The impact of amino acid dialysate on anthropometric measures in adult patients on peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucose-containing dialysate underpins peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. However, its use is associated with amino acid loss in the dialysis effluent, a risk factor for protein-energy wasting (PEW) in PD patients. Amino acid-based dialysis solutions (AAD) may ameliorate this loss. However, the evidence of clinical benefit in preventing PEW is unclear. The aim of this review was to assess the effect of AAD versus standard dialysis solutions (STD) on anthropometric measures and serum albumin.

METHODS

Studies up until 30 September 2020 were identified from databases including MEDLINE and Embase, using a prespecified protocol (PROSPERO - CRD42020209581). Studies evaluating adults on PD were included. Data pertaining to muscle mass (primary outcome), other anthropometric measures and serum albumin were extracted. A meta-analysis of the eligible studies was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 6945 abstracts were reviewed, from which 14 studies (9 randomised and 5 non-randomised) were included. There was no significant difference in any of the anthropometric measures, between AAD and STD during follow-up. Serum albumin at 6 months was statistically lower with AAD compared to STD [mean difference = -0.89 (95%CI -1.77 to -0.01, p = 0.046)]. The quality of evidence was graded low for each outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

AAD may not alter anthropometric measures when compared to STD. The impact on serum albumin is uncertain, with an estimated difference that is unlikely to be of clinical value. These findings should be cautiously interpreted due to low quality of the evidence. Robust studies are needed to address the limitations in evidence.

Aging of the Peritoneal Dialysis Membrane

Long-term peritoneal dialysis as currently performed, causes structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal dialysis membrane. This decay is brought about by the continuous exposure to commercially available glucose-based dialysis solutions. This review summarizes our knowledge on the peritoneum in the initial phase of PD, during the first 2 years and the alterations in function and morphology in long-term PD patients. The pseudohypoxia hypothesis is discussed and how this glucose-induced condition can be used to explain all peritoneal alterations in long-term PD patients. Special attention is paid to the upregulation of hypoxia inducing factor-1 and the subsequent stimulation of the genes coding for glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) and the growth factors transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), plasminogen growth factor activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). It is argued that increased pseudohypoxia-induced expression of GLUT-1 in interstitial fibroblasts is the key factor in a vicious circle that augments ultrafiltration failure. The practical use of the protein transcripts of the upregulated growth factors in peritoneal dialysis effluent is considered. The available and developing options for prevention and treatment are examined. It is concluded that low glucose degradation products/neutral pH, bicarbonate buffered solutions with a combination of various osmotic agents all in low concentration, are currently the best achievable options, while other accompanying measures like the use of RAAS inhibitors and tamoxifen may be valuable. Emerging developments include the addition of alanyl glutamine to the dialysis solution and perhaps the use of nicotinamide mononucleotide, available as nutritional supplement.

Acquired Decline in Ultrafiltration in Peritoneal Dialysis: The Role of Glucose

Ultrafiltration is essential in peritoneal dialysis (PD) for maintenance of euvolemia, making ultrafiltration insufficiency-preferably called ultrafiltration failure-an important complication. The mechanisms of ultrafiltration and ultrafiltration failure are more complex than generally assumed, especially after long-term treatment. Initially, ultrafiltration failure is mainly explained by a large number of perfused peritoneal microvessels, leading to a rapid decline of the crystalloid osmotic gradient, thereby decreasing aquaporin-mediated free water transport. The contribution of peritoneal interstitial tissue to ultrafiltration failure is limited during the first few years of PD, but becomes more important in long-term PD due to the development of interstitial fibrosis, which mainly consists of myofibroblasts. A dual hypothesis has been developed to explain why the continuous exposure of peritoneal tissues to the extremely high dialysate glucose concentrations causes progressive ultrafiltration decline. First, glucose absorption causes an increase of the intracellular NADH/NAD⁺ ratio, also called pseudohypoxia. Intracellular hypoxia stimulates myofibroblasts to produce profibrotic and angiogenetic factors, and the glucose transporter GLUT-1. Second, the increased GLUT-1 expression by myofibroblasts increases glucose uptake in these cells, leading to a reduction of the osmotic gradient for ultrafiltration. Reduction of peritoneal glucose exposure to prevent this vicious circle is essential for high-quality, long-term PD.

