The Adolescent Concept of Social Participation-A Qualitative Study on the Concept of Social Participation from Adolescents with and without Physical Disabilities

Participation of adolescents with and without physical disabilities and chronic diseases: A comprehensive conceptualization

BACKGROUND

In 2001, the International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICF) introduced participation as a main goal of rehabilitation processes. However, to date, a comprehensive concept of participation in the rehabilitative context is missing, particularly in German-speaking countries. We thus aimed to refine and extend the existing concepts of participation in this brief communication.

METHODS

In preceding studies, we conducted semi-structured interviews with adolescents who either had chronic diseases and/or physical disabilities or had no impairments and focus groups with parents and experts. Based on these diverse perspectives and findings, we refine the term participation.

RESULTS

Participation is a construct that is embedded in a social context and consists of objective (i.e., attendance) and subjective (i.e., satisfaction and involvement) dimensions. These dimensions are reflected in different domains and areas that are relevant to adolescents' lives. In addition, the subjective relevance of respective areas in life needs to be regarded as a weighing component when evaluating participation.

CONCLUSION

Our results reflect international models on participation, refine the existing concept, and underline the multidimensional character of participation. These findings are urgently needed to develop appropriate instruments, for example, for assessing whether rehabilitative processes are effective regarding the goal of participation.

A pilot study to develop a participation self-assessment tool for adolescents: The Social Participation Inventory (SPI)

OBJECTIVE

Participation is one of the key goals of re/habilitative processes. Since participation impacts adolescents' social-emotional development and overall health, this goal is particularly important for them. However, to date, no German-speaking self-assessment tool for participation among adolescents is available. This study sought therefore to develop such a tool and to test its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Based on a preliminary qualitative study, we developed 133 items for a pilot version of the Social Participation Inventory (SPI). The SPI assesses the objective dimension (i.e., attendance) and the subjective dimension (i.e., involvement and satisfaction) of participation. To test the psychometric properties of the SPI, we conducted a quantitative cross-sectional survey and applied the SPI to n = 151 adolescents with and without disabilities and/or chronic diseases.

RESULTS

By using principal component analyses, we examined the SPI's consistency and verified the theoretical considerations regarding the two components of participation (i.e., objective and subjective dimensions). Items that did not load sufficiently on components were removed after careful theoretical-based consideration. The condensed version of the SPI consists of 39 items that assess participation and 18 items to assess the perceived importance of respective areas of life. The SPI shows very good overall reliability (Cronbach's α = .920) and good validity.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a new psychometrically tested participation self-assessment scale for adolescence with and without disabilities and/or chronic diseases. Further research is needed to re-evaluate its psychometric properties and to evaluate the application of the SPI in clinical and scientific contexts.

What does social participation mean? A qualitative study exploring the concept of participation from the perspectives of experts and parents

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the theoretical framework regarding social participation from the perspectives of experts and parents of youth aged between 10 and 17 years, and therefore, provides new insights into the concept of social participation.

DESIGN

A qualitative study was conducted to understand the construct of social participation in more detail. Eight focus groups were held with experts (n=21) and parents (n=24) and analysed based on content analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

We used purposive and snowball sampling to obtain a comprehensive sample of (A) parents of adolescents with and without chronic and/or physical-motor impairments and (B) experts involved in participatory research and/or treatment of adolescents with chronic and/or physical-motor impairments. The final sample consisted of 3 focus groups with a total of 21 experts and 5 focus groups with 24 parents. This included 10 parents who had disabled children.

RESULTS

The concept of social participation consists of subjective and objective components. The focus from the experts' perspective is clearly on the subjective level; that is, revolving around the question 'Does the adolescent feel involved?' In contrast, the parents' focus is more on normative expectations. The possibility of participation in all areas of life through the adjustment of environmental factors was identified as a central factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The results underline the importance of the subjective feelings of adolescents, as well as the significance of normative requirements. To capture the subjective component of participation, suitable measurements are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00014739.

Programs Promoting Virtual Social Connections and Friendships for Youth with Disabilities: A Scoping Review

AIMS

This scoping review explores what is known about programs that support youth with physical and developmental disabilities to create virtual social connections as a means toward friendships.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed studies were searched in six electronic databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Two reviewers screened articles that described programs in which participants, ages 8-20, interacted with others online, and reported outcomes related to virtual social connections and friendships in their personal social networks. Data extraction involved program characteristics (e.g., duration, group members, online platform) plus qualitative description outlining access and participation experiences.

RESULTS

After screening 12,605 articles, 9 were determined eligible. Programs followed two approaches: (1) training youth to use the internet and technology to access virtual spaces independently; and (2) designing virtual opportunities and activities that encourage youth interaction and collaboration. Each approach was grounded in the principles of fostering privacy and independence (i.e., socializing with peers without relying on caregivers), safety and self-expression (i.e., communicating authentically), plus confidence and capability (i.e., trying new skills).

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review provides guidance on enhancing access and participation of youth with disabilities in virtual spaces where they can develop social connections that increase chances for friendships.