly affect other prescribed medicines.

A preliminary investigation on the acute pharmacodynamic effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor performance

Research has indicated that the herb St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) has comparable efficacy to conventional antidepressants in the treatment of depression. Although clinical studies have demonstrated that hypericum has a superior side-effect profile compared to standard antidepressants, no study has directly compared the cognitive and psychomotor effects of hypericum with those of other antidepressants. The aim of the current study was to examine the acute effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor function, and to compare its effects with those of amitriptyline. Thirteen healthy volunteers received an acute dose of placebo, amitriptyline (25 mg, positive control) or hypericum (900 mg or 1800 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and subjective measures of sedation were administered before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Amitriptyline impaired performance on a battery of psychological tests, which included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), profile of mood states (POMS) and the line analogue rating scale (LARS), while hypericum had neutral effects on performance in these tests. However, hypericum induced a dose-related impairment on DSST. Current findings suggest that clinical doses of hypericum do not impair attention, sensorimotor function or information processing.

Pharmacodynamic study of Hypericum perforatum L

The effects of Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae) crude ethanol extract (A), ethyl acetate extract (B), aqueous extract (C) and infusion (I), on pentobarbital induced sleeping time, intestinal motility, and their analgesic activity, have been investigated. Extracts A and B exhibited significant stimulatory and antidepressant effects on the CNS. Both extracts prolonged sleep, increasing time up to more than 25 min. The antidepressive activity of extract A was also achieved by significant reduction of the myorelaxant activity of diazepam. Extract B exhibited strong analgesic activity reducing abdominal stretching induced by acetic acid by nearly 50 %. Extracts A, B and C exhibited spasmolytic activity, significantly reducing intestine motility.

Comparison of St John's wort and imipramine for treating depression: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort extract) with imipramine in patients with mild to moderate depression.

DESIGN

Randomised, multicentre, double blind, parallel group trial.

SETTING

40 outpatient clinics in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

324 outpatients with mild to moderate depression.

INTERVENTION

75 mg imipramine twice daily or 250 mg hypericum extract ZE 117 twice daily for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hamilton depression rating scale, clinical global impression scale, and patient's global impression scale.

RESULTS

Among the 157 participants taking hypericum mean scores on the Hamilton depression scale decreased from 22.4 at baseline to 12.00 at end point; among the 167 participants taking imipramine they fell from 22.1 to 12.75. Mean clinical global impression scores at end point were 2.22 out of 7 for the hypericum group and 2.42 for the imipramine group. On the 7 point self assessments of global improvement completed by participants (score of 1 indicating "very much improved" and 7 indicating "very much deteriorated") mean scores were 2.44 in the hypericum group and 2.60 in the imipramine group. None of the differences between treatment groups were significant. However, the mean score on the anxiety-somatisation subscale of the Hamilton scale (3.79 in the hypericum group and 4.26 in the imipramine group) indicated a significant advantage for hypericum relative to imipramine. Mean scores on the 5 point scale used by participants to assess tolerability (score of 1 indicating excellent tolerability and 5 indicating very poor tolerability) were better for hypericum (1.67) than imipramine (2.35). Adverse events occurred in 62/157 (39%) participants taking hypericum and in 105/167 (63%) taking imipramine. 4 (3%) participants taking hypericum withdrew because of adverse events compared with 26 (16%) taking imipramine.

CONCLUSIONS

This Hypericum perforatum extract is therapeutically equivalent to imipramine in treating mild to moderate depression, but patients tolerate hypericum better.

Comparison of an extract of hypericum (LI 160) and sertraline in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

Hypericum (St. John's wort) has been shown to be as efficacious and well tolerated as standard antidepressants in the treatment of depression but has not been compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

OBJECTIVE

This study compared hypericum and the SSRI sertraline in the treatment of depression.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized study conducted in a community hospital, 30 male and female outpatients (19 women, 11 men; mean age, 45.5 years) with mild to moderate depression received 600 mg/d of a standardized extract of hypericum (LI 160) or 50 mg/d sertraline for I week, followed by hypericum 900 mg/d or sertraline 75 mg/d for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The severity of symptoms, as assessed by scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression scale, was significantly reduced in both treatment groups (P < 0.01). Clinical response (defined as a > or =50% reduction in HAM-D scores) was noted in 47% of patients receiving hypericum and 40% of those receiving sertraline. The difference was not statistically significant. Both agents were well tolerated. A post hoc power analysis indicated that failure to reach statistical significance between treatments resulted primarily from an absence of clinical differences rather than the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

The hypericum extract was at least as effective as sertraline in the treatment of mild to moderate depression in a small group of outpatients.

St. John's wort for depression: a meta-analysis of well-defined clinical trials

Studies concluding that St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is an effective antidepressant can be challenged due to questionable methodology. We attempt to correct this by a meta-analysis utilizing only well-defined clinical trials. Controlled, double-blind studies using strictly defined depression criteria were analyzed by the rate of change of depression and by the number of "treatment responders." Rates of side effects and dropouts were also analyzed. Hypericum was 1.5 times more likely to result in an antidepressant response than placebo and was equivalent to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). The meta-analysis also showed that there was a higher dropout rate in the TCA group and that the TCAs were nearly twice as likely to cause side effects, including those more severe than hypericum. Hypericum perforatum was more effective than placebo and similar in effectiveness to low-dose TCAs in the short-term treatment of mild to moderately severe depression. However, design problems in existing studies prevent definitively concluding that St. John's wort is an effective antidepressant.

Alternative therapies for advanced prostate cancer. What should I tell my patients?

