Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 1 (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy)

Approximately 10 years have passed since the Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines were formulated in 2009. Much evidence has been reported during the succeeding years, which were not taken into consideration in the previous guidelines, e.g., the next peritoneal dialysis PD trial of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) in Japan, the significance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), the effects of icodextrin solution, new developments in peritoneal pathology, and a new international recommendation on a proposal for exit-site management. It is essential to incorporate these new developments into the new clinical practice guidelines. Meanwhile, the process of creating such guidelines has changed dramatically worldwide and differs from the process of creating what were “clinical practice guides.” For this revision, we not only conducted systematic reviews using global standard methods but also decided to adopt a two-part structure to create a reference tool, which could be used widely by the society’s members attending a variety of patients. Through a working group consensus, it was decided that Part 1 would present conventional descriptions and Part 2 would pose clinical questions (CQs) in a systematic review format. Thus, Part 1 vastly covers PD that would satisfy the requirements of the members of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This article is the duplicated publication from the Japanese version of the guidelines and has been reproduced with permission from the JSDT.

Comparison of clinical effects between icodextrin and glucose solutions on outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Icodextrin enhances peritoneal filtration for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, clinically important outcomes have not yet been analyzed using authentic, objective statistical methods. The present systematic review aimed to determine the risks and benefits of icodextrin compared with a glucose-based solution with respect to clinically important and patient-centered outcomes.

Methods

We systematically investigated only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by adopting the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (2014) and searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for eligible studies reported in the literature. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

We finally evaluated important outcomes in 13 RCTs. Icodextrin significantly decreased the number of reported episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload in four RCTs that involved 236 patients (relative risk [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.82; moderate certainty evidence). However, the inclusion of icodextrin for peritoneal ultrafiltration did not significantly differ in six RCTs involving 252 patients (mean difference [MD], 186.76 mL; 95% CI, − 47.08 to 420.59; low certainty evidence). Regarding other clinically important outcomes, all-cause mortality in 10 RCTs involving 1106 patients (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.71; low certainty evidence) and technical survival in five RCTs involving 470 patients (RR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.29 to 1.12; low certainty evidence) were not significant. Urine volume in four RCTs involving 136 patients, residual renal function in five RCTs involving 181 patients and peritoneal function measured as the ratio of solute concentration in dialysate and plasma (D/P ratio) in two RCTs involving 105 patients were not specifically affected by icodextrin, and the results for adverse events were similar between icodextrin and glucose PD solutions.

Conclusion

Icodextrin could relieve uncontrolled fluid overload without adding risk. However, a significant effect on clinically relevant outcomes such as technical survival and overall patient survival was not suggested. More trials are required to increase the statistical power and to verify the value of icodextrin in clinical practice.

Trial registration

PROSPERO, CRD42018104360

Effects of Conventional and New Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cell Viability and Proliferation

Objective

To investigate the biocompatibility of “new” peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions with bicarbonate/lactate buffer, non glucose osmotic agents (icodextrin or amino acids), neutral pH, and low levels of glucose degradation products (GDPs).

Design

Using M199 culture medium as a control, we compared conventional and new PD solutions with respect to their effects on the viability of human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) [using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release], on DNA damage in HPMCs [using single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay)], and on HPMC proliferation (using [3H]-thymidine incorporation). The experiments were performed after cell growth was synchronized by incubation with serum-free media for 24 hours. The PD solutions tested included commercial 1.5% glucose and 4.25% glucose solutions with 40 mmol/L lactate (D 1.5 and D 4.25, respectively), 7.5% icodextrin (E), 1.1% amino acid (N), 1.5% glucose solution in a triple-chambered bag (Bio 1.5), 1.5% glucose solution in a dual-chambered bag with neutral pH (Bal 1.5), and 1.5% glucose and 4.25% glucose solution containing 25 mmol/L bicarbonate and 15 mmol/L lactate (P 1.5 and P 4.25, respectively).

Results

When HPMCs were continuously exposed to undiluted PD solutions, D 1.5, D 4.25, P 4.25, and E increased LDH release by more than 60% at 24 hours. All PD solutions tested increased LDH release by more than 75% at 96 hours. With 2-fold diluted PD solutions, only D 4.25 significantly increased LDH release at 96 hours, though not at 24 hours. When cells were exposed to undiluted PD solutions for 60 min and allowed to recover in M199 for up to 96 hours, LDH release was significantly higher at 24 – 96 hours in E (55% – 69%) and D 1.5 (48% –72%) as compared with control [M199 (18%)]. Release of LDH was significantly lower with PD solutions containing lower levels of GDPs than those in D 1.5, suggesting that GDPs may have a role in cell viability. The D solutions (D 1.5 and D 4.25) and E solution also induced significant DNA damage. Both LDH release and DNA damage by D and E were significantly attenuated by adjusting the solution pH to 7.4, suggesting that low pH may be implicated in PD solution–induced DNA damage and cell death. When diluted 2-fold, D 1.5, D 4.25, and P 4.25 decreased [3H]-thymidine incorporation to 43%, 34%, and 41% of control, respectively, at 24 hours and to 45%, 26%, and 35% of control, respectively, at 96 hours. When cells were exposed to undiluted PD solutions for 5 minutes and allowed to recover in M199 for up to 96 hours, D 1.5 and P 4.25—but not D 4.25—significantly inhibited cell proliferation at 24 hours. This effect was sustained up to 96 hours.

Conclusions

The present in vitro data demonstrate that PD solutions with low pH, or high levels of GDPs, or both, promote HPMC death and DNA damage, and that PD solutions with high osmolality inhibit cell proliferation. Solutions with neutral pH, amino acids, and “low GDPs” appear to be more biocompatible than conventional PD solutions. These results require confirmation in in vivo animal and clinical studies.

The Choice of Dialysis Solutions in Pediatric Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis: Guidelines by AnAD HOCEuropean Committee

Objective

To provide guidelines on choosing dialysis solutions for children on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Setting

European Paediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Working Group.

Data Source

Literature on the application of PD solutions in children ( Evidence), and discussions within the group ( Opinion).

