The Determinants of Palliative Care Use in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A National Study

Association between anxiety, depression, and symptom burden in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A multicenter cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have multiple concurrent physical and psychological symptoms. This study aimed to explore the relationship between anxiety, depression, and symptom burden in advanced CRC.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 10 cancer centers from geographically and economically diverse sites in China. A total of 454 patients with advanced CRC completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Multiple regression analysis was applied to explore the relationship between anxiety, depression and symptom burden.

RESULTS

About one-third of the patients showed symptoms of anxiety or depression. Patients with anxiety or depression reported significantly higher symptom burden than those without (p < 0.001). Patients with anxiety or depression reported a higher proportion of moderate-to-severe (MS) symptom number than those without (p < 0.001). About 52% of the patients with anxiety or depression reported at least three MS symptoms. The prevalence of MS symptoms was ranging from 7.3% (shortness of breath) to 22% (disturbed sleep), and in patients with anxiety or depression was 2-10 times higher than in those without (p < 0.001). Disease stage (β = -2.55, p = 0.003), anxiety (β = 15.33, p < 0.001), and depression (β = 13.63, p < 0.001) were associated with higher symptom burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer correlated with higher symptom burden. Findings may lead oncology professionals to pay more attention to unrecognized and untreated psychological symptoms in symptom management for advanced cancer patients.

Palliative Care Use Trends, Racial/Ethnic Disparities, and Overall Survival Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background: Palliative care improves cancer patients' quality of life. Limited research has investigated racial/ethnic disparities in palliative care utilization and its associated survival among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Objectives: To examine racial/ethnic palliative care use disparities and assess racial/ethnic overall survival differences in MBC patients stratified by palliative care use. Design: A retrospective study of MBC patients from the 2004-2020 National Cancer Database. Measurements: Palliative care was defined as noncurative cancer treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or pain management; utilization was coded "yes/no." Racial/ethnic groups included Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Black, Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (HPI), Hispanic, and White. Logistic regression was performed to assess palliative care use disparities. Overall survival was modeled using Cox regression. Results: Of 148,931 patients, the mean age was 62 years; 99% were female; 73% identified as White, 17% as Black, 6% as Hispanic, 3% as Asian, 0.3% as AIAN, and 0.3% as HPI; 42% and 39% had Medicare and private insurance, respectively. Overall, 21% used palliative care, with an increasing utilization rate from 2004 to 2020 (3.6% increase per year, p-trend <0.001). Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 0.94), Asian (aOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.86), and Hispanic (aOR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.74) patients had a lower likelihood of palliative care utilization than White patients. Among palliative care users, compared with White patients, Black (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.21) patients had a greater mortality risk, while Asian (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.97) and Hispanic (aHR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.87) patients had a lower mortality risk. Conclusions: Palliative care utilization among MBC patients significantly increased but remained suboptimal. Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to use palliative care, and Black patients had worse survival, than White patients, suggesting the need for improving palliative care access and ameliorating disparities in MBC patients.

Predisposing, Enabling, and Need Factors Driving Palliative Care Use in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Characterizing factors associated with palliative care (PC) use in patients with stage III and VI head and neck cancer using Anderson's behavioral model of health service use.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database.gg METHODS: We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the association of predisposing, enabling, and need factors with PC use. We also investigated the association of these factors with interventional PC type (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) and refusal of curative treatment in the last 6 months of life.

RESULTS

Five percent of patients received PC. "Predisposing factors" associated with less PC use include Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 086; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.97) and white and black race (vs white: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22). "Enabling factors" associated with lower PC include private insurance (vs uninsured: aOR, 064; 95% CI, 0.53-0.77) and high-income (aOR, 078; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85). "Need factors" associated with higher PC use include stage IV (vs stage III cancer: aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.11-2.40) and higher comorbidity index (vs Index 1: aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.42-1.75). High-income (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85) and private insurance (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.53, 0.77) were associated with higher interventional PC use and lower curative treatment refusal (insurance: aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55, 0.67; income aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44, 0.52).

CONCLUSION

Low PC uptake is attributed to patients' race/culture, financial capabilities, and disease severity. Culturally informed counseling, clear guidelines on PC indication, and increasing financial accessibility of PC may increase timely and appropriate use of this service.

Rural-urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess trends and rural-urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2004-2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as "yes/no." Rural-urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as "rural/urban/metropolitan." Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural-urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

FINDINGS

Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004-2005 to 24.5% in 2008-2019 (7.0% increase per year; p-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (p < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural-urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.

Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample

OBJECTIVES

Poor prognosis and lack of effective therapeutic options have made palliative care an integral part of the management of severe COVID-19. However, clinical studies on the role of palliative care in severe COVID-19 patients are lacking. The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of palliative care in intubated COVID-19 patients and its impact on in-hospital outcomes.

METHODS

Rate of palliative care consult, patient-level variables (age, sex, race, income, insurance type), hospital-level variables (region, type, size) and in-hospital outcome variables (mortality, cost, disposition, complications) were recorded.

RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed 263 855 intubated COVID-19 patients using National Inpatient Sample database from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. 65 325 (24.8%) patients received palliative care consult. Factors associated with an increased rate of palliative care consults included: female gender (p<0.001), older age (p<0.001), Caucasian race (p<0.001), high household income (p<0.001), Medicare insurance (p<0.001), admission to large-teaching hospitals (p<0.001), patients with underlying comorbidities, development of in-hospital complications and the need for intensive care procedures. Patients receiving palliative consults had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.001) and no difference in hospitalisation cost (p=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care utilisation rate in intubated COVID-19 patients was reflective of disease severity and disparities in healthcare access. Palliative care may help reduce hospital LOS. Our findings also highlight importance of improving access to palliative care services and its integration into the multidisciplinary management of severe COVID-19 patients.

Patterns of Palliative Treatments in Stage IV Esophageal Cancer

Background: The 5 year survival rate of esophageal cancer is under 20%. Studies have shown that early palliative treatments can improve patient quality of life and lower depressed mood without expediting mortality. Despite these benefits, few studies have analyzed factors associated with the national variation among patients who received palliative treatment for esophageal cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective study of adults diagnosed with stage IV esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who received palliative treatment or not (n = 43,599). Cross tabulation and binary logistic regression were performed and evaluated using SPSS. Exclusion criteria included concurrent tumors, patients under age 18, and missing data. Results: Of the 43,599 patients, 26.1% of patients received palliative interventions (n = 11,371). The majority of palliative treatment patients lived less than 6 months after diagnosis (54%) and received radiation (35.7%) or chemotherapy (34.5%) with palliative intent. The patients who received palliative treatment tended to be non-Hispanic (96.6%), white (87.2%), male (83.3%) patients between age 61 and 75 (43.8%) at a comprehensive community cancer program (38.7%) with adenocarcinoma histology (71.8%). Palliative treatment patients most commonly relied on Medicare as their primary payor (45.9%) and had a median household income over $48,000 (54.5%). Conclusion: We identified trends among stage IV esophageal cancer patients receiving palliative treatments. Patients receiving palliative treatments tended to be white, non-Hispanic men. Compared to patients who did not receive palliating treatments, this cohort was more likely to receive treatment at a comprehensive, academic, or integrated network facility.

The Determinants of Inpatient Palliative Care Use in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Symptom burden management is a major goal of pancreatic cancer care given that most patients are diagnosed late. Early palliative care is recommended in addition to concurrent active treatment; however, disparities exist. We sought to determine the factors associated with inpatient palliative treatment among pancreatic cancer patients and compare treatment outcomes in terms of mortality, discharge disposition and resource utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 22,053 pancreatic cancers using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (January - December 2020). Patient and hospital characteristics, mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), hospital costs and charges were compared between pancreatic cancer patients based on palliative treatment. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate patient and hospital characteristics and outcomes associated with palliative treatment.

RESULTS

A total number of 3839 (17.4%) patients received palliative care. Patients who received palliative care were more likely to be older, Medicaid insured, and nonobese. Patients were less likely to receive palliative care if they are males, Medicare insured, had a lower Charlson comorbidity score, or treated in Urban nonteaching hospitals. Patients who received palliative care displayed higher odds of in-hospital mortality and prolonged LOS. The adjusted additional mean hospital cost and charges in patients who received palliative care were lower by $1459, and $4222 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient palliative treatment in pancreatic cancer patients is associated with an older age, a higher comorbidity burden, non-obesity, insurance status and urban teaching hospitals. Our study suggests that inpatient palliative treatment decreased hospital resource utilization without prolonging survival.

