Secondary Procedures on the Palate to Correct/Improve Speech: Past, Present and Future

Speech production in general and in patients with cleft palate in particular is multifactorial. In addition to the complex velopharyngeal mechanism, all structures of the oral cavity have some contribution for correct speech production. Therefore, in addition to the velopharynx the surgeons and other cleft/craniofacial team members need to perform a thorough and complete evaluation of all structures to fully appreciate the causative factor(s) responsible for inadequate speech production after palatoplasty and to prescribe the most appropriate, personalized management plan. The purpose of this communication is to stress the importance of areas other than the velopharyngx that could have a negative impact on speech. More specifically, the issues of palatoplasty failures and palatal revisions will be presented. This is an area of significant importance and could represent the first line of defense before considering procedures altering the anatomy of the velopharynx, such as pharyngeal flaps, pharyngoplasties, and others. Issues covering the effects of skeletal and dental problems, such as malocclusion, partial or complete edentulism can also affect speech but are outside the scope of this communication.

Primary Cleft Palate Repair

There are several factors to consider when planning cleft palate repair. It is important to review the patient's associated comorbidities, as they impact decisions on perioperative management and family counseling. Many comorbidities change the risk of postoperative airway obstruction, velopharyngeal insufficiency, or fistula formation. It is also critical to determine the type of cleft palate to be addressed, as this influences the decision on which technique is most appropriate for optimal patient outcome. Common surgical techniques for palatoplasty are reviewed in detail and outcomes are discussed as it relates to various techniques. Intraoperative photographs are included to detail the procedures.

Impact of a Palatal Fistula After Cleft Palate Repair on Velopharyngeal Closure

PURPOSE

A palatal fistula is an adverse outcome of cleft palate repair. It is unknown if a palatal fistula will influence velopharyngeal closure, even after repair of the fistula. This study determines the effect of a soft palate fistula on the risk of developing velopharyngeal insufficiency.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 2000 and 2015, with complete records at 4 years of age. Fistulae involving the secondary palate following primary palatoplasty were classified as the soft or hard palate. A forced-entry multivariate logistic regression model was built to detect predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

RESULTS

Records of 329 patients were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. A palatal fistula was identified in 89/329 patients (27%) and 29/329 patients (9%) underwent an independent fistula repair. Of the patients with fistula, 44% were located in the hard palate only and 56% had soft palate involvement. Compared to patients without a fistula, rates of velopharyngeal dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with a fistula involving the soft palate (OR 3.875, CI: 1.964-7.648, P < .001) but not in patients with a hard palate fistula (OR 1.140, CI: 0.497-2.613, P = .757). Veau class, age at primary repair, and syndromic status were not significant predictors of VPI (0.128≤P ≤ .975).

CONCLUSIONS

A palatal fistula involving the soft palate is a significant predictor for development of velopharyngeal dysfunction after primary palatoplasty. Surgical intervention, at the time of fistula repair, to add vascularized tissue may be indicated to prophylactically decrease the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

A systematic review of differences in outcome between one and two stage palate repair in cleft lip and palate

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether one-stage palatoplasty for children born with cleft lip and palate shows overall advantages in outcome compared with two-stage palatoplasty. The included studies were controlled studies of syndromic and non-syndromic children born with unilateral cleft lip and palate, bilateral cleft lip and palate, or isolated cleft palate. The interventions studied were one-stage palatoplasty and two-stage palatoplasty starting with the soft palate. The outcomes were facial growth, speech, hearing, presence of fistulae, other complications related to surgery, health-related quality of life, and health economics. In total, 14 original studies were included. Results were dichotomized into showing advantage for one- or two-stage palatoplasty for the respective outcome and compared with the results from six included systematic reviews. No overall advantage for either surgical strategy was found for any of the outcome measures. The certainty of evidence was highest for the presence of fistulae, followed by facial growth and speech. For several outcomes, the quality of the existing evidence was too low to allow for any conclusions to be drawn. Neither one- nor two-stage palatoplasty showed significant advantages in clinical outcomes compared with the other. Other aspects such as ethics, economics, or surgeon's preference might hence be of more importance. Homogenous choices of outcome measures and defined minimal clinically important differences would facilitate further research.

Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate

BACKGROUND

Management of cleft lip and palate is interdisciplinary. An evidence-mapping approach was envisaged to highlight the existing gaps in this field, using only the highest level of evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct evidence mapping and quality analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to any aspect of cleft lip and palate.