Conclusions

Glucose is the standard osmotic agent for PD in children ( Evidence). The lowest glucose concentration needed should be used ( Opinion). Low calcium solution (1.25 mmol/L) should be applied, wherever possible, with careful monitoring of parathyroid hormone levels ( Opinion). The use of amino acid-containing dialysis fluids can be considered in malnourished children, although aggressive enteral nutrition is preferred ( Opinion). There is insufficient evidence documenting the efficacy of intraperitoneally administered amino acids ( Evidence). When ultrafiltration and/or solute removal are insufficient, poly-glucose solutions are a welcome addition to the treatment of children on nocturnal intermittent PD ( Evidence). However, in the absence of any reported long-term experience with children, their use must be closely monitored ( Opinion). Bicarbonate would appear to be the preferred buffer for PD in children, but more in vivo studies are required before it replaces the present lactate-containing solutions ( Evidence/Opinion).

Biocompatibility of New Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions: What Can We Hope to Achieve?

Despite the bioincompatibility of the “old”, standard, high glucose, lactate-buffered peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, PD is itself a highly successful dialysis modality with patient survival equivalent to that of hemodialysis (HD) during the initial 3 – 5 years of dialysis therapy. Nevertheless, PD technique survival is often limited by infectious complications and alterations in the structure and function of the peritoneal membrane. These local changes also have a negative impact on patient survival owing to systemic effects such as those often seen in patients with high peritoneal transport rate and loss of ultrafiltration (UF) capacity.

Patient mortality remains unacceptably high in both HD and PD patients, with most premature deaths being associated with signs of malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (MIA syndrome). These systemic signs are likely to be influenced by PD solutions both directly and indirectly (via changes in the peritoneal membrane). New, biocompatible PD solutions may have favorable local effects (viability and function of the peritoneal membrane) and systemic effects (for example, on MIA syndrome). Amino acid–based solution [Nutrineal (N): Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, U.S.A.] may improve nutritional status as well as peritoneal membrane viability. Bicarbonate/lactate–buffered solution [Physioneal (P): Baxter Healthcare Corporation] may ameliorate local and systemic effects of low pH, high lactate, and high glucose degradation products. Icodextrin-based solution [Extraneal (E): Baxter Healthcare SA, Castlebar, Ireland] may improve hypertension and cardiovascular problems associated with fluid overload and may extend time on therapy in patients with loss of UF capacity.

The positive effects of each of these new, biocompatible solutions have been demonstrated in several studies. It is likely that the combined use of N, P, and E solutions will produce favorable synergies in regard to both local effects (peritoneal viability) and systemic effects (less malnutrition, inflammation, and fluid overload). Solution combination is an exciting area for clinical study in the coming years. Furthermore, dialysis fluid additives such as hyaluronan, which protects and improves the function of the peritoneal membrane, may further improve PD solutions. The new, biocompatible PD solutions represent an entirely new era in the evolution of the PD therapy; they are likely to have markedly positive effects on both PD technique and PD patient survival in coming years.

Glucose-Free Dialysis Solutions: Inductors of Inflammation or Preservers of Peritoneal Membrane?

Objectives

Glucose and other bioincompatible factors of conventional peritoneal dialysis solutions may damage the peritoneal membrane. The aim of our study was to investigate whether replacement of glucose with icodextrin (ID) or amino acids (AA) affects inflammatory parameters or cancer antigen 125 (CA125).

Design

Either ID or AA was used, in random order, in one daily exchange during an 8-week period. After the first study period, the patients entered a washout period and then switched to the other study solution for an 8-week period. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured in serum, and CA125, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), and hyaluronan (HA) were measured in the overnight dwell dialysates at the beginning and end of the study periods.

Setting

A university hospital.

Patients

22 patients with duration on peritoneal dialysis of 1.5 – 6.3 months.

Main Outcome Measures

Levels of serum CRP and dialysate CA125, IL-6, HA, and sICAM-1 during use of ID and AA were compared to levels during use of glucose-only-based solutions.

Results

CRP increased significantly during use of ID. CA125 increased significantly during 8 weeks’ use of AA, from 22.8 (5.4 – 89.0) to 42.9 (7.1 – 92.9) kU/L ( p = 0.007). IL-6 increased during 8 weeks’ use of AA, from 22.0 (9.0 – 108.0) to 36.5 (14.0 – 93.0) ng/L ( p = 0.002) and ID, from 25.5 (8.0 – 82.0) to 40.0 (12.0 – 118.0) ng/L ( p = 0.008). TNF-α also increased significantly during use of ID, but showed no significant changes during use of AA.

Conclusions

The use of glucose-free solutions, especially AA, may lead to preservation of mesothelial cell mass and host defense. However, activation of systemic and peritoneal inflammation may appear during the use of ID and to a lesser extent during use of AA.

What is the Optimal Dwell Time for Maximizing Ultrafiltration with Icodextrin Exchange in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

Background

Icodextrin is increasingly being used in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) for the long dwell exchange to maintain adequate ultrafiltration (UF). However, the UF reported in the literature varies with different dwell times: from 200 to 500 mL with 12 – 15 hour dwells. In order to maximize UF, it is important to know the relationship between dwell time and UF when using icodextrin in APD patients. With this knowledge, decisions can be made with respect to dwell period, and adjustments to the dialysis prescription can be made accordingly.

Methods

We prospectively studied this relationship in 36 patients from Canada and Turkey. All patients did the icodextrin day exchange manually after disconnecting themselves from overnight cycler dialysis. Dwell period was increased by 1 hour every week, from 10 to 14 hours. Ultra-filtration was noted for each icodextrin exchange. Mean UF for each week ( i.e., dwell period) was compared by repeated measures ANOVA.

Results

We found no difference in mean UF with increasing dwell time: 351.73 ± 250.59 mL at 10 hours versus 371.75 ± 258.25 mL at 14 hours ( p = 0.83). We also compared mean UF between different subgroups and found that males ( p = 0.02 vs females) and high transporters ( p = 0.04 vs low) had higher mean UF. Further analysis of maximal UF showed no correlation to age, sex, diabetic status, transport category, creatinine clearance, Kt/V, duration on peritoneal dialysis, or duration of icodextrin use.

Conclusion

Icodextrin-related UF in APD patients is not related to demographic factors and does not increase significantly beyond 10 hours.

The Effect of Automated versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis on Mortality Risk in China

Background

There is an emerging practice pattern of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in China. We report on outcomes compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

Data were sourced from the Baxter Healthcare (China) Investment Co. Ltd Patient Support Program database, comprising an inception cohort commencing PD between 1 January 2005 and 13 August 2015. We used time-dependent cause-specific Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks (kidney transplantation, change to hemodialysis) models to estimate relative mortality risk between APD and CAPD. We adjusted or matched for age, gender, employment, insurance, primary renal disease, size of PD program, and year of dialysis inception. We used cluster robust regression to account for center effect.

