1
|
Sharma S, Sun Y, Bonyun J, Khadem M, Amadio J, Eskandari AH, Alambeigi F. A Biomechanics-Aware Robot-Assisted Steerable Drilling Framework for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation Procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2024; 71:1810-1819. [PMID: 38206784 PMCID: PMC11168586 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2024.3352607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel biomechanics-aware robot-assisted steerable drilling framework with the goal of addressing common complications of spinal fixation procedures occurring due to the rigidity of drilling instruments and implants. This framework is composed of two main unique modules to design a robotic system including (i) a Patient-Specific Biomechanics-aware Trajectory Selection Module used to analyze the stress and strain distribution along an implanted pedicle screw in a generic drilling trajectory (linear and/or curved) and obtain an optimal trajectory; and (ii) a complementary semi-autonomous robotic drilling module that consists of a novel Concentric Tube Steerable Drilling Robot (CT-SDR) integrated with a seven degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator. This semi-autonomous robot-assisted steerable drilling system follows a multi-step drilling procedure to accurately and reliably execute the optimal hybrid drilling trajectory (HDT) obtained by the Trajectory Selection Module. Performance of the proposed framework has been thoroughly analyzed on simulated bone materials by drilling various trajectories obtained from the finite element-based Selection Module using Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) scans of a real patient's vertebra.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bennie S, Crowley JD, Wang T, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR. Pedicle screw pull-out testing in polyurethane foam blocks: Effect of block orientation and density. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2024; 238:455-460. [PMID: 38480483 DOI: 10.1177/09544119241236873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Synthetic bone models such as polyurethane (PU) foam are a well-established substitute to cadaveric bone for screw pull-out testing; however, little attention has been given to the effect of PU foam anisotropy on orthopaedic implant testing. Compressive and screw pull-out performance in three PU foam densities; 0.16 g/cm3 (PCF 10), 0.32 g/cm3 (PCF 20) and 0.64 g/cm3 (PCF 40) were performed in each of the X, Y or Z orientations. The maximum compressive force, stiffness in the linear region, maximum stress and modulus were determined for all compression tests. Pedicle screws were inserted and pulled out axially to determine maximum pull-out force, energy to failure and stiffness. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare outcome variables between PU foam densities and orientations, respectively. Compression tests demonstrated the maximum force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 20 (X, Y and Z) while stiffness and maximum stress were different between X versus Y and X versus Z. Maximum pull-out force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 10 foam. No significant differences were noted for other foam densities. There is potential for screw pull-out testing results to be significantly affected by orientation in lower density PU foams. It is recommended that a single, known orientation of the PU foam block be used for experimental testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Bennie
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Douglas Crowley
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tian Wang
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Henry Pelletier
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - William Robert Walsh
- Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (SORL), Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sharma S, Mohanraj TG, Amadio JP, Khadem M, Alambeigi F. A Concentric Tube Steerable Drilling Robot for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation of Osteoporotic Vertebrae. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2023; 70:3017-3027. [PMID: 37130252 PMCID: PMC10623809 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2023.3272306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Spinal fixation with rigid pedicle screws have shown to be an effective treatment for many patients. However, this surgical option has been proved to be insufficient and will eventually fail for patients experiencing osteoporosis. This failure is mainly attributed to the lack of dexterity in the existing rigid drilling instruments and the complex anatomy of vertebrae, forcing surgeons to implant rigid pedicle screws within the osteoporotic regions of anatomy. To address this problem, in this article, we present the design, fabrication, and evaluation of a unique flexible yet structurally strong concentric tube steerable drilling robot (CT-SDR). The CT-SDR is capable of drilling smooth and accurate curved trajectories through hard tissues without experiencing buckling and failure; thus enabling the use of novel flexible pedicle screws for the next generation of spinal fixation procedures. Particularly, by decoupling the control of bending and insertion degrees of freedom (DoF) of the CT-SDR, we present a robotic system that (i) is intuitive to steer as it does not require an on-the-fly control algorithm for the bending DoF, and (ii) is able to address the contradictory requirements of structural stiffness and dexterity of a flexible robot interacting with the hard tissue. The robust and repeatable performance of the proposed CT-SDR have been experimentally evaluated by conducting various drilling procedures on simulated bone materials and animal bone samples. Experimental results indicate drilling times as low as 35 seconds for curved trajectories with 41 mm length and remarkable steering accuracy with a maximum 2% deviation error.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu LC, Hsieh YY, Tsuang FY, Kuo YJ, Chen CH, Chiang CJ. Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws Inserted Using Three Different Techniques: A Biomechanical Study on Polyurethane Foam Block. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:660. [PMID: 37370591 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10060660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pullout strength is an important indicator of the performance and longevity of pedicle screws and can be heavily influenced by the screw design, the insertion technique and the quality of surrounding bone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pullout strength of three different pedicle screws inserted using three different strategies and with two different loading conditions. Three pedicle screws with different thread designs (single-lead-thread (SLT) screw, dual-lead-thread (DLT) screw and mixed-single-lead-thread (MSLT) screw) were inserted into a pre-drilled rigid polyurethane foam block using three strategies: (A) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm; (B) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm and then reversed by 3.5 mm to simulate an adjustment of the tulip height of the pedicle screw and (C) screw inserted to a depth of 30 mm. After insertion, each screw type was set up with and without a cyclic load being applied to the screw head prior to the pullout test. To ensure that the normality assumption is met, we applied the Shapiro-Wilk test to all datasets before conducting the non-parametric statistical test (Kruskal-Wallis test combined with pairwise Mann-Whitney-U tests). All screw types inserted using strategy A had a significantly greater pullout strength than those inserted using strategies B and C, regardless of if the screw was pre-loaded with a cyclic load prior to testing. Without the use of the cyclic pre-load, the MSLT screw had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws for all three insertion strategies. However, the fixation strength of all screws was reduced when pre-loaded before testing, with the MSLT screw inserted using strategy B producing a significantly lower pullout strength than all other groups (p < 0.05). In contrast, the MSLT screw using insertion strategies A and C had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws both with and without pre-loading. In conclusion, the MSLT pedicle screw exhibited the greatest pullout strength of the screws tested under all insertion strategies and loading conditions, except for insertion strategy B with a cyclic pre-load. While all screw types showed a reduced pullout strength when using insertion strategy B (screw-out depth adjustment), the MSLT screw had the largest reduction in pullout strength when using a pre-load before testing. Based on these findings, during the initial screw insertion, it is recommended to not fully insert the screw thread into the bone and to leave a retention length for depth adjustment to avoid the need for screw-out adjustment, as with insertion strategy B.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lien-Chen Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
| | - Yueh-Ying Hsieh
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
| | - Fon-Yih Tsuang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100225, Taiwan
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100225, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jie Kuo
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11696, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hsien Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Jung Chiang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Çetin A, Bircan DA. 3D pull-out finite element simulation of the pedicle screw-trabecular bone interface at strain rates. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2021; 236:134-144. [PMID: 34479459 DOI: 10.1177/09544119211044560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Biomedical experimental studies such as pull-out (PO), screw loosening experience variability mechanical properties of fresh bone, legal procedures of cadaver bone samples and time-consuming problems. Finite Element Method (FEM) could overcome experimental problems in biomechanics. However, material modelling of bone is quite difficult, which has viscoelastic and viscoplastic properties. The study presents a bone material model which is constructed at the strain rates with the Johnson-Cook (JC) material model, one of the robust constitutive material models. The JC material constants of trabecular bone are determined by the curve fitting method at strain rates for the 3D PO finite element simulation, which defines the screw-bone interface relationship. The PO simulation is performed using the Abaqus/CAE software program. Bone fracture mechanisms are simulated with dynamic/explicit solutions during the PO phenomenon. The paper exposes whether the strain rate has effects on the PO performance. Moreover, simulation reveals the relationship between pedicle screw diameter and PO performance. The results obtained that the maximum pull-out force (POF) improves as both the screw diameter and the strain rate increase. For 5.5 mm diameter pedicle screw POFs were 487, 517 and 1708 N at strain rate 0.00015, 0.015 and 0.015 s-1, respectively. The FOFs obtained from the simulation of the other screw were 730, 802 and 2008 N at strain rates 0.00015, 0.0015 and 0.015, respectively. PO phenomenon was also simulated realistically in the finite element analysis (FEA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Çetin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Durmuş Ali Bircan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Banas M, Hore N, Buchfelder M, Brandner S. Assessment of conformity of actual thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw dimensions to manufacturers' specifications. Sci Prog 2021; 104:368504211035035. [PMID: 34398723 PMCID: PMC10358464 DOI: 10.1177/00368504211035035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Although correct selection of pedicle screw dimensions is indispensable to achieving optimum results, manufacturer-specified or intended dimensions may differ from actual dimensions. Here we analyzed the reliability of specifications made by various manufacturers by comparing them to the actual lengths and diameters of pedicle screws in a standardized experimental setup. We analyzed the actual length and diameter of pedicle screws of five different manufacturers. Four different screw lengths and for each length two different diameters were measured. Measurements were performed with the pedicle screws attached to a rod, with the length determined from the bottom of the tulip to the tip of the screw and the diameters determined at the proximal and distal threads. Differences in length of > 1 mm were found between the manufacturers' specifications and our actual measurements in 24 different pedicle screws. The highest deviation of the measured length from the manufacturers' specification was 3.2 mm. The difference in length between the shortest and longest screw with identical specifications was 3.4 mm. The highest deviation of the measured proximal thread diameters and the manufacturer's specifications was 0.5 mm. The diameter of the distal thread depends on the shape of the pedicle screw and hence varies between manufacturers in conical screws. We found clear differences in the length of pedicle screws with identical manufacturer specifications. Since differences between the actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated by the manufacturer may vary, this needs to be taken into account during the planning of spine instrumentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Banas
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinic Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Nirjhar Hore
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Buchfelder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brandner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|