"Antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions in Cystic Fibrosis: A thorough inspection on a stumbling block in patient care"

One hurdle in the management of CF, a disease characterized by progressive endobronchial infection, is the presence of hypersensitivity reactions to antimicrobials due to prolonged and repetitive treatment courses. The aim of this review is to compile existing data and provide insight to medical professionals on a long-debated topic for optimum patient care. Clinical studies were inducted from the last 15 years and filtered based on their relativity to drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs), antibiotics and CF. After completing the selection process, 10 clinical studies were thoroughly examined. The most frequent antibiotic group related to DHRs were beta-lactams. Frequency of the most common overall type of reaction (immediate or nonimmediate) differed among clinical studies. Although severe reactions seem rare comparatively, they do occur during and even after completion of treatment regimens. The prevalence of true drug allergies should be confirmed using a variety of tests available, however, should not be confused with overall DHR rates. Genetic mutations, gender and lifetime antibiotic dose were not related with an increased risk for DHR development. On the contrary, the most important factor according to most studies was the cumulative antimicrobial dose in a given period of time, especially when delivered parenterally. DHRs are an indisputable problem in the management of CF patients. Understanding possible risk factors and increased awareness is vital in both hospital and outpatient settings as early detection can decrease the severity of the reactions.

Simultaneous hypersensitivity reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanate in a dog

Antibiotics are known to be able to cause hypersensitivity reactions through various mechanisms. We present a case of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) and anaphylactic shock occurring simultaneously in a dog after the administration of two classes of antibiotics, namely trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC). The patient recovered completely from DITP on discontinuation of TMP-SMX and the anaphylactic shock caused by AMC was treated with intensive care. DITP is a rare adverse drug reaction (ADR), and anaphylactic shock is a life-threatening ADR. This is the first case report of a dog manifesting two types of hypersensitivity reactions caused by two antibiotics.

Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND

Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latter. Some studies use penicillin allergy while others penicillin family allergy rates. The primary goal of this study was to determine the rates of IgE and non-IgE allergy as well as cross reactions to both penicillin and the penicillin family. Secondary goals were to determine the surgical services giving preoperative cefazolin and the types of self reported reactions that patients' had to penicillin prompting their allergy status.

METHODS

All patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at a University Health Sciences Centre were retrospectively studied. The hospital electronic medical record was used for data collection.

RESULTS

8.9% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 0.9% with cefazolin. 4.0% of our patients reported IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. 10.5% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 0.8% with cefazolin. 4.3% of our patients reported IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our rate of combined IgE and non-IgE reactions for both penicillin and penicillin family allergy was within the range reported in the literature. Our rate of cross reactivity between cefazolin and combined IgE and non-IgE allergy both to penicillin and the penicillin family were lower than reported in the old literature but within the range of the newer literature. We found a lower rate of allergic reaction to a cephalosporin than reported in the literature. We documented a wide range of IgE and non-IgE reactions. We also demonstrated that cefazolin is frequently the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections by many surgical services and that de-labelling patients with penicillin allergy is unnecessary.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bovine clinical mastitis pathogens in Japan and development of a simplified agar disk diffusion method for clinical practice

This study aimed to examine the antimicrobial susceptibility of bovine mastitis pathogens in Japan and develop criteria for testing antimicrobial susceptibility using the simplified agar disk diffusion (ADD) method that is currently being used in clinical practice. Milk samples from 1,349 dairy cows with clinical mastitis were collected and cultured. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antimicrobials were determined for 504 strains of 28 bacteria. Of the gram-positive bacteria, most Staphylococcus spp. were susceptible to penicillin G (PCG), kanamycin (KM), oxytetracycline (OTC), cefazolin (CEZ), pirlimycin, enrofloxacin, and marbofloxacin. Streptococcus spp. and Trueperella pyogenes showed resistance to OTC and KM. Most gram-negative bacteria were resistant to OTC and CEZ and particularly susceptible to fluoroquinolones. To develop the criteria for a disk diffusion test of the simplified ADD method, the relationships between MICs and diameters of inhibition zones (DIZs) were analyzed and compared with the conventional method. The susceptibility breakpoints of several antimicrobials were lower for both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Particularly for gram-positive bacteria, the application of the new criteria lowers the breakpoint for PCG, suggesting that the use of PCG instead of CEZ may increase. The results suggest that use of these criteria for the simplified ADD method may lead to appropriate antimicrobial choice and consequently the appropriate use of antimicrobials in clinical practice.

