Predictors of disability in a childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus cohort: results from the CARRA Legacy Registry

Real-world application of the pediatric Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index in childhood-onset lupus

OBJECTIVES

The pediatric Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (pGTI) is a new, pediatric-specific tool to quantify glucocorticoid (GC)-related morbidity in children. We evaluated the feasibility and construct validity of retrospective pGTI scoring in patients with pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) and identified risk factors for cumulative toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with pSLE treated with GCs at two pediatric centers (1999-2023). GC exposure was estimated using interval-averaged oral prednisone-equivalent dose and cumulative prednisone-equivalent dose. We scored change in GC toxicity every 6 months (±2) using a modified pGTI including 7 of 10 domains. We calculated the Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS), a continuous summation of toxicity accrued. Mixed effects linear regression was used to identify factors associated with CWS.

RESULTS

There were 126 patients with pSLE, including 88 with nephritis, with a median of 6 visits/patient. Nearly half (47 %) experienced toxicity in the Blood Pressure domain. Other common toxicities were mood disturbance (25 %), followed by increased body mass index (BMI), striae, and sleep disturbance (21 % each). Decreased growth velocity was observed in 18 %. There was modest correlation between cumulative GC dose and CWS (rho 0.3; p < 0.01). Greater cumulative toxicity was associated with younger age, elevated BMI, and rituximab use at the time of GC initiation, albeit indications for the latter were not captured.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pSLE experience a high burden of GC toxicity, particularly related to blood pressure, BMI, sleep, and growth. Standardized, pediatric-specific GC toxicity assessment is feasible in real-world settings and can facilitate evaluation of strategies to reduce morbidity in children requiring chronic GC treatment.

Health Equity Implications of Missing Data Among Youths With Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Proof-of-Concept Study in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately impact marginalized populations. Socioeconomically patterned missing data can magnify existing health inequities by supporting inferences that may misrepresent populations of interest. Our objective was to assess missing data and subsequent health equity implications among participants with childhood-onset SLE enrolled in a large pediatric rheumatology registry.

METHODS

We evaluated co-missingness of 12 variables representing demographics, socioeconomic position, and clinical factors (e.g., disease-related indices) using Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry childhood-onset SLE enrollment data (2015-2022; n = 766). We performed logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for missing disease-related indices at enrollment (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K] and/or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]) associated with data missingness. We used linear regression to assess the association between socioeconomic factors and SLEDAI-2K at enrollment using 3 analytic methods for missing data: complete case analysis, multiple imputation, and nonprobabilistic bias analyses, with missing values imputed to represent extreme low or high disadvantage.

RESULTS

On average, participants were missing 6.2% of data, with over 50% of participants missing at least 1 variable. Missing data correlated most closely with variables within data categories (i.e., demographic). Government-assisted health insurance was associated with missing SLEDAI-2K and/or SDI scores compared to private health insurance (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.22, 3.41]). The different analytic approaches resulted in varying analytic sample sizes and fundamentally conflicting estimated associations.

CONCLUSION

Our results support intentional evaluation of missing data to inform effect estimate interpretation and critical assessment of causal statements that might otherwise misrepresent health inequities.

Prevalence of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia: An approach from the national health registry data

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune disease of multifactorial origin. There are no previous studies in Colombia describing juvenile SLE (jSLE) prevalence, prompting this demographic description.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed for prevalence calculation and epidemiologic analysis of jSLE) in Colombian patients, ages 0-19, from 2015 to 2019.

METHODS

This descriptive, cross-sectional study searched the Colombian Ministry of Health database for codes of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) associated with jSLE to estimate the disease prevalence for the total population and for specific age groups at national and regional levels. Calculations used intercensal estimates of population based on the projections of the national statistics administrative department (DANE) from the most recent census. This paper presents a sociodemographic analysis of patients with jSLE.

RESULTS

The study identified in Colombia, from 2015 to 2019, 3680 cases with jSLE as the principal diagnosis. Calculated prevalence of jSLE was 25 cases per 100,000 population, with highest frequency in ages 15-19 and females (84%), with a female:male ratio of 5.1:1.

CONCLUSION

Estimated prevalence of jSLE in Colombia is at the highest limit of worldwide findings. Consistent with reports in the literature, the disease involves females more frequently than males.

Construct validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Paediatric measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: cross-sectional evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate construct validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Paediatric measures of symptoms and functioning against measures of disease activity among youth with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional associations among PROMIS measures and clinical metrics of disease activity were estimated.

