Understanding remission in real-world lupus patients across five European countries

Pain in individuals with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and without rheumatic diseases: A report from the COVAD study

OBJECTIVES

To compare pain intensity among individuals with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), and without rheumatic disease (wAIDs).

METHODS

Data were collected from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study, an international cross-sectional online survey, from December 2020 to August 2021. Pain experienced in the preceding week was assessed using numeral rating scale (NRS). We performed a negative binomial regression analysis to assess pain in IIMs subtypes and whether demographics, disease activity, general health status, and physical function had an impact on pain scores.

RESULTS

Of 6988 participants included, 15.1% had IIMs, 27.9% had other AIRDs, and 57.0% were wAIDs. The median pain NRS in patients with IIMs, other AIRDs, and wAIDs were 2.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.0-5.0), 3.0 (IQR = 1.0-6.0), and 1.0 (IQR = 0-2.0), respectively (P < 0.001). Regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and ethnicity revealed that overlap myositis and antisynthetase syndrome had the highest pain (NRS = 4.0, 95% CI = 3.5-4.5, and NRS = 3.6, 95% CI = 3.1-4.1, respectively). An additional association between pain and poor functional status was observed in all groups. Female gender was associated with higher pain scores in almost all scenarios. Increasing age was associated with higher pain NRS scores in some scenarios of disease activity, and Asian and Hispanic ethnicities had reduced pain scores in some functional status scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IIMs reported higher pain levels than wAIDs, but less than patients with other AIRDs. Pain is a disabling manifestation of IIMs and is associated with a poor functional status.

Impact of overweight and obesity on patient-reported health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Associations between BMI and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in SLE have been implied, but data are scarce. We determined the impact of overweight and obesity on HRQoL in a large SLE population.

METHODS

We pooled cross-sectional baseline data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials (N = 1684). HRQoL was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scale and the European Quality of Life 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Comparisons between BMI groups were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test and adjustments using linear regression. Clinical relevance was determined by minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs).

RESULTS

In total, 43.2% of the patients had BMI above normal and 17.4% were obese. Overweight and obese patients reported worse SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain and FACIT-Fatigue scores than normal weight patients. Divergences were greater than corresponding MCIDs and more prominent with increasing BMI. Despite no clinically important difference in SF-36 mental component summary scores across BMI categories, patients experienced progressively diminished vitality and social functioning with increasing BMI. In linear regression analysis, BMI above normal and obesity were associated with worse PCS (standardized coefficient β = -0.10, P < 0.001 and β = -0.17, P < 0.001, respectively), FACIT-Fatigue (β = -0.11, P < 0.001 and β = -0.16, P < 0.001) and EQ-5D (β = -0.08, P = 0.001 and β = -0.12, P < 0.001) scores, independently of demographic and disease-related factors. The impact of BMI on the PCS and FACIT-Fatigue was more pronounced than that of SLE activity.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE and BMI above normal experienced clinically important HRQoL diminutions in physical aspects, fatigue and social functioning. A survey of potential causality underlying this association is warranted.

Quality of life among female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in remission

The objective is to assess quality-of-life (QoL) parameters among Indian female systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with durable remission. Indian female SLE patients in remission determined by the European consensus criteria and age-matched female control participants were included in the study. All included participants underwent measurements of QoL [Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-12 (SF12)], Fatigue Severity Scale, and structured interview with a clinical psychologist. The population comprised of 126 female SLE patients [median age: 27.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 11]; median disease duration: 36 months (IQR 26)] and 110 female controls [median age 30 years (IQR 9)]. Clinical remission was seen in 65.9% (83/126) and complete remission in 34.1% (43/126). Significant fatigue was present in 18.3% (23/126). Both SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) were similar between SLE patients and controls [median PCS: 50.3 (IQR: 16.2) vs. 48.6 (IQR: 11.6); median MCS: 57.2 (IQR: 4.8) vs. 57.9 (IQR: 7.6)]. In generalised linear modelling, PCS was associated with fatigue [odd's ratio (OR) 0.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.006-0.025, p < 0.001], disease duration ≥ 5 years (OR 23.16, 95% CI 1.548-346.58, p = 0.023), and complete remission (OR 33.16, 95% CI 4.43-248.15, p = 0.001); MCS with fatigue (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.84, p = 0.007) and absence of depression (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.07-12.44, p = 0.038). Patients with SLE in remission report significant fatigue in 18.3% of subjects. Both PCS and MCS scores are similar to healthy controls. Better PCS was associated with less fatigue, longer disease duration, and complete remission. Better MCS was associated with less fatigue and absence of depression.

Changing paradigms in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

SLE poses formidable therapeutic challenges due to its heterogeneity and treatment decisions often cannot be guided by data of high quality. In this review, we attempt to provide insights regarding the treatment of SLE in everyday clinical practice, based on contemporary evidence and our own personal experience. We focus on common therapeutic issues and dilemmas arising in routine care, including monitoring for retinal toxicity associated with hydroxychloroquine, handling of glucocorticoid regimens in order to minimise their adverse events, choice of immunosuppressive medications based on prevailing disease manifestations and optimal use of available biological agents (belimumab and rituximab). We also provide our view on the position of calcineurin inhibitors in the management of lupus nephritis and conclude with remarks on the future perspectives for this challenging disease.

Real-world evidence in rheumatic diseases: relevance and lessons learnt

An emerging trend in the medical literature, including the Rheumatology literature, is that of accumulating large, multicentric, multi-national data based on registries of patients seen in real life situations. Such real-world evidence (RWE) may help provide valuable insights into the long-term outcomes of disease in unselected patients seen in daily practice, including patients belonging to vulnerable populations such as extremes of age, during pregnancy and lactation. Evidences gathered from real life practice settings can help understand drug prescription patterns, including adherence to treatment guidelines, cost-effectiveness of therapy, and real-life long-term outcomes, and adverse effects of treatment with particular medications. Registry-based data also helps analyze comorbidities in patients with rheumatic diseases, and their impact on quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), or systematic reviews of multiple, homogenous RCTs, have been considered the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, and RWE does, at times, provide differing viewpoints from the results of particular drugs in clinical trial settings. Therefore, in the present day, it is prudent to consider the complementary nature of information derived from RWE to that obtained from rigorous, clinical trial settings. Future guidelines for disease management may consider it relevant to include information from RWE in addition to that available from clinical trials, to help devise management guidelines that are harmonious with routine practice settings.

Self-reported disease severity in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pathology with net feminine predominance, is one of the most complex autoimmune diseases and has major impact on patients' life. The aim is to identify patient and disease-related factors associated with self-perceived disease severity in female SLE patients. This cross-sectional study enrolled 73 women fulfilling the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic (SLICC) criteria. SLE disease activity was assessed by the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) score and overall damage by the SLICC/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) index. Patients' general characteristics, associated conditions as well as SLE specific clinical involvements and therapeutic principles were also noted. Fatigue was assessed by FACIT-fatigue scale. Self-perceived disease severity was assessed using numerical rating scales (1-10 NRSs), to evaluate the disease severity at inclusion (1-10 NRS now) and worst severity anytime during disease history (1-10 NRS worst ever). In regard to worst ever lupus severity, 54.8% of patients responded with 9 or 10, while none with 1 or 2 even if only 22.9% of the patients responded with 7 or more for disease severity at inclusion (1-10 NRS now). Women with higher 1-10 NRS now answers had also higher 1-10 NRS worst ever, SLAM, SLICC, and FACIT-fatigue scores. They associated more frequently anxiety/depression diagnosis, antiphospholipid syndrome, joint involvement as well as treatments with corticosteroids. Self-reported disease severity worst ever, anxiety/depression diagnosis, fatigue, and the daily dose of corticosteroids were independently associated with patients' perception on lupus severity at inclusion: OR (95% CI), 2.13 (1.15-3.94) p = 0.017, 6.67 (1.11-39.97) p = 0.038, 1.10 (1.02-1.19) p = 0.018, and 1.11 (1.02-1.21) p = 0.020, respectively. The vast majority of patients identified severe and very severe events during their disease history, results that raise awareness of burden concerning lupus occurrence in women's life. Self-perceived lupus severity is multifactorial, influenced also by factors less considered in the SLE management like fatigue and the depression/anxiety disorders, but also by the previous patient's experience.

The new targeted therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?

Biologic therapy is still limited in lupus, where chronic steroid exposure and wide-spectrum immunosuppression are major triggers of organ damage. In this viewpoint, the authors summarize their views for a "half-full or half-empty" glass on targeted therapy in SLE. The are several reasons for seeing the glass half-empty and in this section the authors propose a critical reflection on scarceness of novel targeted lupus therapies. They show how hard it is to identify suitable biological and clinical targets and to choose the patients that may best fit those targets, as well as to stratify patients according to disease subtype and response, all contributing to the final outcome. On the other hand, reasons are emerging to see the glass half-full, including the growing evidence that disease activity and damage can both be hindered by the proper use of novel drugs and that promising molecules are upcoming. In this section, the authors contextualize potentials and failures of new drugs, providing a critical reading of disappointing results and underlining the concrete benefits obtainable through a wise use of available treatments. Indeed, combining medications with new therapeutic strategies such as the treat-to-target seems the right approach to add some water to a filling glass.

Modelling clinical systemic lupus erythematosus: similarities, differences and success stories

Mouse models of SLE have been indispensable tools to study disease pathogenesis, to identify genetic susceptibility loci and targets for drug development, and for preclinical testing of novel therapeutics. Recent insights into immunological mechanisms of disease progression have boosted a revival in SLE drug development. Despite promising results in mouse studies, many novel drugs have failed to meet clinical end points. This is probably because of the complexity of the disease, which is driven by polygenic predisposition and diverse environmental factors, resulting in a heterogeneous clinical presentation. Each mouse model recapitulates limited aspects of lupus, especially in terms of the mechanism underlying disease progression. The main mouse models have been fairly successful for the evaluation of broad-acting immunosuppressants. However, the advent of targeted therapeutics calls for a selection of the most appropriate model(s) for testing and, ultimately, identification of patients who will be most likely to respond.

Immunosuppressive Treatment for Lupus Nephritis: Long-Term Results in 178 Patients

Lupus nephritis is one of the most severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus features, defining treatment modality and prognosis. Our retrospective study, including 178 patients treated for lupus nephritis during 23 years with mostly cyclophosphamide-based initial regimens followed by azathioprine or mycophenolic acid, demonstrates 84.8% of renal response with 19.2% of flares, 15-year patient survival 78.7% and kidney survival 76.3%, and low damage accrual. Both patient and kidney survival significantly differ for subgroups that achieved complete or partial renal response and nonresponders: patient 15-year survival 95% versus 65% versus 35%; kidney 15-year survival 100% versus 58% versus 0%, respectively. 51% (24 out of 47) of patients evaluated at the end of the study period sustained complete renal response; however, only 9 of them had 0 disease activity according to SELENA SLEDAI scale, while 13 patients had scores 2–4 due to the serological abnormalities only. We conclude that (1) initial treatment with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine is effective and can be used in agreement with International Guidelines until the evidence for biological treatments benefits becomes available; (2) complete and even partial renal response have positive prognostic value, and failure to achieve renal response negatively influences kidney and patient survival; (3) the validity of complete renal response in SLE is questioned by the absence of conventional definition of SLE remission.

[Therapeutic strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus]

Therapeutic strategy means the definition of a long-term target, which should be reached by a chosen management. As for rheumatoid arthritis, the treat to target initiative recommends remission as the target for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but the command variables of remission are not yet defined. The basis of a therapeutic strategy is first the analysis of those factors that may influence the achievement of the objectives: SLE disease activity, the differentiation of damage, organ manifestations, comorbidities, genetics, sex, age of onset and considering the pathophysiological basis are some of these factors. The next step is the analysis of the available substances and concepts that allow the target to be reached. Finally, rules for management (e.g. guidelines) are needed that enrich the possibility to reach the target and improve the prognosis of patients suffering from SLE.