Damage index for antiphospholipid syndrome during long term follow-up: Correlation between organ damage accrual and quality of life

Predictors of damage accrual and its impact on health-related quality of life of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Independent validation of the damage index for antiphospholipid syndrome (DIAPS)

OBJECTIVES

We aim to independently assess the validity of the damage index for antiphospholipid syndrome (DIAPS) in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients by exploring the prevalence and risk factors of organ damage and evaluating its impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including all thrombotic APS patients (Sydney criteria) attending a Portuguese tertiary centre. Damage was assessed using the DIAPS, and HR-QoL using the 3- and 5-level EuroQol HR-QoL (EQ-D5-3L and 5L), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) applied via a phone questionnaire. Spearman's correlation between DIAPS and the HR-QoL scales was performed. Risk factors for damage accrual and HR-QoL impairment were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 108 patients (female, 65.7%; white, 90.7%; primary APS, 75.9%; median disease duration, 6 years), damage (DIAPS≥1) developed in 48.2% of patients (mean ± SD DIAPS, 3.08 ± 1.83). DIAPS's neuropsychiatric domain was the most affected (24.2%), followed by the peripheral vascular domain (20.3%). No clinical, demographic nor laboratory parameters were significantly associated with damage. Regarding HR-QoL, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and usual activities domains were the most frequently impaired in both scales. DIAPS's domains correlated similarly with the EQ-5D-3L and 5L scales' individual domains. Female sex, medical disorders, secondary APS and type of presenting thrombosis (arterial) increased the risk of HR-QoL impairment. Total DIAPS was associated with higher odds of mobility, self-care and pain/discomfort impairment in both EQ-5D-3L and 5L scales but lost its independent risk in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

This external validation of DIAPS reinforces the ability of the score to correlate with HR-QoL while also highlighting risk factors for HR-QoL impairment other than damage accrual.

Risk factors for damage accrual in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: A retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite anticoagulant therapy, a antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has a higher rate of recurrent events, which can lead to damage accrual and a negative impact on life quality.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk factors and APS subsets associated with damage accrual.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study. We reviewed the medical records of 282 APS patients, with a median age of 36 (IQR 30-46) years and a median of 195 (IQR 137-272) months. The primary endpoint was damage accrual during follow-up, defined as organ/tissue impairment present for at least six months or causing permanent loss. The secondary endpoints were early organ damage within six months of disease onset and death.

RESULTS

Eighty (28.4%) patients presented damage accrual; 52.5% developed damage within six months of APS onset, and 41.3% had more than one organ involved. Neuropsychiatric involvement, affecting 38.8% of the patients, was the most frequent, followed by peripheral vasculopathy and renal involvement, 35% either. Death happened in 7 (2.5 %) patients; damage accrual was associated with a 6-fold risk of death [OR 6.7 (95% CI 1.3-35.1), p = 0.03]. Microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations were independent risk factors for damage accrual with 5-fold and 4-fold higher risk, respectively [(OR 4.9 (95% CI 2.1-11.7), p < 0.0001 and (OR 3.8 (95% CI 1.5-10.1), p = 0.007]. The cumulative incidence of damage accrual increased by 5.7-fold and 3.6-fold in patients with microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations.

CONCLUSIONS

APS patients had a higher frequency of damage accrual. Microangiopathy and non-criteria manifestations were independent risk factors for damage accrual.

Damage measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients included in the APS ACTION registry

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to quantify damage burden measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in aPL-positive patients with or without a history of thrombosis in an international cohort (the APS ACTION cohort). Secondly, we aimed to identify clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with damage in aPL-positive patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we analysed the baseline damage in aPL-positive patients with or without APS classification. We excluded patients with other autoimmune diseases. We analysed the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics based on two subgroups: (i) thrombotic APS patients with high vs low damage; and (ii) non-thrombotic aPL-positive patients with vs without damage.