Prevalence, Severity, and Predictors of Insomnia in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

CONTEXT

Insomnia is an under-recognized and undertreated symptom in palliative care and advanced cancer cohorts. Insomnia in an advanced colorectal cancer cohort is yet to be investigated despite colorectal cancer being the third commonest cancer worldwide and one with a high symptom burden.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prevalence of insomnia and its associations in a large advanced colorectal cancer cohort.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort study of 18,302 patients with colorectal cancer seen by palliative care services across various settings (inpatient, outpatient, and ambulatory) was conducted from an Australia-wide database (2013-2019). The Symptom Assessment Score (SAS) was used to assess the severity of insomnia. Clinically significant insomnia was defined as SAS score ≥3/10, and used to compare associations with other symptoms and functional scores from validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

The prevalence of any insomnia was 50.5%, and clinically significant insomnia 35.6%, particularly affecting people who were younger (<45-years-old), more mobile (AKPS score ≥70), or physically capable (RUG-ADL score ≤5). Outpatients and patients living at home had higher prevalence of insomnia. Nausea, anorexia and psychological distress were the commonest concurrent symptoms in patients with clinically significant insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study was the first to investigate the prevalence and associations of insomnia in an advanced colorectal cancer cohort. Our findings demonstrate several groups at greater risk of suffering from insomnia (younger, greater physical capacity, living at home, and those with greater psychological distress). This may guide earlier recognition and management of insomnia to improve overall quality of life in this population.

Survey of Palliative Care Use in Primary Malignant Bone Tumors: A National Cancer Database Review

Background/Objectives: Palliative care (PC) has been associated with reduced patient symptom burden, improved physician satisfaction, and reduced cost of care. However, its use in primary bone tumors has not been well classified. Design/Setting and Subjects: Patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumors (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chordoma) between 2004 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Cross tabulations with chi-square analysis were performed to evaluate frequencies of PC use by patient, facility, and tumor characteristics. Multivariate logistic binary regression was performed to evaluate relationships between patient, treatment facility, and tumor characteristics and the use of PC. Results: Around 24,401 patients were identified. Overall, 2.52% had any form of PC utilization. Of those receiving PC, 55.5-65.1% were treated with only noncurative surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or any combination of these modalities. Odds of PC utilization were decreased for patients with chordomas, patients living >24 miles from the treatment facility, or patients with private insurance, Medicare, or unknown insurance status. Odds of PC utilization were increased in patients with greater tumor diameter or unknown tumor size, tumors in midline, increased tumor grade, stage IV tumors, or living in urban areas. Conclusion: PC use in patients with primary bone tumors increases with tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, and if the tumor is midline, and in patients living in urban areas. However, overall utilization remains markedly low. Future studies should be done to investigate these patterns of care and help expand the utilization of PC.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, gastric, duodenal and distal small bowel, biliary tract, pancreatic, colon, rectal, and anal cancer, comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies that impose a significant global burden. Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for several GI cancers, offering some patients durable responses and prolonged survival. Specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), either as monotherapies or in combination regimens, have gained tissue site-specific regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic disease and in the resectable setting. Indications for ICIs in GI cancer, however, have differing biomarker and histology requirements depending on the anatomic site of origin. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles compared with other systemic treatments that have long been the mainstay for GI cancer, such as chemotherapy. With the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancer. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the expert panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using ICIs to treat GI cancers, with topics including biomarker testing, therapy selection, and patient education and quality of life considerations, among others.

The effect of pain-education nursing based on a mind map on postoperative pain score and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer

Mind mapping is a combination of images and logical thinking in the form of pictures and texts. It presents a natural expression process that conforms to the divergent thinking of the brain, helping patients understand memory. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pain-education nursing with the aid of mind maps on postoperative pain scores and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. The medical records of 100 colorectal cancer patients treated from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected as retrospective research participants and divided into control and observation groups. The control group received routine pain care, and the observation group was given pain-education nursing based on a mind map. The effects on quality of life, pain, negative emotions, and comfort after nursing were compared between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in quality of-life scores between the 2 groups before the nursing intervention (P > .05). After nursing, the physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functions of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. However, the overall quality of life and financial difficulties of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05). The observation group's social, physical, and psychological comfort scores were significantly higher than those in the control group after nursing intervention (P < .05). After nursing, the observation group's visual analog scale scores at different times after the operation were significantly lower than those of the control group. The scores on the self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05). Pain-education nursing based on mind maps can effectively improve the daily living ability, pain symptoms, and quality of life of patients after colorectal cancer, and there is a reference value for post-nursing care of patients after colorectal cancer.