Development and Validation for Quantification of Cephapirin and Ceftiofur by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography with Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry

Cross contamination of β-lactams is one of the highest risks for patients using pharmaceutical products. Penicillin and some non-penicillin β-lactams may cause potentially life-threatening allergic reactions. The trace detection of β-lactam antibiotics in cleaning rinse solutions of common reactors and manufacturing aids in pharmaceutical facilities is very crucial. Therefore, the common facilities adopt sophisticated cleaning procedures and develop analytical methods to assess traces of these compounds in rinsed solutions. For this, a highly sensitive and reproducible ultra-performance liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the analysis of Cephapirin and Ceftiofur. As per the FDA guidelines described in FDA-2011-D-0104, the contamination of these β-lactam antibiotics must be regulated. The analysis was performed on an XBridge C18 column with 100 mm length, 4.6 mm diameter, and 3.5 µm particle size at an oven temperature of about 40 °C. The mobile phase was composed of 0.15% formic acid in water and acetonitrile as mobile phases A and B, and a flow rate was set to 0.6 mL/min. The method was validated for Cephapirin and Ceftiofur. The quantification precision and accuracy were determined to be the lowest limit of detection 0.15 parts per billion (ppb) and the lowest limit of quantification 0.4 ppb. This method was linear in the range of 0.4 to 1.5 ppb with the determination of coefficient (R2 > 0.99). This sensitive and fast method was fit-for-purpose for detecting and quantifying trace amounts of β-lactam contamination, monitoring cross contamination in facility surface cleaning, and determining the acceptable level of limits for regulatory purposes.

Dental implant failure rates in patients with self-reported allergy to penicillin

BACKGROUND

In a number of previous studies, patients with reported penicillin allergies have been documented to experience higher rates of dental implant failure than those who had not reported this allergy. The authors of this study aimed to determine whether an increased risk of implant failure is associated with patient-reported penicillin allergy and which antibiotic was administered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study was conducted through chart review of patients who received dental implants at the New York University College of Dentistry. Participants were eligible if they received one or more dental implants at the College and provided at least 1 year of follow-up data.

RESULTS

The overall implant failure rate was 12.9%. The failure rate in patients who reported no allergy to penicillin and took amoxicillin was 8.4%, while the failure rate in the allergy-reporting group was 17.1% (adjusted OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.44-3.44). The failure rate in allergy-reporting patients who took Clindamycin was also higher than in those who took amoxicillin (19.9%; adjusted OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.77-4.47) or any antibiotic other than amoxicillin (20.9%; adjusted OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.77-4.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant findings included a lower implant failure rate in patients taking amoxicillin than in patients taking other antibiotics. There was a significant increase in early implant failure in allergy reporting patients.

Preoperative β-lactam antibiotic prophylaxis is superior to bacteriostatic alternatives in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Staged implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Postoperative implant infections can have a significant impact on adjuvant oncologic care and reconstructive outcome. Here, we investigate the impact of β-lactam antibiotics (i.e., bactericidal) compared to alternative antibiotic agents on postoperative outcomes for implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent immediate sub-pectoral tissue expander placement with an inferior acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling at a single institution between May 2008 and July 2018 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and complication rates were retrieved. The impact of antibiotic regimen on postoperative outcomes, including infection rate and reconstructive failure, was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients with a mean age and BMI of 48.2 years and 25.0 kg/m² , respectively, who underwent 542 immediate breast reconstructions were included in the study. The use of a β-lactam antibiotic was protective against postoperative infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.467, p = .046), infection requiring operative management (OR = 0.313, p = .022), and reconstructive failure (OR = 0.365, p = .028). Extended, that is, post-discharge, prophylaxis was not associated with any clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

The use of β-lactam antibiotics for pre-/peri-operative prophylaxis is superior to alternative antibiotics with a bacteriostatic mechanism of action regarding rates of postoperative infection and reconstructive failure following immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. Extended, that is, post-discharge, prophylaxis does not appear to be indicated, regardless of the antibiotic chosen.

β-lactam exposure outcome among patients with a documented allergy to penicillins post-implementation of a new electronic medical record system and alerting rules

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that type I hypersensitivity cross-reactivity between β-lactam antibiotics is due to side chain similarity and not the common β-lactam ring. As a result, the prescriber-alerting rules of an electronic medical record (EMR) system were adjusted to only flag prescribers when prescribing penicillins or β-lactams with similar side chains (viz, cephalexin, cefadroxil, and cefoxitin) to patients with a documented allergy to penicillins. This study was conducted to assess and confirm the safety of the adjusted alerting rules; the primary outcome was the prevalence of anaphylaxis on β-lactam re-exposure.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who, under the reformed alerting rules, received a β-lactam antibiotic post-documentation of an allergy to penicillins in their EMR from April 2018 to July 2019 at a 268-bed community hospital. Given the volume of eligible patients, a 25% sample was randomly selected for review from initiation of the β-lactam antibiotic up to 30 days post-exposure to determine the prevalence of anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 325 charts reviewed, 300 patients (92.3%) received a β-lactam antibiotic with a different side chain than penicillins (not alerted on prescribing). Chart review of these 300 patients confirmed no reports of anaphylaxis secondary to β-lactam exposure (0%), and two patients developed non-anaphylactic delayed reactions (rash).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no reports of immediate life-threatening anaphylaxis under the reformed alerting rules, despite 25 patients (7.7%) receiving an alerted drug, such as piperacillin-tazobactam. The reformed alerting rules better reflect current literature and reduce the risk of prescriber-alerting fatigue without compromising patient safety. The occurrence of delayed reactions reinforced the need to monitor for these reactions on β-lactam antibiotic prescribing.

