Patient's best interest as viewed by nursing students

BACKGROUND

In recent years, patient advocacy has emerged as a prominent concept within healthcare. How nursing students decide what is best for their patients is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to examine nursing students' views on doing what is best for patients during their clinical experiences and how they seek to establish patient interests when providing care. Research questions guiding the interview were as follows: (1) What are nursing students' perceptions of patient interests? (2) What factors influence nursing students' perceptions of advocating for patient's interests?

RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive research using thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Data was collected through individual online interviews with nine nursing students with clinical experience.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. Participants provided digital informed consent.

RESULTS

The students asserted that they are able to understand the patients' interests by placing emphasis on the patients' needs. They believe that it is crucial to adopt a collaborative strategy for the provision of care to meet these requirements. In addition, some of them expressed concern over the most effective methods of advocating for the interests of patients. Three themes were identified. (1) Focussing on patient needs first, (2) taking a collective approach, and (3) learning how to advocate.

CONCLUSIONS

Students understand and value the ethical commitments associated with advocating for the patient's best interest by considering factors such as prioritising the patient's needs, adopting a strategy that involves everyone, and acquiring the ability to undertake the advocacy role. Additionally, nursing education strategies in clinical contexts require additional study to inspire students to do what is in their patient's best interests.

Barriers to practicing patient advocacy in healthcare setting

Aim

To explore barriers to practicing patient advocacy in healthcare setting.

Design

This study used a qualitative research approach to arrive at the study result.

Methods

Twenty-five Registered Nurses were purposively selected. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The main theme identified was lack of cooperation between healthcare team, care recipients and the health institution which included the health institution and work environment, ineffective communication and interpersonal relationship, patients' family, religious and cultural beliefs. Unsuccessful advocacy resulted in increased complications, death, negative consequence on the health institution and nursing as a profession. This study has significantly created awareness of the need for an improved patient advocacy to enhance the quality and safety in the care of patients.

Patient advocacy in nursing: A concept analysis

Background:

The concept of patient advocacy is still poorly understood and not clearly conceptualized. Therefore, there is a gap between the ideal of patient advocacy and the reality of practice. In order to increase nursing actions as a patient advocate, a comprehensive and clear definition of this concept is necessary.

Research objective:

This study aimed to offer a comprehensive and clear definition of patient advocacy.

Research design:

A total of 46 articles and 2 books published between 1850 and 2016 and related to the concept of patient advocacy were selected from six databases and considered for concept analysis based on Rodgers’ evolutionary approach.

Ethical considerations:

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University.

Findings:

The attributes of patient advocacy are safeguarding (track medical errors, and protecting patients from incompetency or misconduct of co-workers and other members of healthcare team), apprising (providing information about the patient’s diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, suggesting alternatives of healthcare, and providing information about discharge program), valuing (maintaining self-control, enabling patients to make decisions freely, maintaining individualization and humanity, maintaining patient privacy, and acting in the patients’ values, culture, beliefs, and preferences), mediating (liaison between patients, families, and healthcare professionals, being patients’ voice, and communicate patient preferences and cultural values to members of the healthcare team), and championing social justice in the provision of healthcare (confronting inappropriate policies or rules in the healthcare system, identifying and correcting inequalities in delivery of health services, and facilitating access to community health services and health resources).

Discussion and conclusion:

The analysis of this concept can help to develop educational or managerial theories, design instruments for evaluating the performance of nurses in patient advocacy, develop strategies for enhancing patient advocacy, and improve the safety and quality of nursing care in the community and healthcare system.

Registered nurses' provision of end-of-life care to hospitalised adults: A mixed studies review

OBJECTIVES

To describe, critically appraise and synthesise research regarding nurses' perceptions of their knowledge, skills or experiences in providing end-of-life care to hospitalised adults to help inform both future educational and practice initiatives.

DESIGN

Mixed studies review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases were searched for the years 2004-June 2018, along with journal hand-searching and reference list searching.

REVIEW METHODS

Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of studies. Data extraction and quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was conducted independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Study findings were synthesised thematically.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Of them, ten were quantitative, eight qualitative and one mixed-method. All but one quantitative study were conducted in the United States and all but one used some form of survey. The qualitative studies were conducted in a variety of countries and all but one used some form of interview for data collection. Five themes were identified including nurse as a protecting provider, nurse as an advocate, nurse as a reflective practitioner, obstacles to providing quality end-of-life care and aids to providing quality end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

Registered Nurses have aligned their end-of-life care with practice with the profession's expectations and are enacting a patient centred approach to their practice. They rely on reflective practices and on the support of others to overcome organisational, educational and emotional the challenges they to providing quality end-of-life care.