Prevalence and Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization among Hospitalized Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Objective: Research has shown that palliative care improves the quality of life of cancer patients; however, there is no literature on specific factors that predict its use in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Therefore, the prevalence of palliative care utilization and predictors of palliative care utilization among patients with DLBCL were examined. Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) collected between 2016 to 2018 were used for all analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the predictors of palliative care utilization among hospitalized patients with DLBCL. Descriptive analyses were used to explore the overall prevalence of palliative care receipt in this population. Results: Of the 41,789 hospitalizations, 7.1% of patients used palliative care during hospitalization, while 4.8% utilized palliative care and were discharged alive. DLBCL patients aged 70 and older had 1.3 times (95% CI: 1.14-1.41) higher odds of utilizing palliative care compared to those less than 70 years. Relative to Medicare/Medicaid patients, those with other types of insurance were 1.7 times (95% CI: 1.34-2.05) more likely to receive palliative care. Those who were either transferred to a facility/discharged with home health (AOR: 6.23; 95% CI: 5.21-7.44) or died during hospitalization (AOR: 45.17; 95% CI: 36.98-55.17) had higher odds of receiving palliative care when relative to those with a routine hospital discharge. Other associated factors were type of admission, length of stay, chemotherapy receipt, and number of comorbidities. Conclusions: The prevalence of palliative care utilization was low and factors predicting utilization in our population were identified. Our findings highlight the need to increase awareness among medical oncologists on the need to involve the palliative care team early in the management of hospitalized patients with DLBCL.

Palliative Care Use Among People Living With HIV and Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2018)

PURPOSE

People living with HIV (PLWH) diagnosed with cancer are less likely to receive quality cancer treatment compared with HIV-negative patients. Timely provision of palliative care (PC) during cancer treatment can increase patient's survival and improve quality of life. Our objective was to compare the use of PC by HIV status among adults diagnosed with cancer in the United States.

METHODS

More than 19 million individuals age 18-90 years diagnosed with the 11 most common cancers among PLWH were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2018). The National Cancer Database defined PC as any surgery, radiation, systemic therapy, or pain management treatment with noncurative intent. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between HIV status and PC receipt by cancer site and stage after adjustment for covariates.

RESULTS

The study population included 52,306 HIV-positive (average age: 56.5 years) and 19,115,520 HIV-negative (average age: 63.7 years) cancer cases. PLWH diagnosed with stage I-III cancer were more likely to receive PC compared with their HIV-negative counterparts (adjusted odds ratio [aO]: 1.96; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.14); however, they were also less likely to receive curative cancer treatment (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). PLWH diagnosed with stage IV cancer were less likely to receive PC (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.74) compared with HIV-negative patients. When evaluated by cancer site, PLWH diagnosed with stage IV lung (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.87) and colorectal (aOR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95) cancers were less likely to receive PC than HIV-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

PLWH diagnosed with stage IV cancer, particularly lung and colorectal cancers, were less likely to receive PC compared with cancer patients without HIV. PLWH with nonmetastatic disease were more likely to receive PC but less likely to receive curative treatment, reinforcing that clinical strategies are needed to improve the quality of care among PLWH.

Trends in utilization of first-line palliative treatments for anal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell carcinoma patients often present with significant symptoms, including pain, bleeding, and obstructive symptoms. This requires palliation-directed therapy as a first-line treatment to alleviate symptoms. The proportion of patients receiving first-line palliative treatments is unknown. We aimed to study the factors associated with the use of first-line palliative treatments in stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to identify adult patients diagnosed with stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma between 2004 and 2016. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the clinical and sociodemographic variables associated with the utilization of palliative treatment in the first-line setting, including palliative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and pain management.

RESULTS

Among 16,944 patients diagnosed with stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma, only a small proportion of 492 (2.9%) required first-line palliative treatments to control symptoms. The majority of these patients received palliative radiotherapy (32%), followed by palliative surgery (25%), palliative chemotherapy (19%), combination therapies (14%), and pain management (10%). On multivariable analysis, higher stage disease, lower income, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, and life expectancy <6 months were associated with higher odds of use of first-line palliative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line use of palliative treatments to control symptoms is needed in a small proportion of anal squamous cell cancer patients. It was utilized in all stages, but it was most frequently observed in patients with stage IV disease and patients with <6 months life expectancy. First-line palliative therapy was also more frequent in lower-income patients and patients with Medicare and Medicaid insurance which highlights the disparities in anal cancer management.

Utilization of Palliative Care in Osteosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Review

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common form of bone cancer, but the utilization of palliative care (PC) in patients with this cancer has not previously been investigated in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma (2004-2017) were identified within the NCDB. Cross tabulations with Chi-square analysis were performed to evaluate frequencies of palliative care use by patient, facility, and tumor characteristics. Multivariate logistic binary regression was performed to evaluate relationships between patient, treatment facility, and tumor characteristics and the use of palliative care. Results: A total of 7498 patients were analyzed with 2.8% of patients diagnosed having any form of palliative care utilization. Of this group, 53.37% received PC within the first 12 months after diagnosis. Of the 2.8% of patients receiving PC the most common forms of PC utilized were non-curative symptom-directed surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities (56.7%). Palliative care usage was increased in patients with greater tumor diameter, tumors in the bones of the midline, or stage IV tumors. Palliative care usage was decreased in patients living within 25-49 miles of their treatment facility, those living in pacific states, those with chondroblastic osteosarcoma, or those with private insurance. Conclusion: Palliative care use in patients with osteosarcoma increases with tumor stage, tumor size, or more proximal tumors, but overall utilization remains markedly low. Future studies should further define these patterns of care and help expand the utilization of PC.

