BCD020 rituximab bioanalog compared to standard treatment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: The data of 12 months case-control study

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease. Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood. There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment (SOCT), including steroid toxicity. Rituximab (RTX) is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE.

AIM

To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT.

METHODS

The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years, were analyzed. The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria. We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX. Laboratory data, doses of glucocorticosteroids, disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI, and organ damage were assessed at the time of initiation of therapy and one year later.

RESULTS

Patients, treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement, compared to patients with SOCT. One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI activity index) in the children who received RTX [-19 points (17; 23) since baseline] compared to children with SOCT [-10 (5; 15.5) points since baseline, P = 0.001], the number of patients with active lupus nephritis, and daily proteinuria. During RTX therapy, infectious diseases had three patients; one patient developed a bi-cytopenia.

CONCLUSION

RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE, due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.

Risk Factors and Incidence of Serious Infections in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Undergoing Rituximab Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk and protective factors of serious infection (SI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) within 180 days of rituximab (RTX) treatment.

METHODS

Patients with SLE treated with RTX were analyzed. SI was defined as any infectious disease requiring hospitalization. The clinical characteristics, laboratory profiles, medications, and incidence rate (IR) are presented. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis for risk factors of SI were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients with SLE receiving RTX treatment were enrolled. The overall IR of SIs was 51.0/100 patient-years (PYs). Pneumonia (30.4/100 PYs), followed by soft tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (all 6.1/100 PYs) were the leading types of SIs. Twelve patients died during the 180-day follow-up (crude mortality rate: 14.6/100 PYs). Chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.88, 95% CI 1.30-6.38), and a background prednisolone (PSL) equivalent dosage ≥ 15 mg/day (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.57-7.78) were risk factors for SIs among all patients with SLE. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the risk of SI for patients with SLE with CKD and a background PSL equivalent dosage ≥ 15 mg/day (log-rank P = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) reduced the risk of SIs in patients with SLE (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.82; log-rank P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

SI was prevalent in patients with SLE after RTX treatment. Patients with SLE with CKD and high-dose glucocorticoid use required constant vigilance. HCQ may reduce the risk of SI among patients with SLE administered RTX.

Rituximab as an effective add-on maintenance therapy for disease activities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that can result in high morbidity if not treated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of rituximab treatment in a paediatric SLE cohort in Taiwan.

METHODS

The medical records of paediatric patients diagnosed with SLE at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1992 and August 2022 who received rituximab as maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To enhance our analysis, we included a contemporary comparison group, matching in case number and demographic characteristics. This study aimed to describe the indications, efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of paediatric SLE and to analyse the factors associated with disease outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 40 rituximab-treated patients with a median age of 14.3 years at the time of disease diagnosis. In the rituximab-treated cohort, the median score on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 decreased from 8 before rituximab administration to 4 after 2 years. The levels of C3 and C4 increased and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels decreased significantly within 6 months. The equivalent oral prednisolone dose halved after 6 months. Finally, 8 (20%) patients achieved disease control and 35 (87.5%) patients had no flare-ups during the follow-up period (median, 2 years). Those patients who achieved disease control had a significantly shorter interval between diagnosis and rituximab administration. In terms of adverse effects, only one patient developed hypogammaglobulinaemia that required intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement. Compared with the comparison group (n=53), the rituximab-treated cohort exhibited superior disease outcomes and a reduced incidence of flare-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides real-world data and illuminates rituximab's role in maintaining disease stability among patients with paediatric-onset SLE who are serologically active without major clinical deterioration. Most importantly, no mortality or development of end-stage renal disease was observed in the rituximab-treated cohort.

Rituximab as add-on therapy in patients with resistant lupus nephritis who have failed induction or maintenance therapy with other agents: A real-world experience from a single center in Mumbai

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with poor outcomes and a significant risk of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Some patients with resistant LN do not respond adequately to current treatment options and need alternative strategies or therapies.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab as a re-induction therapy (Re-RTX) followed by maintenance therapy for patients with resistant LN.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with resistant LN (failed initial induction therapy or severe relapse after remission) were analyzed. Re-RTX was co-administered with other immunosuppressants. The primary KDIGO criteria outcomes included renal response (complete and partial), disease progression, relapses, and infections.

RESULTS

The median age was 28 years (IQR 24.5-42), and the female-to-male ratio was 11:1. All patients had active LN, and 91.3% had proliferative LN. Baseline creatinine was 1.075 mg% (IQR 0.7-1.38), and mean urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was 4.9 (IQR 2.8-6.65). Of the patients receiving RTX as re-induction therapy, 66.6% (16/24) had failed initial induction therapy with other immunosuppressants, whereas 33.3% (8/24) had severe relapse during maintenance therapy.Re-RTX had a favorable renal response at 6 months, with 91.7% of the patients responding (20.8% complete response and 70.8% partial response). At 12 months, 58.3% of the patients maintained a renal response (25% complete response and 33.3% partial response). Approximately one-third of patients relapsed within a year.Fourteen patients (58.3%) continued RTX maintenance therapy with two different treatment regimens. At 6 months, Regimen-1 (500 mg every 6 months) resulted in a partial response in 43% (3/7) and relapse in 57% (4/7) of patients. Regimen 2 (1 g dose per year) achieved a complete response in 28.5% (2/7) and a partial response in 71.5% (5/7) with no relapses at 6 months.At a median follow-up of 29 months, adverse renal outcomes were observed in 29.16% of the patients with progression to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The overall use of Re-RTX was considered safe, with a reported infection prevalence of 16%, which is comparable to the existing data.

CONCLUSION

Re-RTX demonstrated efficacy and safety as an induction therapy for resistant LN. However, the response waned after 1 year, underscoring the need for optimized maintenance therapy.

A Comprehensive Literature Review on Managing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Females and Its Autoimmune Disease Associations

This review aimed to evaluate the mechanism of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, particularly in the female population, and emphasize the need for early management interventions; explore the association between SLE and two autoimmune diseases, myasthenia gravis (MG) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and their management strategies; and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in managing SLE, focusing on premenopausal females, females of childbearing age, and pregnant patients. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to achieve these objectives using various databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The collected data were analyzed and synthesized to provide an evidence-based overview of SLE, its management strategies as an independent disease, and some disease associations. The treatment should be focused on remission, preventing organ damage, and improving the overall quality of life (QOL). Extensive emphasis should also be focused on diagnosing SLE and concurrent underlying secondary diseases timely and managing them appropriately.

