Estimating syphilis seroprevalence among patients in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi

Dramatic Shift in the Etiology of Genital Ulcer Disease Among Patients Visiting a Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi

BACKGROUND

Genital ulcer diseases (GUDs) are a common syndrome associated with sexually transmitted infections. Genital ulcer diseases increase the risk of HIV transmission, necessitating appropriate diagnosis and treatment. We provide an updated GUD etiology assessment in Malawi to guide diagnostic development and treatment algorithms.

METHODS

We enrolled patients 18 years or older presenting with GUD at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, between May and October 2021. We purposively sampled by HIV status. Swabs of ulcers were tested for Treponema pallidum, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 and HSV-2, Haemophilus ducreyi, and Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction. Blood was collected for syphilis and HSV-2 serologies and acute HIV testing. Participants were treated per Malawi guidelines. Ulcer resolution (size reduced by >50%) was evaluated 14 days later.

RESULTS

Fifty participants enrolled (30 without HIV, 2 with acute HIV infection, 18 with HIV seropositivity; 32 men, 18 women). Forty-six (92%) had an etiology identified. Syphilis was more common among those without HIV (22 of 30 [73%]) than participants with HIV (PWH; 8 of 20 [40%]; P = 0.04). Herpes simplex virus was more common among PWH (11 of 20 [55%]) than participants without (2 of 30 [7%]; P = 0.0002). One-fifth (9 of 50 [18%]) had H. ducreyi. Among those who returned for follow-up (n = 45), 9 (20%) had unresolved ulcers; persistent GUD was slightly more common in PWH (6 of 19 [32%]) than participants without (3 of 26 [12%]; P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a dramatic increase in syphilis ulcer proportion in a population whose GUDs were previously HSV predominant. Observed differences in etiology and resolution by HIV status could play an important role in the ongoing transmission and treatment evaluation of GUD.

Effectiveness of an intervention to increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision among men with sexually transmitted infections in Malawi: a preinterventional and postinterventional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect a multistrategy demand-creation and linkage intervention on voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) uptake, time to VMMC and predictors of VMMC uptake among men with sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

DESIGN

Pragmatic preinterventional and postinterventional quasi-experimental study combined with a prospective observational design.

SETTING

A public and specialised STI clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi.

POPULATION

Uncircumcised men who presented to the STI clinic.

METHODS AND INTERVENTION

The intervention consisted of transport reimbursement ('R'), intensified health education ('I') and short-messaging services/telephonic tracing ('Te'), abbreviated (RITe). A preintervention phase was conducted at baseline while RITe was rolled-out in the intervention phase in a sequential manner called implementation blocks: 'I' only-block 1; 'I+Te'-block 2 and RITe-block 3.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: VMMC uptake and time to VMMC for the full intervention and for each block. Secondary: predictors of VMMC uptake.

RESULTS

A total of 2230 uncircumcised men presented to the STI clinic. The mean age was 29 years (SD±9), 58% were married/cohabiting, HIV prevalence was 6.4% and 43% had urethral discharge. Compared with standard of care (8/514, 1.6%), uptake increased by 100% during the intervention period (55/1716, 3.2%) (p=0.048). 'I' (25/731, 113%, p=0.044) and RITe (17/477, 125%, p=0.044) significantly increased VMMC uptake. The median time to VMMC was shorter during the intervention period (6 days, IQR: 0, 13) compared with standard of care (15 days, IQR: 9, 18). There was no significant incremental effect on VMMC uptake and time to VMMC between blocks. Men with genital warts were 18 times more likely to receive VMMC (adjusted relative risk=18.74, 95% CI: 2.041 to 172.453).

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention addressing barriers to VMMC improved VMMC uptake and time to VMMC among uncircumcised men with STIs, an important subpopulation for VMMC prioritisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04677374.

Etiological Surveillance of Genital Ulcer Syndrome in South Africa: 2019 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) has been the leading cause of genital ulcer syndrome (GUS) in South Africa for more than a decade, and acyclovir therapy is incorporated into syndromic management guidelines. We conducted surveillance at 3 sentinel sites to define the common sexually transmitted etiologies of GUS and to determine whether current syndromic management is appropriate. Secondary objectives of surveillance were to determine the seroprevalence of coinfections (HIV, syphilis, HSV-2) in persons presenting with GUS.

METHODS

Consecutive, consenting adult men and women presenting with visible genital ulceration were enrolled between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Genital ulcer swab and blood specimens were collected and transported to a central sexually transmitted infection reference laboratory in Johannesburg.

RESULTS

Among 190 participants with GUS, HSV-2 was the most frequently detected ulcer pathogen (49.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41.9%-56.1%). The relative prevalence of the second most common ulcer-derived pathogen, Treponema pallidum, was 26.3% (95% CI, 20.5%-33.1%), with 90% of primary syphilis cases having a positive rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer. Male sex was independently associated with primary syphilis compared with herpetic ulcers, after adjusting for the effect of casual sex partners and other exposures (adjusted odds ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.35-9.21; P = 0.010). The overall HIV prevalence among participants was 41.3% (78 of 189; 95% CI, 34.2%-48.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Herpes simplex virus 2 remains the predominant cause of GUS, justifying the continued use of acyclovir in syndromic guidelines. Adequate supplies of benzathine penicillin G for syphilis treatment are essential at primary health care level, in addition to the provision of syphilis and HIV risk reduction services.