Evaluation of Clinical Properties and Diagnostic Test Results of Cephalosporin Allergy in Children

INTRODUCTION

Beta-lactams (BLs) are one of the most frequent causes of drug hypersensitivity reactions (HRs), and cephalosporins are a widely used subclass of BLs, especially in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and diagnostic test results of pediatric patients evaluated for suspected cephalosporin allergy.

METHODS

This study included patients who presented to our pediatric allergy clinic with a history of reactions attributed to cephalosporins between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, and whose diagnostic tests were completed for the diagnosis.

RESULTS

This study included 120 pediatric patients and 69 (57.5%) of them were girls. The median age was 38.63 (interquartile range 10.5-85.7) months. Reactions occurring within 1 h of drug intake were reported in 33 patients (27.5%). Reactions were maculopapular rash in 55 (45.8%) patients, urticaria and/or angioedema in 49 (40.8%), anaphylaxis in 11 (9.2%), severe cutaneous drug reaction in 4 (3.3%), and fixed drug reaction in 1 patient (0.83%). The most frequently suspected agent was cefixime in 41 patients (34.2%). In total, 30 (25%) patients were diagnosed as having cephalosporin hypersensitivity. Confirmation of HRs was also significantly more frequent among patients who were older (p: 0.000), who had taken the drug parenterally (p: 0.000) and with immediate reactions (p: 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Cephalosporin allergy has been confirmed in approximately one-fourth of the patients evaluated for suspected cephalosporin allergy. Confirmation of HRs was significantly more common among patients who were older, had immediate reactions, and had taken the drug parenterally.

Immune thrombocytopenia induced by beta-lactam antibiotics: Cross-reactions of responsible antibodies with other beta-lactam drugs

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam antibiotics are a relatively common cause of immune thrombocytopenia. Because the many beta-lactam drugs now in clinical use have structural similarities, when a patient experiences this complication the question of whether an alternative member of this drug family can safely be used often arises but there are little data available to guide this decision.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibodies from 32 patients who experienced thrombocytopenia while being treated with a beta-lactam drug of the penam (piperacillin, etc.) or cephem (ceftriaxone etc.) groups were studied for serologic cross-reactivity with other drugs from these families using flow cytometry. Cross-reactions observed were analyzed for correlations with structural features of the drugs tested.

RESULTS

Among 14 antibodies specific for penam drugs, five "strong" cross-reactions with other penam drugs were found. Among 18 antibodies specific for cephem drugs, 8 "strong cross-reactions were identified. Antibodies induced by penam drugs did not cross-react strongly with cephem drugs and vice versa. A strong correlation between cross-reactions and similar or identical R1 side groups of the beta-lactams studied was observed.

DISCUSSION

The findings suggest that patients who experience immune thrombocytopenia while being treated with a beta-lactam of the penam group can safely be treated with a cephem drug and vice versa. If a patient is to be switched to another beta lactam within the same group, the likelihood of serologic cross-reactivity can be minimized by choosing an agent with a distinctly different R1 side group.

Inappropriate Use of Aztreonam

BACKGROUND

Aztreonam is not a preferred empiric antibiotic because of variable susceptibilities compared with alternative agents. In addition, it has no Gram-positive activity, necessitating coadministration with vancomycin when used empirically, and is more costly when compared with other Gram-negative active agents. Aztreonam is often given to patients with a reported penicillin allergy without further investigation into the reaction or other relevant allergy information.

STUDY QUESTION

How frequently is aztreonam being used inappropriately?

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective chart review at an academic medical center to assess the appropriateness of our aztreonam use.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Our primary outcome was frequency of appropriate aztreonam use, based on a true IgE-mediated allergy reported for each patient. We evaluated whether the patients had tolerated a beta-lactam in the past, and what the reported allergic reaction was.

RESULTS

We included 165 patients and found that 46.7% of our aztreonam use was inappropriate, based on previous use of a beta-lactam, or no documentation of an IgE-mediated response. Of the patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy, 63 (38.2%) patients had no allergy manifestation listed, and 37 (22.4%) patients had a non-IgE-mediated allergy manifestation. Of the total population, 61 (37%) patients had tolerated a beta-lactam in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Aztreonam should be avoided, except in the case of a true IgE-mediated allergic reaction. Our goal was to reduce the inappropriate use of aztreonam at our institution by one or more of the following: educating providers, reviewing aztreonam orders, requiring answering of order questions, or requiring an indication for use. Penicillin skin testing and desensitization are options as well.