Results

We modeled 100,351 subjects from 1,178 centers over 240,803 patient-years. Of these, 368 received APD at some time. Compared with patients on CAPD, those on APD were significantly younger, more likely to be male, employed, self-paying, and from larger programs. Overall, APD was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64 – 0.97) compared with CAPD in Cox proportional hazards models, and 0.76 (0.62 – 0.95) in Fine-Gray competing risks regression models. There was prominent effect modification by follow-up time: benefit was observed only up to 4 years follow-up, after which risk of death was similar.

Conclusion

Automated peritoneal dialysis is associated with an overall lower adjusted risk of death compared with CAPD in China. Analyses are limited by the likelihood of important selection bias arising from group imbalance, and residual confounding from unavailability of important clinical covariates such as comorbidity and Kt/V.

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, including neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (GDP) solutions and icodextrin, have previously been shown to favourably influence some patient-level outcomes, albeit based on generally sub-optimal quality studies. Several additional randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating biocompatible solutions in PD patients have been published recently. This is an update of a review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of biocompatible PD solutions in comparison to standard PD solutions in patients receiving PD.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register was searched up to 12 February 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs in adults and children comparing the effects of biocompatible PD solutions (neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low GDP; neutral pH, bicarbonate(± lactate)-buffered, low GDP; glucose polymer (icodextrin)) in PD were included. Studies of amino acid-based solutions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes. Summary effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

This review update included 42 eligible studies (3262 participants), including six new studies (543 participants). Overall, 29 studies (1971 participants) compared neutral pH, low GDP PD solution with conventional PD solution, and 13 studies (1291 participants) compared icodextrin with conventional PD solution. Risk of bias was assessed as high for sequence generation in three studies, allocation concealment in three studies, attrition bias in 21 studies, and selective outcome reporting bias in 16 studies.Neutral pH, low GDP versus conventional glucose PD solutionUse of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions improved residual renal function (RRF) preservation (15 studies, 835 participants: SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33; high certainty evidence). This approximated to a mean difference in glomerular filtration rate of 0.54 mL/min/1.73 m² (95% CI 0.14 to 0.93). Better preservation of RRF was evident at all follow-up durations with progressively greater preservation observed with increasing follow up duration. Neutral pH, low GDP PD solution use also improved residual urine volume preservation (11 studies, 791 participants: MD 114.37 mL/day, 95% CI 47.09 to 181.65; high certainty evidence). In low certainty evidence, neutral pH, low GDP solutions may make little or no difference to 4-hour peritoneal ultrafiltration (9 studies, 414 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.10) which approximated to a mean difference in peritoneal ultrafiltration of 69.72 mL (16.60 to 122.00 mL) lower, and may increase dialysate:plasma creatinine ratio (10 studies, 746 participants: MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03), technique failure or death compared with conventional PD solutions. It is uncertain whether neutral pH, low GDP PD solution use led to any differences in peritonitis occurrence, hospitalisation, adverse events (6 studies, 519 participants) or inflow pain (1 study, 58 participants: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.08).Glucose polymer (icodextrin) versus conventional glucose PD solutionIn moderate certainty evidence, icodextrin probably reduced episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload (2 studies, 100 participants: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) and augmented peritoneal ultrafiltration (4 studies, 102 participants: MD 448.54 mL/d, 95% CI 289.28 to 607.80) without compromising RRF (4 studies, 114 participants: SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49; low certainty evidence) which approximated to a mean creatinine clearance of 0.30 mL/min/1.73m² higher (0.65 lower to 1.23 higher) or urine output (3 studies, 69 participants: MD -88.88 mL/d, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12; low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether icodextrin use led to any differences in adverse events (5 studies, 816 participants) technique failure or death.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review strengthens evidence that neutral pH, low GDP PD solution improves RRF and urine volume preservation with high certainty. These effects may be related to increased peritoneal solute transport and reduced peritoneal ultrafiltration, although the evidence for these outcomes is of low certainty due to significant heterogeneity and suboptimal methodological quality. Icodextrin prescription increased peritoneal ultrafiltration and mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload with moderate certainty. The effects of either neutral pH, low GDP solution or icodextrin on peritonitis, technique survival and patient survival remain uncertain and require further high quality, adequately powered RCTs.

Treatment of severe ultrafiltration failure with nonglucose dialysis solutions in patients with and without peritoneal sclerosis

Introduction. Ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is a reflection of changes in the peritoneal membrane, which can include mesothelial damage, neoangiogenesis, and occasionally, peritoneal fibrosis. These structural changes are probably induced by the use of bioincompatible dialysis solutions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the treatment with a combination of nonglucose dialysis solutions in patients with severe UFF. Methods. Ten patients with UFF (net ultrafiltration <400 mL/4 h on 3.86% glucose) were treated with a combination of glycerol and icodextrin with or without amino acid-based dialysis solutions for 3 months. Four of them were diagnosed with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (PS), proven by peritoneal biopsies. Standard peritoneal permeability analyses (SPA), using 3.86% glucose, were performed, and dialysate CA125 appearance rate (AR-CA125) was analysed at the start, after 6 weeks and after 12 weeks. PS and non-PS patients were compared. Results. One patient underwent transplant after 6 weeks, one was withdrawn from PD because of clinical signs of encapsulating PS before the 3-month period ended. PS patients had been treated with PD for a longer duration than the non-PS patients (102 versus 52 months, P = 0.05), but no differences in baseline transport parameters or AR-CA125 were present. During the study, no differences were observed for transport characteristics when the results of the whole group at 6 and 12 weeks were compared to baseline. For the non-PS patients, however, a significant increase in the transcapillary ultrafiltration rate (from 2.2 mL/min to 2.6 mL/min, P < 0.05) and a decrease in the MTAC creatinine (from 14.3 mL/min to 12.6 mL/min, P < 0.05) were found after 6 weeks of glucose-free treatment. Free-water transport, measured as the maximum dip in the dialysate-to-plasma ratio of sodium and as the transport through the ultrasmall pores in the first minute, tended to improve, but this difference did not reach significance. In addition, the AR-CA125 increased significantly (from 2.8 U/min to 16.1 U/min, P < 0.05). Continued treatment did not reach statistical difference even after 3 months. No changes were observed in the PS patients. Conclusions. In the present study, an improvement of UFF in the non-PS patients was obtained by withdrawal of glucose-based dialysis solutions. The abnormalities in PS patients are probably irreversible. Early withdrawal of glucose-based dialysis solutions or at least a marked reduction in glucose exposure should be considered in UFF patients, but the identification of the patients who would benefit most needs further studies.