How to Improve the Biocompatibility of Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions (without Jeopardizing the Patient's Health)

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important, if underprescribed, modality for the treatment of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Among the barriers to its wider use are the deleterious effects of currently commercially available glucose-based PD solutions on the morphological integrity and function of the peritoneal membrane due to fibrosis. This is primarily driven by hyperglycaemia due to its effects, through multiple cytokine and transcription factor signalling-and their metabolic sequelae-on the synthesis of collagen and other extracellular membrane components. In this review, we outline these interactions and explore how novel PD solution formulations are aimed at utilizing this knowledge to minimise the complications associated with fibrosis, while maintaining adequate rates of ultrafiltration across the peritoneal membrane and preservation of patient urinary volumes. We discuss the development of a new generation of reduced-glucose PD solutions that employ a variety of osmotically active constituents and highlight the biochemical rationale underlying optimization of oxidative metabolism within the peritoneal membrane. They are aimed at achieving optimal clinical outcomes and improving the whole-body metabolic profile of patients, particularly those who are glucose-intolerant, insulin-resistant, or diabetic, and for whom daily exposure to high doses of glucose is contraindicated.

The osmo-metabolic approach: a novel and tantalizing glucose-sparing strategy in peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a viable but under-prescribed treatment for uremic patients. Concerns about its use include the bio-incompatibility of PD fluids, due to their potential for altering the functional and anatomical integrity of the peritoneal membrane. Many of these effects are thought to be due to the high glucose content of these solutions, with attendant issues of products generated during heat treatment of glucose-containing solutions. Moreover, excessive intraperitoneal absorption of glucose from the dialysate has many potential systemic metabolic effects. This article reviews the efforts to develop alternative PD solutions that obviate some of these side effects, through the replacement of part of their glucose content with other osmolytes which are at least as efficient in removing fluids as glucose, but less impactful on patient metabolism. In particular, we will summarize clinical studies on the use of alternative osmotic ingredients that are commercially available (icodextrin and amino acids) and preclinical studies on alternative solutions under development (taurine, polyglycerol, carnitine and xylitol). In addition to the expected benefit of a glucose-sparing approach, we describe an ‘osmo-metabolic’ approach in formulating novel PD solutions, in which there is the possibility of exploiting the pharmaco-metabolic properties of some of the osmolytes to attenuate the systemic side effects due to glucose. This approach has the potential to ameliorate pre-existing co-morbidities, including insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes, which have a high prevalence in the dialysis population, including in PD patients.

Impact of Glucose in Peritoneal Dialysis: Saint or Sinner?

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions using glucose as osmotic agent have been used for more than two decades as effective treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although alternative osmotic agents such as amino acids and macromolecular solutions, including polypeptides and glucose polymers, are now available, glucose is still the most widely used osmotic agent in PD. It has been shown to be safe, effective, readily metabolized, and inexpensive. On the other hand, it is widely assumed that exposure of the peritoneal membrane to high glucose concentrations contributes to both structural and functional changes in the dialyzed peritoneal membrane. As in diabetes, glucose, either directly or indirectly through the generation of glucose degradation products or the formation of advanced glycation end products, may contribute to peritoneal membrane failure. Although efforts to reduce glucose toxicity have been made for years, only a few suggestions, such as dual-bag systems with bicarbonate as buffer system, have found broader acceptance. Recently, some interesting new approaches to the problem of glucose-related toxicity have been made, but further investigations will be necessary before they can be used clinically. This review will focus on adverse effects of glucose in PD solutions and summarize different aspects of glucotoxicity and potential therapeutic interventions.