A Survey on Knowledge Gaps in Assessment and Management of Severe Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Australian Health Care Providers

Severe drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are often encountered by health care professionals (HCPs). We evaluated knowledge of doctors and pharmacists in the assessment and management of severe DHRs using a structured questionnaire. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 4 metropolitan hospital networks in Melbourne, Australia. A 13-question, scenario-based multiple-choice questionnaire to assess specific knowledge domains in drug hypersensitivity syndrome recognition, causality attribution, cross-reactivity patterns, appropriate diagnostic tests, and therapy was administered to HCPs of various vocation and specialty groups. Data were analyzed according to profession, self-reported experience, and preparedness in managing severe DHRs. Two hundred thirty-eight participants (45.0% senior doctors, 24.4% junior doctors, and 30.7% pharmacists) across a range of subspecialties achieved an overall median score of 7 (IQR, 5-8)-overall 55.6% correct responses to all questions-with senior doctors outperforming junior doctors and pharmacists (P < .001). The best performance by all participants was in DHR syndrome recognition (60.9%), and the poorest was in diagnostics/therapy (52.0%). HCP group and experience level were significantly associated with better performance in the knowledge domains of cross-reactivity and diagnostics/therapy (P = .003 and < .001, respectively), but not in the domains of syndrome recognition and causality attribution (P > .05). Levels of self-reported preparedness in DHR management were not associated with performance rates in any of the knowledge domains. This study demonstrated significant knowledge gaps in the recognition and management of severe drug hypersensitivity reactions. Targeted multidisciplinary education of staff caring for these patients is needed to improve knowledge gaps.

A Practical Guide for Managing Antibiotic Allergies in the Emergency Department

Up to 30% of patients report at least one antibiotic allergy, but oftentimes these antibiotic allergies are misdiagnosed. In fact, of the 10% of patients reporting penicillin allergies, 90%-98% are not truly allergic. In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance coupled with a limited number of new antibiotics, evaluating antibiotic allergies is critical in providing optimal patient care. Differentiating adverse drug reactions from antibiotic allergies may seem like a daunting task for clinicians and providers, especially in the emergency department, where decisions are made quickly. However, a systemic approach, including medical record review coupled with patient and/or family interview, is vital in managing patients with antibiotic allergies. Inappropriate, alternative antibiotics are frequently chosen due to patient allergies, and data suggest higher rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and poor outcomes as a result. Herein, we review antibiotic selection in patients reporting antibiotic allergies in the emergency department.

Impact of Beta-lactam Allergy on Treatment of Outpatient Infections

PURPOSE

The most commonly reported medication allergies in the United States involve beta-lactam antibiotics, creating an important consideration for prescribers when choosing optimal treatment of infections. Currently, few data exist on outpatient prescribing patterns in response to patients with a beta-lactam allergy. This study sought to evaluate the appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic therapy in patients with documented beta-lactam allergies within a Veterans Affairs health care system to evaluate areas of improvement in prescribing practices.

METHODS

Patients receiving outpatient oral antibiotics were prospectively identified through real-time electronic alerts from June 2017 through February 2018. Prescriptions were then reviewed retrospectively to identify appropriateness of antibiotic, drug choice, dose, and duration based on current guideline recommendations. Data were compared between patients with a listed beta-lactam allergy and patients without a beta-lactam allergy to determine the impact on prescribing patterns and outcomes. Baseline characteristics were compared by using descriptive statistics. Significant risk factors for inappropriate prescribing were identified through a multivariable analysis.

FINDINGS

The cohort included 1844 antibiotic prescriptions (documented beta-lactam allergy, 221; no beta-lactam allergy, 1623). Appropriate drug, dose, and duration for antibiotics prescribed in patients reporting a beta-lactam allergy versus nonallergic patients were 44.3% versus 53.0% (P = 0.02), 91.4% versus 86.2% (P = 0.03), and 75.1% versus 76.2% (P = 0.83), respectively. Patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy were 31% less likely to receive the correct drug for indication empirically (95% CI, 0.52-0.92) in the multivariable regression model when adjusted for fluoroquinolone use. In addition, patients reporting a beta-lactam allergy were 2.2 times (95% CI, 1.6-3.0) more likely to receive a fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Antibiotics were considered overall inappropriate based on at least one aspect of therapy in 79.6% of patients reporting a beta-lactam allergy and in 71% of nonallergic patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Antibiotic therapy in patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy was less likely to be appropriate overall, suggesting an area of improvement for prescribing habits. Future interventions should focus on prescriber education regarding first-line and alternative treatments for patients with beta-lactam allergies to ensure that optimal treatment is being provided.

Bacteriophages as Alternatives to Antibiotics in Clinical Care

Antimicrobial resistance is increasing despite new treatments being employed. With a decrease in the discovery rate of novel antibiotics, this threatens to take humankind back to a “pre-antibiotic era” of clinical care. Bacteriophages (phages) are one of the most promising alternatives to antibiotics for clinical use. Although more than a century of mostly ad-hoc phage therapy has involved substantial clinical experimentation, a lack of both regulatory guidance standards and effective execution of clinical trials has meant that therapy for infectious bacterial diseases has yet to be widely adopted. However, several recent case studies and clinical trials show promise in addressing these concerns. With the antibiotic resistance crisis and urgent search for alternative clinical treatments for bacterial infections, phage therapy may soon fulfill its long-held promise. This review reports on the applications of phage therapy for various infectious diseases, phage pharmacology, immunological responses to phages, legal concerns, and the potential benefits and disadvantages of this novel treatment.