AÇÕES DOS ENFERMEIROS NO EXERCÍCIO DA ADVOCACIA DO PACIENTE: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA

RESUMO: Objetivo: identificar as ações dos enfermeiros no exercício da advocacia do paciente, na literatura científica internacional publicada nos últimos dez anos. Método: revisão integrativa da literatura, cujos dados foram coletados na base de dados Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature e SAGE Journals Online, utilizando-se os descritores "patient advocacy" e "nursing", sendo encontrados 27 artigos. Resultados: como resultados, emergiram duas categorias: ações de advocacia exercidas por enfermeiros em diferentes nações e culturas; e ações de advocacia nos diferentes ambientes de atuação dos enfermeiros. Conclusão: acredita-se que os achados deste estudo poderão contribuir para a produção de pesquisas e conhecimentos em enfermagem, ampliando a compreensão da advocacia do paciente como um componente ético da prática dos enfermeiros.

"We are the best to stand in for patients": a qualitative study on nurses' advocacy characteristics in Ghana

Background

Patient advocacy has been identified as a core duty of the nurse, and certain nurse characteristics influence the performance of the role. However, these characteristics have not been adequately explored in Ghana. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of nurses about the characteristics of nurses that influence their role as patient advocates.

Methods

An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted among 15 nurses from a regional hospital in Ghana. Purposive sampling was used to select participants and individual in-depth interviews were conducted in English using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were audio-taped and transcribed. Data analysis was done concurrently employing the principles of thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained for the study from the Noguchi Memorial Institute of Medical Research and the Ghana Health Service Ethical Review Committee.

Results

Themes generated revealed nurse traits which enhanced the advocacy role of nurses such as being empathetic, nurturing, ethical, assertive and persistent and nurse states which hindered the performance of the role such as fatigue and frustration. However, “compassionate” emerged as an additional nurse trait from this study. Out of empathy, participants availed themselves for patients to share their problems with them. In their nurturing roles, spending more time with patients and providing personal care fostered closeness which helped in identifying patients’ problems. Helping patients navigate the health system was also found. They perceived patient advocacy as a moral responsibility and identified good communication skills and determination to help patients get their problems solved as important in patient advocacy. Some participants also described compassion-based activities such as pleading on patients’ behalf, providing material and financial assistance, facilitating care and providing emotional support in their advocacy. However, heavy workload and lack of appreciation from patients were found to hinder the performance of the advocacy role.

Conclusions

We concluded that nurse characteristics that influence patient advocacy are comparable to those identified internationally such as being empathetic, assertiveness and fatigue. Enhancing these characteristics could help nurses overcome the negative states that undermine the patient advocacy role of nurses.

How organizational learning is associated with patient rights: a qualitative content analysis

Background

Nowadays, patient rights, particularly receiving favorable health care based on modern knowledge, informed consent, and privacy, are important issues in health care delivery systems. Organizational learning is considered an important factor influencing health care quality and patient rights. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue.

Objective

The present study was conducted to explore the role of organizational learning in patient rights from clinical nurses’ viewpoint.

Design

This qualitative study was conducted through conventional content analysis. In total, 18 nurses who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data were gathered through 20 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, which continued until data saturation was achieved. Data collection also included constant and simultaneous comparative analyses.

Results

Data analysis led to four major themes: conservation of patient safety, providing favorable care, being the patient's advocate, and informing the patients. All the participants believed that organizational learning could play a vital role in respecting patient rights and interests.

Conclusions

Participants believed that their efforts to conduct organizational learning, tried to improve respecting the patient rights via conservation of patient safety, trying to improve quality of care, being an advocate, and informing the patient. It would be appreciable if nursing managers honored the commitment of the nurses for learning, highlight their role as defenders of patient rights, and encourage them to initiate organizational learning.