SEARCH METHODS

The cleft lip and palate field was divided into 9 domains and 50 subdomains and a method of categorization of systematic reviews was established. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out in seven databases along with the search of gray literature and references of included articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Systematic reviews related to any aspect of cleft lip and palate, conducted by a minimum of two reviewers, with a comprehensive search strategy and adequate quality analysis were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A self-designed, pre-piloted data-extraction sheet was used to collect information that was analyzed through an expert group discussion. Quality analysis was performed using ROBIS-I, AMSTAR 2, and the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 144 systematic reviews published between 2008 and 2022 were included. The largest number of these could be categorized in the therapeutic domain (n = 58). A total of 27% of the studies were categorized as inconclusive, 40% as partially conclusive, and 33% as conclusive. As per ROBIS-I, 77% of reviews had high risk of bias while 58% were graded as critically low in quality as per AMSTAR 2. The majority of systematic reviews showed low reporting errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of systematic reviews related to cleft lip and palate relate to therapeutic and prognostic domains and show high risk of bias and critically low quality regardless of the source journal. The results of this paper might serve as a starting point encouraging authors to carry out high-quality research where evidence is lacking.

REGISTRATION

A multidisciplinary expert-group formulated an a priori protocol, registered in Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/NQDV2).

Reinforcing the Modified Double-Opposing Z-Plasty Approach Using the Pedicled Buccal Fat Flap as an Interpositional Layer for Cleft Palate Repair

Pedicled buccal fat flaps have been adopted in primary Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty palatoplasty to reduce oronasal fistula formation or to attenuate maxillary growth disturbance. We combined both goals in a single intervention. This study describes a series of 33 modified Furlow small double-opposing Z-plasty palatoplasties reinforced with a middle layer of pedicled buccal fat flaps between the oral and nasal layers for full coverage of the dissected palatal surfaces, with rapid mucosalization of lateral relaxing incisions and no dehiscence or fistula formation.

Triple Layer Oronasal Fistula Repair Using Local Endonasal Flaps: Case Series of Three Patients

Oronasal fistula (ONF) is a common complication encountered after palatoplasty. Repair is indicated when symptoms impact speech and swallowing. In spite of the variety of surgical approaches described to repair these defects, recurrence rates remain high. Traditionally, successful closure is said to be achieved in using a double-layered approach due to the three-dimensional aspect of the defect. The extent of the fistula into the nasal cavity has incited an increased curiosity in using local endonasal flaps. In recent years, endonasal reconstructive procedures have seen increased interest and application, from cranial base defect repairs to orbital reconstruction and beyond. The nasoseptal (NSF) and inferior turbinate flaps (ITF) possess a robust arterial supply and an exceptional reach with excellent results demonstrated in large defect repair. However, the use of these flaps in ONF repair is scarcely discussed in the literature, and their effectiveness is relatively undetermined. In this manuscript, we present a series of three patients who underwent a triple layer ONF closure, with the oral portion incorporating a turn-in mucosal flap plus a local palate rotation flap or greater palatine artery pedicled-rotation flap, and a NSF or an ITF for the nasal portion of the defect.

Palatoplasty Using Alveolar Ridge Incisions: A Novel Approach for Addressing Cleft Palate Deformities

Background:

Traditionally, plastic surgeons have performed palatoplasties using mucoperiosteal flaps with lateral incisions that are medial to the alveolar ridge. However, narrow flaps can cause limitations in some cases. To construct larger and wider flaps and minimize exposed bone after closure, we propose a novel technique that entails creating the lateral incisions at the top of the alveolar ridge, instead of the base of the alveolar ridge, to capture more tissue when repairing the hard palate.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing cleft palate repair with the aforementioned technique. Information collected included basic demographic and diagnostic factors related to cleft palate deformity and history of previous facial surgeries. Operative report details and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results:

Nineteen patients with hard palate clefts were included in the analysis, with the majority being women (68%). There was a balanced representation of patients with Veau classifications of II (47%) and III (42%). The majority of patients had an isolated cleft palate (74%) and incomplete deformity (63%), with no other craniofacial deformities. One (5%) had postoperative self-limited oronasal fistula managed conservatively.

Conclusions:

We present a novel approach for repairing cleft palate deformities by extending the lateral incision to the top of the alveolar ridge to create larger mucosal flaps. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate how this unique approach compares to traditional methods—with respect to impact on maxillary growth processes, requirement for subsequent surgeries beyond two years of follow-up, and ultimately normalized speech over time.

Long-Term Follow-up of Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate: Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgeries and Fistula Formation

OBJECTIVE

The ideal surgical protocol and technique for primary closure of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) are unclear, and the development of velopharyngeal insufficiency and fistulae following primary repair is common. This study aimed to determine the long-term surgical burden of care in terms of secondary surgeries, defined as speech-correcting surgeries (SCSs) and fistula repair, in a UCLP population, and to compare outcomes of various surgical protocols.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center review.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 290 nonsyndromic children with complete UCLP. Different surgical protocols entailing both single-stage and 2-stage approaches were compared, and the surgical outcome was analyzed at the time of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) and post ABG.