SETTING

Seven clinical sites of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Alliance (CARRA) in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Youth aged 8-17 years enrolled in the CARRA Registry.

INTERVENTION

PROMIS measures were collected and associations with clinical measures of disease activity estimated, by condition, in bivariate and multivariable analyses with adjustment for sociodemographics, insurance status, medications and disease duration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PROMIS Paediatric measures of mobility, physical activity, fatigue, pain interference, family relationships, peer relationships, depressive symptoms, psychological stress, anxiety, and meaning and purpose, and clinical metrics of disease.

RESULTS

Among 451 youth (average age 13.8 years, 71% female), most (n=393, 87%) had a JIA diagnosis and the remainder (n=58, 13%) had SLE. Among participants with JIA, those with moderate/high compared with low/inactive disease had, on average, worse mobility (multivariable regression coefficient and 95% CIs) (-7.40; -9.30 to -5.50), fatigue (3.22; 1.02 to 5.42), pain interference (4.76; 3.04 to 6.48), peer relationships (-2.58; -4.52 to -1.64), depressive symptoms (3.00; 0.96 to 5.04), anxiety (2.48; 0.40 to 4.56) and psychological stress (2.52; 0.68 to 4.36). For SLE, youth with active versus inactive disease had on average worse mobility (-5.07; -10.15 to 0.01) but PROMIS Paediatric measures did not discriminate participants with active and inactive disease in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven PROMIS Paediatric measures discriminated between active and inactive disease in youth with JIA. Results advance the usefulness of PROMIS for understanding well-being and improving interventions for youth with JIA, but larger studies are needed to determine utility in SLE cohorts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U19AR069522).

Adherence to medication by adolescents and young adults with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Background: Approximately 20% of all cases systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) are juvenile onset. Children and adolescents with SLE usually present with more severe illness and have a higher mortality rate compared to adults with SLE. Adherence to medications in children and adolescents has a major impact on disease control as well as short- and long-term outcomes. Improved understanding of adherence rates, risk factors for non-adherence, and barriers to adherence are essential in order to increase patient adherence with medication regimens. The aim of our study was to evaluate adherence to medications among children and young adults with pediatric-onset SLE and identify barriers for non-adherence by utilizing several adherence evaluation methods.

Methods: Adherence to medications of patients aged 12–25, with childhood-onset SLE was assessed as follows: (1). The brief medication questionnaire (BMQ): self-report tool for screening adherence and barriers to adherence. (2). Mycophenolic acid (MPA) serum level. (3). Medication possession ratio (MPR): data assessing 90-day refills and dispense prior to patient’s enrollment was collected.

Results: Of the 38 patients who were enrolled in the study, 65% were found to be non-adherent according to at least 1 measurement method. Forty-four percent of patients were found to be non-adherent based on the self-reported questionnaire (BMQ). Of those taking MMF, 33% had an MPA level < 1 mcg/mL and were defined as non-adherent. Seventeen percent of patients were found to be non-adherent according to pharmacy refills rate. Forty-six percent of patients stated that their medications caused side effects, 33% of patients indicated difficulty remembering to take the medications, and 25% reported difficulty paying for medications. The disease activity index (SLEDAI) score of the “adherent group” at diagnosis was significantly lower compared to the “non-adherent” group. Patients with private insurance had more access barriers to obtaining medications compared to patients with public insurance.

Conclusion: Non-adherence to medications is highly prevalent among cSLE patients. Higher SLEDAI score is a risk factor for non-adherence. Adherence to medications should be routinely evaluated among adolescence and young adults with cSLE and barriers to adherence need to be addressed to decrease morbidity and improve patient outcomes.

Quality of life measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review

In this study we systematically investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tools, which have been most often used over the last five years to evaluate the QoL in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), focusing on their items and applications. A detailed literature search was conducted: the inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies including at least 50 patients; 2) studies including at least 25 patients with SLE; 3) quality of life testing with validated measures. The systematic review was based on 119 studies for a total of 32,449 SLE patients and 3092 controls. A total of 35 different patients-reported quality of life measures, applied in cohorts of patients with SLE, were retrieved with the 36-item Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) (63 studies of 119 =52.95%), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) (17 studies =14.3%) and Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) (12 studies =10%) being the most commonly used tools. Overall, this systematic review of the literature indicated that quality of life in patients with SLE appears to be poor and generally lower compared to both the general population and patients with other chronic conditions, as was shown by a few studies that used SF-36 and LupusPRO. The use of HRQoL scoring in SLE is gaining increasing interest and is used both in randomized controlled trials and in real-life. Future efforts are needed to improve the understanding of the impact of the disease burden on quality of life from the patient’s perspective.

