1
|
Buschmann L, Wellmann I, Bonberg N, Wellmann J, Hense HW, Karch A, Minnerup H. Isolating the effect of confounding from the observed survival benefit of screening participants - a methodological approach illustrated by data from the German mammography screening programme. BMC Med 2024; 22:43. [PMID: 38287392 PMCID: PMC10826012 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03258-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammography screening programmes (MSP) aim to reduce breast cancer mortality by shifting diagnoses to earlier stages. However, it is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of current MSP because analyses can only rely on observational data, comparing women who participate in screening with women who do not. These comparisons are subject to several biases: one of the most important is self-selection into the MSP, which introduces confounding and is difficult to control for. Here, we propose an approach to quantify confounding based on breast cancer survival analyses using readily available routine data sources. METHODS Using data from the Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, we estimate the relative contribution of confounding to the observed survival benefit of participants of the German MSP. This is accomplished by comparing non-participants, participants with screen-detected and participants with interval breast cancers for the endpoints "death from breast cancer" and "death from all causes other than breast cancer" - the latter being assumed to be unrelated to any MSP effect. By using different contrasts, we eliminate the effects of stage shift, lead and length time bias. The association of breast cancer detection mode with survival is analysed using Cox models in 68,230 women, aged 50-69 years, with breast cancer diagnosed in 2006-2014 and followed up until 2018. RESULTS The hazard of dying from breast cancer was lower in participants with screen-detected cancer than in non-participants (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.20-0.22), but biased by lead and length time bias, and confounding. When comparing participants with interval cancers and non-participants, the survival advantage was considerably smaller (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.58-0.66), due to the elimination of stage shift and lead time bias. Finally, considering only mortality from causes other than breast cancer in the latter comparison, length time bias was minimised, but a survival advantage was still present (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.56-0.70), which we attribute to confounding. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that, in addition to stage shift, lead and length time bias, confounding is an essential component when comparing the survival of MSP participants and non-participants. We further show that the confounding effect can be quantified without explicit knowledge of potential confounders by using a negative control outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Buschmann
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Ina Wellmann
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nadine Bonberg
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jürgen Wellmann
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Hense
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - André Karch
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Heike Minnerup
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - WESTERN PACIFIC 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
|
3
|
Klein-Awerjanow K, Rzyman W, Dziedzic R, Fijalkowska J, Spychalski P, Szurowska E, Fijalkowski M. Assessment of Calcium Score Cutoff Point for Clinically Significant Aortic Stenosis on Lung Cancer Screening Program Low-Dose Computed Tomography-A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020246. [PMID: 36673055 PMCID: PMC9858230 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is predominantly applied in lung cancer screening programs. Tobacco smoking is the main risk factor for developing lung cancer but is also common for cardiovascular diseases, including aortic stenosis (AS). Consequently, an increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases is expected in lung cancer screenees. Therefore, initial aortic valve calcification evaluation should be additionally performed on LDCT. The aim of this study was to estimate a calcium score (CS) cutoff point for clinically significant AS diagnosis based on LDCT, confirmed by echocardiographic examination. The study included 6631 heavy smokers who participated in a lung cancer screening program (MOLTEST BIS). LDCTs were performed on all individuals and were additionally assessed for aortic valve calcification with the use of CS according to the Agatston method. Patients with CS ≥ 900 were referred for echocardiography to confirm the diagnosis of AS and to evaluate its severity. Of 6631 individuals, 54 met the inclusion criteria and underwent echocardiography for confirmation and assessment of AS. Based on that data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of CS were plotted, and cutoff points for clinically significant AS diagnosis were established: A CS of 1758 for at least moderate AS had 85.71% (CI 65.36-95.02%) sensitivity and 75.76% (CI 58.98-87.17%) specificity; a CS of 2665 for severe AS had 87.5% (CI 73.89-94.54%) sensitivity and 76.92% (CI 49.74-91.82%) specificity. This is the first study to assess possible CS cutoff points for diagnosing clinically significant AS detected by LDCT in lung cancer screening participants. LDCT with CS assessment could enable early detection of patients with clinically significant AS and therefore identify patients who require appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Klein-Awerjanow