Antibiotic Hypersensitivity Mechanisms

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed to treat a variety of bacterial infections. As with all medications, hypersensitivity reactions may occur and clinicians should be able to recognize them accurately and recommend appropriate management. Antibiotic related hypersensitivity reactions may be one of four different types: Type I reactions, which are IgE mediated and may lead to anaphylaxis; Type II reactions that are antibody-mediated and may result in thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or hemolytic anemia; Type III reaction that involves an immune complex formation such as vasculitis; and Type IV reactions that consist of four subtypes and typically include a rash of varying level of severity with or without systemic signs and symptoms. Herein, we describe the mechanisms of different types of allergic reactions to commonly prescribed antibiotics and offer recommendations for management. Further, we briefly refer to antibiotic reactions that mimic hypersensitivity reactions but are not immune mediated, such as pseudoallergies and serum sickness-like reactions.

The Impact of Penicillin Skin Testing on Aztreonam Stewardship and Cost Savings in Immunocompromised Cancer Patients

Objective

Reported penicillin allergies result in alternative antimicrobial use and are associated with worse outcomes and increased costs. Penicillin skin testing (PST) has recently been shown to be safe and effective in immunocompromised cancer patients, yet its impact on antimicrobial costs and aztreonam utilization has not been evaluated in this population.

Method

From September 2017 to January 2018, we screened all admitted patients receiving aztreonam. Those with a self-reported history of possible immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reaction to penicillin were eligible for PST with oral challenge.

Results

A total of 129 patients were screened, and 49 patients were included and underwent testing. Sixteen patients (33%) had hematologic malignancies and 33 patients (67%) had solid tumors. After PST with oral challenge, 46 patients (94%) tested negative, 1 patient tested positive on oral challenge, and 2 patients had indeterminate results. The median time from admission to testing was 2 days (interquartile range, 1–4). After testing negative, 33 patients (72%) were switched to beta-lactam therapy, which resulted in a total of 390 days of beta-lactam therapy. For identical therapy durations, the direct total antibiotic cost was $15 138.89 for beta-lactams versus $78 331.50 for aztreonam, resulting in $63 192.61 in projected savings. A significant reduction in median days of aztreonam therapy per 1000 patient days (10.0 vs 8.0; P = .005) was found during the intervention period.

Conclusions

Use of PST in immunocompromised cancer patients receiving aztreonam resulted in improved aztreonam stewardship and significant cost savings. Our study demonstrates that PST with oral challenge should be considered in all cancer patients with reported penicillin allergies.

Overview and Insights into Carbapenem Allergy

Understanding antibiotic allergies and the risk of cross-sensitivity between and within antibiotic classes can have a substantial impact on patient care. The purpose of this review article is to provide insight into carbapenem allergies, describing the overall incidence, risk factors, and in-class cross-sensitivity. A PubMed search was conducted using the following search terms: carbapenem, allergy, cross-sensitivity, incidence, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, and doripenem. Article bibliographies and relevant drug monographs were also reviewed. The overall reported incidence of carbapenem allergy is 0.3%–3.7%. Risk of cross-sensitivity between penicillins and carbapenems is less than 1% in patients with a positive penicillin skin test. Data on cross-sensitivity between cephalosporins and carbapenems are limited; however, the risk appears to also be low. No clinical studies have described cross-sensitivity between the carbapenem agents thus far. The limited data available from case reports demonstrates a lack of cross-sensitivity between the individual carbapenems, suggesting that an alternative carbapenem may cautiously be used in patients with a reported carbapenem allergy.

Discrepancies Between Patient Self-Reported and Electronic Health Record Documentation of Medication Allergies and Adverse Reactions in the Acute Care Setting: Room for Improvement

Background: Allergy information is commonly transcribed into an electronic health record (EHR) for all patients admitted to acute care hospital units by a licensed health care professional. The allergy history is utilized each time a new inpatient medication is prescribed to identify the patient's risk of having an allergic reaction and/or anaphylaxis. There is potential for negative consequences in cases where the allergy history is incorrectly documented. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the discordance between documented allergy information in the EHR and verbally reported allergy information from a patient interview. Methods: Prospective, observational, nonrandomized study performed within a 2-month period during the Spring of 2016. The study was performed at a teaching community hospital in Chicago, Illinois. A total of 270 patients were interviewed on the general medicine (n = 216) and headache (n = 54) units regarding their medication allergies and reactions. The outcomes were discordance among EHR-documented and verbally stated medication allergies and reactions. Results: The agreement across all medications and reactions between the EHR and patient self-reported interview was 80.9%. There were 31 reactions (6.7%) that were verbally reported by patients but were not documented in the EHR (omissions) and 57 reactions (12.4%) that were verbally reported but were incorrectly documented in the EHR (incorrect documentations). Only 20 out of the 264 verbally reported reactions (7.5%) met the study definition of anaphylaxis. The highest rate of incorrect documentations occurred with opiate agonists, and the highest rate of omissions occurred with anticonvulsants. EHR documentation was more likely to be incorrect among patients who reported gastrointestinal reactions and was more likely to be correct among patients who reported cutaneous reactions. Conclusion: There was a high rate of discordance amid EHR-documented and verbally stated medication allergies and reactions. Errors among opiate agonists, anticonvulsants, and sulfa drugs were most prevalent.

Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity

Cephalosporins are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes due to their wide clinical utility and general tolerability, with approximately 1-3% of the population reporting a cephalosporin allergy. However, clinicians may avoid the use of cephalosporins in patients with reported penicillin allergies despite the low potential for cross-reactivity. The misdiagnosis of β-lactam allergies and misunderstanding of cross-reactivity among β-lactams, including within the cephalosporin class, often leads to use of broader spectrum antibiotics with poor safety and efficacy profiles and represents a serious obstacle for antimicrobial stewardship. Risk factors for cephalosporin allergies are broad and include female sex, advanced age, and a history of another antibiotic or penicillin allergy; however, cephalosporins are readily tolerated even among individuals with true immediate-type allergies to penicillins. Cephalosporin cross-reactivity potential is related to the structural R1 side chain, and clinicians should be cognizant of R1 side chain similarities when prescribing alternate β-lactams in allergic individuals or when new cephalosporins are brought to market. Clinicians should consider the low likelihood of true cephalosporin allergy when clinically indicated. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the role of cephalosporins in clinical practice, and to highlight the incidence of, risk factors for, and cross-reactivity of cephalosporins with other antibiotics.

Management of a surgical patient with a label of penicillin allergy: narrative review and consensus recommendations

Unsubstantiated penicillin-allergy labels are common in surgical patients, and can lead to significant harm through avoidance of best first-line prophylaxis of surgical site infections and increased infection with resistant bacterial strains. Up to 98% of penicillin-allergy labels are incorrect when tested. Because of the scarcity of trained allergists in all healthcare systems, only a minority of surgical patients have the opportunity to undergo testing and de-labelling before surgery. Testing pathways can be modified and shortened in selected patients. A variety of healthcare professionals can, with appropriate training and in collaboration with allergists, provide testing for selected patients. We review how patients might be assessed, the appropriate testing strategies that can be used, and the minimum standards of safe testing.

Management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer: A survey of Australian and New Zealand practice

AIM

Variation in the management of fever and neutropenia (FN) in children is well described. The aim of this study was to explore the current management of FN across Australia and New Zealand and highlight areas for improvement.

METHODS

A practice survey was administered to paediatric health-care providers via four clinical and research networks. Using three clinical case vignettes, we explored risk stratification, empiric antibiotics, initial investigations, intravenous-oral switch, ambulatory management and antibiotic duration in children with cancer and FN.

RESULTS

A response was received from 104 participants from 16 different hospitals. FN guideline compliance was rated as moderate or poor by 24% of respondents, and seven different fever definitions were described. There was little variation in the selected empiric monotherapy and dual-therapy regimens, and almost all respondents recommended first-dose antibiotics within 1 h. However, 27 different empiric antibiotic combinations were selected for beta-lactam allergy. An incorrect risk status was assigned to the low-risk case by 27% of respondents and to the high-risk case by 41%. Compared to current practice, significantly more respondents would manage the low-risk case in the ambulatory setting provided adequate resources were in place (43 vs. 85%, P < 0.0001). There was variation in the use of empiric glycopeptides as well as use of aminoglycosides beyond 48 h.

CONCLUSION

Although the antibiotics selected for empiric management of FN are appropriate and consistent, variation and inaccuracies exist in risk stratification, the selection of monotherapy over dual therapy, empiric antibiotics chosen for beta-lactam allergy, use of glycopeptides and duration of aminoglycosides.

A General LC-MS/MS Method for Monitoring Potential β-Lactam Contamination in Drugs and Drug-Manufacturing Surfaces

Penicillins and some non-penicillin β-lactams may cause potentially life-threatening allergic reactions. Thus, possible cross contamination of β-lactams in food or drugs can put people at risk. Therefore, when there is a reasonable possibility that a non-penicillin product could be contaminated by penicillin, the drug products are tested for penicillin contamination. Here, a sensitive and rapid method for simultaneous determination of multiple β-lactam antibiotics using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed and validated. Mass spectral acquisition was performed on a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer in positive ion mode with parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The method was validated for seven β-lactam antibiotics including one or two from each class and a synthetic intermediate. The quantification precision and accuracy at 200 ppb were in the range of ± 1.84 to ± 4.56 and - 5.20 to 3.44%, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.2 ppb, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 2 ppb with a linear dynamic range (LDR) of 2-2000 ppb for all eight β-lactams. From various drug products, the recoveries of eight β-lactams at 200 and 2 ppb ranged from 93.8 ± 3.2 to 112.1 ± 4.2% and 89.7 ± 4.6 to 110.6 ± 1.9%, respectively. The application of the method for detecting cross contamination of trace β-lactams (0.2 ppb) and for monitoring facility surface cleaning was also investigated. This sensitive and fast method was fit-for-purpose for detecting and quantifying trace amount of β-lactam contamination, monitoring cross contamination in manufacturing processes, and determining potency for regulatory purposes and for quality control.