Factors Associated With Variation in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Care Delivery

Objective

Patients with pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) receive only a fraction of recommended care. Using published quality indicators and guidelines, we developed a 13‐item pediatric lupus care index (p‐LuCI) to quantify the proportion of recommended clinical evaluations and comorbidity prevention interventions completed and the timeliness of follow‐up. Our objective was to assess baseline index performance and identify sources of p‐LuCI variation.

Methods

We performed a cross‐sectional study in patients with pSLE or MCTD and analyzed the performance of individual p‐LuCI process metrics and calculated the overall p‐LuCI score. We identified factors associated with the p‐LuCI using multivariable linear regression with clustering by provider.

Results

For 110 patients (99 with pSLE and 11 with MCTD), the median p‐LuCI was 65.2% (interquartile range: 9.1‐92.3%). Component performance ranged from 27.3% (on‐time scheduling) to 95.4% (steroid‐sparing treatment). Patients with p‐LuCI scores above the median had higher scores across all 13 components. Higher p‐LuCI scores were independently associated with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug use (β = 14.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5‐27.2]), nephritis (β = 10.4 [95% CI, 5.1‐15.8]), higher provider pSLE/MCTD volume (β = 3.1 [95% CI, 1.9‐4.2] per patient), assignment to rheumatology fellow trainee (β = 36.3 [95% CI, 17.3‐55.2]), and disease duration of less than 1 year (β = 12.6 [95% CI, 0.7‐24.5]). Differences by race, ethnicity, and/or insurance were not observed.

Conclusion

Using an index of recommended pSLE care metrics, we identified significant variation in performance by disease, treatment, and provider characteristics. The p‐LuCI may be useful to assess care quality at the patient, provider, and practice levels and to identify areas in need of greater standardization.

Lupus Cohorts

Large cohorts with diverse ethnic backgrounds and heterogenous clinical features have provided the real-life data about the safety and efficacy of various treatment regimens for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There are multiple well-established regional, national, and international lupus cohorts that have made significant contributions to the understanding of SLE. Using social media for cohort-based studies can significantly increase the outreach in a short time period for studying rare diseases such as SLE. Lack of strict inclusion criteria allows study of a broad range of patients but selection bias and incomplete data are possible in long-term cohort studies.

Patterns of Healthcare Use and Medication Adherence among Youth with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus during Transfer from Pediatric to Adult Care

OBJECTIVE

Youth with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) transferring from pediatric to adult care are at risk for poor outcomes. We describe patterns of rheumatology/nephrology care and changes in healthcare use and medication adherence during transfer.

METHODS

We identified youth ages 15-25 with SLE using US private insurance claims from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart. Rheumatology/nephrology visit patterns were categorized as (1) unilateral transfers to adult care within 12 months, (2) overlapping pediatric and adult visits, (3) lost to followup, or (4) continuing pediatric care. We used negative binomial regression and paired t tests to estimate changes in healthcare use and medication possession ratios (MPR) after the last pediatric (index) visit. We compared MPR between youth who transferred and age-matched peers continuing pediatric care.

RESULTS

Of the 184 youth transferred out of pediatric care, 41.8% transferred unilaterally, 31.5% had overlapping visits over a median of 12 months before final transfer, and 26.6% were lost to followup. We matched 107 youth continuing pediatric care. Overall, ambulatory care use decreased among those lost to followup. Acute care use decreased across all groups. MPR after the index date were lower in youth lost to followup (mean 0.24) compared to peers in pediatric care (mean 0.57, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Youth with SLE with continuous private insurance coverage do not use more acute care after transfer to adult care. However, a substantial proportion fail to see adult subspecialists within 12 months and have worse medication adherence, placing them at higher risk for adverse outcomes.

Socioeconomic Status, Health Care, and Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affects those with low socioeconomic status. Evidence from the past 2 decades has revealed clearer distinctions on the mechanisms of poverty that affect long-term outcomes in SLE. Poverty exacerbates direct, indirect, and humanistic costs and is associated with worse SLE disease damage, greater mortality, and poorer quality of life. Ongoing commitments from medicine and society are required to reduce disparities, improve access to care, and bolster resilience in persons with SLE who live in poverty.