RESULTS

Altogether 110 children (37.9%) underwent secondary surgery by the time of ABG. Of the total population 25.9% (n  =  75) had undergone SCS and 17.2% (n  =  50) had undergone fistula repair. The respective incidences at follow-up (post ABG) were 30.3% (n  =  88) and 18.9% (n  =  55). Median age at ABG was 9.8 years and at follow-up was 16.3 years. No significant difference emerged in terms of secondary surgeries between the techniques and protocols applied at primary repair. However, some differences occurred regarding the location of fistulae; the single-stage procedure had more anterior fistula repairs, particularly connected to a perialveolar fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the outcome differences between the surgical protocols were small, indicating that none of the treatment protocols was clearly superior to another, attention was drawn to the favorable outcomes of the single-stage protocol.

Five-year prospective fistula audit in a single center. TIG training negates consultant learning curve, but surgeons should beware the mid-range palatal defect

The aim of primary palatoplasty is to achieve optimum speech with minimal morbidity. Symptomatic fistulae are well-recognised complications of palatoplasty and may require additional surgical intervention, increasing the burden of care. Our aims were to better understand fistula experience in our unit and compare fistula rates between an established consultant and a newly appointed training interface group (TIG) trained consultant. Post-operative fistulae were prospectively and independently recorded by Cleft Clinical Nurse Specialists as part of routine 6-week post-operative reviews. Cleft type and intra-operative hard-soft palate junction (HSPJ) width were prospectively recorded by operating surgeons. Data were collated and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018, 250 primary palatoplasties were performed. The overall fistula rate was 8% (0% SMCP, ICP 7%, UCLP 8%, BCLP 22%). Fistulae clustered in clefts with a mid-range HSPJ width of 12-16 mm. Numerically, fistula rates remained similar over time despite increased unit activity (doubling of primary surgeries in 2017 and 2018). There was no significant difference in fistulae rates between surgeons (P > 0.05). Overall fistulae rate compared favourably with published data. TIG fellowships were designed in the context of cleft surgery to address issues relating to steep operative learning curves. These data demonstrate that results from a newly appointed TIG-trained surgeon are comparable to that of an established TIG-trained surgeon. Data also suggest surgeons should be aware of the risk of fistulae in the mid-range palatal defect and in HSPJ widths of 12-16 mm.

Impact of Cleft Palate on Tongue-Based Upper Airway Obstruction in Pierre Robin Sequence: Implications for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Timing of Cleft Palate Repair

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study are to analyze the impact of cleft palate (CP) on upper airway obstruction using polysomnography in patients with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and subsequent CP repair.

METHODS

A single-surgeon, retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with nonsyndromic PRS treated with MDO. Severity of upper airway obstruction was evaluated pre- and post-distraction via polysomnography. Details of MDO and CP repair were collected and any complications recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-one nonsyndromic PRS patients with CP and 6 patients without CP met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in predistraction apnea-hypopnea index between the 2 groups (53.4 ± 42.1 versus 34.4 ± 18.9; P = 0.3). Patients with CP had significantly higher predistraction SpO2 saturation (94.5 ± 1.6% versus 91.0% ± 4.8%; P = 0.01), SpO2 nadir (74.5% ± 9.1% versus 63.6% ± 11.6%; P = 0.03) and lower percentage time spent below 90% SpO2 (6.0% ± 7.2% versus 23.6% ± 29.9%; P = 0.04). The rate of oronasal fistulas formation was 38%. The time between MDO and CP repair was shorter for patients with complications (250.8 ± 3.3 versus 370.8 ± 191.9 days; P = 0.08). Five patients experienced relapse of respiratory difficulties after CP repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of CP in nonsyndromic PRS patients decreases the severity of obstructive sleep apnea by oxygen parameters on PSG. Palatal fistulas and relapse of respiratory distress are common complications of CP repair following MDO. Delaying CP repair may help to decrease complication rates.

Cleft Palate Repair by Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons: Risk Factors for Postoperative Fistula

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To assess the incidence of palatal fistula after primary repair of the cleft palate among two cohorts of Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons and to identify patient and surgeon characteristics that may predict fistula development.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with chart review.

METHODS

Children who underwent primary repair of cleft palate at one of two multidisciplinary cleft centers over a 10 year period were identified. Charts were reviewed for the presence of palatal fistula; chi square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine variables associated with fistula formation.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2017, 477 patients underwent primary repair of cleft palate by one of 6 Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons. Twenty-four children had incomplete charts, allowing 453 patients to be included in the final analysis. The pooled mean incidence of palatal fistula was 6.6% (P = .525) and varied significantly by cleft type. Logistic regression analysis controlling for multiple variables, showed that Veau IV classification had the highest risk of fistula (OR = 10.582; P = .004). Repair by a specific surgeon was not a significant risk factor for fistula development (P > .07 for each surgeon).

CONCLUSIONS

Among six Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons with fellowship training in cleft palate repair postoperative fistula rates were consistent and compared favorably to standards in the Cleft and Craniofacial surgery literature established by other surgical specialties. Consistent with larger database studies involving multiple surgical specialties, Veau IV classification was the strongest predictor of palatal fistula development, even after adjusting for multiple variables, including differing levels of experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:1281-1285, 2021.