Confronting the Challenge of Beta-Lactam Allergies: A Quasi-Experimental Study Assessing Impact of Pharmacy-Led Interventions

OBJECTIVE

To improve allergy history documentation and increase the use of beta-lactams when appropriate in patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy.

METHODS

This pre-post study was conducted at a 167-bed tertiary care community hospital and evaluated multidisciplinary interventions on allergy documentation and antibiotic selection. Interventions included education, creation of local practice guidelines, and modified practices for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Inpatients with a reported beta-lactam allergy receiving at least 1 antibiotic for >24 hours were included; first admissions were assessed. Primary outcomes were documentation of reaction type and percentage of patients receiving non-beta-lactam therapy. Secondary outcomes included documentation of previously tolerated beta-lactams, modification of non-beta-lactam therapy, discharge antibiotics, and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were included, 91 preintervention and 88 postintervention. No significant differences were observed between the before versus after groups in the percentage of patients with documentation of reaction type (90.1% vs 89.8%, P = .940) or the overall percentage of patients receiving non-beta-lactams (86.8% vs 84.1%, P = .605). However, significantly more patients in the after phase had documentation of previously tolerated beta-lactams (8.8% vs 28.4%, P = .001), and among patients receiving a non-beta-lactam, a greater percentage was subsequently switched to a beta-lactam (11.4% vs 25.7%, P = .022). One allergic reaction was documented during the study, which occurred in the before phase.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary education and local guideline implementation led by pharmacists may improve allergy documentation and antibiotic selection in patients with reported beta-lactam allergies.

Cross-reactivity in β-Lactam Allergy

β-Lactam drugs (penicillins, amoxicillin, and cephalosporins) account for 42.6% of all severe drug-induced anaphylaxis. In this review, we focus on clinically significant immunologic cross-reactivity in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy to cephalosporins, and the structural involvement of the R₁ and R₂ chemical side chains of the cephalosporins causing IgE-mediated cross-reactivity with penicillin and other cephalosporins. Skin tests predict IgE-mediated reactions and showed cross-reactivity between penicillins and early generation cephalosporins that shared side chains, but confirmatory challenge data are lacking. Later-generation cephalosporins, which have distinct side chains, do not have any skin test cross-reactivity with penicillin/amoxicillin. There is debate as to the involvement of R₂ side chains as the antigenic determinants that cause IgE-mediated hypersensitivity with various cephalosporins. Avoidance of cephalosporins, when they are the drug of choice in a penicillin-allergic individual, results in significant morbidity that outweighs the low risk of anaphylaxis. We conclude that there is ample evidence to allow the safe use of cephalosporins in patients with isolated confirmed penicillin or amoxicillin allergy.

Higher risk of revision for infection using systemic clindamycin prophylaxis than with cloxacillin

Background and purpose - Clindamycin has not been compared with other antibiotics for prophylaxis in arthroplasty. Since 2009, the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) has been collecting information on the prophylactic antibiotic regime used at every individual operation. In Sweden, when there is allergy to penicillin, clindamycin has been the recommended alternative. We examined whether there were differences in the rate of revision due to infection depending on which antibiotic was used as systemic prophylaxis. Patients and methods - Patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed due to osteoarthritis (OA) during the years 2009-2015 were included in the study. Information on which antibiotic was used was available for 80,018 operations (55,530 patients). Survival statistics were used to calculate the rate of revision due to infection until the end of 2015, comparing the group of patients who received cloxacillin with those who received clindamycin as systemic prophylaxis. Results - Cloxacillin was used in 90% of the cases, clindamycin in 7%, and cephalosporins in 2%. The risk of being revised due to infection was higher when clindamycin was used than when cloxacillin was used (RR =1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the revision rate for other causes (p = 0.2). Interpretation - We advise that patients reporting allergic reaction to penicillin should have their allergic history explored. In the absence of a clear history of type-I allergic reaction (e.g. urticaria, anaphylaxis, or bronchospasm), we suggest the use of a third-generation cephalosporin instead of clindamycin as perioperative prophylaxis when undergoing a TKR. No recommendation can be given regarding patients with type-1 allergy.

The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations.

METHODS

Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council.

RESULTS

This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included.

SUMMARY

The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery in the setting of penicillin allergy: A decision-making algorithm

Cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in many developed countries. Postoperative endophthalmitis is a rare complication with potentially devastating visual outcomes. Currently, there is no global consensus regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery despite growing evidence of the benefits of prophylactic intracameral cefuroxime at the conclusion of surgery. The decision about which antibiotic regimen to use is further complicated in patients reporting penicillin allergy. Historic statistics suggesting crossreactivity of penicillins and cephalosporins have persisted into modern surgery. It is important for ophthalmologists to consider all available antibiotic options and have an up-to-date knowledge of antibiotic crossreactivity when faced with the dilemma of choosing appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing cataract surgery with a history of penicillin allergy. Each option carries risks, and the choice may have medicolegal implications in the event of an adverse outcome. We assess the options for antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery in the setting of penicillin allergy and provide an algorithm to assist decision-making for individual patients.