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, including neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (GDP) solutions and icodextrin, have previously been shown to favourably influence some patient-level outcomes, albeit based on generally sub-optimal quality studies. Several additional randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating biocompatible solutions in PD patients have been published recently. This is an update of a review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of biocompatible PD solutions in comparison to standard PD solutions in patients receiving PD.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register was searched up to 12 February 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs in adults and children comparing the effects of biocompatible PD solutions (neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low GDP; neutral pH, bicarbonate(± lactate)-buffered, low GDP; glucose polymer (icodextrin)) in PD were included. Studies of amino acid-based solutions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes. Summary effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

This review update included 42 eligible studies (3262 participants), including six new studies (543 participants). Overall, 29 studies (1971 participants) compared neutral pH, low GDP PD solution with conventional PD solution, and 13 studies (1291 participants) compared icodextrin with conventional PD solution. Risk of bias was assessed as high for sequence generation in three studies, allocation concealment in three studies, attrition bias in 21 studies, and selective outcome reporting bias in 16 studies.Neutral pH, low GDP versus conventional glucose PD solutionUse of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions improved residual renal function (RRF) preservation (15 studies, 835 participants: SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33; high certainty evidence). This approximated to a mean difference in glomerular filtration rate of 0.54 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.93). Better preservation of RRF was evident at all follow-up durations with progressively greater preservation observed with increasing follow up duration. Neutral pH, low GDP PD solution use also improved residual urine volume preservation (11 studies, 791 participants: MD 114.37 mL/day, 95% CI 47.09 to 181.65; high certainty evidence). In low certainty evidence, neutral pH, low GDP solutions may make little or no difference to 4-hour peritoneal ultrafiltration (9 studies, 414 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.10) which approximated to a mean difference in peritoneal ultrafiltration of 69.72 mL (16.60 to 122.00 mL) lower, and may increase dialysate:plasma creatinine ratio (10 studies, 746 participants: MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03), technique failure or death compared with conventional PD solutions. It is uncertain whether neutral pH, low GDP PD solution use led to any differences in peritonitis occurrence, hospitalisation, adverse events (6 studies, 519 participants) or inflow pain (1 study, 58 participants: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.08).Glucose polymer (icodextrin) versus conventional glucose PD solutionIn moderate certainty evidence, icodextrin probably reduced episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload (2 studies, 100 participants: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) and augmented peritoneal ultrafiltration (4 studies, 102 participants: MD 448.54 mL/d, 95% CI 289.28 to 607.80) without compromising RRF (4 studies, 114 participants: SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49; low certainty evidence) which approximated to a mean creatinine clearance of 0.30 mL/min/1.73m2 higher (0.65 lower to 1.23 higher) or urine output (3 studies, 69 participants: MD -88.88 mL/d, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12; low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether icodextrin use led to any differences in adverse events (5 studies, 816 participants) technique failure or death.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review strengthens evidence that neutral pH, low GDP PD solution improves RRF and urine volume preservation with high certainty. These effects may be related to increased peritoneal solute transport and reduced peritoneal ultrafiltration, although the evidence for these outcomes is of low certainty due to significant heterogeneity and suboptimal methodological quality. Icodextrin prescription increased peritoneal ultrafiltration and mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload with moderate certainty. The effects of either neutral pH, low GDP solution or icodextrin on peritonitis, technique survival and patient survival remain uncertain and require further high quality, adequately powered RCTs.

"Biocompatible" Neutral pH Low-GDP Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions: Much Ado About Nothing?

Adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD), including PD related infections, the loss of residual kidney function (RKF), and longitudinal, deleterious changes in peritoneal membrane function continue to limit the long-term success of PD therapy. The observation that these deleterious changes occur upon exposure to conventional glucose-based PD solutions fuels the search for a more biocompatible PD solution. The development of a novel PD solution with a neutral pH, and lower in glucose degradation products (GDPs) compared to its conventional predecessors has been labeled a "biocompatible" solution. While considerable evidence in support of these novel solutions' biocompatibility has emerged from cell culture and animal studies, the clinical benefits as compared to conventional PD solutions are less clear. Neutral pH low GDP (NpHLGDP) PD solutions appear to be effective in reducing infusion pain, but their effects on other clinical endpoints including peritoneal membrane function, preservation of RKF, PD-related infections, and technique and patient survival are less clear. The literature is limited by studies characterized by relatively few patients, short follow-up time, heterogeneity with regards to the novel PD solution type under study, and the different patient populations under study. Nonetheless, the search for a more biocompatible PD solution continues with emerging data on promising non glucose-based solutions.