Disparities in Childhood-Onset Lupus

Disparities in prevalence, disease severity, physical and mental morbidity, and mortality exist in childhood-onset systemic lupus (cSLE) that lead to worse outcomes in children with systemic lupus erythematosus from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. Important gaps exist in knowledge regarding many individual race/ethnicities across the globe, the interaction between race/ethnicity and poverty, and drivers for identified disparities. Large cSLE registries will facilitate investigating disparities in groups of patients that have yet to be identified. Social-ecological models can inform approaches to investigate, monitor, and address disparities in cSLE.

Global consensus building and prioritisation of fundamental lupus challenges: the ALPHA project

Objective

Lupus is a complex, heterogeneous autoimmune disease that has yet to see significant progress towards more timely diagnosis, improved treatment options for short-term and long-term outcomes, and appropriate access to care. The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) project is the first step in establishing global consensus and developing concrete strategies to address the challenges limiting progress.

Methods

A Global Advisory Committee of 13 individuals guided the project and began barrier identification. Seventeen expert interviews were conducted to further characterise key barriers. Transcripts were analysed using Nvivo and a codebook was created containing a list of thematic ‘nodes’ (topics) and their descriptions. Findings were used to develop a final survey instrument that was fielded to a diverse, international stakeholder audience to achieve broad consensus.

Results

Expert interviews identified lupus heterogeneity as the primary barrier hindering advancement. Subsequent barriers were categorised into three areas: (1) Drug development. (2) Clinical care. (3) Access and value. The global survey received 127 completed responses from experts across 20 countries. Respondents identified barriers as high priority including the lack of biomarkers for clinical and drug development use, flawed clinical trial design, lack of access to clinicians familiar with lupus, and obstacles to effective management of lupus due to social determinants of care. Respondents also identified 30 autoimmune conditions that may be lupus-related based on overlapping features, shared autoantibodies and pathophysiology.

Conclusions

ALPHA is a comprehensive initiative to identify and prioritise the continuum of challenges facing people with lupus by engaging a global audience of lupus experts. It also explored views on lupus as a spectrum of related diseases. Conclusions from this effort provide a framework to generate actionable approaches to the identified high-priority barriers.

Are diffuse and limited juvenile systemic sclerosis different in clinical presentation? Clinical characteristics of a juvenile systemic sclerosis cohort

Introduction:

Juvenile systemic sclerosis is an orphan disease. Currently, the majority of juvenile systemic sclerosis cohort studies are retrospective in design without standardized assessment. This study was conducted prospectively to investigate the difference in manifestations of limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis and diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis subtypes. An additional aim was to compare these data to other juvenile systemic sclerosis cohorts and a large adult systemic sclerosis cohort.

Methods:

Patients fulfilling the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society juvenile systemic sclerosis classification criteria were included. Clinical characteristics and patient-related outcomes were assessed.

Results:

In all, 88 patients with a mean disease duration of 3.5 years were enrolled, 72.5% with diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis with a mean modified Rodnan Skin score of 18 and 27.5% with limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis with mean modified Rodnan Skin score of 9. The mean age at the onset of Raynaud’s and first non-Raynaud’s symptoms was similar in both groups, approximately 9 and 10.5 years. Active digital tip ulcerations were present in 29% diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis and none in the limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis subjects (p = 0.005). Of those with cardiopulmonary testing, 3% of diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis and 23% of limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis group had cardiac involvement (p = 0.015), and 41% diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis and 22% of the limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis group had pulmonary involvement (p = 0.009). Physician global disease damage assessment was higher in the diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis group compared to the limited cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis group: 35 and 15 (p = 0.021).

Discussion:

The majority of this international juvenile systemic sclerosis cohort had diffuse cutaneous juvenile systemic sclerosis (72.5%) with more frequent vascular and pulmonary involvement compared to the limited cutaneous group, who had increased cardiac involvement. Our cohort reflects prior findings of published juvenile systemic sclerosis cohorts and emphasizes a difference in the presentation compared to adult-onset systemic sclerosis.

Transitions in Rheumatic Disease: Pediatric to Adult Care

Although it has been widely acknowledged for more than two decades that transition from pediatric to adult care is a vulnerable time for adolescents and young adults with rheumatic diseases, current primary and subspecialty care transition and transfer processes remain inadequate. Barriers to improving transition include complex health care systems, neurodevelopmental challenges of adolescents and young adults, and insufficient transition-related education and resources for health care providers. Standardized, evidence-based transition interventions are sorely needed to establish best practices. Quality improvement approaches such as the Six Core Elements of Health Care Transition offer opportunities to improve transition care for teens and young adults.