Novel direct-acting anticoagulants for risk reduction in ACS

Novel oral anticoagulants for acute coronary syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a cardiovascular condition with a multifactorial pathophysiology that includes atherosclerotic plaques, platelet activation and thrombin production, among others. Thrombin production and the prothrombotic state of ACS patients have provided a role for anticoagulants to treat patients during the acute event and has led to subsequent research for the post-acute state. Warfarin has an indication for ACS, however, it is restricted to specific patients and many factors limit its use. Therefore, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being explored for ACS. Limitations for the use of NOACs in ACS are centered on the increased risk of bleeding that occurs when these agents are added to the current standard of care with dual antiplatelet therapy. Rivaroxaban is the only NOAC that has achieved approval in Europe for this indication with none of the NOAC currently approved in the US for use in ACS. Ongoing studies for rivaroxaban and apixaban may provide evidence to further clarify the place in therapy for NOAC agents in ACS management.

Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Recent Advances in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical data on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as practical considerations when using these products.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for VTE, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and relevant drug international nonproprietary names were conducted. Additional online searches were conducted for prescribing information.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban for the management of VTE compared with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; published between 1966 and December 2015) were reviewed and summarized, together with information on dosing, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and drug-drug interactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The DOACs have the potential to circumvent many of the disadvantages of VKAs. At a minimum, they greatly increase the available therapeutic options, thus providing a greater opportunity for clinicians to select a management option that best fits the needs of individual patients. Despite the significant advance that DOACs represent, they are not without risk and require careful consideration of a number of clinical issues to optimize safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergence of DOACs for the management of thromboembolic disorders represents a paradigm shift from oral VKAs. The DOACs provide similar efficacy and improved safety in selected patients as compared with VKAs. Clinicians treating VTE need to be familiar with the intricacies involved in using these agents, including the appropriate dose selection for the relevant indication, avoidance of drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, and consideration of dose adjustments in specific clinical situations, such as organ dysfunction.