The effect of age on specialized palliative care use in the last year of life for patients who die of cancer: A nationwide study from Norway

INTRODUCTION

Specialized palliative care (SPC) is beneficial towards end of life because of its holistic approach to improve quality of life and comfort of patients and their families. Few studies have described how patient age, sex, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with SPC use in nonselective populations who die of cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the use of SPC in the year preceding death by all Norwegian individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis who died of cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From nationwide registries, we identified patients with a recent (<5 years) cancer diagnosis who died during 2010-2014. Using binary logistic regression models, we estimated the probability of receiving hospital-based SPC during the last year of life according to individual (age, sex, comorbidity), cancer (stage, type, and months since diagnosis), and SES (e.g., living alone, household income, and education) characteristics.

RESULTS

The analytical sample contained 45,521 patients with a median age at death of 75 years; 46% were women. The probability of receiving hospital-based SPC in the total cohort was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.43). Use of SPC was higher if patients were younger, female, had limited comorbidity, metastatic disease, had one the following cancer types: colorectal, pancreatic, bladder, kidney, or gastric, were diagnosed more than six months before death, and had higher SES. Adjusted model results suggested that the probability of using SPC in the last year of life for patients aged 80-89 years was 0.31 (95% CI 0.30-0.32), compared to a probability of 0.63 (95% CI 0.61-0.65) for patients aged 50-59 years. For patients ≥90 years, the probability was 0.16 (95% CI 0.15-0.18).

DISCUSSION

Less hospital-based SPC use among older patients, males, and those with lower SES indicates possible under-treatment in these groups. Future studies should be designed to determine the underlying reasons for these observed differences.

Development, implementation and evaluation a palliative care program for colorectal cancer patients: a mixed methods protocol study

Introduction

Colorectal cancer(CRC) patients are among the incurable groups who need comprehensive palliative care covering all aspects including physical, mental, social, and spiritual. The purpose of this study is to develop, implement, and evaluate a holistic palliative care program for CRC patients in order to improve quality of life of CRC patients.

Methods

This study is an exploratory mixed methods study which will be conducted using a sequential qualitative-quantitative design (QUAL quan) consists of four sequential steps using the approach proposed by Ewles & Sminett to develop the program. In the first phase, a qualitative study (semi-structured interview) will be conducted to discover the needs of CRC patients from the perspective of patients, family members and care providers. In the second phase, the literature review will be performed with the aim of confirming and completing the discovering new needs. In the third phase, in order to prioritize the identified needs and prepare a initial draft of the palliative care program will be done a panel of experts. In the fourth phase, the part of the developed program according to the opinions of the panel of experts, will be implemented as quasi-experimental intervention and the effect of intervention on quality of life will be evaluated.

Discussion

This results of this study are expected to meet the needs of CRC patients and their families through providing a holistic care and improve their quality of life in the socio-cultural context of Iran. This program can be useful in providing care, education, policy making and for future research.

Trends, Sociodemographic and Hospital-Level Factors Associated With Palliative Care Utilization Among Multiple Myeloma Patients Using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2018)

BACKGROUND

Several factors are reported to be associated with palliative care utilization among patients with various cancers, but literature is lacking on multiple myeloma (MM) specific factors. MM patients have a high symptom burden and early involvement of palliative could increase their quality of life. We examined factors associated with palliative care utilization among MM patients and explored prevalence trends in palliative care utilization among patients with MM.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using the National Inpatient Sample data collected between 2016 and 2018. Descriptive analyses were used to explore prevalence trends in palliative care utilization over time. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine sociodemographic and hospital-level factors associated with palliative care utilization in MM patients.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of palliative care utilization in our population was 7.7% with a trend of increasing use of palliative care from 7.3% in 2016 to 8.2% in 2018. MM patients aged 70 years and above had 1.30 times higher odds (95% CI: 1.20-1.42) of receiving palliative care relative to those younger than 70 years. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.86; 95% CI: 0.79-0.94) were less likely to utilize palliative care. Patients on Medicaid (AOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.49), private insurance (AOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.16-1.39) and other insurance types (AOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.79-2.47) had significantly higher odds of receiving palliative care when compared to those on Medicare. Other factors identified were hospital region, location, patient disposition, admission type, length of stay, and number of comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the urgent need for education of hospital physicians on the need for early palliative care involvement in the care of hospitalized MM patients. Messaging interventions such as the delivery of pop-up messages in electronic medical records to serve as reminders for physicians can be explored as a potential way to increase palliative care consultations for patients who need them.

