In vitro properties of orthodontic adhesives with fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate

This in vitro study evaluated the efficacy of orthodontic adhesives with fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) in reducing bacterial adhesion and enamel demineralization. Forty human premolars each sectioned buccolingually into three parts were bracketed with control resin (Transbond XT) or adhesives containing ACP (Aegis Ortho) or fluoride (QuickCure). Artificial lesions induced by pH cycling were examined by X-ray photoelectron spectrophotometry (XPS) and polarized light microscopy (PLM). After 28 days, Aegis Ortho demonstrated the lowest calcium and phosphorous content by XPS analysis. After 42 days, reductions in lesion depth areas were 23.6% for Quick Cure and 20.3% for Aegis Ortho (P < 0.05). In the presence of 1% sucrose, adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Aegis Ortho and Quick Cure was reduced by 41.8% and 37.7% (P < 0.05) as compared to Transbond XT. Composites containing ACP or fluoride reduced bacterial adherence and lesion formation as compared to a composite without ACP or fluoride.

Linear regression modeling to compare fluoride release profiles of various restorative materials

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the released fluoride profiles of various restorative materials by using linear regression analysis.

METHODS

Specimens were prepared using a cylindrical Teflon mold with a height of 2 mm and a radius of 8 mm. After being prepared, specimens were immediately placed into artificial saliva which was replaced at various times during 6 weeks. These released intrinsic fluoride amounts were measured by using an ion selective electrode. Then, data obtained cumulatively were statistically analyzed, and the released profiles were compared.

RESULTS

It was observed that the materials released fluoride at different levels of concentration and the largest fluoride release was obtained from the conventional glass ionomer cement. This was followed by resin modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid modified composite resin, and fluoride releasing composite resin, respectively. Although the released fluoride amounts of the materials were different, their release profiles were found to be similar in that the release was initially fast and then it became steady as time passed.

SIGNIFICANCE

The statistical modeling of the release profiles helps to compare the fluoride release behavior of materials and also to predict fluoride release amounts for the future. In literature, for these purposes, separate nonlinear statistical models have extensively been utilized. However, the single linear statistical modeling approach has numerous advantages such as providing estimators having good statistical properties, exact results, precise inference and simplicity in calculation. Therefore, this study was conducted to introduce the use of single linear regression modeling to compare release profiles statistically.

Long-term in vitro fluoride release and rerelease from orthodontic bonding materials containing fluoride

The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro long-term (30 month) fluoride release and rerelease rates (after fluoride exposure) from 3 orthodontic bonding materials containing fluoride and 1 without fluoride. Ten samples of each material (Python, TP Orthodontics, LaPorte, Ind; Assure, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill; Fuji Ortho LC, GC America, Alsip, Ill; and Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were fabricated and stored in deionized distilled water at 37 degrees C. Five samples had fluoride-release rates measured at days 546, 637, 730, 821, and 913 after initial fabrication, and 5 samples were exposed to fluoride (Nupro 2% NaF gel, Dentsply Canada, Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada) for 4 minutes at day 535 and had measurements taken on days 546, 548, 552, 575, 637, 730, 821, and 913. To prevent cumulative measurements, the storage solutions were changed 24 hours before measurement. Statistically significant differences were found in fluoride-release rates (P <.0001), with Fuji Ortho LC releasing the most fluoride, followed by Python and Assure at all time points in the nonfluoride exposed group. In the fluoride-exposed group, there were significant differences in fluoride release (P <.0001), with Fuji Ortho LC releasing the most fluoride. A "burst-effect" pattern of fluoride release was seen after fluoride exposure for all materials. It was concluded that Fuji Ortho LC, Assure, and Python might have sufficient long-term fluoride-release rates to reduce white spot formation, and all are recommended as suitable fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding materials.

Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents

The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of fluoride release with time from 1 nonfluoridated and 3 fluoride-containing orthodontic bonding materials in distilled water and artificial saliva. Materials tested were Assure (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, Ill), Fuji Ortho LC (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Python (TP Orthodontics, LaPorte, Ind), and Transbond XT (3M Dental Products, Monrovia, Calif). Ten specimens of each material type were stored in distilled water, and 10 of each type were stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. Fluoride release was measured with an ion-specific electrode. Readings were taken periodically for a total time period of 6 months. At day 1, Assure released the most fluoride into distilled water (66.2 microg/cm(2)) and into artificial saliva (65.8 microg/cm(2)), followed by Fuji Ortho LC (25.9 microg/cm(2); 18.8 microg/cm(2)), Python (6.3 microg/cm(2); 4.2 microg/cm(2)), and Transbond (0.1 microg/cm(2); 0.1 microg/cm(2)). The fluoride release rates were highest during the first days of testing, declining to lower but more stable levels. At the end of 6 months, Fuji Ortho LC released the most fluoride (3.8 microg/cm(2); 3.5 microg/cm(2)) followed by Assure (3.1 microg/cm(2); 2.8 microg/cm(2)), Python (2.6 microg/cm(2); 1.7 microg/cm(2)), and Transbond (0.1 microg/cm(2); 0.1 microg/cm(2)). The type of storage medium did not dramatically affect fluoride release. The second part of the study, undertaken after a year of sample storage, tested the 20 samples of Assure for a further 2-week period, after exposure to running and still distilled water. Although fluoride release rates declined with time, they were still higher than the 1.5 microg/cm(2) level that is referenced as inhibiting decalcification of enamel in a clinical environment. Release rates were similar in running and still water at all time points. Throughout the 6-month period, all 3 fluoride-containing materials had rates of fluoride release that could theoretically inhibit decalcification of enamel.