Impact of a pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview on inpatient antimicrobial therapy: A pilot project

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of a pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview on antimicrobial therapy.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PRACTICE SETTING

Clarification of beta-lactam allergy may expand treatment options for patients and potentially improve outcomes, reduce toxicity, and reduce costs.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

At our institution, a pilot service using a pharmacy resident and infectious diseases clinical pharmacist was implemented to clarify beta-lactam allergy information and, where appropriate, recommend a change to the patient's antibiotic therapy.

EVALUATION

Adult patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy who had received non-penicillin antibiotics and who had undergone a beta-lactam allergy interview were identified via pharmacy intervention data. A pharmacist interviewed these patients with the use of an internally developed allergy questionnaire. Recommendations for beta-lactam therapy were made to the patient's primary medical team based on the results of the allergy interview and factors including infection type and culture results. The primary objectives were to determine the percentage of patients successfully switched to beta-lactam therapy as a result of the drug allergy interview, to identify allergy discrepancies between the electronic medical record (EMR) and pharmacist's interview, and to quantify the acceptance rate of the pharmacist's antimicrobial recommendations after drug allergy clarification.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were interviewed, and 24 were candidates for a beta-lactam recommendation. As a result of the interview, 21 patients (65.6%) were successfully switched from a non-penicillin antibiotic to a cephalosporin, carbapenem, or penicillin. A discrepancy between the EMR-reported allergy and history obtained on interview was identified in 11 patients (34.4%). Medical providers accepted 87.5% of pharmacists' antimicrobial recommendations.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview was effective in switching eligible patients to beta-lactam therapy and identifying discrepancies between EMR-documented allergies and confirmed allergies. Antimicrobial recommendations were well received by medical providers with a high acceptance rate.

Anaphylactic shock caused by intramuscular injection of midazolam during the perioperative period: a case report

Although anaphylactic shock during the perioperative period is rare, it can be lethal due to severe cardiovascular and respiratory collapse. Midazolam is generally used as premedication for relieving anxiety about the operation, and the danger of anaphylactic shock after intramuscular injection is not widely recognized. We report the first case of anaphylactic shock occurring during the perioperative period after intramuscular injection of midazolam. Since anaphylactic shock after intramuscular injection can be of slow onset, the operation should be delayed if an anaphylactic reaction is suspected, even if the symptoms are limited. In addition, anesthesiologists should be prepared for the occurrence of anaphylaxis at any time in the perioperative period.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam

Objective: To review the chemistry, pharmacology, microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, tolerability, dosage, and administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam, a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor. Data Sources: A literature search through clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed was conducted (January 2007-May 2015) using the search terms ceftolozane, ceftolozane/tazobactam, FR264205, CXA-101/tazobactam, and CXA-201. References from retrieved articles and abstracts presented at recent meetings were reviewed to identify additional material. The prescribing information was also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Preclinical data as well as phase 1, 2, and 3 studies published in English were evaluated. Data Synthesis: Ceftolozane/tazobactam displays enhanced potency against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Clinical trials have shown that ceftolozane/tazobactam is noninferior to levofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (76.9% vs 68.4%, 95% CI = 2.3-14.6) and when used in combination with metronidazole is noninferior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (83% vs 87.3%, 95% CI = −8.91 to 0.54). An alternate antibiotic should be considered in patients who have a severe β-lactam allergy or an estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 50 mL/min. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is well tolerated, with few drug interactions and no effects on the cytochrome P450 system. Conclusions: In an era of increasing resistance to antimicrobials, ceftolozane/tazobactam provides clinicians with an additional treatment option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Antibiotics in frozen bone grafts can cause allergic reactions in recipient patients

Antibiotic prophylaxis is a routine procedure during total hip arthroplasty (THA), and the vast majority of cadavers within the multitissue procurement receive one or more antibiotics. Upon harvesting, bone grafts are stored in the bone banks on the temperature as low as -80°C for up to 5 years. It is shown in the literature that the antibiotics remain active and viable in the bone grafts even after being exposed to extremely low temperatures in the prolonged periods. Possibility of remnant antibiotic concentrations in the bone grafts and the fact that these antibiotic remnants maintain active even after being exposed to extremely low temperatures create the environment in which the possibility for the allergic reaction in sensitive patient receiving bone graft exists. We hypothesize that harvested bone grafts containing active antibiotic substance have the potential for local and systemic allergic reaction in sensitive recipient patients thus increasing morbidity and the costs of the treatment. Allergic reactions can mimic surgical site infections as well with the consequent substantial pitfalls in the treatment. Following that, in the setting of an assumed but not confirmed surgical site infection, the immunological evaluation on antibiotics for recipients of bone grafts could be added to the standard diagnostic algorithms. In addition, bone banks should be obliged to provide information of all potential drugs that can be found in every specific bone graft to the end users.