Predictive Factors of Death on Hospitalization in Patients With Advanced Cancer in Palliative Care

Proposal of a nutrition screening algorithm for patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care: Data from a prospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

To propose and evaluate the clinical utility of a new nutrition screening algorithm, NutriPal, to detect the degree of nutritional risk in patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care.

METHODS

It is a prospective cohort conducted in an oncology palliative care unit. The NutriPal algorithm was used in a three-step process: (i) administration of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment short form; (ii) calculation of the Glasgow Prognostic Score; and (iii) application of the algorithm to classify patients into four degrees of nutritional risk. The higher the degrees of NutriPal, the worse the nutritional risk, comparing nutritional measures, laboratory data, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study included 451 patients that were classified using the NutriPal. They were allocated to the degrees: 1 (31.26%), 2 (27.49%), 3 (21.73%), and 4 (19.71%). Statistically significant differences were found in most of the nutritional and laboratory parameters and in OS with each increment in the NutriPal degrees, and OS was reduced (log-rank <0.001). In addition, NutriPal was able to predict a 120-day mortality: there was a significantly higher risk of death in the patients classified as degrees 4 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.18-4.19), 3 (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.46-2.78), and 2 (HR, 1.42; 95% CI; 1.04-1.95) than in those classified as degree 1. It also showed good predictive accuracy (concordance statistic, 0.76).

CONCLUSION

The NutriPal is associated to nutritional and laboratory parameters and can predict survival. It could therefore be incorporated into clinical practice for patients with incurable cancer receiving palliative care.

Fatores Associados ao Karnofsky Performance Status e sua Trajetória no Último Mês de Vida em Pacientes com Câncer Terminal

Introdução: O Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) pode caracterizar o impacto da doença em pacientes com câncer. Objetivo: Avaliar os fatores associados ao KPS e a sua trajetória no último mês de vida em pacientes com câncer terminal. Método: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo, com pacientes com câncer terminal internados em uma unidade de cuidados paliativos, falecidos entre julho e agosto de 2019. A variável dependente foi o KPS avaliado diariamente no último mês de vida. Uma análise transversal dos fatores associados ao KPS inicial foi realizada por meio de regressões logísticas ordinais. Para verificar a trajetória do KPS no último mês de vida, foram realizadas análises gráficas longitudinais. Resultados: Foram avaliados 108 pacientes, cuja maioria possuía >60 anos (68,5%) e era do sexo feminino (62,0%). Os sítios tumorais mais prevalentes foram o trato gastrointestinal (TGI) (24,3%), mama (18,7%) e cabeça e pescoço (CP) (16,8%). No modelo múltiplo, os sítios tumorais primários permaneceram associados ao KPS. Durante o último mês de vida, a redução do KPS foi mais pronunciada naqueles com tumor no TGI, CP e tecido ósseo conjuntivo, que apresentaram valores mais elevados de KPS no trigésimo dia antes do óbito quando comparados aos demais. Por outro lado, aqueles com câncer no sistema nervoso central e pulmão iniciaram o período de seguimento com valores de KPS mais baixos e tiveram redução menos exacerbada que os demais. Conclusão: Os valores de KPS diminuem no último mês de vida, porém com intensidade diferente de acordo com o local do tumor em pacientes com câncer terminal.

Cancer patients with COVID-19: does prior nutritional risk associated with cancer indicate a poor prognosis for COVID-19?

OBJECTIVE

To verify whether the presence of related nutritional risk indicators prior to COVID-19 diagnosis is associated with poor survival in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of hospitalized cancer patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021. Nutritional risk was defined as the presence of one of the following characteristics: body mass index <20kg/m 2 , scored Patient-generated Subjective Global Assessment ≥9 points or classification B, albumin level <3.5g/dL, and C-reactive protein level ≥10mg/L, evaluated between 7 and 60 days prior to the date of patient inclusion. The endpoint measure was all-cause mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients were included, most of whom were elderly (62.4%) and female (63.6%). Overall, 45.4% of the patients were at nutritional risk. Survival was significantly lower in patients at nutritional risk (8 days; interquartile range [IQR]: 3-29) than in patients not at nutritional risk (16 days; IQR: 6-30) (p<0.001). The presence of prior nutritional risk was associated with increased 30-day mortality (HR: 1.42; 95%CI: 1.03-1.94), regardless of age, gender, tumor site or stage, and other risk factors, and the model had good discrimination accuracy (concordance statistic: 0.744).

CONCLUSION

The presence of prior nutritional risk indicators is related to poor prognosis in patients with cancer and COVID-19, emphasizing the importance of nutritional care, notably during this pandemic.

Characteristics and factors associated with mortality in palliative patients visiting the Emergency Department of a large tertiary hospital in Thailand

Background

The characteristics and outcomes of palliative patients who visited the Emergency Department (ED) in Thailand, a country in which no standard palliative care system existed, have not been comprehensively studied. We aimed to report the characteristics of ED palliative patients and investigate factors associated with mortality.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between March 2019 and February 2021 by means of interviewing palliative patients and/or their caregivers and medical record review. Palliative patients with either incurable cancer or other end-stage chronic diseases were included.

Results

A total of 182 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 73 years, 61.5% were female, and 53.8% had incurable cancer. Of these, 20.3% had previously visited the palliative clinic. Approximately 60% had advanced directives, 4.9% had a living will, and 27.5% had plans on their preferred place of death. The most common chief complaint was dyspnea (43.4%), and the main reason for ED visits was ‘cannot control symptoms’ (80%). At the ED, 17% of the patients had been seen by the palliative care team, and 23.1% died. Although 51% were admitted, 48.9% could not survive to discharge. Cancer, having received morphine, a palliative performance scale > 30, and ED palliative consultation were independently associated with hospital mortality.

Conclusion

The recognition and utilization of palliative care were largely inadequate, especially for non-cancer patients. An improvement and promotion in the palliative care system from the ED through home care are mandatory to improve the quality of life of palliative patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01009-z.