Patients With Advanced Cancer Requiring Intensive Care: Reasons for ICU Admission, Mortality Outcomes, and the Role of Palliative Care

Medical advancements in oncology and critical care during the past 2 decades have led to more patients with cancer being admitted to intensive care units. This article discusses the most common reasons for intensive care unit admission and factors associated with mortality among patients with cancer. It also reviews the multiple benefits of palliative care services in caring for critically ill patients with cancer and opportunities for critical care nurses working with these patients.

Health Care Access Measures and Palliative Care Use by Race/Ethnicity among Metastatic Gynecological Cancer Patients in the United States

Palliative care improves quality-of-life and extends survival, however, is underutilized among gynecological cancer patients in the United States (U.S.). Our objective was to evaluate associations between healthcare access (HCA) measures and palliative care utilization among U.S. gynecological cancer patients overall and by race/ethnicity. We used 2004-2016 data from the U.S. National Cancer Database and included patients with metastatic (stage III-IV at-diagnosis) ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancer (n = 176,899). Palliative care was defined as non-curative treatment and could include surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and pain management, or any combination. HCA measures included insurance type, area-level socioeconomic measures, distance-to-care, and cancer treatment facility type. We evaluated associations of HCA measures with palliative care use overall and by race/ethnicity using multivariable logistic regression. Our population was mostly non-Hispanic White (72%), had ovarian cancer (72%), and 24% survived <6 months. Five percent of metastatic gynecological cancer patients utilized palliative care. Compared to those with private insurance, uninsured patients with ovarian (aOR: 1.80,95% CI: 1.53-2.12), and cervical (aOR: 1.45,95% CI: 1.26-1.67) cancer were more likely to use palliative care. Patients with ovarian (aOR: 0.58,95% CI: 0.48-0.70) or cervical cancer (aOR: 0.74,95% CI: 0.60-0.88) who reside >45 miles from their provider were less likely to utilize palliative care than those within <2 miles. Ovarian cancer patients treated at academic/research programs were less likely to utilize palliative care compared to those treated at community cancer programs (aOR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58-0.84). Associations between HCA measures and palliative care utilization were largely consistent across U.S. racial-ethnic groups. Insurance type, cancer treatment facility type, and distance-to-care may influence palliative care use among metastatic gynecological cancer patients in the U.S.

Comparing Palliative Care Knowledge in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas of the United States: Results from a National Survey

Background: Despite recent growth in access to specialty palliative care (PC) services, awareness of PC by patients and caregivers is limited and misconceptions about PC persist. Identifying gaps in PC knowledge may help inform initiatives that seek to reduce inequities in access to PC in rural areas. Objective: We compared knowledge of PC in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas of the United States using a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Design: We used data from the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5 Cycle 2 to compare prevalence and predictors of PC knowledge and misconceptions in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas as defined by the 2013 Urban-Rural Classification (URC) Scheme for Counties. We estimated the association between nonmetro status and knowledge of PC, adjusted for respondent characteristics, using multivariable logistic regression. Results: More respondents reported that they had never heard of PC in nonmetro (78.8%) than metro (70.1%) areas (p < 0.05). Controlling for other factors, nonmetro residence was associated with a 41% lower odds of PC knowledge (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-0.94), and Hispanic respondents also demonstrated significantly lower odds of PC knowledge conditional on rural status (OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.83). Misconceptions about PC were high in both metro and nonmetro areas. Conclusion: Awareness of PC was lower in rural and micropolitan areas compared with metropolitan areas, suggesting the need for tailored educational strategies. The reduced awareness of PC among Hispanic respondents regardless of rural status raises concerns about equitable access to PC services for this population.

Palliative care in metastatic head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Due to inherent impact on quality of life, metastatic head and neck cancer patients are well-suited to benefit from palliative care (PC). Our objective was to examine factors that shape PC utilization and implications for overall survival in stage IVc head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with stage IVc head and neck cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2004 and 2015 was conducted.

RESULTS

7794 cases met inclusion criteria, of which 19.3% received PC. PC use was associated with more recent years of diagnosis, Northeast facility geography, and non-private insurances (p < 0.05). Compared to no PC, "interventional" PC, defined as palliative surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy, and "pain management only" PC were associated with lower overall survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PC use increased over time and was associated with demographic and clinical factors. There remains opportunity for improvement in optimal implementation of palliative care.