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of biocompatible PD solutions in comparison to standard PD solutions in patients receiving PD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (28 February 2013), through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, and handsearching conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults and children comparing the effects of biocompatible PD solutions (neutral pH, lactate-buffered, low glucose degradation product (GDP); neutral pH, bicarbonate (± lactate)-buffered, low GDP; glucose polymer (icodextrin)) in PD were included. Studies of amino acid-based PD solutions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes (including adverse effects). The authors contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six eligible studies (2719 patients) were identified: Neutral pH, lactate-buffered/bicarbonate (± lactate)-buffered, low GDP PD solution (24); icodextrin (12). Allocation methods and concealment were generally incompletely reported, and adequate in only ten studies (27.8%). Patients lost to follow-up ranged from 0% to 83.4%. Neutral pH, low GDP versus conventional glucose PD solutionBased on generally sub-optimal quality evidence, the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions was associated with larger urine volumes at the end of the studies, up to three years of therapy duration (7 studies, 520 patients: MD 126.39 mL/d, 95% CI 26.73 to 226.05). Improved preservation of residual renal function was evident in studies with greater than 12 month follow-up (6 studies, 360 patients: SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52). There was no significant effect on peritonitis, technique failure or adverse events with the use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solutions. Glucose polymer (icodextrin) versus conventional glucose PD solutionThere was a significant reduction in episodes of uncontrolled fluid overload (2 studies, 100 patients: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59) and improvement in peritoneal ultrafiltration (4 studies, 102 patients, MD 448.54 mL/d, 95% CI 289.28 to 607.80) without compromising residual renal function (4 studies, 114 patients: SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.49) or urine output (3 studies, 69 patients: MD -88.88 mL/d, 95% CI -356.88 to 179.12) with icodextrin use. A comparable incidence of adverse events with the icodextrin (four studies) was reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on generally sub-optimal quality studies, use of neutral pH, low GDP PD solution led to greater urine output and higher residual renal function after use exceeded 12 months. Icodextrin prescription improved peritoneal ultrafiltration and mitigated uncontrolled fluid overload. There were no significant effects on peritonitis, technique survival, patient survival or harms identified with their use. Based on the best available evidence, the use of these 'biocompatible' PD solutions resulted in clinically relevant benefits without added risks of harm.

[Guidelines for specialized nutritional and metabolic support in the critically-ill patient. Update. Consensus of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units-Spanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SEMICYUC-SENPE): acute renal failure]

Nutritional support in acute renal failure must take into account the patient's catabolism and the treatment of the renal failure. Hypermetabolic failure is common in these patients, requiring continuous renal replacement therapy or daily hemodialysis. In patients with normal catabolism (urea nitrogen below 10 g/day) and preserved diuresis, conservative treatment can be attempted. In these patients, relatively hypoproteic nutritional support is essential, using proteins with high biological value and limiting fluid and electrolyte intake according to the patient's individual requirements. Micronutrient intake should be adjusted, the only buffering agent used being bicarbonate. Limitations on fluid, electrolyte and nitrogen intake no longer apply when extrarenal clearance techniques are used but intake of these substances should be modified according to the type of clearance. Depending on their hemofiltration flow, continuous renal replacement systems require high daily nitrogen intake, which can sometimes reach 2.5 g protein/kg. The amount of volume replacement can induce energy overload and therefore the use of glucose-free replacement fluids and glucose-free dialysis or a glucose concentration of 1 g/L, with bicarbonate as a buffer, is recommended. Monitoring of electrolyte levels (especially those of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium) and of micronutrients is essential and administration of these substances should be individually-tailored.

The Effect of Weather on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Prescription: Seasonal Variation in PD Dialysate Utilization

♦ Background

There have been no reports on peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution utilization since this treatment was developed in the 1920s. The aim of the present investigation was to investigate if weather affects PD prescription.