Pharmacologic targets and peritoneal membrane remodeling

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with functional and structural changes of the peritoneal membrane, also known as peritoneal remodeling. The peritoneal membrane is affected by many endogenous and exogenous factors such as cytokines, PD fluids, and therapeutic interventions. Here, we present an overview of various studies that have investigated pharmacologic interventions aimed at regression of peritoneal damage and prolongation of PD treatment.

Histological and clinical findings in patients with post-transplantation and classical encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a European multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) commonly presents after peritoneal dialysis has been stopped, either post-transplantation (PT-EPS) or after switching to hemodialysis (classical EPS, cEPS). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether PT-EPS and cEPS differ in morphology and clinical course.

METHODS

In this European multicenter study we included fifty-six EPS patients, retrospectively paired-matched for peritoneal dialysis (PD) duration. Twenty-eight patients developed EPS after renal transplantation, whereas the other twenty-eight patients were classical EPS patients. Demographic data, PD details, and course of disease were documented. Peritoneal biopsies of all patients were investigated using histological criteria.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients from the Netherlands and thirty-eight patients from Germany were included. Time on PD was 78(64-95) in the PT-EPS and 72(50-89) months in the cEPS group (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the morphological findings of cEPS and PT-EPS. Podoplanin positive cells were a prominent feature in both groups, but with a similar distribution of the podoplanin patterns. Time between cessation of PD to the clinical diagnosis of EPS was significantly shorter in the PT-EPS group as compared to cEPS (4(2-9) months versus 23(7-24) months, p<0.001). Peritonitis rate was significantly higher in cEPS.

CONCLUSIONS

In peritoneal biopsies PT-EPS and cEPS are not distinguishable by histomorphology and immunohistochemistry, which argues against different entities. The critical phase for PT-EPS is during the first year after transplantation and therefore earlier after PD cessation then in cEPS.

Optimizing peritoneal dialysis prescription for volume control: the importance of varying dwell time and dwell volume

Not only adequate uremic toxin removal but also volume control is essential in peritoneal dialysis (PD) to improve patient outcome. Modification of dwell time impacts on both ultrafiltration (UF) and purification. A short dwell favors UF but preferentially removes small solutes such as urea. A long dwell favors uremic toxin removal but also peritoneal fluid reabsorption due to the time-dependent loss of the crystalloid osmotic gradient. In particular, the long daytime dwell in automated PD may result in significant water and sodium reabsorption, and in such cases icodextrin should be considered. Increasing dwell volume favors the removal of solutes such as sodium due to the increased volume of diffusion and the recruitment of peritoneal surface area. A very large fill volume with too high an intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) may, however, result in back-filtration and thus reduced UF and sodium clearance. Based on these principles and the individual transport and pressure kinetics obtained from peritoneal equilibration tests and IPP measurements, we suggest combining short dwells with a low fill volume to favor UF with long dwells and a large fill volume to favor solute removal. Results from a recent randomized cross-over trial and earlier observational data in children support this concept: the absolute UF and UF relative to the administered glucose increased and solute removal and blood pressure improved.

Treatment for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) that is associated with significant morbidity including death, hospitalisation, and need to change from PD to haemodialysis. Treatment is aimed to reduce morbidity and recurrence. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of treatments for PD-associated peritonitis.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update we searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to March 2014 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, and handsearching conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the treatment of peritonitis in PD patients (adults and children). We included any study that evaluated: administration of an antibiotic by different routes (e.g. oral, intraperitoneal (IP), intravenous (IV)); dose of an antibiotic agent; different schedules of administration of antimicrobial agents; comparisons of different regimens of antimicrobial agents; any other intervention including fibrinolytic agents, peritoneal lavage and early catheter removal.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Multiple authors independently extracted data on study risk of bias and outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model. We expressed summarised treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 42 eligible studies in 2433 participants: antimicrobial agents (36 studies); urokinase (4 studies), peritoneal lavage (1 study), and IP immunoglobulin (1 study). We did not identify any optimal antibiotic agent or combination of agents. IP glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin) had uncertain effects on primary treatment response, relapse rates, and need for catheter removal compared to first generation cephalosporins, although glycopeptide regimens were more likely to achieve a complete cure (3 studies, 370 episodes: RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.72). For relapsing or persistent peritonitis, simultaneous catheter removal and replacement was better than urokinase at reducing treatment failure rates (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.91) although evidence was limited to a single small study. Continuous and intermittent IP antibiotic dosing schedules had similar treatment failure and relapse rates. IP antibiotics were superior to IV antibiotics in reducing treatment failure in one small study (RR 3.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 9.81). Longer duration treatment (21 days of IV vancomycin and IP gentamicin) had uncertain effects on risk of treatment relapse compared with 10 days treatment (1 study, 49 patients: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.95) although may have increased ototoxicity.In general, review conclusions were based on a small number of studies with few events in which risk of bias was generally high; interventions were heterogeneous, and outcome definitions were often inconsistent. There were no RCTs evaluating optimal timing of catheter removal and data for automated PD were absent.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Many of the studies evaluating treatment of PD-related peritonitis are small, out-dated, of poor quality, and had inconsistent definitions and dosing regimens. IP administration of antibiotics was superior to IV administration for treating PD-associated peritonitis and glycopeptides appear optimal for complete cure of peritonitis, although evidence for this finding was assessed as low quality. PD catheter removal may be the best treatment for relapsing or persistent peritonitis.Evidence was insufficient to identify the optimal agent, route or duration of antibiotics to treat peritonitis. No specific antibiotic appears to have superior efficacy for preventing treatment failure or relapse of peritonitis, but evidence is limited to few trials. The role of routine peritoneal lavage or urokinase is uncertain.