Effect of a fluoride varnish on demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets

Home fluoride regimens have long been used to reduce the amount of demineralization adjacent to orthodontic appliances. In the absence of patient compliance, another method of applying the fluoride must be used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the ability of a fluoride varnish, Duraflor, to directly inhibit demineralization of enamel surrounding orthodontic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 36 extracted human canines and premolars with a traditional composite resin and randomly assigned to three equal groups of twelve. Group 1 served as the control with no topical application after bonding. Group 2 was treated with a single application of a nonfluoridated placebo varnish. Group 3 was treated with a single application of Duraflor. All groups were cycled in an artificial caries challenge for 1 hour two times daily for 37 days and were brushed with a medium bristled toothbrush to simulate mechanical wear of the varnish. Demineralization of enamel was evaluated in longitudinal buccolingual tooth sections using polarized light microscopy. Both average depth and area of demineralization were measured with a sonic digitizer. ANOVA (P </=. 0001) and Duncan's test (P </=.05) indicated significant differences in depth and area of demineralized enamel. Those teeth treated with Duraflor exhibited 50% less demineralization than the control teeth and an even greater difference when compared to the placebo group. Fluoride varnishes should be considered for use as a preventive adjunct to reduce enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets, particularly in patients who exhibit poor compliance with oral hygiene and home fluoride use.

Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study

Enamel demineralization is recognized as a possible side effect of bonding orthodontic brackets with composite resins. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials have been shown to inhibit tooth demineralization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two fluoride-releasing hybrid glass ionomer bonding agents for inhibition of enamel demineralization surrounding orthodontic brackets under two experimental conditions. This in vitro study used 72 extracted human premolars. Twenty-four teeth were bonded with Advance resionomer, 24 were bonded with Fuji Ortho LC hybrid glass ionomer and 24 were bonded with Transbond XT composite resin as the control. The teeth were cycled in an artificial caries challenge three times daily for 30 days. Half of the teeth in each group were brushed twice daily with a fluoridated dentifrice, and the other half were not brushed. Demineralization of enamel surrounding orthodontic brackets was evaluated with polarized light microscopy. Enamel lesions were photographed under maximum illumination. Images were projected, and demineralized areas were traced. Both average depth and area were measured with a sonic digitizer. Analysis of variance (P <.0001) and Duncan's test (P <.05) indicated significant differences in depth and area of demineralized enamel such that lesion size was: Transbond XT no brush > Transbond XT brush > Advance no brush = Advance brush = Fuji Ortho LC no brush = Fuji Ortho brush. The promising results of this in vitro study warrant further clinical investigation of hybrid glass ionomer adhesives as orthodontic bonding agents to minimize enamel demineralization.

Long-term fluoride release of some orthodontic bonding resins: a laboratory study

OBJECTIVES

The present study compared the amounts and profiles of long term fluoride release from four commercial direct bonding resins (Light-Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products; Rely.a. Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products; Orthon, Orthon Dental Inc.; Fluor Ever, Macro-Chem Corporation) and one glass ionomer cement (Ketac-Cem, Espe).

METHODS

The specimens were equilibrated in double-deionized water at 37 degrees C. At predetermined intervals, and up to 560 days, the fluoride concentration of the equilibrated solution was determined with a fluoride ion selective electrode. For Light-Bond and Rely.a. Bond two batches were studied and the amount of fluoride released in a 0.1 mol/L NaCl solution was also determined. Differences in the fluoride release profiles due to batch, type of solution and time were determined with a three-factor mixed design ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor.

RESULTS

The fluoride release profiles of the orthodontic adhesives studied differ markedly. Initially, Fluor Ever and Ketac-Cem release comparable amounts of fluoride which are greater than those released by Orthon. After a few weeks the amounts of fluoride released by Ketac-Cem and Orthon become comparable, but are considerably higher than those released by Fluor Ever. During the first days of the elution, the amount of fluoride released by Light-Bond equals that of Orthon, but then decreases below the determination limit of the analytical method within half a year. No difference was found between the fluoride release profiles in water and the NaCl solution. However, the fluoride release profiles apparently depend on the batch. For Rely.a. Bond, the amount of fluoride released is smaller than the detection limit for the fluoride analysis.

SIGNIFICANCE

The fluoride release of the orthodontic adhesives investigated markedly depends on the mechanisms responsible for the fluoride release process.

Modeling the caries-inhibitory effects of dental materials

The objectives of this review are to compare the models that are used to simulate the caries process in cardiology research and to suggest how these models might be used to assess caries-inhibitory properties of dental materials. Available caries-simulation models fall into the following classifications: 1) in vitro demineralization using acid buffers, 2) in vitro demineralization using bacterially generated acids, 3) in vitro demineralization/remineralization using a pH-cycling system, 4) an artificial mouth where a bacterially generated acid challenge is interspersed with a "saliva" treatment, 5) in vivo animal model (generally with rats), 6) in situ demineralization and/or remineralization using enamel or dentin blocks or slices in the human mouth, and 7) in vivo studies using teeth scheduled for extraction in the human mouth. Most dental materials studies have used simple in vitro demineralization models or component release experiments, each of which is inadequate to answer the questions that are being asked about the caries-inhibitory properties of the material being tested. Experimental methods must be chosen with care to ensure that the material to be tested is examined in an appropriate mode. The ultimate goal is to correctly predict clinical outcomes. The design or redesign of a model must eventually be tied to documented clinical outcomes to improve the model and allow for future successful development of new materials.