♦ Study Design and Methods

This 10-year observational study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Setting and Participants: Claims for different concentrate PD dialysate were analyzed monthly. 2.5% and 4.25% PD solutes were defined as hypertonic solutions. Predictor: Monthly outdoor mean temperature. Outcome and Measurement: The relationship between monthly mean of PD dialysate utilization and monthly outdoor temperature was analyzed by linear regression. Monthly mean PD dialysate utilization amount in 4 quarters was analyzed by ANOVA.

♦ Results

During the 10-year study period, a clear seasonal variation in PD dialysate was observed. This seasonal variation was present regardless of age, gender, and the presence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Monthly mean temperature was positively correlated to 1.5% dialysate utilization amount ( r = 0.559, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated to 2.5% ( r = –0.533, p < 0.001) and 4.25% ( r= –0.410, p < 0.001) dialysate utilization amount. In longitudinal follow-up, hypertonic PD fluid utilization was higher in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients from the beginning of treatment. Thereafter, it increased rapidly and reached a plateau within 1 year. Limitations: Analysis of ultrafiltration amount, blood pressure, and body weight was unfeasible due to the nature of the database.

♦ Conclusions

The utilization of differential strengths of PD solutions has a seasonal cyclic pattern, with more hypertonic PD solution utilized in winter and more hypotonic PD solution in summer.

The effects of a dialysis solution with a combination of glycerol/amino acids/dextrose on the peritoneal membrane in chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) with conventional glucose based, lactate-buffered PD fluids may lead to morphological and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane. It was hypothesized that long-term exposure to a different buffer and a mixture of osmotic agents would cause less peritoneal abnormality.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of long-term exposure to a bicarbonate/lactate-buffered dialysis solution with a mixture of osmotic agents: glycerol 1.4%, amino acids 0.5%, and dextrose 1.1% (= 1% glucose) (GLAD) in a rat model with chronic kidney failure.

METHODS

All rats underwent a peritoneal catheter implantation and a 70% nephrectomy. Thereafter, the rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: GLAD, 3.86% Dianeal (Baxter, Nivelles, Belgium), and buffer (Physioneal without glucose, Baxter). All rats were infused daily for 16 weeks with the appropriate PD fluid. Afterwards, a peritoneal permeability analysis (SPARa) was performed using 3.86% Physioneal in all groups. After the SPARa, the rats were sacrificed to obtain tissue samples for morphometric determinations. Omental tissue was stained with picro Sirius red for assessment of fibrosis and with CD31 for vessel density.

RESULTS

GLAD and Dianeal showed faster small solute transport compared to the hypotonic buffer. No differences between the groups were present in ultrafiltration. Dianeal had the lowest value for free water transport and the highest protein clearances. Total triglyceride in plasma was not different between GLAD and the buffer. Vessel density after GLAD exposure (20 V/F) was very similar to the value found for the buffer solution (17 V/F); Dianeal caused a significantly higher value (35 V/F, p < 0.01). Also, the amount of fibrosis was higher in the Dianeal-exposed rats (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Both hypertonic dialysis solutions increased peritoneal solute transport. GLAD exposure was associated with the best preservation of peritoneal morphology. The results of GLAD were very similar to those of the bicarbonate/lactate-buffered solution without osmotic agents. Studies in humans are needed for further assessment of GLAD.

Simulating inadequate dialysis and its correction using an individualized patient-derived nomogram

Optimization of the peritoneal dialysis prescription is dependent on proper characterization of the peritoneal membrane, as obtained by the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) or similar procedure. For any individual, certain predictions can be made to allow for decisions as to number of cycles, bag strength, and other options in order to maximize both small-solute clearance and ultrafiltration. In this paper, designed to address questions around correcting nonadherence to a prescribed peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription, Lee et al. remind us that by using modeling programs, a series of theoretical prescriptions can be generated for each patient based on changes in cycle number or bag strength. From a selection of these prescriptions and using the current cycler technology that allows for downloading recent patient run data, and uploading new prescriptions, they demonstrate that one can correct for (scripted) nonadherent dialysis in relation to small-solute clearance. Currently, PD programs should be capable of making use of concepts from this study, as well as the ability to provide prescriptive changes via multiple preprogrammed memory cards or over modem/Internet, to provide patients with individually modeled and optimized options to correct certain forms of inadequate dialysis, for example, missed cycles or hours due to power failures.

Future technologies and techniques in peritoneal dialysis-opportunities and challenges ahead

In the last 5 years, we have started to witness the emergence of new technologies and techniques that offer the potential for improved patient outcomes but which often still lack clinical demonstration and/or confirmation in well-designed, multicentre studies. These include biocompatible solutions, glucose sparing regimens, low-sodium solutions, bimodal solution formulations and continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD). This review discusses the potential benefits ascribable to each of these technologies and an analysis of the challenges that have to be surmounted before anyone of these candidate technologies can be declared as established. The demonstration of either hard clinical endpoints or validated surrogate endpoints is very feasible in terms of sample size requirements for some outcome measures, such as preservation of RRF, but will be much more challenging for other endpoints such as preservation of UF capacity.

Monitoring of the peritoneal membrane

Background. Indirect methods can be used to provide valuable information about peritoneal structure and function for the indirect analysis of peritoneal membrane. Methods. The focus of this paper will be on the commonly available tools for this purpose. First, the value and clinical relevance of CA125 as a marker of mesothelial cell mass in peritoneal effluent will be evaluated. Thereafter, monitoring the peritoneal membrane by using its properties to transport solutes and water will be discussed. Results. The data obtained can be useful for tailoring dialysis adequacy, analysis of clinical problems such as ultrafiltration failure or to predict the development of peritoneal sclerosis.

Pathogenesis and treatment of peritoneal membrane failure

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a viable treatment option for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients worldwide. PD may provide a survival advantages over hemodialysis (HD) in the early years of treatment. However, the benefits of PD are short-lived, as peritoneal membrane failure ensues in many patients, owing mainly to structural and functional changes in the peritoneal membrane from the use of conventional bio-incompatible PD solutions, which are hyperosmolar, acidic, have lactate buffer and contain high concentrations of glucose and glucose degradation products (GDPs). Current data suggest that chronic exposure of the peritoneum to contemporary PD fluids provokes activation of various inflammatory, fibrogenic and angiogenic cytokines, interplay of which leads to progressive peritoneal fibrosis, vasculopathy and neoangiogenesis. There is emerging evidence that peritoneal vascular changes are mainly responsible for increased solute transport and ultrafiltration failure in long-term PD. However, the precise pathophysiologic mechanisms initiating and propagating peritoneal fibrosis and angiogenesis remain elusive. The protection of the peritoneal membrane from long-term toxic and metabolic effects of high GDP-containing, conventional, glucose-based solutions is a prime objective to improve PD outcome. Recent development of new, more biocompatible, PD solutions should help to preserve peritoneal membrane function, promote ultrafiltration, improve nutritional status and, hopefully, preserve peritoneal membrane and improve overall PD outcomes. Elucidation of molecular mechanisms involved in the cellular responses leading to peritoneal fibrosis and angiogenesis spurs new therapeutic strategies that might protect the peritoneal membrane against the consequences of longstanding PD.

Glucotoxicity in peritoneal dialysis--solutions for the solution!

Glucose has served well as the prototypical osmotic agent in peritoneal dialysis for more than 2 decades, because it affords many of the characteristics required of a safe and effective osmotic agent. The disadvantages of glucose include its rapid dissipation from the peritoneum and its resulting limited UF efficiency capacity in high and high-average transporters, the associated metabolic response to absorbed glucose in all patients, and the local effects of glucose, glucose degradation products, and hyperosmolality on peritoneal membrane structure and function. This paper briefly reviews the salient elements of glucotoxicity associated with conventional glucose-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution use, and then discusses emerging clinical benefits of newer nonglucose PD solutions. Potential future strategies designed to abrogate glucose-associated toxicity are then reviewed. These approaches include bimodal long-dwell solutions, nonglucose crystalloid osmotic agent mixtures, and administration of pharmacologically active agents.