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of biocompatible PD solutions in comparison to standard PD solutions in patients receiving PD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (28 February 2013), through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, and handsearching conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults and children comparing the effects of biocompatible PD solutions (neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product (GDP); neutral pH, bicarbonate (± lactate)-buffered, low GDP; glucose polymer (icodextrin)) in PD were included. Studies of amino acid-based PD solutions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes (including adverse effects). The authors contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six eligible studies (2719 patients) were identified: Neutral pH, lactate-buffered/bicarbonate (± lactate)-buffered, low GDP PD solution (24); icodextrin (12). Allocation methods and concealment were generally incompletely reported, and adequate in only ten studies (27.8%). Patients lost to follow-up ranged from 0% to 83.4%. Neutral pH, low GDP versus conventional glucose PD solutionBased on generally sub-optimal quality evidence, the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions was associated with larger urine volumes at the end of the studies, up to three years of therapy duration (7 studies, 520 patients: MD 126.39 mL/d, 95% CI 26.73 to 226.05). Improved preservation of residual renal function was evident in studies with greater than 12 month follow-up (6 studies, 360 patients: SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52). There was no significant effect on peritonitis, technique failure or adverse events with the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions. Glucose polymer (icodextrin) versus conventional glucose PD solutionThere was a significant reduction in episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload (2 studies, 100 patients: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) and improvement in peritoneal ultrafiltration (4 studies, 102 patients, MD 448.54 mL/d, 95% CI 289.28 to 607.80) without compromising residual renal function (4 studies, 114 patients: SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49) or urine output (3 studies, 69 patients: MD -88.88 mL/d, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12) with icodextrin use. A comparable incidence of adverse events with the icodextrin (four studies) was reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on generally sub-optimal quality studies, use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solution led to greater urine output and higher residual renal function after use exceeded 12 months. Icodextrin prescription improved peritoneal ultrafiltration and mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload. There were no significant effects on peritonitis, technique survival, patient survival or harms identified with their use. Based on the best available evidence, the use of these 'biocompatible' PD solutions resulted in clinically relevant benefits without added risks of harm.

Impact of icodextrin on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although icodextrin has been shown to augment peritoneal ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, its impact upon other clinical end points, such as technique survival, remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated the effect of icodextrin use on patient level clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, Embase and reference lists were searched (last search 13 September 2012) for randomized controlled trials of icodextrin versus glucose in the long dwell exchange. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible trials (1222 patients) were identified. There was a significant reduction in episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload [two trials; 100 patients; relative risk (RR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.59] and improvement in peritoneal ultrafiltration [four trials; 102 patients; mean difference (MD) 448.54 mL/day, 95% CI 289.28-607.80] without compromising residual renal function [four trials; 114 patients; standardized MD (SMD) 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49] or urine output (three trials; 69 patients; MD -88.88, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12) with icodextrin use for up to 2 years. There was no significant effect on peritonitis incidence (five trials; 607 patients; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76-1.23), peritoneal creatinine clearance (three trials; 237 patients; SMD 0.36, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.96), technique failure (three trials; 290 patients; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.20), patient survival (six trials; 816 patients; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.32-2.13) or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Icodextrin prescription improved peritoneal ultrafiltration, mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload and was not associated with increased risk of adverse events. No effects of icodextrin on technique or patient survival were observed, although trial sample sizes and follow-up durations were limited.

Phenotypes of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis--macroscopic appearance, histologic findings, and outcome

BACKGROUND

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but devastating complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), with clinical signs of abdominal pain, bowel obstruction, and weight loss in late stages.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who were diagnosed with EPS between March 1998 and October 2011 in our department of nephrology. We focused on the 24 EPS patients who underwent surgery because of symptomatic late-stage EPS. We identified 3 different macroscopic phenotypes of EPS that we categorized as types I - III. We correlated histologic findings with those macroscopic phenotypes of EPS. The postoperative and long-term outcomes were evaluated by macroscopic phenotype.

RESULTS

Duration of PD was longer in type III than in types I and II EPS (p = 0.05). We observed no other statistically significant differences between the groups in baseline characteristics, except for operation time, which was longer in the type I than in the type III group (p = 0.02). Furthermore, we observed no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the onset of complaints before surgery (7.8 ± 5.9 months vs 7.0 ± 7.0 months vs 6.5 ± 5.3 months). Concerning patient outcomes, there was no evidence that any of the macroscopic EPS types was associated with more major or minor complications after surgery. For all study patients, follow-up was at least 3 years, with 19 patients still being alive, and 16 having no or very mild complaints. The typical histologic findings of EPS were present in all macroscopic types; only fibrin deposits were more prominent in type II than in type III.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe 3 subtypes of EPS based on macroscopic findings. Postoperative treatment should probably not be influenced by the macroscopic EPS phenotype. Whether the different phenotypes represent different pathophysiologic processes remains unclear and has to be further evaluated.

Role of advanced glycation endproducts and potential therapeutic interventions in dialysis patients

It has been nearly 100 years since the first published report of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) by the French chemist Maillard. Since then, our understanding of AGEs in diseased states has dramatically changed. Especially in the last 25 years, AGEs have been implicated in complications related to aging, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Although AGE formation has been well characterized by both in vitro and in vivo studies, few prospective human studies exist demonstrating the role of AGEs in patients on chronic renal replacement therapy. As the prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States rises, it is essential to identify therapeutic strategies that either delay progression to ESRD or improve morbidity and mortality in this population. This article reviews the role of AGEs, especially those of dietary origin, in ESRD patients as well as potential therapeutic anti-AGE strategies in this population.

A peritoneal dialysis regimen low in glucose and glucose degradation products results in increased cancer antigen 125 and peritoneal activation

BACKGROUND

Glucose and glucose degradation products (GDPs) in peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) are both thought to mediate progressive peritoneal worsening.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover study, incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were treated either with conventional lactate-buffered PDF (sPD regimen) or with a regimen low in glucose and GDPs: Nutrineal×1, Extraneal×1, and Physioneal×2 (NEPP regimen; all solutions: Baxter Healthcare, Utrecht, The Netherlands). After 6 months, patients were switched to the alternative regimen for another 6 months. After 6 weeks of run-in, before the switch, and at the end of the study, 4-hour peritoneal equilibration tests were performed, and overnight effluents were analyzed for cells and biomarkers. Differences between the regimens were assessed by multivariate analysis corrected for time and regimen sequence.