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-58-349-2504; Fax: +48-58-346-1201
| | - Witold Rzyman
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Robert Dziedzic
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Jadwiga Fijalkowska
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Edyta Szurowska
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Marcin Fijalkowski
- First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spychalski P, Kobiela J, Wieszczy P, Bugajski M, Reguła J, Kaminski MF. Adenoma to Colorectal Cancer Estimated Transition Rates Stratified by BMI Categories—A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Asymptomatic Individuals from Screening Colonoscopy Program. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010062. [PMID: 35008224 PMCID: PMC8750540 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Most colorectal cancers assumedly develop from precursor lesions, i.e., colorectal adenomas (adenoma-carcinoma sequence). Epidemiological and clinical data supporting this hypothesis are limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to estimate relative dynamics of colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence for groups of screenees stratified by body mass. We have analyzed 163,129 individuals that underwent screening colonoscopy and calculated adjusted prevalences of colorectal adenomas and colorectal. Based on that data we have found that obese individuals are more likely to develop adenomas, advanced adenomas and early CRC but less likely to progress to advanced CRC. Therefore, this study provides new evidence that obesity paradox exists for colorectal cancer. Abstract Most colorectal cancers (CRC) assumedly develop from precursor lesions, i.e., colorectal adenomas (adenoma-carcinoma sequence). Epidemiological and clinical data supporting this hypothesis are limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to estimate relative dynamics of colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence for groups of screenees stratified by BMI (body mass index) based on prevalence data from Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program (PCSP). We performed a cross-sectional analysis of database records of individuals who entered the national opportunistic colonoscopy screening program for CRC in Poland. We calculated prevalence of adenomas and CRCs adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, family history of CRC, smoking, diabetes and use of aspirin, hormonal therapy and proton-pump inhibitors use. Thereafter we calculated estimated transition rate (eTR) with confidence intervals (CIs) defined as adjusted prevalence of more advanced lesion divided by adjusted prevalence of less advanced lesion. All analyzes were stratified according to the BMI categories: normal (BMI 18.0 to <25.0), overweight (BMI 25.0 to <30.0) and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0). Results are reported in the same respective order. After exclusions we performed analyses on 147,385 individuals. We found that prevalence of non-advanced adenomas is increasing with BMI category (12.19%, 13.81%, 14.70%, respectively; p < 0.001). Prevalence of advanced adenomas was increasing with BMI category (5.20%, 5.77%, 6.61%, respectively; p < 0.001). Early CRCs prevalence was the highest for obese individuals (0.55%) and the lowest for overweight individuals (0.44%) with borderline significance (p = 0.055). For advanced CRC we found that prevalence seems to be inversely related to BMI category, however no statistically significant differences were observed (0.35%, 0.31%, 0.28%; p = 0.274). eTR for non-advanced adenoma to advanced adenoma is higher for obese individuals than for overweight individuals with bordering CIs (42.65% vs. 41.81% vs. 44.95%) eTR for advanced adenoma to early CRC is highest for normal individuals, however CIs are overlapping with remaining BMI categories (9.02% vs. 7.67% vs. 8.39%). eTR for early CRC to advanced CRC is lower for obese individuals in comparison to both normal and overweight individuals with marginally overlapping CIs (73.73% vs. 69.90% vs. 50.54%). Obese individuals are more likely to develop adenomas, advanced adenomas and early CRC but less likely to progress to advanced CRC. Therefore, this study provides new evidence that obesity paradox exists for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.W.); (M.B.); (J.R.); (M.F.K.)
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.W.); (M.B.); (J.R.); (M.F.K.)
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jaroslaw Reguła
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.W.); (M.B.); (J.R.); (M.F.K.)
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał F. Kaminski
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (P.W.); (M.B.); (J.R.); (M.F.K.)
