Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cleft Lip and Palate with and Without Speech Therapy During COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

Cleft-related speech concerns can affect the quality of life (QOL) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in-person speech therapy (ST) was restricted due to fear of getting infected. This study aimed to compare QOL in patients with CLP with and without ST during the pandemic.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional Study.

SETTING

CLP team at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six CLP subjects with a mean age of 17.33 ± 4 years participated in two groups, including with and without ST. Fifteen subjects had cleft palate only (CPO) and others had CLP.

INTERVENTIONS

ST group received at least 10 ST sessions, and group without ST didn't receive ST during COVID-19.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

A virtual link of demographic and QOL adolescent cleft (QoLAdoCleft) questionnaires were sent to fill out. Results were extracted and transferred to SPSS.

RESULTS

Total and subscales' scores of QoLAdoCleft were lower in ST group than without ST but differences between them weren't statistically significant (P > .05). Furthermore, according to cleft type, there weren't any statistically significant differences in total, physical, and social subscales of QoLAdoCleft (P > .05); however, psychological subscale in CLP had a higher significant score than CPO (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

QOL was weak in all patients with CLP, and receiving/not receiving ST couldn't make noticeable differences between them. It seems; COVID-19 pandemic can have an adverse effect on these results. Also, subjects with CLP had weaker psychological than CPO due to negative psychosocial feedback related to Orofacial deformities received from society.

Wideband Tympanometry (WBT) Features in Children with Cleft Palate and Otitis Media with Effusion Before and After Cleft Palate Surgery

Aims

In some cases, children with cleft palate undergo unnecessary tympanostomy along with palatoplasty because of inaccurate evaluations in determining the level of otitis media with effusion (OME). Recent studies have shown that wideband tympanometry (WBT) significantly contributes to the accurate evaluation of the middle ear status in children with cleft palate. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate WBT and auditory brainstem response (ABR) indices before and after cleft palate repair surgery.

Materials and Methods

The study involved 88 children with cleft palate, and ABR and WBT energy absorbance indices were measured in two phases. The first phase was conducted three months and three days prior to cleft palate repair surgery, and the second phase was carried out one, three, and six months after surgery.

Results

In the first phase, the energy absorbance index of low frequencies was below the normal range in all children, within the normal range at high frequencies in 78 children, and below the normal range in only 10 children three months before cleft palate surgery. In the second phase, the energy absorbance index and hearing thresholds at low frequencies after surgery showed a significant difference compared with the preoperative index (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Monitoring WBT indices and hearing thresholds in children with cleft palate is effective in determining the appropriate surgery for children with otitis media with effusion (OME). Furthermore, the WBT plays a crucial role in accurately assessing middle ear function after cleft palate surgery.

Impact of a Modified Restoration of Tensor Veli Palatini on Hearing and Middle Ear Function in Cleft Palate Children-a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Many children with cleft palate also exhibit hearing loss and middle ear dysfunction, which could last for years. There are still arguments on how to treat this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a modified restoration of tensor veli palatine (TVP) on hearing and middle ear function in the cleft palate children.

METHODS

This retrospective study was completed using records of the cleft palate children who received surgery in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2013 to December 2020. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: children who received cleft palate surgery without specific restoration of TVP; Group 2: children who received palate surgery with a specific TVP restoration technique. Perioperative information was collected. The conductive auditory brainstem response and the 226-Hz tympanometry before and after the cleft surgery were compared intragroup and intergroup.

RESULTS

Totally 42 children were included in this study, 21 children in each group. There were no significant differences considering clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. The modified TVP restoration didn't increase operation time or complication compared with no TVP restoration. Statistically, neither the auditory brainstem response air conduction hearing thresholds nor the 226-Hz tympanometry results had significant differences between the 2 groups after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified restoration of TVP was not time-consuming and did not increase complications. The beneficial effect of the modified TVP restoration on the hearing or the middle ear function of cleft palate children was uncertain around 6 months after surgery compared with no restoration.

Speech and Audiology Outcomes After Single-Stage Versus Early 2-Stage Cleft Palate Repair

PURPOSE

The timing and management of patients with cleft palates have been controversial. Early soft palate closure at the time of cleft lip repair followed by hard palate closure at a second stage has been hypothesized to improve speech and audiology outcomes. This study compares cleft palate patients who have undergone single-stage versus 2-stage cleft palate repairs and the outcomes on speech and hearing.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients with diagnosis of cleft lip with complete cleft palate who underwent either single or 2-stage repair from 2006 to 2012. Data collected included age at each surgery, necessity of further speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency, frequency of tympanostomy tube placement, presence of hearing loss, and speech assessment data graded per the validated Americleft speech scale.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were identified and subdivided into groups of single-stage and 2-stage repair. The mean age at the time of single-stage palate repair was 13.3 months. For the 2-stage group, the mean ages were 4.2 and 11.8 months for the soft palate and hard palate repairs, respectively. Comparing the single-stage versus 2-stage palate repairs, there was no significant difference in all speech parameters including hypernasality, hyponasality, nasal air emission, articulation, expressive language, receptive language, speech intelligibility, and speech acceptability for both unilateral and bilateral cleft lip/palate patients. Two-stage repair was associated with increased number of tympanostomy tube placement compared with single-stage repair (relative risk, 1.74; P = 0.009), and the first set of tubes was performed at a statistically significantly younger age, 4.5 months in the 2-stage repair compared with 16.9 months in the single-stage (P = 0.012) with 87.5% performed with first stage of repair. However, there was no difference in the types, degrees of hearing loss, or the presence of at least mild conductive hearing loss at latest follow-up audiograms between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant benefit with respect to speech or hearing outcomes between single-stage and 2-stage cleft palate repairs. This advocates for surgeon and family preference in the timing of cleft palate repair.

Children with Cleft Palate: Predictors of Otologic Issues in the First 10 Years

Objective

To evaluate the characteristics of children with cleft palate associated with persistent otologic issues in the first 10 years of life.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Single academic center.

Subjects and Methods

Children born with cleft palate from 2003 to 2007 and treated by the UC Davis Cleft and Craniofacial Team between January 2003 and December 2017 were included in the study. Data from 143 patients were analyzed via Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests for univariate analysis and logistic regression to determine adjusted odds ratios.

Results

The median length of follow-up was 9.9 years, and the age at last ear examination was 10.7 years. At the last evaluation, unresolved otologic issues were common, with at least 1 ear having a tympanic membrane (TM) perforation (16.1%), a tympanostomy tube (36.2%), or conductive hearing loss (23.1%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, history of palate revision or speech surgery was associated with having a TM perforation ( P = .02). The only clinical variables associated with conductive hearing loss was the presence of a TM perforation ( P < .01) or a genetic abnormality ( P = .02). Severity of palatal clefting was not associated with specific otologic or audiologic outcomes after adjusting for other characteristics.

Conclusion

A large proportion of children with cleft palate have persistent otologic issues at age 10 years and would benefit from continued close monitoring well after the age when most children have normalized eustachian tube function. Prolonged otologic issues were not found to be associated with cleft type.