A Concept Analysis of Resistiveness to Care

Differences in Staff-Resident Care Interactions by Nursing Home Racial Composition: a Preliminary Analysis

Limited research has examined racial differences in the quality of staff-resident care interactions in long-term care settings. The quality of care interactions can significantly affect resident quality of life and psychological well-being among nursing home residents living with dementia. Limited research has assessed racial or facility differences in the quality of care interactions. The purpose of the present study was to determine if there were differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia between Maryland nursing home facilities with and without Black residents. It was hypothesized that after controlling for age, cognition, comorbidities, and function, the quality of care interactions would be better in facilities with Black residents versus those in which there were only White residents. Baseline data from the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD) intervention study was used and included 276 residents. The results indicated that facilities in Maryland with Black residents had a 0.27 increase (b = 0.27, p < .05) in the quality of care interaction score compared to facilities without Black residents. The findings from this study will be used to inform future interventions to aid in reducing quality of care disparities in nursing home facilities with and without Black nursing home residents. Future work should continue to examine staff, resident, and facility characteristics associated with the quality of care interactions to improve quality of life among all nursing home residents regardless of race or ethnicity.

District nurses' experiences with involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Research shows that half of person(s) living with dementia (PLWD) receive care which they resist and/or have not given consent to, defined as involuntary treatment. District nurses play a key role in providing this care. Knowledge about how district nurses experience involuntary treatment is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the experiences of district nurses who used involuntary treatment for PLWD at home.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured interviews. Sixteen district nurses with experience in involuntary treatment for PLWD were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.

RESULTS

District nurses' experiences with involuntary treatment were influenced by their involvement in the decision-making process. When they were involved, they considered involuntary treatment use to be appropriate care. However, at the moment that involuntary treatment use was started, district nurses were worried that its use was unjust since they wished to respect the wishes of the PLWD. Eventually, district nurses found, from a professional perspective, that involuntary treatment use was necessary, and that safety outweighed the autonomy of the PLWD. District nurses experienced dealing with this dilemma as stressful, due to conflicting values. If district nurses were not involved in the decision-making process regarding the use of involuntary treatment, family caregivers generally decided on its use. Often, district nurses perceived this request as inappropriate dementia care and they first tried to create a dialogue with the family caregivers to reach a compromise. However, in most cases, family caregivers stood by their request and the district nurse still provided involuntary treatment and found this difficult to tolerate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that district nurses experience involuntary treatment use as stressful due to dealing with obverse values of safety versus autonomy. To prevent involuntary treatment use and obverse values, we need to increase their ethical awareness, communication skills, knowledge and skills with person-centred care so they can deal with situations that can evolve into involuntary treatment use in a person-centred manner.

Association between Dementia Severity and Oral Hygiene Management Issues in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

Oral hygiene management issues vary across types and clinical stages of dementia. We aimed to clarify the issues related to oral hygiene management in older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to stages defined by the Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's Disease (FAST). In all, 397 records (45 men and 352 women; average age, 86.8 years; age range, 65-106) from older adults with AD were used for the cross-sectional study. We used data from a cohort of older adults (≥65 years old) who required long-term care and lived in the Omorimachi area of Yokote City, Akita Prefecture, Japan. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the associations of the FAST stage, set as the exposure variable, with oral hygiene management parameters set as outcome variables. Compared to the reference category (combined FAST stage 1-3), FAST stages 6 and 7 had significantly higher odds ratios for refusal of oral health care, dependence in performing oral health care, and rinsing and gargling disability. FAST stages 4 and 7 were associated with dental plaque accumulation. Oral health care for older adults with AD should be planned appropriately according to dementia severity.

How do family carers and care-home staff manage refusals when assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care?

Background and objectives

Caregivers may encounter, or inadvertently cause, refusals of care by a care recipient. Managing refusals of care can be challenging and have potential negative consequences. We aimed to examine caregivers’ (care-home staff and family carers) experiences of managing refusals of personal care in advanced dementia.

Research design and methods

One-to-one semi-structured interviews with 12 care assistants from six care homes and 20 family carers who were physically assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care in the UK. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, with data analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Findings

Core to the caregiver experience of refusals of care was knowing the person. This underpinned five key themes identified as caregivers’ strategies used in preventing or managing refusals of care: (1) finding the right moment to care; (2) using specific communication strategies; (3) being tactful: simplifying, leaving, or adapting care; (4) having confidence in care; and (5) seeking support from others when safety is at risk.