Alternative medicine use in the general population has continued to dramatically increase in this decade. The research supporting the use of acupuncture treatment in other areas of medicine is compelling. In addition, herbal therapies, such as PC-SPES and St. John's Wort, may play important roles in this disease. Clinicians dealing with advanced prostate cancer need to be introduced to some of these newer treatments so they can be discussed objectively with patients.

MRI temporal lobe volume measures and neuropsychologic function in Alzheimer's disease

The authors performed quantitation of the temporal lobes using magnetic resonance imaging in 20 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, 20 age-matched aged control subjects, and 26 healthy young volunteers. Compared to young subjects, aged controls showed volume reductions in amygdala (17%, p = 0.02), hippocampus (15%, p = 0.0001) and temporal lobe (22%, p = 0.0001). Compared to aged controls, Alzheimer's subjects showed further volume reductions in amygdala (33%, p = 0.0001) and hippocampus (20%, p = 0.006) but not temporal lobe (7%, p = 0.15). In Alzheimer's subjects, left temporal lobe volume correlated strongly with the Mini Mental State (MMSE) score (adjusted r2 = 0.46, p = 0.0006) whereas right amygdala volume correlated inversely with the noncognitive ADAS score (adjusted r2 = 0.46, p = 0.0006). The authors conclude that significant volume changes occur in the temporal lobe in aging and in Alzheimer's disease, with the greatest percentage reductions in the amygdala in Alzheimer's disease. Temporal neocortical atrophy and temporal limbic atrophy might be associated with different patterns of performance and behavior in Alzheimer's patients.

Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in depression: pest or blessing?

St John's wort (SJW) was introduced into Australia during the 1880s for medicinal purposes, but was subsequently declared a noxious weed. There is now a resurgence of interest in the therapeutic properties of this herb. In particular, use of SJW as an antidepressant has increased in recent months owing to reports of its effectiveness and safety. Nevertheless, the controlled trials available have limitations. Increasing use of SJW in the community poses a variety of questions. For example, should medical practitioners become more knowledgeable about the effects and interactions of alternative remedies? What are the ethical and medical implications of "antidepressant" prescribing by non-medical persons? Who is to fund further research and treatment studies? How can quality of SJW preparations be guaranteed?

The scientific, quasi-scientific and popular literature on the use of St. John's Wort in the treatment of depression

St. John's Wort, also known as Hypericum, is an herbal product that is available in health food stores as an allegedly 'safe' alternative to antidepressants developed by the pharmaceutical industry. Recently it has received extensive coverage through the media, especially in the United States. To the best of our knowledge, Germany is the only country where it has been formally approved for clinical use. We reviewed both the vulgar and the scientific literature on this product. Although the few controlled studies that have been conducted pertain to adjustment disorder with depressed mood, several books and the media advocate its use for clinical and/or chronic depression. The high placebo rate in these studies, often in the 50% range, does indeed suggest that the controlled trials have been conducted on mild transient depressions; extrapolation to more serious or chronic depressions would therefore be unwarranted. We could not find any published literature comparing the efficacy of Hypericum to a standard antidepressant versus placebo. Furthermore, the studies claiming safety and freedom from potentially serious side effects appear flawed methodologically. Actually, little is known about the putative mechanism of action of Hypericum in depression; if indeed it does involve serotonergic mechanisms or monoamine-oxidase inhibition, it invites caution with concurrent use with an SSRI and, of course, with a MAOI. A skeptic might conclude that St. John's Wort should not be used until more definitive data are available. A less conservative view would be that, while its current widespread use is not warranted, the product may still have some merit for mild nonchronic depressive states below the clinical threshold. If this were conclusively proven, it would indeed constitute an important development in the field of antidepressants.

St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum)--a herbal antidepressant

A number of clinical studies conducted over the past few years have indicated that whole extract of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) has antidepressant effects. The herbal antidepressant St John's wort offers promising results in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate depression (response rate of 60-70% estimated by analysis of pooled data). St John's wort preparations are well tolerated. Their use rarely leads to adverse drug reactions which, when they do occur, are mainly subjective symptoms (e.g. gastrointestinal, dizziness). The generally good tolerability of St John's wort preparations and the resulting high patient compliance in taking the prescribed medication, in conjunction with their efficacy in mild and moderate depression, make these preparations particularly suitable for use in outpatient practice. Tolerability is also very good in elderly patients. If a sufficiently high-dose course of treatment with St John's wort preparations (900 mg daily) does not lead to a clear improvement in depression after four to six weeks, therapy should be continued with an established ('classical') antidepressant.

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in Alzheimer's disease

Modern imaging techniques such as X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used in the clinical evaluation of patients with dementia disorders. Computed tomography was introduced for clinical practice in the beginning of the 1970s. The advent of MRI came later with the first equipment used for clinical purposes being introduced in the first half of the 1980s. The two modalities differ in many aspects: CT has a lower contrast resolution compared with MRI and is also faster and often more convenient for patients. In contrast, MRI gives a superior picture of the brain tissue without the use of contrast agents. Moreover, MRI, like CT, does not suffer from bone artifacts. The latter is of special importance in the study of dementia diseases (especially Alzheimer's) where structural changes are present close to the brain. The possibility of image in arbitrary imaging planes also makes MRI more suitable to study structures of relevance in Alzheimer's disease such as the medial temporal lobes and the hippocampal formation.

Quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in aging and Alzheimer's disease. A review

In recent aging research, quantitative techniques have been used to overcome limitations of qualitative interpretation of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging. The purpose of this review is to summarize imaging results emphasizing quantitative studies using these two modalities in human aging. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is viewed as an extension of imaging, and results of in vivo spectroscopic studies are included. Because Alzheimer's disease (AD) is closely related to aging, a discussion of quantitative imaging techniques that may distinguish normal elderly from patients with AD is included.