Racial disparities in palliative care utilization among metastatic gynecological cancer patients living at last follow-up: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends palliative care should be integrated in to cancer care starting from cancer diagnosis. However, traditionally palliative care is prioritized for cancer patients at the end-of-life. In our main article titled “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Gynecological Cancer Patients” we present data describing racial/ethnic disparities among metastatic gynecological cancer patients who were deceased at last follow-up. Here, we expand our population to evaluate racial disparities in palliative care utilization among (1) all metastatic gynecologic cancer patients, regardless of vital status (alive or deceased) (n = 176,899) and (2) among only patients who were alive at last follow-up (n = 66,781). We used data from the 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) and included patients between ages 18–90 years with metastatic (stage III-IV) gynecologic cancers including, ovarian, cervical and uterine cancer. Palliative care was defined by NCDB as non-curative treatment, and could include surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and pain management or any combination. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate racial disparities in palliative care use among our two populations of interest. Overall, the mean age of gynecologic cancer patients utilizing palliative care was 66 years. Five percent of all metastatic gynecologic oncology patients utilized palliative care overall; and by cancer site palliative care use was as follows: 4% among ovarian, 9% among cervical, and 11% among uterine cancer patients. Among patients who utilized palliative care, 62% utilized surgery, radiation or chemotherapy only and 12% utilized pain management as a form of palliative care. Among ovarian cancer patients, Hispanic ovarian cancer patients were less likely to utilize palliative care compared to their NH-White counterparts (aOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.91). Among cervical cancer patients, we observed that Hispanic (aOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56–0.75) and Asian (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59–0.93) were less likely to utilize palliative care than NH-White cervical cancer patients. We observed no racial disparities in palliative care utilization among uterine cancer patients. When we focused on patients who were alive at last follow-up we found that only 3% of patients utilized palliative care. We also conducted multivariable analyses of racial/ethnic disparities among ovarian and cervical cancer patients who were alive at last follow-up. We were unable to conduct multivariable analyses of uterine cancer patients who were alive at last follow-up due to limited sample size of those who utilized palliative care. We observed no racial/ethnic disparities among this patient population of metastatic gynecologic patients.

Racial and ethnic disparities in palliative care utilization among gynecological cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) is recommended for gynecological cancer patients to improve survival and quality-of-life. Our objective was to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in PC utilization among patients with metastatic gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

We used data from the 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) and included patients between ages 18-90 years with metastatic (stage III-IV) gynecologic cancers including, ovarian, cervical and uterine cancer who were deceased at last contact or follow-up (n = 124,729). PC was defined by NCDB as non-curative treatment, and could include surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and pain management or any combination. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate racial disparities in PC use.

RESULTS

The study population was primarily NH-White (74%), ovarian cancer patients (74%), insured by Medicare (47%) or privately insured (36%), and had a Charlson-Deyo score of zero (77%). Over one-third of patients were treated at a comprehensive community cancer program. Overall, 7% of metastatic gynecologic deceased cancer patients based on last follow-up utilized palliative care: more specifically, 5% of ovarian, 11% of cervical, and 12% of uterine metastatic cancer patients. Palliative care utilization increased over time starting at 4% in 2004 to as high as 13% in 2015, although palliative care use decreased to 7% in 2016. Among metastatic ovarian cancer patients, NH-Black (aOR:0.87, 95% CI:0.78-0.97) and Hispanic patients (aOR:0.77, 95% CI:0.66-0.91) were less likely to utilize PC when compared to NH-White patients. Similarly, Hispanic cervical cancer patients were less likely (aOR:0.75, 95% CI:0.63-0.88) to utilize PC when compared to NH-White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PC is highly underutilized among metastatic gynecological cancer patients. Racial disparities exist in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic gynecological cancer.

Palliative versus hospice care in patients with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend an early access to specialised palliative medicine services for patients with cancer, but studies have reported a continued underuse. Palliative care facilities deliver early care, alongside antineoplastic treatments, whereas hospice care structures intervene lately, when cancer-modifying treatments stop.

AIM

This review identified factors associated with early and late interventions of specialised services, by considering the type of structures studied (palliative vs hospice care).

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review, prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018110063).

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline and Scopus databases for population-based studies. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the study quality using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists.

RESULTS

The 51 included articles performed 67 analyses. Most were based on retrospective cohorts and US populations. The median quality scores were 19/22 for cohorts and 15/16 for cross-sectional studies. Most analyses focused on hospice care (n=37). Older patients, men, people with haematological cancer or treated in small centres had less specialised interventions. Palliative and hospice facilities addressed different populations. Older patients received less palliative care but more hospice care. Patients with high-stage tumours had more palliative care while women and patients with a low comorbidity burden received more hospice care.

CONCLUSION

Main disparities concerned older patients, men and people with haematological cancer. We highlighted the challenges of early interventions for older patients and of late deliveries for men and highly comorbid patients. Additional data on non-American populations, outpatients and factors related to quality of life and socioeconomic status are needed.

Trends of inpatient palliative care use among hospitalized patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is an effective intervention to improve quality of life, although historically, access and availability have been very restricted.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2007 to 2014. Diagnostic codes were used to identify patients with PD and palliative care referral. Trends were calculated and logistic analysis performed to identify predictors of palliative care use.

RESULTS

We identified 397,963 hospitalizations from 2007 to 2014 for patients with PD. Of these, 10,639 (2.67%) were referred to palliative care. The rate of consultation increased from 0.85% in 2007 to 4.49% in 2014. For 1 unit in year increase, there was 1.23 time the odds of receiving palliative consultation (OR 1.23, CI 1.21-1.25, p < 0.0001). Hispanics (OR 0.90, CI 0.81-1.01, p = 0.0550), Black (OR 0.90, CI 0.81-1.01, p = 0.0747) and White patients had similar rates of referral after adjustment. Women were less likely to be referred to palliative care (OR 0.90, CI 0.87-0.94, p < 0.0001). Other factors strongly associated with a higher rate of referrals included private insurance when compared to Medicare (OR 2.14, CI 1.89-2.41, p < 0.0001) and higher income (OR 1.41, CI 1.30-1.53, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There has been a significant increase in palliative care referrals among hospitalized patients with PD in the US, although the overall rate remains low. After controlling for confounders, racial and ethnic disparities were not found. Women, patients with Medicare/Medicaid, and those with lower income were less likely to be referred to palliative care.

Trends in palliative care interventions among patients with advanced bladder, prostate, or kidney cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care has an established role in improving the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer, but little is known regarding its delivery among patients with urologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine trends in the utilization of palliative interventions among patients with advanced bladder, prostate, and kidney cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients from years 2004 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage IV bladder (n = 17,997), prostate (n = 23,322), and kidney (n = 34,697) cancer, after excluding those with missing disease stage, treatment, and outcomes data.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed to evaluate utilization of palliative care intervention. Utilization was analyzed by cancer type and by overall survival strata (<6, 6-24, and >24 months). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed overall survival.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Palliative interventions were utilized in 12.5% (2,257/17,997), 14.7% (3,442/23,322), and 19.9% (6,935/34,697) of advanced bladder, prostate, and kidney cancer patients, respectively. Older age and longer survival were associated with lower odds of palliative intervention utilization in each malignancy, as was minority race in kidney and bladder cancer patients. Palliative radiation was used most commonly, and utilization of any palliative intervention was associated with poorer overall survival. Limitations largely stem from imperfect data abstraction, and the analysis of interventions' incomplete reflection of palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative interventions were seldom used among patients with advanced urologic malignancies. Palliative interventions were less frequently used in older patients and minority races. Further study is warranted to define the role of palliative interventions in advanced urologic malignancies and guide their utilization.

Access to palliative care for cancer patients between diagnosis and death: a national cohort study

Background and purpose: Introducing palliative care earlier in the disease trajectory has been found to provide better management of physical and psychological suffering. In France, the proportion of cancer patients who receive palliative care is unclear. This study aimed primarily to measure the prevalence of access to inpatient palliative care and associated patient-level factors, and to identify the time between access to palliative care and death. Patients and methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the French national health system database (SNDS). All those diagnosed with cancer in 2013 who died between 2013 and 2015 were included. Access to inpatient palliative care was the main outcome. Results: Of the 313,059 patients diagnosed with cancer in 2013 in France, 72,315 (23%) died between 2013 and 2015. Overall, 57% had access to inpatient palliative care. The following groups were the most likely to have access to palliative care: women (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11-1.20), people aged 18-49 (aOR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.26-1.51), individuals with metastatic cancer (aOR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.96-2.13), and patients with cancer of the nervous system (aOR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.62-2.01). The median time between palliative care and death was 29 (interquartile range: 13-67) days. Conclusion: More than half of cancer patients who died within 2 years after diagnosis had access to inpatient palliative care. Access to palliative care occurs late in the disease trajectory, often during the final month of life. Further research and guidelines are warranted to optimize access to early, standardized palliative care.