Discussion and implications

Different caregiver relationships with the person with dementia influenced how they managed refusals of care. Refusals of care can place caregivers in tough situations with tensions between providing care when it is seemingly not wanted and leaving care incomplete. Both caregiver groups require support such as coaching, mentoring and/or advice from other health and social care practitioners to manage difficult personal care interactions before crisis points occur.

The Impact of Cognitive impairment on Clinical Symptoms, Physical Activity and Care Interactions among Residents in Assisted Living Settings

The purpose of this study was to describe differences in pain, behavioral symptoms, quality of staff-resident interactions, participation in function focused care and physical activity among residents with and without cognitive impairment in assisted living. This was a secondary data analysis using baseline data from an ongoing trial testing Function Focused Care for Assisted Living using the Evidence Integration Triangle (FFC-AL-EIT). A total of 550 residents were recruited from 59 communities. The average age of participants was 89.30 (SD = 7.63), the majority were white (98%), female (69%), had evidence of cognitive impairment (75%), and 5.16 (SD = 1.86) comorbidities. Those with cognitive impairment had more pain, were more sedentary and less likely to engage in function focused care activities. Addressing pain and implementing interventions for those with cognitive impairment to participate in function focused care may help optimize function and physical activity in assisted living residents.

Practitioners' identification of informal caregivers' difficulties with activities of daily living interventions for older people with dementia in Japan

BACKGROUND

Older people with dementia who cannot perform daily activities independently due to cognitive impairment need support at home and in the community. This study identified aspects of activities of daily living (ADL) interventions that advanced dementia care practitioners recognise as challenging for informal caregivers to perform.

METHODS

We conducted a self-administered cross-sectional survey on advanced dementia care practitioners, including certified nurses, specialising in gerontological, community health, home care, and visiting nursing, nurses specialising in dementia certified by the Japanese Nursing Association, and dementia care leaders certified by prefectural governors. The participants rated a caregivers' extent of difficulty in aspects of ADL interventions on a four-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was performed to determine ADL intervention aspects that are recognised by advanced dementia care practitioners as challenging for informal caregivers.

RESULTS

The highest loaded factors for mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment stages were 'right time to draw attention,' 'opportunities to perform ADL,' and 'communicating how to perform ADL without giving up,' respectively. Therefore, it is imperative to educate informal caregivers about the effects of cognitive impairment on ADL performance in people with dementia and enable them to provide concrete ADL interventions and tips to support the persons' autonomy and independence. The Cronbach's alpha values of the highest loaded factors for mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment stages were 0.851, 0.925, and 0.946, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative contribution ratios of each stage were 46.04%, 50.52%, and 47.36%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study dealt with identifying informal caregivers' difficulties with ADL interventions across the stages of dementia. Informal caregivers should be supported on aspects of ADL interventions that are potentially difficult for them to perform. Useful educational content and approaches in training programs for informal caregivers should be developed to enable them to help people with Alzheimer's disease maintain ADL performance toward 'ageing in place' even as the disease progresses.

Forced treatment and care in home-dwelling persons with dementia

BACKGROUND

The use of forced treatment and care of home-dwelling persons with dementia is a universally important topic. These patients are completely dependent on care from others to continue living at home.

AIM

This study aimed to gain insights into formal decisions related to the forced treatment and care of home-dwelling persons with dementia.

DESIGN AND SAMPLE

This is a cross-sectional study, based on formal decisions of forced treatment and care of home-dwelling persons with dementia in Norway between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016.

METHODS

Descriptive statistical analysis. Statistically significant associations suitable for binary logistic regression were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Approved by The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, and by the Norwegian Center for Research.

RESULTS

We found 108 formal decisions of forced treatment and care of persons with dementia. Decisions of admission represented 57% of the data, other medical and safety decisions 27%, and assistance with activities of daily living 16%. In most cases, physicians were responsible for the decisions (77%), but nurses and family members were often involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a prevalence rate of formally documented decisions of forced treatment and care much lower than findings in previous studies. Poor documentation may constitute a risk for the safety and wellbeing of persons with dementia. Although physicians were usually responsible for the decisions, nurses and family members were often involved in the process. Family participation in forced treatment and care raises ethical dilemmas. More research on the experiences of nurses, persons with dementia and family members with forced treatment and care is needed to aid ethical, legal, and clinically challenging decision-making processes.