RESULTS

The 45 patients who completed the study were equally distributed over both groups. During NEPP treatment, D(4)/D(0) glucose was lower (p < 0.01) and D/P creatinine was higher (p = 0.04). In NEPP overnight effluent, mesothelial cells (p < 0.0001), cancer antigen 125 (p < 0.0001), hyaluronan (p < 0.0001), leukocytes (p < 0.001), interleukins 6 (p = 0.001) and 8 (p = 0.0001), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, p < 0.0001) were increased by a factor of 2-3 compared with levels in sPD effluent. The NEPP regimen was associated with higher transport parameters, but that association disappeared after the addition of VEGF to the model. The association between NEPP and higher effluent levels of VEGF could not be attributed to glucose and GDP loads.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results indicate preservation of the mesothelium and increased peritoneal activation during NEPP treatment. Whether the increase in VEGF reflects an increase in mesothelial cell mass or whether it points to another, undesirable mechanism cannot be determined from the present study. Longitudinal studies are needed to finally evaluate the usefulness of the NEPP regimen for further clinical use.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) with a 50% mortality rate. EPS is characterized by progressive and excessive fibrotic thickening of the peritoneum, leading to encapsulation of the bowels and intestinal obstruction. At present, EPS cannot be detected with certainty during its early stages; however, a progressive loss of ultrafiltration capacity often precedes its development. Studies that attempted to elucidate the pathogenesis of EPS have shown that the duration of exposure to PD fluids is the most important risk factor for EPS, and that young age and possibly the effects of peritonitis are additional contributory factors. The pathophysiology of EPS is probably best described as a multiple-hit process with a central role for transforming growth factor β. A form of EPS that develops shortly after kidney transplantation has also been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, and may be a common form of EPS in countries with a high transplantation rate. Criteria have been developed to identify EPS by abdominal CT scan at the symptomatic stage, but further clinical research is needed to identify early EPS in asymptomatic patients, to clarify additional risk factors for EPS and to define optimal treatment strategies.

Comparison of icodextrin and glucose solutions for long dwell exchange in peritoneal dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Icodextrin is widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, the safety and efficacy of icodextrin are unclear. In the present study, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared icodextrin and glucose for the once-daily long dwell in PD.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to select all eligible studies. Eligible studies, as determined by consensus using predefined criteria, were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard form.

RESULTS

In the 9 RCTs that were identified, patients using icodextrin were found to have much greater net ultrafiltration (UF) and a lower incidence of negative net UF compared to patients using 1.5%, 2.5%, and 4.25% glucose solutions. Additionally, icodextrin has a markedly increased UF efficiency ratio and peritoneal clearance of creatinine and urea nitrogen, but residual renal function was not different from patients using glucose solutions for PD. No significant differences were observed between icodextrin and glucose groups with respect to risk of mortality, peritonitis, and total adverse events. Although rashes occurred significantly more often in icodextrin groups, few differences were noted between icodextrin and glucose groups when withdrawal rates secondary to adverse events were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that icodextrin provides patients with greater fluid removal and small solute clearance and does not cause any damage to residual renal function. Icodextrin is particularly appropriate for use in patients with high peritoneal transport status.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in peritoneal dialysis: is what is good for the kidney also good for the peritoneum?

Morphological changes of the peritoneal membrane that occur over time among patients on peritoneal dialysis include fibrosis and neoangiogenesis. While the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying these changes are not fully understood, the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) may have an important role. Components of the RAAS are constitutively expressed within peritoneal mesothelial cells, and are upregulated in the presence of acute inflammation and chronic exposure to peritoneal dialysate. The high glucose concentration, low pH, and the presence of glucose degradation products in peritoneal dialysis solutions have all been implicated in modulation of peritoneal RAAS. Furthermore, activation of the RAAS, as well as the downstream production of transforming growth factor-beta, contributes to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation of mesothelial cells, resulting in progressive fibrosis of the peritoneal membrane. This process also leads to increased vascular endothelial growth factor production, which promotes peritoneal neoangiogenesis. Functionally, these changes translate into reduced ultrafiltration capacity of the peritoneal membrane, which is an important cause of technique failure among patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis. This brief review will describe our current state of knowledge about the role of peritoneal RAAS in peritoneal membrane damage and potential strategies to protect the membrane.

Analytical Interferences in Point-of-Care Testing Glucometers by Icodextrin and its Metabolites: An Overview

Current point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers are based on various test principles. Two major method groups dominate the market: glucose oxidase-based systems and glucose dehydrogenase-based systems using pyrroloquinoline quinone (GDH-PQQ) as a cofactor. The GDH-PQQ-based glucometers are replacing the older glucose oxidase-based systems because of their lower sensitivity for oxygen. On the other hand, the GDH-PQQ test method results in falsely elevated blood glucose levels in peritoneal dialysis patients receiving solutions containing icodextrin ( e.g., Extraneal; Baxter, Brussels, Belgium). Icodextrin is metabolized in the systemic circulation into different glucose polymers, but mainly maltose, which interferes with the GDH-PQQ-based method. Clinicians should be aware of this analytical interference. The POCT glucometers based on the GDH-PQQ method should preferably not be used in this high-risk population and POCT glucose results inconsistent with clinical suspicion of hypoglycemic coma should be retested with another testing system.

Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes after Peritonitis-Related Technique Failure

Background

Peritonitis is the leading cause of technique failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Some patients experience recurrent ascites, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS), and even death after catheter removal. Little is known, however, about the risk factors for such complications.

Methods

The study subjects were 117 patients that had their PD catheter removed due to peritonitis between January 2000 and June 2006. Biochemical and clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood and effluent white blood cell counts (WBC) were measured at baseline and at 72 hours of peritonitis. Based on adverse outcomes, patients were classified into 4 groups: non-complication (NC; n = 73), recurrent ascites (A; n = 26), EPS (E; n = 10), and death directly related to peritonitis (D; n = 8).

Results

Age at PD catheter removal was significantly higher in D group compared to NC group (62.0 ± 10.6 vs 51.2 ± 11.5 years, p < 0.05). In addition, mean PD duration was significantly longer in E group compared to NC and A groups (130.5 ± 48.1 vs 58.8 ± 42.4 vs 74.8 ± 47.4 months, p < 0.01). Compared to baseline, effluent WBC was significantly decreased in NC group after 72 hours of peritonitis. In addition, serum CRP level was significantly decreased in NC and A groups, whereas it was significantly increased in D group. Multivariate analyses adjusted for age, PD duration, blood and effluent WBC, serum CRP, and micro-organisms revealed that serum CRP level at 72 hours predicted significantly the development of EPS [odds ratio (OR) 1.15, p < 0.05] and peritonitis-related death (OR 1.18, p < 0.01). In addition, PD duration (per 1 month increase: OR 1.03, p < 0.05) and age at PD catheter removal (per 1 year increase: OR 1.11, p < 0.05) were identified as significant determinants of EPS and peritonitis-related death respectively. Only effluent WBC at 72 hours was significantly associated with the development of ascites (OR 1.27, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Older patients with long PD duration and those with persistently elevated serum CRP levels were likely to develop complications after peritonitis-related technique failure. Our study suggests that serial measurement of CRP may be helpful in predicting the development of complications after PD catheter removal.