Predictive Factors of the Use of Rituximab and Belimumab in Spanish Lupus Patients

Objectives: To analyze the characteristics and the predictive factors of the use of rituximab and belimumab in daily practice in patients from the inception cohort Registro Español de Lupus (RELES). Material and methods: The study included 518 patients. We considered patients treated with biologics who received at least one dose of rituximab or belimumab, and possible indications of those manifestations registered at the same time or in the previous 2 months of the start of the therapy. Results: In our cohort, 37 (7%) patients received at least one biological treatment. Rituximab was prescribed in 26 patients and belimumab in 11. Rituximab was mainly prescribed for hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia (11 patients, 42%), lupus nephritis and neuropsychiatric lupus (5 patients each, 19%). Belimumab was mostly used for arthritis (8 patients, 73%). In the univariate analysis, the predictive factors at diagnosis for the use of biologic therapy were younger age (p = 0.022), a higher SLEDAI (p = 0.001) and the presence of psychosis (p = 0.011), organic mental syndrome (SOCA) (p = 0.006), hemolytic anemia (p = 0.001), or thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01). In the multivariant model, only younger age, psychosis, and hemolytic anemia were independent predictors of the use of biologics. Conclusions: Rituximab is usually given to patients with hematological, neuropsychiatric and renal involvement and belimumab for arthritis. Psychosis, hemolytic anemia and age at the diagnosis of lupus were independent predictive factors of the use of biological agents. Their global effects are beneficial, with a significant reduction in SLE activity and a low rate of side effects.

Current Treatment Approach, Emerging Therapies and New Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal involvement may be observed and affects the outcome. Hydroxychloroquine should be administered to every lupus patient irrespective of organ involvement. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy includes corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment, flares occur and broad immunosuppression is accompanied by multiple side effects. Flare occurrence, target organ involvement, side effects of broad immunosuppression and increased knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis as well as the availability of biologic agents has led to the application of biologic agents in SLE management. Biologic agents targeting various pathogenetic paths have been applied. B cell targeting agents have been used successfully. Belimumab, a B cell targeting agent, has been approved for the treatment of SLE. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting agent is also used in SLE. Anifrolumab, an interferon I receptor-targeting agent has beneficial effects on SLE. In conclusion, biologic treatment is applied in SLE and should be further evaluated with the aim of a good treatment response and a significant improvement in quality of life.

Current treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinician's perspective

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Its variable course makes it difficult to standardize patient treatment. This article aims at a literature review on available drugs for treating SLE and on drugs that have shown therapeutic effects in this disease. The PubMed/MEDLINE electronic search engine was used to identify relevant studies. This review presents the current therapeutic options, new biological therapies, and combination therapies of biologics with standard immunosuppressive and immunomodulating drugs. We have also underlined the importance to implement the treat-to-target strategy aimed at reducing or discontinuing therapy with glucocorticosteroids (GCs). The awareness of the benefits and risks of using GCs helps in refining their dosage and thereby obtaining a better safety profile. The advent of biological targeted therapies, and more recently, low-molecular-weight compounds such as kinase inhibitors, initiated numerous clinical trials in SLE patients and led to the approval of two biological drugs, belimumab, and anifrolumab, for SLE treatment. Progress in the treatment of SLE was reflected in the 2019 and 2021 recommendations of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). However, a mass of recent clinical research data requires continuous consolidation to optimize patient outcomes.

Infective endocarditis complicating rituximab in a lupus patient with lupus nephritis and dilated cardiomyopathy: case report and review of literature

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic multisystem disease that has a considerable morbidity and mortality. Rituximab is used in treating some severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus; however, it may expose patients to serious infections. We report a case of post rituximab infective endocarditis as the second case in literature described in patients with SLE.

Case presentation

A 17-year-old male diagnosed as systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis and dilated cardiomyopathy received rituximab and underwent upper endoscopy and colonoscopy investigating iron deficiency anemia. Later on the patient developed septic shock secondary to infective endocarditis and passed away.

Conclusions

Infective endocarditis is a possible complication after rituximab therapy in lupus patients with lupus nephritis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Prophylactic antibiotics may be considered in those patients in the settings of gastrointestinal endoscopies.

Rituximab in the real-world treatment of lupus nephritis: A retrospective cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Although recommended in established international guidelines for lupus nephritis (LN), rituximab is not officially approved for LN treatment, making all such use off-label. The Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) conducted a retrospective observational study on real-world efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment for LN in Japan.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 47 hospitals for LN patients treated with rituximab to retrospectively investigate dosing schedule, efficacy, and safety.

RESULTS

This retrospective analysis included 115 patients: 84 (73%) received 375 mg/m2 weekly up to four doses, and 31 (27%) received 1000 mg/body in one or two doses 2 weeks apart. Rituximab significantly improved findings for urinalysis, systemic lupus erythematosus serology, and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity and was assessed as 'extremely effective' in 24.8% of patients and 'effective' in 60.2%. The renal response by the JCR-I criteria was 52.5% for overall response rate (ORR) (complete renal response rate 20.8% and partial renal response rate 31.7%) and that by the JCR-II criteria was 49.5% (21.8% and 27.7%, respectively). Corticosteroid dose was significantly reduced. Rituximab was well tolerated, with frequent but manageable adverse events of infusion reaction and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab is effective for the treatment of Japanese patients with LN refractory to conventional therapy.

Review of an Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases of the Skin

Biologic therapies targeting B-cells are emerging as an effective strategy to treat a variety of immune-mediated diseases. One of the most studied B-cell-targeted therapies is rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that exemplifies B-cell depletion therapy and has served as the prototype for other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and the development of biosimilars. While there are multiple studies on the use of rituximab in dermatology, a comprehensive review of rituximab therapy in autoimmune skin conditions is lacking. In this literature review, we summarize indications, treatment efficacy, and safety of rituximab among common autoimmune diseases of the skin: pemphigus vulgaris, cutaneous lupus erythematous, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, thyroid dermopathy, autoimmune pemphigoid diseases, and cutaneous vasculitis diseases. Existing data on rituximab support the approach of rituximab, biosimilars, and newer B-cell-targeting therapies in immune-mediated cutaneous diseases. Overall, rituximab, which targets CD20, provides an effective alternative or concomitant option to traditional immunosuppressants in the management of various autoimmune diseases of the skin. Further studies are necessary to expand the understanding and possible utility of B-cell-targeted therapies among autoimmune skin diseases.

The emerging role of regulatory cell-based therapy in autoimmune disease

Autoimmune disease, caused by unwanted immune responses to self-antigens, affects millions of people each year and poses a great social and economic burden to individuals and communities. In the course of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and multiple sclerosis, disturbances in the balance between the immune response against harmful agents and tolerance towards self-antigens lead to an immune response against self-tissues. In recent years, various regulatory immune cells have been identified. Disruptions in the quality, quantity, and function of these cells have been implicated in autoimmune disease development. Therefore, targeting or engineering these cells is a promising therapeutic for different autoimmune diseases. Regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, regulatory dendritic cells, myeloid suppressor cells, and some subsets of innate lymphoid cells are arising as important players among this class of cells. Here, we review the roles of each suppressive cell type in the immune system during homeostasis and in the development of autoimmunity. Moreover, we discuss the current and future therapeutic potential of each one of these cell types for autoimmune diseases.

Comprehensive genetic and functional analyses of Fc gamma receptors influence on response to rituximab therapy for autoimmunity

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is widely used to treat autoimmunity but clinical response varies. Efficacy is determined by the efficiency of B-cell depletion, which may depend on various Fc gamma receptor (FcγR)-dependent mechanisms. Study of FcγR is challenging due to the complexity of the FCGR genetic locus. We sought to assess the effect of FCGR variants on clinical response, B-cell depletion and NK-cell-mediated killing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in 835 patients [RA = 573; SLE = 262]. Clinical outcome measures were two-component disease activity score in 28-joints (2C-DAS28CRP) for RA and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 major clinical response (MCR) for SLE at 6 months. B-cells were evaluated by highly-sensitive flow cytometry. Single nucleotide polymorphism and copy number variation for genes encoding five FcγRs were measured using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Ex vivo studies assessed NK-cell antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and FcγR expression.

FINDINGS

In RA, carriage of FCGR3A-158V and increased FCGR3A-158V copies were associated with greater 2C-DAS28CRP response (adjusted for baseline 2C-DAS28CRP). In SLE, MCR was associated with increased FCGR3A-158V, OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.12-2.41) and FCGR2C-ORF OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.09-3.40) copies. 236/413 (57%) patients with B-cell data achieved complete depletion. Homozygosity for FCGR3A-158V and increased FCGR3A-158V copies were associated with complete depletion in combined analyses. FCGR3A genotype was associated with rituximab-induced ADCC, and increased NK-cell FcγRIIIa expression was associated with improved clinical response and depletion in vivo. Furthermore, disease status and concomitant therapies impacted both NK-cell FcγRIIIa expression and ADCC.

INTERPRETATION

FcγRIIIa is the major low affinity FcγR associated with rituximab response. Increased copies of the FCGR3A-158V allele (higher affinity for IgG1), influences clinical and biological responses to rituximab in autoimmunity. Enhancing FcγR-effector functions could improve the next generation of CD20-depleting therapies and genotyping may stratify patients for optimal treatment protocols.

FUNDING

Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Versus Arthritis.

The history of lupus throughout the ages

The word lupus (Latin term for the wolf) was used indistinctively since the Middle Ages for several types of diseases characterized by ulcerous lesions, mainly in the lower limbs. In the middle of the 18th century, the French dermatologist Cazenave mentioned for the first time the term "lupus érythémateux," while Kaposi reported discoid lupus as a separate entity. The true turning point in the history of lupus occurred at the beginning of the 19th century, when the distinction between lupus vulgaris and cutaneous lupus in its modern sense emerged slowly. Major subsequent contributions from Kaposi, Sequiera and Balean, and Osler enabled the recognition of the systemic nature of the disease, with its modern history being marked by the recognition of DNA as the main target of antinuclear antibodies and the central role of interferons. Although many nonpharmacologic treatments have been used throughout the ages, glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine, and immunosuppressive agents mainly appeared in the second half of the 20th century. The beginning of the 21st century is now characterized by an in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and the appearance of biologic and targeted treatments, paving the way for a better care of lupus patients.

Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus in females

Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is a rare blistering presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, typically affecting women with the highest incidence in those of African descent. The key pathogenic insult includes the formation of autoantibodies against type VII collagen, which weaken the basement membrane zone and lead to the formation of subepidermal blisters. The acute vesiculobullous eruptions in BSLE generally tend to affect photo-distributed areas, although they can arise unrelated to sun exposure (eg, mucous membranes, axillae). The bullae can arise from erythematous macules, inflammatory plaques, or previously normal skin. Their appearance can range from small, grouped vesicles reminiscent of lesions in dermatitis herpetiformis to large, tense blisters, similar to bullous pemphigoid. Internal organ involvement occurs in up to 90% of those affected. This mostly includes lupus nephritis (classes III–V, lifetime prevalence of up to 90%), arthralgias/arthritis, and cytopenias, while serositis and neuropsychiatric involvement are rare. First-line management with dapsone should be considered in mild disease with stable underlying systemic lupus erythematosus. As discussed in this review, the off-label use of rituximab (an anti-CD20 B-cell depleting agent) has been shown to be safe and effective in several refractory cases of BSLE unresponsive to dapsone, glucocorticoids, or steroid-sparing immunosuppressants.

Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Common Induction Therapies for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (infection events) between rituximab (RTX), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapies in lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception up to December 9, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine the direct and indirect evidence of different drugs for LN patients. The pooled relative effects were shown using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

Results

Nineteen studies (1,566 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the present study. The network meta-analysis reported that no statistically significant differences were found in partial remission (PR) and infection among the four drugs. RTX showed a significantly higher complete remission (CR) than MMF (OR = 2.60, 95% CrI = 1.00–7.10) and seemed to be more effective than CYC (OR = 4.20, 95% CrI = 1.70–14.00). MMF had a better CR than CYC (OR = 1.60, 95% CrI = 1.00–3.20). TAC presented a better overall response than CYC (OR = 3.70, 95% CrI = 1.20–12.00). Regarding CR and overall response, the maximum surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were 96.94% for RTX and 80.15% for TAC. The maximum SUCRA value of infection reaction was 74.98% for RTX and the minimum value was 30.17% for TAC, respectively.

Conclusions

RTX and TAC were the most effective drugs for induction remission in LN. Among the four drugs, TAC had the lowest probability of infection, and RTX showed the highest probability of experiencing an infection. This meta-analysis could not conclude about other adverse events.

Targeting B cells in the pre-phase of systemic autoimmunity globally interferes with autoimmune pathology

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a loss of self-tolerance, systemic inflammation, and multi-organ damage. While a variety of therapeutic interventions are available, it has become clear that an early diagnosis and treatment may be key to achieve long lasting therapeutic responses and to limit irreversible organ damage. Loss of humoral tolerance including the appearance of self-reactive antibodies can be detected years before the actual onset of the clinical autoimmune disease, representing a potential early point of intervention. Not much is known, however, about how and to what extent this pre-phase of disease impacts the onset and development of subsequent autoimmunity. By targeting the B cell compartment in the pre-disease phase of a spontaneous mouse model of SLE we now show, that resetting the humoral immune system during the clinically unapparent phase of the disease globally alters immune homeostasis delaying the downstream development of systemic autoimmunity.

•

The clinically unapparent pre-phase of SLE impacts clinical disease

•

Autoreactive IgM antibodies represent a biomarker for early therapeutic intervention

•

Pre-phase B cells orchestrate clinical disease

•

Depleting pre-phase B cells diminishes disease pathology

Antibody-independent functions of B cells during viral infections

The humoral immune response and antibody-mediated functions of B cells during viral infections are well described. However, we have limited understanding of antibody-independent B cell functions, such as cytokine production and antigen presentation, in acute and chronic viral infections and their role in protection and/or immunopathogenesis. Here, we summarize the current literature on these antibody-independent B cell functions and identify remaining knowledge gaps. B cell subsets produce anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can have both beneficial and detrimental effects during viral clearance. As professional antigen presenting cells, B cells also play an important role in immune regulation/shaping of the developing adaptive immune responses. Since B cells primarily express TLR7 and TLR9, we specifically discuss the role of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated B cell responses to viral infections and their role in augmenting adaptive immunity through enhanced cytokine production and antigen presentation. However, viruses have evolved strategies to subvert TLR signaling and additional stimulation via B cell receptor (BCR) may be required to overcome the defective TLR response in B cells. To conclude, antibody-independent B cell functions seem to have an important role in regulating both acute and chronic viral infections and may form the basis for novel therapeutic approaches in treatment of viral infections in the future.

B cells as target for immunotherapy in rheumatic diseases - current status

This mini-review is a short overview of different therapeutical strategies targeting B cells in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, mainly: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjogren Syndrome (pSS). Many strategies and their rationale are discussed in this review: B cells' depletion (anti-CD20, anti-CD22), long-lived plasma cells depletion (anti-CD19, anti-CD27, anti-CD38 and anti-CD138), changing activation of B cells (anti-BAFF) and inhibiting proteasomes in plasma cells (bortezomib). The past successful therapies and less successful are shown, and the possible reasons for failures are discussed.

Dihydroartemisinin attenuated the symptoms of mice model of systemic lupus erythematosus by restoring the Treg/Th17 balance

The Treg/Th17 imbalance is associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), a semi-synthetic derivative of artemisinin, is isolated from the traditional Chinese herb Artemisia annua Artemisia annua L. This study aims to evaluate the effects of DHA alone or in combination with prednisone in immunodeficiency of SLE. In vivo, the therapeutical effect of DHA alone or in combination with prednisone was assessed in the pristane-induced SLE mouse model. Then, the level of serum antibodies, creatinine (Cre), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), urine protein, kidney histopathology, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-6, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, the expression of RORγt and Foxp3, the percentages of Treg and Th17 in peripheral blood and spleen were assayed. In vitro, the mouse spleen lymphocytes were separated and treated with DHA alone or DHA in combination with prednisone. Then the percentages of Treg and Th17, the concentration of IL-17, IL-6, TGF-β, and the expression of RORγt and Foxp3 were assayed. It was shown that DHA alone or in combination with prednisone treatment significantly alleviated the manifestations of pristane-induced SLE mice, suppressed inflammation and restored the Treg/Th17 balance. DHA alone or in combination with prednisone significantly inhibited Th17 cell differentiation while induced Treg cell differentiation in vitro. DHA alone or in combination with prednisone also reduced the transcription of RORγt and increased Foxp3 in lymphocytes, as well as IL-17 and TGF-β levels. Our data indicated that DHA can produce synergistic effect with prednisone to attenuate the symptoms of SLE by restoring Treg/Th17 balance.

Recent Advances in Lupus B Cell Biology: PI3K, IFNγ, and Chromatin

In the autoimmune disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), autoantibodies are formed that promote inflammation and tissue damage. There has been significant interest in understanding the B cell derangements involved in SLE pathogenesis. The past few years have been particularly fruitful in three domains: the role of PI3K signaling in loss of B cell tolerance, the role of IFNγ signaling in the development of autoimmunity, and the characterization of changes in chromatin accessibility in SLE B cells. The PI3K pathway coordinates various downstream signaling molecules involved in B cell development and activation. It is governed by the phosphatases PTEN and SHIP-1. Murine models lacking either of these phosphatases in B cells develop autoimmune disease and exhibit defects in B cell tolerance. Limited studies of human SLE B cells demonstrate reduced expression of PTEN or increased signaling events downstream of PI3K in some patients. IFNγ has long been known to be elevated in both SLE patients and mouse models of lupus. New data suggests that IFNγR expression on B cells is required to develop autoreactive germinal centers (GC) and autoantibodies in murine lupus. Furthermore, IFNγ promotes increased transcription of BCL6, IL-6 and T-bet in B cells, which also promote GC and autoantibody formation. IFNγ also induces epigenetic changes in human B cells. SLE B cells demonstrate significant epigenetic reprogramming, including enhanced chromatin accessibility at transcription factor motifs involved in B cell activation and plasma cell (PC) differentiation as well as alterations in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Histone deacetylase inhibitors limit disease development in murine lupus models, at least in part via their ability to prevent B cell class switching and differentiation into plasma cells. This review will discuss relevant discoveries of the past several years pertaining to these areas of SLE B cell biology.

Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, whose hallmark is the production of autoantibodies. B cells are promising targets for novel SLE therapies. In 2011, belimumab (Benlysta®), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting B-cell activation and proliferation, was the first medication in 50 years to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adult SLE. This review discusses the current experience with B-cell-targeted therapies, including those targeting B-cell-surface antigens (rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, obexelimab, epratuzumab, daratumumab), B-cell survival factors (belimumab, tabalumab, atacicept, blisibimod), or B-cell intracellular functions (ibrutinib, fenebrutinib, proteasome inhibitors), for the management of SLE. It focuses on ongoing clinical trials and real-world post-marketing use, where available, including their safety profiles, and concludes with our recommendations for B-cell-centric approaches to the management of SLE.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune inflammatory condition with a wide spectrum of disease manifestations and severities, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The aetiopathogenesis of SLE is complex. Young women and certain ethnicities are commonly affected, suggesting a significant hormonal and genetic influence. Diverse immunological abnormalities have been described. A characteristic abnormality is the presence of autoantibodies, implicating a central role for B cells in disease pathogenesis and/or perpetuation. Whilst conventional therapies have improved outcomes, a great unmet need remains. Recently, biological therapies are being explored. B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been in use off-label for nearly two decades. Inconsistent results between uncontrolled and controlled studies have raised doubts about its efficacy. In this review, we will focus on B cell abnormalities and the rationale behind B-cell depletion therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), rituximab, will be explored including an evaluation of clinical and trial experience. Finally, we will discuss the mechanistic basis for considering alternative anti-CD20 mAbs.

Management of inflammatory neurologic and psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The neurological and psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) are a heterogeneous group of conditions with variable clinical presentation and significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to comprehensively assess and present the evidence for treatments used in the management of inflammatory NPSLE.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CINHAL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 1990 to end of March 2019 using key words that related to NPSLE and treatment. Included studies comprised clinical trials, observational studies or case series with ≥5 patients and sufficient data related to treatment and outcome in NPSLE patients.

RESULTS

There were 7222 studies identified in the search, of which 90 were included in the review. There was a notable paucity of clinical trials, with only two randomised controlled trials and one pilot study. Treatment categories included corticosteroids (14 studies), cyclophosphamide (18 studies), synthetic DMARDs (7 studies), biologic therapies (14 studies), therapeutic plasma exchange (6 studies), intravenous immunoglobulin (2 studies), autologous stem cell transplant (3 studies), other therapies (8 studies), combination therapies (6 studies), studies with grouped outcome data (5 studies) and observational studies with therapy-specific associations (7 studies). Corticosteroids are accepted as first line treatment in NPSLE and there is low-moderate evidence supporting their benefit. Moderate evidence, based on consistent data in numerous studies and some trial data, supports the use of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of NPSLE. Limited data support some synthetic DMARDs such as mycophenolate, azathioprine and intrathecal methotrexate. In refractory disease, low-moderate evidence supports rituximab therapy and limited evidence supports benefit following autologous stem cell transplant. Regarding adjuvant treatments, limited evidence favours addition of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and hydroxychloroquine. There exists very limited data for other therapies.

CONCLUSION

There are multiple therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory NPSLE including systemic, biologic and interventional therapies; however, currently there is a paucity of high-quality trial data to guide firm recommendations. In order to better understand the optimal treatment of NPSLE and its different subtypes, further well-designed clinical trials are needed.

The Dawn of a New Era of Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complicated multisystem autoimmune disease that is associated with significant mortality and morbidity in the younger population. The development of novel therapies of SLE lag behinds other autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases because of its clinical and immunological heterogeneities, the complexity of outcome assessments in multiple systems, and difficulty in optimizing the design of clinical trials. Despite the futility of quite a number of clinical trials, we are seeing the dawn of novel therapeutics in SLE, given the promising results of the newer-generation anti-CD20, anti-CD40L biologics, and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), as well as anti-cytokine biologics, Jakinibs, and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. The initial success of the Jakinibs and combination regimens in SLE illustrates the importance of targeting multiple pathogenetic mechanisms. The results of the ongoing phase III clinical trials in SLE are eagerly awaited.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilar in refractory lupus

Aims

To characterise patients with refractory SLE receiving rituximab biosimilar (CT-P10) and to explore short-term efficacy and safety associated with rituximab biosimilar use.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed data from the medical records of patients with refractory SLE who received CT-P10 in Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. Baseline characteristics, disease activity (modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)), response to treatment at 6 months after CT-P10 and infection over 6 months were recorded.

Results

Thirty-two patients with SLE received CT-P10 from April 2018 to June 2019. Of these, 29 (90.6%) were female and the mean±SD age was 36.8±15.2 years. The median (IQR) disease duration was 9.5 (1.3–13.0) years. All patients received glucocorticoid treatment and used 1.7±0.1 immunosuppressive agents at baseline, excluding antimalarial drugs. Baseline Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index score was 0.5 (0.0–1.0). Overall response, which was defined as a reduction in the modified SLEDAI score of ≥4, was achieved in 25.0% of patients at 6 months. The modified SLEDAI score reduced from 4 (1.3–8.0) at baseline to 1 (0.0–5.8) at 6 months (p=0.005). Response by active organ involvement was 71.8%. Serious infection occurred in four patients (12.5%), resulting in one death. The median time of onset of infection after CT-P10 infusion was 35.5 (17.0–72.5) days.

Conclusion

Rituximab biosimilar is associated with improvement in active organ involvement in patients with refractory SLE. Infection occurred early after rituximab biosimilar infusion.

Candidate drug replacements for quinacrine in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a disfiguring and potentially disabling disease that causes significant morbidity in patients. Antimalarials are an important class of medication used to treat this disease and have been the first-line systemic therapy since the 1950s. Quinacrine, in particular, is used as an adjuvant therapy to other antimalarials for improved control of CLE. Quinacrine is currently unavailable in the USA, which has taken away an important component of the treatment regimen of patients with CLE. This paper reviews the evidence of available local and systemic therapies in order to assist providers in choosing alternative treatments for patients who previously benefited from quinacrine therapy.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): emerging therapeutic targets

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a heterogeneous clinical presentation whose etiologies are multifactorial. A myriad of genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors contribute to its pathogenesis, and its diverse biological basis and phenotypic presentations make development of therapeutics difficult. In the past decade, tens of therapeutic targets with hundreds of individual candidate therapeutics have been investigated.

AREAS COVERED

We used a PUBMED database search through April 2020 to review the relevant literature. This review discusses therapeutic targets in the adaptive and innate immune systems, specifically: B cell surface antigens, B cell survival factors, Bruton's tyrosine kinase, costimulators, IL-12/IL-23, the calcineurin pathway, the JAK/STAT pathway, and interferons.

EXPERT OPINION

Our ever-improving understanding of SLE pathophysiology in the past decade has allowed us to identify new therapeutic targets. Multiple new drugs are on the horizon that target different elements of the adaptive and innate immune systems. SLE research remains challenging due to the heterogenous clinical presentation of SLE, confounding from background immunosuppressives being taken by SLE patients, animal models that inadequately recapitulate human disease, and imperfect and complicated outcome measures. Despite these limitations, research is promising and ongoing. The search for new therapies that target specific elements of SLE pathophysiology are discussed as well as key findings, pitfalls, and questions surrounding these targets.

Expert Perspective: An Evidence-Based Approach to Refractory Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of skin manifestations and have a dramatic effect on a patient's quality of life. Effective treatment options for this disease are limited, and the efficacy of these treatments is often supported by low levels of evidence. This makes the treatment of refractory disease especially challenging, as it is difficult to achieve a consensus on the appropriate progression of treatment beyond first- and second-line treatment options. The treatment of refractory CLE often involves some degree of immunosuppression, which carries some risk for patients and requires a thoughtful approach to the selection of medications. Some treatments that have proven to be effective in systemic disease may not be as effective in cutaneous disease, making it difficult to extrapolate from the available evidence on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ultimately, the increased use of objective skin measurements in SLE clinical trials is necessary to understand drug efficacy in CLE and develop new treatments for this challenging disease. Here, we provide clinical examples of the challenges involved in treating refractory CLE, examine the evidence currently available for treatment options, and provide an algorithmic approach to the treatment of refractory disease based on this evidence. Novel therapies under development for CLE are also discussed, as they may soon be part of the accepted treatment regimen for refractory CLE.

Biologic Sequencing in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: After Secondary Non-response to Rituximab, Switching to Humanised Anti-CD20 Agent Is More Effective Than Belimumab

Background: Rituximab is commonly used for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but secondary non-depletion and non-response (2NDNR) associated with anti-drug antibodies is a notable problem with repeat rituximab cycles. Other B cell-targeted therapies include other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or belimumab.

Objective: To compare efficacy of switching to alternative anti-CD20 agents vs. belimumab in SLE patients with 2NDNR to rituximab.

Methods: One hundred and twenty five patients received rituximab and had evaluable data. 77/125 received repeat rituximab cycles. Of these, 14/77 (18%) had 2NDNR. 8/14 patients were switched to belimumab (CD20-to-belimumab group) and 6/14 patients were switched to an alternative humanised anti-CD20 agent (CD20-to-CD20 group, ocrelizumab n = 3, ofatumumab n = 2, obinutuzumab n = 1). Efficacy was assessed using the BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K, SRI-4, and daily prednisolone requirement at baseline and 6 months.

Results: In the CD20-to-belimumab group, only one patient achieved an SRI-4 and 2/8 patients had new/worsening BILAG-2004 grade A for lupus nephritis. There was no improvement in SLEDAI-2K; median (IQR) was 11.0 (9.5–14.8) at baseline and 10 (9.5–15.5) at 6 months. Median (IQR) prednisolone dose increased from 7.5 mg (4.4–12.5) to 10 mg (6.3–10). In the CD20-to-CD20 group, all 6 patients achieved an SRI-4. Median (IQR) SLEDAI-2K improved from 16.0 (10.3–24.0) at baseline to 5.0 (2.5–6.0) at 6 months. Median (IQR) prednisolone dose decreased from 15 mg (15–15) to 10.5 mg (5.3–15.0).

Conclusion: This is the first assessment of belimumab's efficacy in a post-rituximab population. Our data suggests that patients with 2NDNR to rituximab, which constituted 11% of all patients initiated on this drug, should be switched within the same biologic class to another anti-CD20 agent.

Low-dose rituximab therapy in steroid-refractory thrombocytopenia due to systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, characterized by multi-organ symptomatology. 16% of the patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia have SLE and are associated with high mortality. Intravenous methylprednisolone or high-dose steroids are the first-line treatments in those patients who experienced life-threatening bleeding or have a severely low platelet count, whereas a second line includes splenectomy, as well as other immunosuppressive agents as monotherapy or combined therapy, including azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil. However, response rates of these therapies vary considerably. Rituximab (RTX) became a useful tool in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, due to the decrease of autoantibodies production. In addition, there is evidence that low doses of RTX (100 mg IV per week for 4 weeks) can have a similar effect compared to the standard dose. The objective of this study was to describe the response to low doses of RTX in patients with lupus-induced thrombocytopenia. We present a report of four female patients with newly diagnosed SLE, accompanied by purpuric syndrome and severe thrombocytopenia (< 30 × 109/L) as the clinical debut that was refractory to glucocorticoids (GC) therapy and treated with low doses of RTX. By week 5, complete response (> 100 × 109/L) was achieved in two patients, partial response (> 50 × 109/L) in 1 patient, and no response in one patient. There is little information on the treatment of SLE-associated autoimmune thrombocytopenia. The most extensive study found at the time of our search was the study of 10 Asian patients. They found that 80% of the patients responded by week four and maintained until week 24 of follow-up. At week 36, a follow-up for two patients showed relapse; this occurred on patients with the most disease duration (> 5 years) and was associated with a lower response rate. In contrast, our study with four patients found that half of them presented a complete response: one patient added concomitant therapy with azathioprine (AZA) and another patient without the concomitant therapy. A third patient with a partial improvement, this was seen by week five of treatment. Moreover, a fourth patient who did not have a response by week five of treatment presented a clinical response in subsequent appointments with a count of > 100 at week 24. Those patients who required concomitant use of AZA were patients who had positive antiphospholipid serology. The use of low-dose RTX for the management of severe thrombocytopenia refractory to GC in patients with SLE has a good response. It could be a safe, economical, and effective therapy.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab for systemic lupus erythematosus treatment: a meta-analysis

Background:

Given the inconsistency of previous studies and the newly emerging evidence, we decided to conduct a meta-analysis.

Methods:

The meta-analysis included 2 randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies 742 patients in total. Qualified studies were properly searched from databases . Data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software. Results were demonstrated as WMD , SMD and RR with 95% CIs, I² and P value.

Results:

we observed that a remarkable increase of complement C3 in the rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed= 7.67mg/dL, 95%CIs=−0.16~15.50, I²=0%, P=0.05). A significant increase of complement C4 was observed in the rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed=3.14mg/dL, 95%CIs=1.06~5.22, I²=0%, P=0.003). Notably decreased peripheral CD19+B cells in rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed=−117.93n/µl, 95%CIs=−172.94~−62.91, I²=0%, P<0.0001) in RCTs. Patients with severe or refractory SLE got more satisfactory efficacy results after receiving rituximab in observational studies, such as British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index score, SLE Disease Activity Index score, complement C3/C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, peripheral CD19⁺B cells and so on. Safety profiles were no difference between rituximab and placebo groups.

Conclusion:

although the efficacy of rituximab is highly controversial for SLE, our study shows that rituximab presents a satisfying efficacy and safety for SLE.

Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey

This study aimed to systematically review neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and establish a simplified diagnostic criterion for NPSLE. Publications from 1994 to 2018 in the database (Wanfang data (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/index.html) and China National Knowledge Internet (http://www.cnki.net)) were included. In total, 284 original case reports and 24 unpublished cases were collected, and clinical parameters were analyzed. An attempt was made to develop a set of simplified diagnostic criteria for NPSLE based on cases described in the survey and literature; moreover, and pathophysiology and management guidelines were studied. The incidence rate of NPSLE was estimated to be 12.4% of SLE patients in China. A total of 408 NPSLE patients had 652 NP events, of which 91.2% affected the central nervous system and 8.8% affected the peripheral nervous system. Five signs (manifestations, disease activity, antibodies, thrombosis, and skin lesions) showed that negative and positive predictive values were more than 70%, included in the diagnostic criteria. The specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised diagnostic criteria were significantly higher than those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (χ2=13.642, 15.591, 65.010, p<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for revised diagnostic criteria was 0.962 (standard error=0.015, 95% confidence intervals [CI] =0.933-0.990), while the AUC for the ACR criteria was 0.900 (standard error=0.024, 95% CI=0.853-0.946). The AUC for the revised diagnostic criteria was different from that for the ACR criteria (Z=2.19, p<0.05). Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to NPSLE is essential for the evaluation and design of effective interventions. The set of diagnostic criteria proposed here represents a simplified, reliable, and cost-effective approach used to diagnose NPSLE. The revised diagnostic criteria may improve the accuracy rate for diagnosing NPSLE compared to the ACR criteria.

Is There a Future for Anti-CD38 Antibody Therapy in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases?

CD38 is a type II glycoprotein highly expressed on plasmablasts, short-lived and long-lived plasma cells, but weakly expressed on other lymphoid cells, myeloid cells and non-hematopoietic cells. This expression pattern makes CD38 an interesting target for a targeted therapy aiming to deplete antibody-producing plasma cells. We present data suggesting that anti-CD38 therapy may be effective for the prevention at the preclinical stage and for the treatment of established autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. Given the high unmet need for efficacious disease-modifying treatment in these diseases, studies are warranted to determine if anti-CD38 antibody-based therapies may delay or prevent the disease progression of systemic autoimmune diseases.

B cells targeting therapy in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects the majority of organs and systems. Traditional therapies do not lead to complete remission of disease but only relieve symptoms and inflammation. B cells are the most important effector cell types in the pathogenesis of SLE. Therefore, therapies targeting B cells and their related cytokines are a very important milestone for SLE treatment. Several biologics that modulate B cells, either depleting B cells or blocking B cell functions, have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Belimumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds B cells activating factor (BAFF), was the first of these agents approved for SLE treatment. In this review, we explore the currently available evidence in B cell targeted therapies in SLE including agents that target B cell surface antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22), B cell survival factors (BAFF and a proliferation-inducing ligand, APRIL), cytokines (interleukin-1 and type 1 interferons) and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40 ligand). We highlighted the mechanisms of action and the individual characteristics of these biologics, and present an update on the clinical trials that have evaluated their efficacy and safety. Finally, we describe some of the emerging and promising therapies for SLE treatment.

Potential role of regulatory B cells in immunological diseases

Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are immune-modulating cells that affect the immune system by producing cytokines or cellular interactions. These cells have immunomodulatory effects on the immune system by cytokine production. The abnormalities in Bregs could be involved in various disorders such as autoimmunity, chronic infectious disease, malignancies, allergies, and primary immunodeficiencies are immune-related scenarios. Ongoing investigation could disclose the biology and the exact phenotype of these cells and also the assigned mechanisms of action of each subset, as a result, potential therapeutic strategies for treating immune-related anomalies. In this review, we collect the findings of human and mouse Bregs and the therapeutic efforts to change the pathogenicity of these cells in diverse disease.

Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting multiple organ systems that runs an unpredictable course and may present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Advances in treatment over the last decades, such as use of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, have improved life expectancy of SLE sufferers. Unfortunately, in many cases effective management of SLE is still related to severe drug-induced toxicity and contributes to organ function deterioration and infective complications, particularly among patients with refractory disease and/or lupus nephritis. Consequently, there is an unmet need for drugs with a better efficacy and safety profile. A range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials, particularly dedicated to this subset of patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment regimes. Unfortunately, most of these trials have given unsatisfactory results, with belimumab being the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of SLE so far. Despite these pitfalls, several novel biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, or cytokines are constantly being evaluated in clinical trials. It seems that they may enhance the therapeutic efficacy when combined with standard therapies. These efforts raise the hope that novel drugs for patients with refractory SLE may be available in the near future. This article reviews the current biological therapies being tested in the treatment of SLE.

Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and solutions

Refractory lupus nephritis, broadly defined as failure to attain clinical remission after appropriate induction immunosuppressive therapy, is associated with an increased risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease and mortality. This is a challenging issue in clinical practice, as modern induction therapy despite proven efficacy can still be associated with treatment failure. Moreover, newer therapies have failed in recent years to displace or even match existing protocols for effective induction of remission. Refractory disease is generally assessed on the basis of clinical parameters, which may be unreliable, and renal biopsy, which is often not performed in a standard or timely fashion. Persisting histological inflammation in 30%–50% of patients who have attained clinical remission highlights the disparity between clinical and immunological response to therapy. The lack of an international consensus regarding what constitutes refractory lupus nephritis compounds clinician indecision regarding optimal management for these patients. Moreover, non-adherence to prescribed therapy versus primary treatment failure can be challenging to discriminate, and the time point at which non-response becomes treatment failure is unclear. In this review, we assess the key published evidence for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and provide practical recommendations based around the use of adjunctive therapies. These agents include rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors, with evidence consisting largely of observational or uncontrolled studies, as well as some of the biologic therapies currently under investigation through prospective clinical trials. The poor prognosis of refractory lupus nephritis demands regular review of patient response and the flexibility to switch or augment therapy.

Therapeutic advances in the treatment of SLE

In recent years, the research on the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been deepened, from the level of histopathology to the cellular and molecular biology, thus promoting the progress of SLE drug therapeutics. In March 2011, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the humanized monoclonal antibody, Belimumab for the treatment of SLE and put an end to the dilemma of no new drug available to SLE for more than half a century. On the other hand, the continuous evidence-based medical information has enabled rheumatologists to have a more comprehensive and depth understanding of the application of SLE traditional therapies, further improve the treatment strategy of SLE and put forward higher requirements for treatment goals. At the same time, advances in therapies have significantly improved survival rate of the patients, and the importance of long-term complications such as early-onset atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events has become increasingly apparent as a new challenge. In view of the hot issues of SLE clinical treatment, this paper introduces the research progress in recent years.

2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007–12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.

Neuropsychiatric Lupus with Antibody-Mediated Striatal Encephalitis

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies resulting in tissue injury across multiple organs; up to 50% of patients develop neurologic involvement, collectively referred to as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. The cases in this clinical report will highlight a subtype of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus demonstrating imaging findings of striatal inflammation responsive to plasmapheresis similar to those in the subset of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor autoimmune encephalitis that involves the striatum. Although the cause for this striking imaging appearance is not definitely known, literature will be presented supporting the hypothesis that it is due to peripheral anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies entering the central nervous system to cross-react with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antigens.

Novel Treatments in Lupus

Purpose of Review: The standard treatment options for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are focused on non-specific immunosuppression. Over the past few years, scientific studies and ongoing clinical trials have shifted the paradigm with rapid advances in developing biologics and small molecules. A number of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors have been developed to target specific pathways involved in SLE. Many of these novel therapeutic agents are already being tested in clinical trials and they may 1 day reshape the landscape of SLE treatment. Herein we review potential future therapeutic options for SLE.

Advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: From back to the future, to the future and beyond

There have been many advances in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over the past decades. Following more than eleven centuries of therapeutic uncertainty, the discovery of the therapeutic properties of glucocorticoids is without any doubt one of the most significant advance in the field of autoimmune diseases. The many progresses made by rapidly growing chemical industry of the 19th century chemistry have allowed the identification of valuable therapeutic compounds such as anti-malarials, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine and later mycophenolate mofetil, which have all profoundly changed the face of the disease. A very visible consequence of this is the profound improvement in the prognosis of the disease, with 10-year survival rates of more than 90% in most dedicated centres. Following the development of biotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis, the late 20th century has slowly opened a new era for the treatment of SLE, that of targeted therapies. With the approval of belimumab in 2011 and 74 targeted therapies in clinical development, we may expect great changes in the therapeutic management of SLE. Those molecules target inflammatory cytokines or chemokines and their receptors, B cells or plasma cells, intracellular signalling pathways, B/T cells co-stimulation molecules, interferons, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as various other targets of interest. Current challenges are now slowly shifting from whether some new drugs will be available to how to select the most adequate drug (or drug combination) at the patient-level.

Early onset neutropenia and thrombocytopenia following rituximab in lupus nephritis

Biologics have emerged as an important modality of treatment in rheumatic diseases and have allowed the rheumatologist to explore varied therapeutic uses of these drugs. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20 receptor is an important member of the biologic armamentarium for the treatment of various refractory autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The drug is now widely used in systemic lupus erythematosus for several complications which are refractory to conventional therapy. Although relatively safe, the post-marketing surveillance of rituximab has revealed a few rare but important adverse reactions. Cytopenia including neutropenia following rituximab, has been vastly reported as a late event (>4 weeks), but a few cases of early onset neutropenia (EON) and thrombocytopenia are also found in the literature. We describe a case of a 35-year-old woman with refractory lupus nephritis who developed asymptomatic EON and thrombocytopenia following rituximab infusion. The neutropenia responded well to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment and the platelets spontaneously recovered. This case report is aimed at highlighting the importance of identifying early onset cytopenia following rituximab which may have an important bearing on the final outcome for the patient.

Recent advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease presenting highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations and multi-systemic involvement. Patients are susceptible to relapse- and remission, thus making management challenging. Moreover, a considerable number of side effects may occur with conventional therapies; therefore, there is clearly a need for new therapeutic strategies. Since the pathogenesis of SLE is highly complex, it is far from being fully understood. However, greater understanding of the pathways and of the cellular and molecular mediators involved in SLE is being achieved. Emerging evidence has allowed the development of new biological therapeutic options targeting crucial molecular mediators involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. This literature review analyzes the availability of biological and target-directed treatments, phase II and III trials, and new therapies that are being developed for the treatment of SLE.