Speaking up: factors and issues in nurses advocating for patients when patients are in jeopardy

Although speaking up to protect patients is a key ethical and moral mandate for nurses, silence still prevails in many situations. On the basis of concepts of safety culture, generational theory, personal cultural literature, advocacy theory, oppressed group theory, and moral distress theory, the author conducted a literature review and offers a new theoretical framework. The proposed theory identifies primary factors of speaking up: generational, personal culture, and organizational.

COMO ENFERMEIROS VÊM EXERCENDO A ADVOCACIA DO PACIENTE NO CONTEXTO HOSPITALAR? - UMA PERSPECTIVA FOUCAULTIANA

Objetivou-se conhecer como os enfermeiros vêm exercendo a advocacia do paciente no contexto hospitalar. Realizou-se uma pesquisa qualitativa, do tipo exploratório-descritiva, em um hospital universitário do Sul do Brasil. Foram respondentes da pesquisa 16 enfermeiros, selecionados por meio de amostragem não probabilística, do tipo bola de neve. Para a coleta de dados, foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas, gravadas e transcritas, analisadas mediante análise textual discursiva e referencial teórico foucaultiano. Como resultados, emergiram duas categorias: a coragem de verdade: o exercício da advocacia mediado pelo diálogo franco; estratégias de resistência para o exercício da advocacia do paciente. Conclui-se que a estabilidade profissional e o apoio da instituição contribuem para que os enfermeiros se sintam encorajados a exercer a advocacia, mesmo diante de situações de difícil enfrentamento, utilizando-se da parrésia e de estratégias de resistência para garantir a defesa efetiva dos interesses dos pacientes.

Nursing beliefs and actions in exercising patient advocacy in a hospital context

AbstractOBJECTIVEAnalyzing beliefs and actions of nurses in exercising patient advocacy in a hospital context.METHODA quantitative cross-sectional exploratory and descriptive study, conducted with 153 nurses from two hospitals in southern Brazil, one public and one philanthropic, by applying Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale - Brazilian version. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance.RESULTSNurses believe they are advocating for patients in their workplaces, and agree that they should advocate, especially when vulnerable patients need their protection. Personal values and professional skills have been identified as major sources of support for the practice of advocacy.CONCLUSIONNurses do not disagree nor agree that advocating for patients in their working environments can bring them negative consequences. It is necessary to recognize how the characteristics of public and private institutions have helped or not helped in exercising patient advocacy by nurses.

Rationales of restricted visiting hour in Iranian intensive care units: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Today, critical care visitation is considered an important aspect of patient-centred care and its positive effects on patients and their relatives have been demonstrated. However, restricted visiting hours in the intensive care units (ICUs) is often an adopted norm. The reasons for such restricted policies in Iran still remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify the rationales for restricted visiting hours in adult ICUs in Iran.

METHODS

A qualitative design using a thematic analysis approach was used for data gathering and analysis. Participants in this study were six nurses, three head nurses, two patients and four visitors. They were chosen through purposive sampling method. Data were gathered through semi-structured individual interviews.

FINDINGS

The data analysis resulted in three themes: 'health protection', 'safety promotion' and 'privacy preservation'.

CONCLUSION

The result showed that through restricted visiting hours, nurses try to protect vulnerable ICU patients from physical, psychological and legal risk. Although the ICU nurses' concerns seem reasonable in some cases, a review of visiting policies in order to meet the needs of patients and their families is essential.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Effective supervision by charge nurses and regulation of environmental activities with visiting hours can resolve many concerns. Health care professionals, especially nurses, are required to create the conditions in which patients' family members are informed about the patients' health status and patients can be visited in suitable ward conditions.

Iranian families' experience of receiving support during their patients' surgical process: qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The time spent waiting through the surgery of a loved one is stressful for family members because of their worries regarding the procedure and potential outcomes. In Iran, the attention and support of healthcare professionals focus almost exclusively on the patient. No studies have explored the related support experiences of family members. Understanding these experiences may facilitate the development by healthcare professionals of support strategies to alleviate the surgery-related stresses of patients' family members.

PURPOSE

This study elucidates the support experiences of the Iranian families of patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

A qualitative design using a content analysis approach was used to gather and analyze the support experiences of 16 Iranian families awaiting the conclusion of their relative's surgical operation. The study was conducted at a university medical center hospital in an urban area in Iran. After employing a purposive sampling method to select participants, semistructured interviews were used to collect data.

RESULTS

Data analysis led to the development of two main themes: "interaction:" and "physical proximity." One significant finding was the role of productive interactions among family members to facilitate the passing of time and to provide a buffer. These interactions may take place among family members as well as among other companions.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study may be used to guide nursing practices and may help change nursing attitudes toward the family members of surgical patients. By better understanding the experience of families, nurses may improve their professional actions and reduce the stress experienced by family members while waiting for the conclusion of surgery.

Some ethical conflicts in emergency care

BACKGROUND

Decision-making and assessment in emergency situations are complex and result many times in ethical conflicts between different healthcare professionals.

AIM

To analyse and describe situations that can generate ethical conflict among nurses working in emergency situations.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis. A total of 16 emergency nurses took part in interviews and a focus group.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Organisational approval by the University Hospital, and informed consent and confidentiality were ensured before conducting the research.

RESULT/CONCLUSION

Two categories emerged: one in 'ethical issues' and one in 'emotions and feelings in caring'. The four ethical subcategories are presented: Autonomy, the first sub category: first, the nurse's ability to practise care on an emergency ward and, second, to support the patient and/or relatives in terms of care and medical treatment. The conflicts arise when the nurse ends up in the middle between the patient and the physician responsible for the diagnosis and treatment from a nature scientific perspective. Reification of injured body: patient was often reified and fragmented, becoming just a leg or arm. Different factors contributed in this perspective. Pain: pain relief was often inadequate but more effectively treated in the emergency medical services than at the emergency department. The nurses highlighted the phenomenon of suffering because they felt that pain was only an object, forgetting the patients' care need, like separating mind from body. Death: the nurses felt that the emergency services are only prepared to save lives and not to take care of the needs of patients with 'end-of-life' care. Another issue was the lack of ethical guidelines during a cardiac arrest. Resuscitation often continues without asking about the patient's 'previous wishes' in terms of resuscitation or not. In these situations, the nurses describe an ethical conflict with the physician in performing their role as the patient's advocate. The nurses express feelings of distress, suffering, anger and helplessness.

Nurses' autonomy level in teaching hospitals and its relationship with the underlying factors

This study aimed to determine the autonomy level of nurses in hospitals affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 252 subjects were recruited using systematic random sampling method. The data were collected using questionnaire including Dempster Practice Behavior Scale. For data analysis, descriptive statistics and to compare the overall score and its subscales according to the demographic variables, t-test and analysis of variance test were used. The nurses in this study had medium professional autonomy. Statistical tests showed significant differences in the research sample according to age, gender, work experience, working position and place of work. The results of this study revealed that most of the nurses who participated in the study compared with western societies have lower professional autonomy. More studies are needed to determine the factors related to this difference and how we can promote Iranian nurses' autonomy.

Iranian Nurses' Attitudes and Perception towards Patient Advocacy

Patient advocacy is an inherent component of professional nursing ethics; in other words, nurses' enough knowledge would be essential to gain a positive attitude towards nursing advocacy. Using a descriptive-analytic design, this study aimed to assess the correlation between nurses' perception and attitudes towards patient advocacy, amongst 385 nurses in Kerman, Iran; hence, a three-part questionnaire was applied: part I, a demographic data sheet, part II, attitude measuring instrument, and part III, perception measuring instrument in nursing advocacy. The results implied that fairly positive attitudes and perception were found amongst the participants, and nurses' attitudes, in general, were positively correlated to their perception toward nursing advocacy. This means that with an improvement in perception, the attitude would also improve. In addition to our findings, it seems that these nurses needed more advocacy educational programs and support from responsible employers.

Perceived ethical values by Iranian nurses

Nursing, a scientific and practical discipline, faces continuing challenges of finding new direction in order to decipher its core values and develop current ethical codes for nursing practice. In 2009–10, 28 nurses were purposely selected and interviewed using a semi-structured format in focus groups and individually. Thematic Content Analysis helped explore the perception of Iranian nurses on ethical values in patient care. Seven major themes emerged: respect for dignity, professional integrity, professional commitment, developing human relationships, justice, honesty, and promoting individuals and the nursing profession. Iranian nurses revealed a unique and culture-based set of ethical values. This study found that Iranian nurses place a greater emphasis on preserving the dignity of those accompanying the patient and in showing regard for patients' religious beliefs in a gender appropriate environment.