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spychalski P, Błażyńska-Spychalska A, Kobiela J. Mortality Rates of Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Differing Methodologies, Complimentary Results. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:2454-2455. [PMID: 33220522 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhatt R, van den Hout A, Pashayan N. A multistate survival model of the natural history of cancer using data from screened and unscreened population. Stat Med 2021; 40:3791-3807. [PMID: 33951215 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
One of the main aims of models using cancer screening data is to determine the time between the onset of preclinical screen-detectable cancer and the onset of the clinical state of the cancer. This time is called the sojourn time. One problem in using screening data is that an individual can be observed in preclinical phase or clinically diagnosed but not both. Multistate survival models provide a method of modeling the natural history of cancer. The natural history model allows for the calculation of the sojourn time. We developed a continuous-time Markov model and the corresponding likelihood function. The model allows for the use of interval-censored, left-truncated and right-censored data. The model uses data of clinically diagnosed cancers from both screened and nonscreened individuals. Parameters of age-varying hazards and age-varying misclassification are estimated simultaneously. The mean sojourn time is calculated from a micro-simulation using model parameters. The model is applied to data from a prostate screening trial. The simulation study showed that the model parameters could be estimated accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikesh Bhatt
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ardo van den Hout
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kobiela J, Spychalski P, Wieszczy P, Pisera M, Pilonis N, Rupinski M, Bugajski M, Regula J, Kaminski MF. Mortality and Rate of Hospitalization in a Colonoscopy Screening Program From a Randomized Health Services Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1501-1508.e3. [PMID: 31525515 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS It is difficult to quantify adverse events related to screening colonoscopy due to lack of valid and adequately powered comparison groups. We compared mortality and rate of unplanned hospitalizations among subjects who underwent screening colonoscopies within the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program (PCSP) vs unscreened matched controls in Poland. METHODS Persons 55-64 years old living in the area covered by the PCSP from 2012 through 2015 were assigned in a (1:1) to a group invited for screening colonoscopy (n = 338,477) or a matched group that would be invited 5 years later (controls, n = 338,557). All subjects in the screening group were assigned proposed screening colonoscopy dates (actual dates when invitees confirmed or rescheduled colonoscopy) and those in the control group were assigned virtual dates corresponding to the matched individuals from the screening group. In the screening group, 55,390 subjects (16.4%) underwent screening colonoscopy. Mortality and hospitalization data were obtained from National Registries. We compared mortality and rate of hospitalization between the groups for defined intervals before and after colonoscopy date. Hospitalizations were divided into related and unrelated to colonoscopy based on ICD codes by 3 specialists. Our primary aim was to compare mortality and hospitalization 6 weeks before and 30 days following the actual or virtual date of colonoscopy in the screening or control group. RESULTS In the intent to treat analysis, overall there were no significant differences in mortality between the colonoscopy group and control group (0.22% vs 0.22%; risk difference less than .01%; 95% CI, decrease of 0.02% to 0.02%; P = .913). The overall rate of unplanned hospitalization was significantly higher for the colonoscopy group (2.39% vs 2.31% for the control group; risk difference, 0.08%; 95% CI, 0.01%-0.15%; P=.026) for the entire observation period. This was due to the higher rate of hospitalizations after screening (1.10% vs 1.01% for the control group; risk difference, 0.09%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.14%; P < .001) including higher proportion of hospitalizations that were assessed as related to colonoscopy (0.24% vs 0.22% for the control group; risk difference, 0.02%; 95% CI, 0.00%-0.05%; P = .046). In the per-protocol analysis, the overall rate of hospitalizations did not differ significantly between control and screening colonoscopy groups (1.87% vs 1.90%; P=.709). However, screening colonoscopy did increase rates of related hospitalizations after the date of screening (from 0.14% to 0.31%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of data from the PCSP, we found high-quality evidence that colonoscopy as a screening intervention does not increase mortality before or after colonoscopy. However, it may be associated with a small but significant increase in unplanned hospitalizations, especially after the colonoscopy is completed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland; Department of Cancer Prevention, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Pisera
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Nastazja Pilonis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Rupinski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jaroslaw Regula
