Impact of a Multidisciplinary Craniofacial Clinic for Patients With Craniofacial Syndromes on Patient Satisfaction and Outcome

Child life specialist services, practice, and utilization across health care: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to map the available evidence regarding the scope of child life specialist services, practice, and utilization.

INTRODUCTION

The concept of child life services began in 1922 and emerged as the child life specialist services specialty in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s. Child life specialists are members of multidisciplinary health care system teams who prioritize the developmental needs of pediatric patients to support and improve patient and family health care experiences. Evidence of the effectiveness of child life specialist services and the utilization of those services is often incorporated in multidisciplinary research reports and thus overlooked.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research study reports and systematic reviews investigating child life specialist services, practice, and utilization in health care systems were included.

METHODS

This review was guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and a published a priori protocol. CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and PsycINFO (APA) were searched for evidence published from January 1980 to August 2022.

RESULTS

Research publications about child life specialist services, practice, and utilization have increased dramatically over the past decade, with more than 50% of studies published in the past 5 years. Although the first authors of the majority of the research publications were physicians, these multidisciplinary author teams depicted child life specialist services in a variety of roles, including co-investigators, interventionists, and research subjects. The 105 full-text publications reviewed were from 9 countries, plus 1 publication that surveyed people across Europe. The contexts spanned a wide scope of clinical settings and medical subspecialties, but primarily in hospitals and health centers, and to a lesser extent, in ambulatory clinics and communities. A wide variety of child life specialist services were described across these settings.

CONCLUSION

Mapping the research can help delineate the barriers and facilitators to child life specialist services in health care systems. This scoping review provides evidence of the global diffusion of child life specialist services across health care system settings, with recent increases in research publications involving child life specialist services.

A Quality Improvement Project to Improve After-visit Summary Patient Instructions in a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Neuromuscular Program

Introduction

Multidisciplinary clinics aim to coordinate care between multiple specialties for children with medical complexity yet may result in information overload for caregivers. The after-visit summary (AVS) patient instruction section offers a solution by summarizing visit details and recommendations. No known studies address patient instruction optimization and integration within a multidisciplinary clinic setting. This project aimed to improve the quality of patient instructions to support better postvisit communication between caregivers and providers in a multidisciplinary pediatric neuromuscular program.

Methods

A multidisciplinary stakeholder team created a key driver diagram to improve postvisit communication between caregivers and providers in the clinic. The first specific aim was to achieve an 80% completion rate of AVS patient instructions within 6 months. To do so, a standardized electronic medical record "text shortcut" was created for consistent information in each patient's instructions. Feedback on AVS from caregivers was obtained using the Family Experiences with Coordination of Care survey and open-ended interviews. This feedback informed the next specific aim: to reduce medical jargon within patient instructions by 25% over 3 months. Completion rates and jargon use were reviewed using control charts.

Results

AVS patient instruction completion rates increased from a mean of 39.4%-85.0%. Provider education reduced mean jargon usage in patient instructions, from 8.2 to 3.9 jargon terms.

Conclusions

Provider education and caregiver feedback helped improve patient communication by enhancing AVS compliance and diminishing medical jargon. Interventions to improve AVS patient instructions may enhance patient communication strategies for complex medical visits.

Choosing a Multidisciplinary Cleft and Craniofacial Team: Medical, Surgical, and Social Considerations

Cleft and craniofacial conditions often present with a variety of functional and esthetic sequelae optimally treated by a multidisciplinary approach. Diagnosis of such conditions pre- or postnatally may evoke parental uncertainty and anxiety, and an important primary consideration is the selection of a cleft and craniofacial team. Identifying an optimal team may be particularly important for developing long-term relationships with clinicians who will ideally work intimately with the family from diagnosis to adulthood. While families, parents, and providers should consider several factors, a dearth of evidence-based suggestions preclude critical appraisal of cleft and craniofacial teams. In this article, the authors summarize medical, surgical, and social considerations for selecting a cleft and craniofacial team to optimize patient outcomes and the family/caregiver experience.

Qualitative feedback from caregivers in a multidisciplinary pediatric neuromuscular clinic

OBJECTIVE

This study explored family satisfaction and perceived quality of care in a pediatric neuromuscular care clinic to assess the value of the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) model in delivering coordinated care to children with neuromuscular disorders, such as cerebral palsy.

METHODS

Caregivers of 22 patients were administered a qualitative survey assessing their perceptions of clinic efficiency, care coordination, and communication. Surveys were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was completed using both deductive and inductive methods.

RESULTS

All caregivers reported that providers adequately communicated next steps in the patient's care, and most reported high confidence in caring for the patient as a result of the clinic. Four major themes were identified from thematic analysis: Care Delivery, Communication, Care Quality, and Family-Centeredness. Caregivers emphasized that the MDC model promoted access to care, enhanced efficiency, promoted provider teamwork, and encouraged shared care planning. Caregivers also valued a physical environment that was suitable for patients with complex needs.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that caregivers believed the MDC model was both efficient and convenient for pediatric patients with neuromuscular disorders. This model has the potential to streamline medical care and can be applied more broadly to improve care coordination for children with medical complexity.

Can a Multidisciplinary Endocrine Clinic be Beneficial for Patients and Surgeons?

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary clinics are expected to improve patient care by enhancing efficiency for both patients and care providers. We hypothesized that while these clinics are an efficient use of time for patients, they can limit a surgeon's productivity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for patients evaluated in a Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Clinic (MDETC) and Multidisciplinary Thyroid Cancer Clinic (MDTCC) from 2018 to 2021. Time from evaluation to surgery and prevalence of surgery were evaluated. Patients were compared to those evaluated in a surgeon-only endocrine surgery clinic (ESC) from 2017 to 2021. Chi-square and t-tests were used to test significance.

RESULTS

Patients referred to the ESC underwent surgery more often than those referred to either multidisciplinary clinic (ESC 79.5%, MDETC 24.6%, MDTCC 7%; P < .001) but had a significantly longer delay between appointment and operation (ESC 19.9 days, MDETC 3.3 days, MDTCC 16.4 days; P < .001). Patients had a longer wait from referral to appointment for the MDCs (ESC 22.6 days, MDETC: 44.5, MDTCC 33; P < .05). There was no significant difference in miles traveled by patients to any clinic.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary clinics can provide fewer appointments and faster time to surgery for patients but may lead to longer wait time from referral to appointment and fewer overall surgeries than endocrine surgeon-only clinics.

High patient satisfaction and increased physical activity following a remote multidisciplinary team multiple myeloma clinic

PURPOSE

Patients with multiple myeloma suffer from disease-related complications such as bone destruction, toxicities from repeated therapies and age-related co-morbidities. With improved treatment options, patients are living longer and have specific survivorship needs such as low exercise levels that need to be addressed. In this study, we designed, implemented and evaluated a multidisciplinary team (MDT) myeloma clinic that provided participants with tailored exercise and lifestyle advice.

METHODS

The Promoting Individualised Self-Management and Survivorship (PrISMS) clinic was set up in two UK myeloma centres. This remote MDT clinic comprised of a doctor, a nurse specialist and a physiotherapist. Patients were required to complete blood tests and a questionnaire about their symptoms and concerns before each consultation. Patient-reported outcome measures were captured using validated questionnaires. Patient feedback was collected using a specially designed survey and structured telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the pilot clinic with 210 consultations held during the study period. Nine patients had disease progression and were referred safely back to face-to-face clinics. There was a significant improvement in patients' exercise score (p = 0.02) after PrISMS clinic. Patient satisfaction was high, with 83% feeling more confident in self-managing myeloma after PrISMS clinic.

CONCLUSION

PrISMS clinic is safe and feasible, with high patient compliant and acceptability. It empowers patients to self-manage their condition and encourages physical activity, which is associated with improved quality of life and fatigue level. Future randomised controlled trials will help to confirm its benefits on patient clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Multidisciplinary Presurgical Education: Clinical Impact on Children With Orofacial Clefts Undergoing Maxillary Distraction via Rigid External Distraction

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia is commonly addressed via distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external device (RED). While effective, this method can be socially stigmatizing in an already vulnerable patient population. To prepare children and their caregivers for life with a RED and decrease peri-operative anxiety, we instituted a multidisciplinary pre-surgical education session (MPES). This educational team involves our cleft care coordinator, child life specialist, orthodontist and plastic surgeon 2 weeks prior to surgery. We reviewed the impact of this intervention by examining clinical outcomes before and after its implementation.

DESIGN

From February 2017 to February 2020, a retrospective chart review was performed to include patients with orofacial clefts and maxillary hypoplasia who underwent maxillary distraction osteogenesis with RED at our center before (28 patients) and after (29 patients) the implementation of MPES.

RESULTS

MPES was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay compared to controls who did not receive MPES (3.6 vs 3.1 days, p < 0.03) and significantly decreased usage of inpatient narcotic pain medication compared to controls (16.8 morphine equivalents vs 31.8 morphine equivalents, p < 0.02). