The Effect of Gastrointestinal Mucositis Care Training Given to Pediatric Leukemic Patients and Caregivers on Mucosal Barrier Injury

BACKGROUND

Management of chemotherapy-induced mucosal barrier damage and oral/anal mucositis in leukemia is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mucositis care training given to children receiving leukemia treatment and their caregivers on caregiver knowledge and skills, the development of gastrointestinal mucositis in children, the mean oral mucositis area in children, and the mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection in the clinic.

METHODS

A stepped-wedge, quasi-experimental, unpaired control group design was used. The participants in the control group were given routine training, and the intervention group members were given mucositis care training in accordance with the guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between groups in developing anal mucositis, but a significant difference in developing oral mucositis was documented, with the mean mucositis area of children being 8.36 ± 3.97 cm2 in the control group and 4.66 ± 2.90 cm2 in the intervention group. The mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection ratio was 4 per 1000 catheter days in the control group and 3 per 1000 catheter days in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Mucositis care training had a significant positive effect on caregivers' knowledge and skills, the development of oral mucositis, and the mean oral mucositis area in children. However, the training had no effect on the development of anal mucositis or the infection rate in the clinic.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses might increase the knowledge and skill levels of caregivers with training on mucositis care, prevent the development of mucositis, and reduce the mean mucositis area. Training might also contribute to the reduction in the infection rate of the clinic.

Implementation frameworks, strategies and outcomes in optimizing central venous access device practice in paediatrics: A scoping review

Paediatric patients with complex or acute conditions may require a central venous access device, however, almost one-third of these devices have associated complications (e.g. infections). Implementation of evidence-based practices regarding central venous access devices can reduce and potentially prevent complications.

AIMS

This scoping review aimed to explore recent interventional research in CVAD management through an implementation lens.

DESIGN

This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Studies were included if they were written in English, published in 2012 to July 2023, involved children and were relevant to the study aims. Risk of bias was appraised by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were undertaken in EMBASE, CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL).

RESULTS

Of the 1769 studies identified in a systematic search, 46 studies were included. Studies mostly focused on health professionals and central venous access device maintenance and had quantitative pre-post study designs. Adherence to implementation frameworks was lacking, with many studies employing quality improvement approaches. Implementation strategies were typically multipronged, using health-professional education, bundles and working groups. Bundle compliance and reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infections were the most featured outcomes, with most studies primarily focusing on effectiveness outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Translation of evidence-based practices to the clinical setting is difficult and current adoption of implementation frameworks (apart from 'quality improvement') is limited. Implementation strategies are diverse and dependent on the local context, and study outcomes typically focus on the effectiveness of the physical intervention, rather than measuring the implementation effort itself.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENTS

Future intervention research requires a more uniform and deliberate application of implementation frameworks and strategies.

IMPACT

Greater exploration of relationships between frameworks and strategies and implementation and service outcomes is required to increase understanding of their role in maximizing resources to improve health care. Adhered to best reporting guidelines as per PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Implementation of Supportive Care Program to Decrease CLABSI in a Middle East Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Inpatient Unit

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) support the administration of chemotherapy and other medications, blood products, fluids, and nutrient infusions, and reduce the need for peripheral blood sampling in children with cancer. CVC use is also associated with the risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Despite the implementation of CLABSI care bundles, CLABSI prevention remains challenging. Method: This project implemented supportive preventive care interventions to decrease CLABSI in pediatric hematology/oncology patients in a tertiary hospital in the Middle East region. Interventions included bathing or skin care once daily, oral care twice daily, and ambulating patients three times daily. Parent and staff education materials were developed. The project moniker was Step 1-2-3, inspired by successful implementations of such measures in a U.S. cohort showing reduced CLABSI rates. The project used a mixed methods approach. We report outcomes through August 2022. Results: Pre-project (12/2019-05/2020) five CLABSIs occurred in the inpatient unit. Following the implementation of Step 1-2-3, Pediatric Oncology achieved 492 CLABSI-free days. Six CLABSIs then occurred over a short period of time between October 2021 and January 2022, which was associated with high levels of patient acuity and staff sick leave. The inpatient ward remained CLABSI-free from January 9, 2022, through August 2022. Discussion: Extended periods of CLABSI-free care in a pediatric hematology/oncology unit are achievable. A variety of factors contribute to the sustainability of being CLABSI-free. Data collection and analysis are important factors which aided in our understanding of our own CLABSI events.

Changes in Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Rates Following Implementation of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis for Children and Adolescents With High-Risk Leukemia

Background: Despite initiatives to reduce central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies, as well as those with relapsed disease, remain at the greatest risk for infection. This single-institution project evaluated changes in CLABSI rates following implementation of antibacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Methods: Positive blood culture events meeting National Health Safety Network surveillance criteria to be classified as CLABSIs from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, were included. Data were organized into four time periods for comparison based on implementation of CLABSI-reduction interventions. Conditional Poisson regression models were used to evaluate the effect of time (intervention period) on CLABSI rates with post hoc Tukey pairwise comparisons between each of the four time periods. Results: From 2006 and 2019, 227 patients experienced 310 CLABSIs. Clinically important decreases in CLABSI rates from baseline (4.84 per 1,000 line days) occurred with implementation of Children's Hospital Association (CHA) bundles (3.29 per 1,000 line days); however, this difference was not significant ( p  =  .16). CLABSI rates decreased from baseline with the addition of formalized supportive cares (2.66 per 1,000 line days; incidence rate ratio [IRR]  =  0.60; p < .01), and with the use of antibacterial prophylaxis (1.66 per 1,000 line days; IRR  =  0.35; p < .01). Post hoc comparisons indicated decreased CLABSI rates with the use of antibacterial prophylaxis compared with CHA bundles alone (IRR  =  0.49; p  =  .011) and CHA bundles plus formalized supportive cares (IRR  =  0.58; p  =  .046). Discussion: Results demonstrate sustained success using a practice-based evidence approach to guide CLABSI-reduction interventions. Follow-up research, applying machine learning algorithms, may identify additional risk factors and inform future interventions.

Addressing Schooling in Children With Cancer-It's Everybody's Job, So It's Nobody's Job: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Background: Neurocognitive deficits from childhood cancer treatment are common, long-standing, and negatively impact multiple domains of life leading to challenges with schooling and education. The purpose of this study is to describe caregiver-reported experiences of neurocognitive effects from therapy and to understand the roles clinicians play in this domain in the United States. Methods: An explanatory mixed-methods study of 174 caregivers of children with cancer provided insight into how clinicians provided information on neurocognitive effects of treatment and their experiences with school-related resources. Clinicians provided descriptions of how they provide this information and assist families with accessing services or transition back to school after therapy. Results: Caregivers identified that physicians, nurses, and social workers primarily provide information regarding neurocognitive effects of treatment. Over half (55.9%) of families seek additional information elsewhere and 49.4% report doing so because the information they received from their team was inadequate. Nearly 40% of caregivers report accessing school supports feels like a constant fight and over 40% were not offered homebound educational services by their school. Qualitative interviews with providers found that clinicians focus on therapy-related physical symptoms of treatment and only discuss neurocognitive effects when prompted by families or when children are returning to school. Discussion: Clinicians' focus on physical symptoms and just-in-time thinking when it comes to providing education or school-related services may explain why families endorse infrequent education on the topic and challenges with school reintegration. Improved education for clinicians on this topic, integration of interdisciplinary teams, and new clinical practice models may improve the family experience.

Prevention and Treatment of Oral Complications in Hematologic Childhood Cancer Patients: An Update

Cancers have a highly negative impact on the quality of life of paediatric patients and require an individualised oral treatment program for the phases of the disease. The aim of this study was to update existing research on oral care in children diagnosed with cancer. We carried out a literature search (in English, Spanish and Portuguese) in the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, WOS, SciELO, Lilacs, ProQuest, and SCOPUS databases and the websites of hospitals that treat childhood cancers. We found 114 articles and two hospital protocols. After review, we describe the interventions necessary to maintain oral health in children with cancer, divided into: phase I, before initiation of cancer treatment (review of medical record and oral history, planning of preventive strategies and dental treatments); phase II, from initiation of chemo-radiotherapy to 30-45 days post-therapy (maintenance of oral hygiene, reinforcement of parent/patient education in oral care, prevention and treatment of complications derived from cancer treatment); phase III, from 1 year to lifetime (periodic check-ups, maintenance, and reinforcement of oral hygiene, dental treatments, symptomatic care of the effects of long-term cancer treatment). The use of standardised protocols can avoid or minimise oral cancer complications and the side effects of cancer therapies.

CE: Hematologic Childhood Cancers: An Evidence-Based Review

Every year in the United States, thousands of children and adolescents are diagnosed with a hematologic cancer. That diagnosis and the prescribed course of treatment profoundly affect both the child and the family. This article provides a brief overview of the therapies used to treat such cancers, describes the presentations and diagnoses of the various hematologic cancers, and explains the treatments specific to each. Nursing care of the child and family is discussed, with an emphasis on education and supportive care.

Quality Improvement Interventions across a Network of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Clinics

Introduction

Achieving improvement in quality among different institutions is challenging. Immunocompromised children with febrile neutropenia are at high risk of severe infection. Pediatric hematology-oncology patients frequently experience central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) associated with implanted catheters. A network of 8 pediatric hematology-oncology clinics affiliated with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital launched 2 initiatives designed to reduce the incidence of infections and improve infection treatment.

Methods

We reviewed the timing of antibiotic administration for immunocompromised patients with a fever before and after a quality improvement intervention tailored to each affiliate clinic. We also reviewed the frequency of CLABSIs before and after implementing a central line care bundle for implanted catheters in ambulatory patients.

Results

Across the affiliate clinic network, the timing of antibiotic administration improved from the preintervention period (23% of patients received antibiotics within 60 min of registration) to 53% and 73%, in successive postintervention periods. Implementing a central line bundle for implanted catheters was associated with increased compliance and a trend toward increased time between CLABSIs.

Conclusion

We describe an approach to quality improvement utilizing a system of monitoring with annual clinical audits, development of joint quality improvement initiatives, ongoing education, and focused training of staff for effecting change that improves patient healthcare across multiple institutions.

Back to Basics: CLABSI Reduction Through Implementation of an Oral Care and Hygiene Bundle

Children with cancer often undergo treatments that render them severely immunocompromised. Side effects of treatment place them at risk for developing oral mucositis (OM), which can potentially lead to infection and bacteremia. Staff nurses on an inpatient pediatric oncology unit noted inconsistent daily oral hygiene practices despite assessing OM consistently. Basic oral hygiene can reduce the severity of OM, and evidence-based bundled care has shown to increase consistency of practice. Based on findings and recommendations from the literature, an oral care and hygiene bundle was developed. The oral care bundle included a soft bristled toothbrush, fluoride toothpaste, twice-daily brushing and sodium bicarbonate rinses, lip balm, and oral moisturizer. The hygiene component consisted of a daily bath or shower and daily linen changes. Education on the rationale and purpose for the use of an oral care and hygiene bundle was provided to the inpatient direct care staff prior to implementation on two inpatient oncology units. Audits were performed to measure the adherence of the oral care and hygiene bundle. Central line–associated bloodstream infections were measured in collaboration with the quality and infection prevention departments. Since the oral care and hygiene bundle was implemented, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection rates decreased from 1.05 to 0.54 per 1,000 catheter days, while mucosal barrier injury rates decreased from 2.98 to 1.27 per 1,000 catheter days.

Token economy to improve adherence to activities of daily living

BACKGROUND

Participation in key activities of daily living (ADL), including daily bathing, physical activity, and oral hygiene, can decrease the risk of bloodstream infections, oral complications, and deconditioning in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, many patients fail to perform ADL during their inpatient stay. To improve inpatient adherence to ADL, we tested a token economy to engage patients, families, and the clinical team in improving adherence to these important health behaviors during this critical time.

METHODS

We used a controlled before-after study design to test our hypothesis. All patients were prescribed three ADL. We used an "all or none" measurement for each component of the ADL 1-2-3 initiative to measure adherence. HSCT patients with poor ADL adherence (<20%) were eligible to receive the intervention, which consisted of rewarding patients through an ADL via a token economy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients participated in the study. ADL adherence for the 14 days prior to intervention in study subjects (n = 294 inpatient days) averaged 0.51 ADL per day (95% CI 0.45-0.57). In the 14 days postinitiation of the token economy intervention (n = 294 inpatient days), the average adherence was 2.5 ADL per day (95% CI 2.4-2.5; P = <0.001).

DISCUSSION

Positive reinforcement through a token economy system is associated with improved adherence to ADL in hospitalized pediatric patients who demonstrated poor ADL adherence at baseline. We believe this intervention can positively impact adherence to targeted health behaviors with the ability to correlate with improved health outcomes.

Changes in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates Among Children With Immune Compromised Conditions: An 11-Year Review

This article describes changes in central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates among common causative organisms over an 11-year period on a pediatric inpatient unit prior to and following CLABSI reduction strategies. The setting for this descriptive cohort design study was a 32-bed inpatient unit in a tertiary pediatric hospital serving children with immune compromised conditions, including cancer and recipients of hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplants. Between January 2006 and December 2016, 265 CLABSIs involving 189 patients were reported. Data were organized into three time periods: 5-year preintervention baseline (2006-2010), implementation of maintenance care bundles (2011-2012), and addition of formalized supportive care practices to the maintenance care bundles (2013-2016). Organisms were categorized into four groups based on the National Health Safety Network organism list. Time-by-class Poisson regression models evaluated changes in CLABSI rates. Characteristics of patients who developed CLABSIs were unchanged. Infections occurred most frequently among patients with hematologic malignancies and neutropenia. Significant log rate decreases in CLABSI rates were observed with the implementation of maintenance care bundles plus enhanced supportive cares compared to preintervention baseline for the following organisms: (1) common commensal organisms (-1.05, p = .005), (2) mucosal barrier injury (MBI) organisms common to the mouth (-.708, p = .007), and (3) other noncommensal/non-MBI pathogens (-.77, p = .005). Rates were unchanged for MBI organisms common to the lower gastrointestinal tract. Central line maintenance care bundles and formalized supportive care practices resulted in sustained decreased CLABSI rates. Additional interventions are needed to reduce CLABSIs involving MBI-associated organisms common to the lower gastrointestinal tract.