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Cancer Prevention, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Czwikla J, Giersiepen K, Langner I, Enders D, Heinze F, Rothgang H, Haug U, Zeeb H, Hense HW. A cohort study of mammography screening finds that comorbidity measures are insufficient for controlling selection bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 104:1-7. [PMID: 30075187 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the potential of claims-based comorbidity measures for controlling selection bias in observational studies of mammography screening. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Based on claims data of a large German Statutory Health Insurance fund, the single comorbidities considered by the Charlson, Elixhauser, Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System, and M3 comorbidity measures were identified for mammography screening participants and nonparticipants. Total death rates within 4 years after screening invitation were compared. Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed unadjusted and adjusted for age, federal state of residence, and comorbidity. RESULTS Among 1,247,919 insured women aged 50-68 years (56.2% participants), 10,311 participants (death rate 375.8/100,000 person-years) and 18,113 nonparticipants (death rate 854.8/100,000 person-years) died from any cause during the follow-up. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death from any cause for participants vs. nonparticipants was 0.44 (99.9% confidence interval 0.42-0.46). Adjustments attenuated the HR to a maximum of 0.52 (0.50-0.54). CONCLUSION The lower short-term all-cause mortality among participants cannot be explained by mammography screening effects and should be interpreted as selection bias. Adjusting for comorbidities only slightly attenuated this bias. Future studies should examine whether claims data include further information that is beneficial to adequately control selection bias in observational studies of mammography screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Czwikla
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Klaus Giersiepen
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ingo Langner
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Dirk Enders
- Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Franziska Heinze
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heinz Rothgang
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Hense
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 D3, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pascoal TA, Mathotaarachchi S, Shin M, Benedet AL, Mohades S, Wang S, Beaudry T, Kang MS, Soucy JP, Labbe A, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P. Synergistic interaction between amyloid and tau predicts the progression to dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 13:644-653. [PMID: 28024995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent literature proposes that amyloid β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) synergism accelerates biomarker abnormalities in controls. Yet, it remains to be answered whether this synergism is the driving force behind Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia. METHODS We stratified 314 mild cognitive impairment individuals using [18F]florbetapir positron emission tomography Aβ imaging and cerebrospinal fluid p-tau. Regression and voxel-based logistic regression models with interaction terms evaluated 2-year changes in cognition and clinical status as a function of baseline biomarkers. RESULTS We found that the synergism between [18F]florbetapir and p-tau, rather than their additive effects, was associated with the cognitive decline and progression to AD. Furthermore, voxel-based analysis revealed that temporal and inferior parietal were the regions where the synergism determined an increased likelihood of developing AD. DISCUSSION Together, the present results support that progression to AD dementia is driven by the synergistic rather than a mere additive effect between Aβ and p-tau proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tharick A Pascoal
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sulantha Mathotaarachchi
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Monica Shin
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Andrea L Benedet
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada; CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Sara Mohades
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Seqian Wang
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Tom Beaudry
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | - Min Su Kang
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Aurelie Labbe
- Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Serge Gauthier
- AD Research Unit, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada; Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada; AD Research Unit, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Functional Constipation and Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome in the General Population: Data from the GECCO Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2016:3186016. [PMID: 26880887 PMCID: PMC4736007 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3186016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The prevalence of constipation in the (German) population has been shown to be 14.9% in a telephone survey, but more detailed data are required to characterize the sociographics and clinical characteristics of persons with different types of functional constipation, either constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) or functional constipation with or without meeting Rome criteria. Methods. Of 2239 constipated individuals identified during the telephone interview, 1037 (46.3%) were willing to provide a postal address for a questionnaire, of which 589 (56.8%) returned the questionnaire, inquiring about sociographic data, clinical symptoms, and health care behavior related to constipation, as well as health-related quality-of-life (SF12). Subgroups of functionally constipated individuals were compared. Results. More than 50% of the respondents reported a somatic comorbid condition and/or regular medication intake that may contribute to constipation. We split the remaining individuals (N = 214) into three groups, matching Rome-criteria for IBS (IBS-C, n = 64) and for functional constipation (FC-R, n = 36) and FC not matching Rome criteria (n = 114). Nearly all sociographic and clinical characteristics were equal among them, and all individuals with constipation had similar and lowered QOL on the SF-12 physical health domain, but in IBS-C the scores were also significantly lower in comparison to FC-R and FC, in both the physical health and the mental health domain. Conclusion. Only a fraction of individuals with chronic constipation match Rome criteria for IBS-C or FC, but subgroups do not differ with respect to most other measures except quality-of-life profiles.
Collapse
|