Comparison of icodextrin- and glucose-based peritoneal dialysis fluids in their acute and chronic effects on human peritoneal mesothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) display several features that may potentially improve their biocompatibility compared to conventional glucose-containing solutions. So far, however, the studies assessing the biocompatibility profile of icodextrin toward human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) has produced mixed results. The present study was performed to examine the acute and chronic impact of icodextrin on HPMC in vitro in comparison with standard glucose-based PDF.

METHODS

Omentum-derived HPMC were either acutely pre-exposed to or incubated chronically (for up to 10 days) in the presence of icodextrin-PDF. Parallel cultures were treated with conventional PDFs containing either 1.5% or 4.25% glucose. All fluids were tested at neutral pH. HPMC were assessed for viability, proliferation, IL-6 secretion and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

RESULTS

Incubation in the presence of icodextrin-PDF significantly reduced HPMC proliferation in a manner similar to that of 1.5% glucose-PDF. In addition, exposure to icodextrin-PDF impaired viability and IL-6 release from HPMC. This effect occurred both after the short pre-treatment with neat icodextrin-PDF for 1-4 hours and after prolonged incubation (up to 10 days) in media supplemented with icodextrin-PDF (1:1). The dysfunction of icodextrin-treated HPMC was of the magnitude that was between the effects exerted by 1.5%- and 4.25%-glucose PDF. Furthermore, exposure of HPMC to icodextrin-PDF induced a dose-dependent increase in ROS generation which was comparable to that produced by 1.5%-glucose PDF.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to icodextrin-PDF may impair viability and function of HPMC. The detrimental effects of icodextrin-PDF are at least as serious as those produced by conventional heat-sterilized low glucose-based PDF.

Relationship Between Effluent Levels of ?2-Microglobulin and Peritoneal Injury Markers in 7.5% Icodextrin-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Solution

The removal of low molecular weight proteins such as beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)MG) is accelerated by using a 7.5% icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis solution (ICO) dwell. To examine the possibility of peritoneal injury in ICO, we investigated the relationship between beta(2)MG and the injury markers in effluent. Sixteen ICO-treated patients (11 male and five female, mean age 50.1 +/- 10.9 years) with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD; mean duration 54.6 +/- 30.8 months) were studied. The patients were treated with ICO 2 L and 2.27% glucose-based solution 2 L for an 8-h dwell and the effluent was collected. We investigated the correlations between beta(2)MG and the injury markers (e.g. hyaluronic acid [HA], interleukin-6 [IL-6], matrix metalloproteinase-2 [MMP-2]) in each effluent sample. The beta(2)MG level in the ICO effluent was 8978 +/- 2431 microg/L, significantly higher than in the 2.27% glucose-based solution effluent (6454 +/- 2956 microg/L; P = 0.0032). The levels of HA and MMP-2 in ICO effluent were significantly higher than those in the 2.27% glucose-based solution effluent (P = 0.00214, P = 0.0113, respectively). There was a trend toward higher IL-6-values in ICO effluent, although no significant differences were seen. There were positive correlations between levels of various injury markers and beta(2)MG. We propose that the subclinical injury of the peritoneum by ICO treatment may accelerate peritoneal permeability to increase beta(2)MG in effluent. ICO's biocompatibility might not be superior to that of glucose-based solution.

Effects of icodextrin on glycemic and lipid profiles in diabetic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

AIM

Icodextrin reduces glucose absorption from the peritoneal dialysate. We conducted this prospective, open-labeled, multicenter study to determine the effects of icodextrin on glycemic and lipid parameters in diabetic patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) or automated PD.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from 15 institutions in Japan, and a total of 51 patients (15 women and 36 men, mean age: 59 +/- 10 years, median duration of PD: 13 months) were enrolled. The patients were administered an overnight or daytime dwell of 1.5 or 2.0 l of 7.5% icodextrin-containing solution. At baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the start of icodextrin, nonfasting blood was drawn for measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and serum lipids.

RESULTS

During icodextrin treatment, there was no change in overall HbA1C levels compared to baseline values; however, for those with baseline HbA1C > or =6.5% (n = 22), significant decreases in HbA1C were observed. Mean total/LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were decreased significantly during icodextrin treatment, with greater decreases for patients with baseline total cholesterol > or =220 mg/dl, LDL cholesterol > or =120 mg/dl or triglycerides > or =150 mg/dl. HDL cholesterol did not differ at any time point; however, values for patients with baseline HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dl tended to increase with marginal significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, switching from glucose-containing dialysis solution to icodextrin resulted in improved lipid profiles and possibly a favorable metabolic profile, particularly in patients with poor glycemic control. These hypotheses remain to be proven in controlled clinical trials.

Recommendations for the use of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis patients

Icodextrin is a starch-derived, high molecular weight glucose polymer, which has been shown to promote sustained ultrafiltration equivalent to that achieved with hypertonic (3.86%/4.25%) glucose exchanges during prolonged intraperitoneal dwells (up to 16 h). Patients with impaired ultrafiltration, particularly in the settings of acute peritonitis, high transporter status and diabetes mellitus, appear to derive the greatest benefit from icodextrin with respect to augmentation of dialytic fluid removal, amelioration of symptomatic fluid retention and possible prolongation of technique survival. Glycaemic control is also improved by substituting icodextrin for hypertonic glucose exchanges in diabetic patients. Preliminary in vitro and ex vivo studies suggest that icodextrin demonstrates greater peritoneal membrane biocompatibility than glucose-based dialysates, but these findings need to be confirmed by long-term clinical studies. This paper reviews the available clinical evidence pertaining to the safety and efficacy of icodextrin and makes recommendations for its use in peritonal dialysis.

Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis

Icodextrin (Extraneal) is a high molecular weight glucose polymer developed specifically for use as an alternative osmotic agent to dextrose during the once-daily long-dwell exchange in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Isosmotic 7.5% icodextrin solution induces transcapillary ultrafiltration (UF) by a mechanism resembling 'colloid' osmosis (unlike hyper-osmolar dextrose-based solutions, which induce UF by crystalline osmosis). In addition, absorption of icodextrin from the peritoneal cavity is relatively slow compared with that of dextrose; this results not only in UF of longer duration, but also a lower carbohydrate load compared with medium (2.5%) and strong (4.25%) dextrose exchanges. In randomised clinical trials of up to 2 years in duration, administration of icodextrin for the long (8- to 16-hour) overnight exchange in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or daytime exchange in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) produced net UF which exceeded that with 1.5% and 2.5% dextrose solutions (thereby improving fluid balance), and was equivalent to that with 4.25% dextrose solution. Icodextrin also increased peritoneal clearances of creatinine and urea nitrogen compared with 2.5% dextrose solution. The increase in UF volume with icodextrin was enhanced in CAPD patients with high peritoneal membrane permeability (i.e. high and high-average transporters), maintained in the small number of patients followed-up for 2 years and sustained during episodes of peritonitis. Icodextrin reduced the percentage of patients with net negative UF in contrast to 1.5% and 2.5% dextrose and, in noncomparative studies, extended PD technique survival in patients who had failed dextrose-based dialysis. The use of icodextrin was also associated with some symptomatic improvements and health-related quality of life advantages, and no adverse effect on patient survival, compared with dextrose, although confirmation of these findings is ideally required in appropriately designed studies. The tolerability of icodextrin was generally similar to that of dextrose-based solutions in controlled clinical trials, although there was an approximate three-fold increase in the risk of new skin rash (5.5% vs 1.7%). However, reports of severe cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions remain rare; this possibility should not preclude the use of the polymer.

CONCLUSION

7.5% icodextrin solution offers the first feasible alternative to conventional dextrose solutions for the once-daily long-dwell exchange in PD. It is effective, generally well tolerated and appears to be most useful in situations of reduced or inadequate UF with dextrose, including in high and high-average transporters, during episodes of peritonitis and patients who have failed dextrose-based dialysis.

Peritoneal Ultrafiltration and Serum Icodextrin Concentration during Dialysis with 7.5% Icodextrin Solution in Japanese Patients

♦ Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of icodextrin in Japanese patients and to investigate the relationship between net ultrafiltration (UF) during the long dwell and plasma oligosaccharides.

♦ Design

Open-labeled clinical trial involving patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) receiving icodextrin during the 12-hour long dwell for 6 weeks, preceded by and followed by a 2-week baseline period and a follow-up period during which 1.36% glucose was used for the 8-hour long dwell.

♦ Setting

A prospective, randomized multicenter study done in tertiary medical centers.

♦ Patients

18 stable patients on CAPD for 3 months or longer.

♦ Main Outcomes Measures

Net UF (in milliliters), UF rate (in milliliters per hour), plasma oligosaccharides, serum osmolarity (in milliosmoles per liter), peritoneal absorption of icodextrin, and peritoneal clearances of icodextrin, creatinine, and urea were assessed. Adverse events, laboratory findings, and vital signs were also monitored.

♦ Results

Long-dwell net UF (544.4 ± 96.7 mL at day 3, p < 0.001; 309.4 ± 60.7 mL at week 4, p < 0.001; and 391.7 ± 61.1 mL at week 6, p< 0.001) and UF rate (48.2 ± 38.8 mL/hour at day 3, p < 0.001; 26.9 ± 22.1 mL/hr at week 4, p < 0.002; and 35.3 ± 22.9 mL/hr at week 6, p = 0.0002) were significantly greater during the icodextrin period than at baseline (-25.9 ± 46.0 mL and -2.2 ± 22.1 mL/hr, respectively). Plasma oligosaccharides reached steady state within 2 weeks, remained stable during the treatment period, and returned to baseline level 2 weeks after discontinuation of icodextrin. Serum osmolarity increased during the use of icodextrin by approximately 5 mOsm/L. No statistically significant relationship was found between plasma oligosaccharides and net UF. Peritoneal absorption of icodextrin (36.3% ± 5.1% at day 3,42.2% ± 5.9% at week 4, and 38.0% ± 6.3% at week 6) and peritoneal clearance of icodextrin (10.1 mL/minute at day 3,10.1 mL/min at week 4, and 10.3 mL/min at week 6) showed no major change over time. Serum sodium and serum chloride both decreased by 5 mEq/L with icodextrin but remained within the normal range during the treatment period and returned to baseline levels immediately after discontinuation. No serious adverse events were observed during the study.

♦ Conclusion

The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that an increased blood oligosaccharide level and the concomitant elevation in serum osmolarity have a negative impact on peritoneal UF. Therefore, the increase in plasma oligosaccharides appears to be too small to be of clinical significance.

Solutions for APD: special considerations

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has become the fastest growing dialysis modality in Europe and the United States in recent years. Freedom from daytime exchanges, flexibility of prescription, performance in recumbent position leading to enhanced treatment efficacy, and a decreased incidence of peritonitis are the main advantages of APD over CAPD. Studies on new developments of glucose-based PD fluids were performed predominantly in CAPD patients. High volumes and frequent APD cycles in patients may aggravate the adverse effects of standard CAPD fluids on the peritoneal membrane with increasing time on PD. New, glucose-based PD fluids with neutral pH, very low concentrations of glucose degradation products (GDPs), containing either lactate or bicarbonate as buffering substances have been introduced into clinical use recently. With these new fluids, various in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies could demonstrate a better preservation of peritoneal cell viability and growth, less inhibited secretory cell functions, a significant reduction in the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and clinical signs for an improved preservation of peritoneal mesothelial cells indicated by an increase in effluent CA125. One has to be aware, however, that uremia per se prior to initiation of PD, as well as during PD treatment itself, directly impacts on peritoneal membrane structural changes so that new, more biocompatible PD fluids may not be completely sufficient to prevent morphologic and functional changes of the membrane. Due to a strong sodium sieving during APD, PD fluids with sodium concentrations of 125-130 mmol/L may be beneficial. Systematic calcium kinetic studies have not yet been performed in APD patients. APD fluids should offer a calcium concentration range of 1.0-1.75 mmol/L in order to enable an individualized APD prescription. For long-term APD treatment, better knowledge of peritoneal membrane physiology and PD kinetics should promote individualization of prescriptions. New, pH-neutral PD solutions with minimized amounts of GDPs may be a significant step forward to improved membrane preservation during long-term APD treatment.