RESULTS

Of the 826 aPL-positive patients included in the registry as of April 2020, 586 with no other systemic autoimmune diseases were included in the analysis (412 thrombotic and 174 non-thrombotic). In the thrombotic group, hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 1.82; 95% CI 1.05, 3.15; adjusted P = 0.032), obesity (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.23, 3.71; adjusted P = 0.007), aβ2GPI high titres (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.36, 4.02; adjusted P = 0.002) and corticosteroid use (ever) (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.80, 7.75; adjusted P < 0.001) were independently associated with high damage at baseline. In the non-thrombotic group, hypertension (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.82, 11.35; adjusted P = 0.001) and hyperlipidaemia (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.37, 13.65; adjusted P = 0.013) were independent predictors of damage at baseline; conversely, single aPL positivity was inversely correlated with damage (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.075, 0.77; adjusted P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

DIAPS indicates substantial damage in aPL-positive patients in the APS ACTION cohort. Selected traditional cardiovascular risk factors, steroids use and specific aPL profiles may help to identify patients more prone to present with a higher damage burden.

Epidemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: macro- and microvascular manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic macro- and microvascular manifestations and pregnancy complications in the setting of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), namely anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. Four decades after its first description, APS prevalence and incidence are still not completely understood due to the limited number of well-designed, population-based multi-ethnic studies. Furthermore, despite decades of efforts to standardise aPL immunoassays, considerable intraassay and interlaboratory variances in aPL measures still exist. Large multicentre APS cohorts have shown a 10-year survival of ∼91% and the presence of catastrophic APS occurs in about 1% of the entire population, associated with a 50% mortality rate. Clinically, any organ can be affected in the context of large, medium or small vessel (artery and/or vein) thrombosis. Macrovascular thrombosis is the hallmark of the disease and veins are more frequently affected than arteries. Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism thromboembolic disease is the most common APS manifestation, while stroke and transient ischaemic attack are the most frequent arterial thrombosis events. Myocardial infarction can also occur and contributes to increased mortality in APS. A minority of patients present with thrombosis affecting the intraabdominal organs, including the liver, spleen, small and large bowel, and the kidneys. Microvascular thrombosis, including APS nephropathy, chronic skin ulcers and livedoid vasculopathy represent a diagnostic challenge requiring histologic confirmation. In this narrative review we summarize the available evidence on APS epidemiology, focusing on the description of the prevalence of macro- and microvascular manifestations of the disease.

Bleeding events in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: prevalence, severity, and associated damage accrual

Background

Life-long anticoagulation increases bleeding risk in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome does not include bleeding events in damage accrual.

Objectives

We aimed to characterize the prevalence, severity, and damage associated with bleeding events in patients with APS.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with thrombotic APS (2006 Sydney criteria). Bleeding events were reviewed up to 43 years and classified according to the ISTH definitions into 2 groups: 1) major bleedings and 2) nonmajor bleedings (minor bleedings and clinically relevant nonmajor bleedings). Damage events were recorded as bleeding events a) resulting in permanent (>6 months) decrease in organ function and b) complicated by total/partial organ resection.

Results

Among 197 patients (2412 patient-years [PYs] of follow-up), all of whom had been exposed to antithrombotic therapy, 40.6% experienced 167 bleedings (6.9 events per 100 PYs), of whom 61.3% had nonmajor bleedings (77.2% of bleedings: 42.6% minor, 57.4% clinically relevant nonmajor) and 38.8% had major bleedings (22.8% of bleedings; 1.6 events per 100 PYs). Soft/connective tissue was affected in 44.3% of bleedings, and 94.6% were nonmajor bleedings. Central nervous system was affected in 20.9% of bleedings, and 62.9% were major bleedings. Bleeding events were spontaneous in 90.4% of cases, and thrombocytopenia was likely involved in 62.2% of bleedings. Damage occurred in 11.4% of bleedings and affected 7.6% of patients. Most of the damage was associated with central nervous system events (8.4% of all bleedings).

