1
|
Pedone M, Argiento R, Stingo FC. Personalized treatment selection via product partition models with covariates. Biometrics 2024; 80:ujad003. [PMID: 38364806 DOI: 10.1093/biomtc/ujad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Precision medicine is an approach for disease treatment that defines treatment strategies based on the individual characteristics of the patients. Motivated by an open problem in cancer genomics, we develop a novel model that flexibly clusters patients with similar predictive characteristics and similar treatment responses; this approach identifies, via predictive inference, which one among a set of treatments is better suited for a new patient. The proposed method is fully model based, avoiding uncertainty underestimation attained when treatment assignment is performed by adopting heuristic clustering procedures, and belongs to the class of product partition models with covariates, here extended to include the cohesion induced by the normalized generalized gamma process. The method performs particularly well in scenarios characterized by considerable heterogeneity of the predictive covariates in simulation studies. A cancer genomics case study illustrates the potential benefits in terms of treatment response yielded by the proposed approach. Finally, being model based, the approach allows estimating clusters' specific response probabilities and then identifying patients more likely to benefit from personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pedone
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 50134
| | - Raffaele Argiento
- Department of Economics, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, 24121
| | - Francesco C Stingo
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 50134
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nagata Y, Zhao R, Awada H, Kerr CM, Mirzaev I, Kongkiatkamon S, Nazha A, Makishima H, Radivoyevitch T, Scott JG, Sekeres MA, Hobbs BP, Maciejewski JP. Machine learning demonstrates that somatic mutations imprint invariant morphologic features in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2020; 136:2249-2262. [PMID: 32961553 PMCID: PMC7702479 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Morphologic interpretation is the standard in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but it has limitations, such as varying reliability in pathologic evaluation and lack of integration with genetic data. Somatic events shape morphologic features, but the complexity of morphologic and genetic changes makes clear associations challenging. This article interrogates novel clinical subtypes of MDS using a machine-learning technique devised to identify patterns of cooccurrence among morphologic features and genomic events. We sequenced 1079 MDS patients and analyzed bone marrow morphologic alterations and other clinical features. A total of 1929 somatic mutations were identified. Five distinct morphologic profiles with unique clinical characteristics were defined. Seventy-seven percent of higher-risk patients clustered in profile 1. All lower-risk (LR) patients clustered into the remaining 4 profiles: profile 2 was characterized by pancytopenia, profile 3 by monocytosis, profile 4 by elevated megakaryocytes, and profile 5 by erythroid dysplasia. These profiles could also separate patients with different prognoses. LR MDS patients were classified into 8 genetic signatures (eg, signature A had TET2 mutations, signature B had both TET2 and SRSF2 mutations, and signature G had SF3B1 mutations), demonstrating association with specific morphologic profiles. Six morphologic profiles/genetic signature associations were confirmed in a separate analysis of an independent cohort. Our study demonstrates that nonrandom or even pathognomonic relationships between morphology and genotype to define clinical features can be identified. This is the first comprehensive implementation of machine-learning algorithms to elucidate potential intrinsic interdependencies among genetic lesions, morphologies, and clinical prognostic in attributes of MDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasunobu Nagata
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Hematology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ran Zhao
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and
| | - Hassan Awada
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Cassandra M Kerr
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Inom Mirzaev
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sunisa Kongkiatkamon
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Aziz Nazha
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and
| | - Hideki Makishima
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Jacob G Scott
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mikkael A Sekeres
- Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and
| | | | - Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma J, Stingo FC, Hobbs BP. Bayesian personalized treatment selection strategies that integrate predictive with prognostic determinants. Biom J 2019; 61:902-917. [PMID: 30786040 PMCID: PMC7341533 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The evolution of "informatics" technologies has the potential to generate massive databases, but the extent to which personalized medicine may be effectuated depends on the extent to which these rich databases may be utilized to advance understanding of the disease molecular profiles and ultimately integrated for treatment selection, necessitating robust methodology for dimension reduction. Yet, statistical methods proposed to address challenges arising with the high-dimensionality of omics-type data predominately rely on linear models and emphasize associations deriving from prognostic biomarkers. Existing methods are often limited for discovering predictive biomarkers that interact with treatment and fail to elucidate the predictive power of their resultant selection rules. In this article, we present a Bayesian predictive method for personalized treatment selection that is devised to integrate both the treatment predictive and disease prognostic characteristics of a particular patient's disease. The method appropriately characterizes the structural constraints inherent to prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and hence properly utilizes these complementary sources of information for treatment selection. The methodology is illustrated through a case study of lower grade glioma. Theoretical considerations are explored to demonstrate the manner in which treatment selection is impacted by prognostic features. Additionally, simulations based on an actual leukemia study are provided to ascertain the method's performance with respect to selection rules derived from competing methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junsheng Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Francesco C. Stingo
- Department of Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni “G.Parenti”, University of Florence, Florence, 50134, Italy
| | - Brian P. Hobbs
- Quantitative Health Sciences and The Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang M, Hobbs BP. Estimating mean local posterior predictive benefit for biomarker-guided treatment strategies. Stat Methods Med Res 2018; 28:2820-2833. [PMID: 30037304 DOI: 10.1177/0962280218788099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Precision medicine has emerged from the awareness that many human diseases are intrinsically heterogeneous with respect to their pathogenesis and composition among patients as well as dynamic over the course therapy. Its successful application relies on our understanding of distinct molecular profiles and their biomarkers which can be used as targets to devise treatment strategies that exploit current understanding of the biological mechanisms of the disease. Precision medicine present challenges to traditional paradigms of clinical translational, however, for which estimates of population-averaged effects from large randomized trials are used as the basis for demonstrating improvements comparative effectiveness. A general approach for estimating the relative effectiveness of biomarker-guided therapeutic strategies is presented herein. The statistical procedure attempts to define the local benefit of a given biomarker-guided therapeutic strategy in consideration of the treatment response surfaces, selection rule, and inter-cohort balance of prognostic determinants. Theoretical and simulation results are provided. Additionally, the methodology is demonstrated through a proteomic study of lower grade glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meilin Huang
- 1 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Brian P Hobbs
- 2 Taussig Cancer Institute and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|