Conclusion

Approximately 40% of patients experienced at least 1 bleeding, and almost 8% of patients were left with organ damage not recognized by the current version of the Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Comorbid association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome (tPAPS): A more severe phenotype?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the frequency of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome (tPAPS), to investigate the performance of screening tools for OSA in this scenario and to compare clinical/laboratorial differences in tPAPS patients with and without OSA.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled patients with tPAPS to undergo sleep studies using a portable monitor. OSA was defined as apnea-hypopnea index ≥15 events/h. Frequency of OSA in tPAPS was evaluated and compared with age-, gender-, and BMI-matched controls (1:3 ratio) from the Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto (ELSA-Brasil). Next, we tested the performance of three different screening tools for assessing OSA in patients with tPAPS. Finally, patients with tPAPS were stratified according to OSA status comparing their clinical and laboratory characteristics (including damage burden measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome [DIAPS] and biomarkers associated with thrombosis) using standard statistical procedures.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included for analysis (females: 82.7%; mean age: 48 ± 14 years; body-mass index: 31.1 ± 6.5 Kg/m2; 25% with moderate-severe OSA). When compared to matched controls from ELSA-Brasil (n = 115), there was no significant differences in the frequencies of OSA (tPAPS: 12/42 [28.6%] vs. controls: 35/115 [30.4%], p = 0.821). Among screening tools, NoSAS had the highest area under ROC curve (AUC 0.806, CI 95% 0.672-0.939, p = 0.001), followed by STOP-Bang (AUC 0.772, CI 95% 0.607-0.938, p = 0.004). Patients with comorbid tPAPS and OSA presented higher levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) (median 38.9 vs. 32.6, p = 0.038) and DIAPS (median 5 vs. 2, p = 0.020), when compared to those without OSA. OSA remained statistically associated with higher DIAPS, even after controlling for age, disease duration and BMI.

CONCLUSION

OSA is common in patients with tPAPS, with rates comparable to a non-referred population. Both NoSAS and STOP-Bang scores seems to be useful for screening OSA in these patients. Patients with tPAPS+OSA had higher damage burden and higher levels of vWF, which might suggest a more severe phenotype of tPAPS in this scenario.

Prevalence and adverse consequences of delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. An observational cohort study and a review of the literature

OBIECTIVES

This study aims to prospectively evaluate the frequency and adverse consequences of diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis in a cohort of patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS). In addition, a systematic review of the literature concerning the diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis of TAPS was carried out.

METHODS

Patient enrollment occurred between 1999 and 2022. The study group was formed by TAPS patients whose diagnosis was delayed and those who were misdiagnosed. The control group was made up of patients who were timely and correctly diagnosed with TAPS.

RESULTS

The literature review showed 42 misdiagnosed patients, 27 of them were in one retrospective cohort study and 15 in 13 case reports. One hundred sixty-one out of 189 patients (85.2%) received a timely, correct diagnosis of TAPS; 28 (14.8%) did not. The number of patients with diagnostic issues was significantly higher for the first period (1999-2010), and the number of patients with a correct diagnosis was significantly higher for the second one (2011-2022). When the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients with delayed diagnosis were compared with those with misdiagnosis, there was a significantly higher number of severe adverse consequences characterized by permanent disability or death in the latter group. The two most common types of misdiagnoses were systemic lupus erythematosus (6 cases, 46.1%) and cardiovascular diseases (4 cases, 30.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that although knowledge about TAPS has improved over time, diagnostic delays and errors remains to be addressed as they are strongly associated to adverse consequences. Key Points •Although knowledge of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome has improved over time, it is still limited. •Diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis are still an important issue that remains to be addressed as they are strongly associated to adverse consequences. •The three more frequent misdiagnoses are multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and cardiovascular diseases.

Controversies in the Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

ABSTRACT

Strategies to prevent thrombosis in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients are of the utmost importance. The risk of thrombosis in patients with aPLs varies, depending on additional venous thrombosis and cardiovascular risk factors, as well as associated comorbidities. Recurrent thrombosis despite treatment with vitamin K antagonists is relatively common in daily practice. In this context, the effectiveness of the new direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome is debated, as well as that of low-dose aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis. There is an urgent unmet need to recognize the subgroup of patients that may benefit from low-dose aspirin use. Here we also discuss different points of view on primary and secondary thrombosis preventions in aPL-positive patients, which were presented as a debate during the 2021 PANLAR Congress (Pan-American League of the Association of Rheumatology) and that was organized by GESAF (Argentine Society of Rheumatology APS Study Group). It is the intention of this article to provide a useful discussion to aid treatment decision-making in daily clinical practice.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombo-inflammatory disease propelled by circulating autoantibodies that recognize cell surface phospholipids and phospholipid binding proteins. The result is an increased risk of thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity, and various other autoimmune and inflammatory complications. Although antiphospholipid syndrome was first recognized in patients with lupus, the stand alone presentation of antiphospholipid syndrome is at least equally common. Overall, the diagnosis appears to affect at least one in 2000 people. Studies of antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis have long focused on logical candidates such as coagulation factors, endothelial cells, and platelets. Recent work has shed light on additional potential therapeutic targets within the innate immune system, including the complement system and neutrophil extracellular traps. Vitamin K antagonists remain the mainstay of treatment for most patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome and, based on current data, appear superior to the more targeted direct oral anticoagulants. The potential role of immunomodulatory treatments in antiphospholipid syndrome management is receiving increased attention. As for many systemic autoimmune diseases, the most important future direction is to more precisely identify mechanistic drivers of disease heterogeneity in pursuit of unlocking personalized and proactive treatments for patients.

Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) to better understand how living with aPL may affect their quality of life.

METHODS

Patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PF) and Cognitive Function (CF) Short Forms as well as the pain intensity (PI) rating (scale of 1-10). Patients were characterized for demographics, clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory test results, and medication usage. Multivariate modeling was done via linear regression.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients, 89 had primary APS, 21 had secondary APS, and 29 had persistent aPL without meeting clinical criteria for APS. The average T scores (±SD) for PF and CF were 45.4 ± 9.2 and 48.6 ± 11.6, respectively; the average for PI was 3.0 ± 2.6. Approximately half of the patients (47%) endorsed at least mild impairment in PF (T score < 45). Mean PF, CF, and PI did not differ between diagnostic groups. Individuals who endorsed more impairment on one measure also tended to endorse more impairment on another (Pearson r = 0.43-0.59). In the multivariate models, age, smoking, pain medications, and serotonergic medications were associated with impairment in at least one PRO domain. The Damage Index for APS was significantly correlated with both PF and CF.

CONCLUSION

Individuals living with APS endorsed more impairment in PF (and potentially CF) than expected for the general population. The relationship between certain medications and PROs warrants further study, as does the longitudinal trajectory of these and other PROs.

Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical features and therapeutic interventions in a single center retrospective case series

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thromboinflammatory disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies and either thrombotic events or pregnancy morbidity. The objective of this study was to review a large institution's experience to better understand the characteristics of children with APS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric APS at a tertiary referral center. The electronic medical record system was queried from 2000 through 2019, and 21 cases were included based on meeting the revised Sapporo Classification criteria by age 18 or younger. Comparisons between primary and secondary APS patients were made with two-tailed t-tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included with a median age at diagnosis of 16 years and median follow-up of 5.8 years. Secondary APS was slightly more common than primary APS (11 vs. 10 cases) and was primarily diagnosed in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus. Two thirds of patients (67%) also had "non-criteria" manifestations of APS including thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and livedo reticularis/racemosa. Almost half of patients (43%) had recurrent thrombosis, typically when patients were subtherapeutic or non-adherent with anticoagulation. Damage Index in Patients with Thrombotic APS (DIAPS) scores indicated a chronic burden of disease in both primary and secondary APS patients.

CONCLUSION

This case series of pediatric APS provides important context regarding disease phenotypes displayed by children with APS. High prevalence of non-criteria clinical manifestations highlights the need to consider these characteristics when developing pediatric-specific classification criteria and when considering this relatively rare diagnosis in pediatric practice.

Description of damage in different clusters of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To identify the different clinical phenotypes of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by using cluster analysis and describe cumulative damage of disease clusters.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes patients with APS (±systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)). Two-step cluster analysis was applied by considering clinical data. Damage was calculated for all patients by applying damage index for APS (DIAPS).

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients (198 females; median age of 43 years; median follow-up of 9.5 years) were classified into four clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 74) consisted of older patients with arterial-predominant thrombosis, livedo reticularis, and increased cardiovascular risk; cluster 2 (n = 70) of SLE+APS patients with thrombocytopenia and heart valve disease; cluster 3 (n = 59) of patients with venous-predominant thrombosis, less extra-criteria manifestations; and cluster 4 (n = 34) of patients with only pregnancy morbidity with lower frequency of extra-criteria features and cardiovascular risk. Patients with SLE+APS (n = 123) had the highest mean DIAPS. Regarding clusters, 1 and 2 had high cumulative damage. While cumulative survival rates of clusters did not differ, cluster 2 and 3 had lower survival rates at further years. There was no correlation between DIAPS and mortality.

CONCLUSION

SLE+APS patients with extra-criteria manifestations and older APS patients with arterial thrombosis and increased cardiovascular risk have higher cumulative damage. Effective treatment of SLE disease activity and control of cardiovascular risk may help to reduce cumulative damage in these patients.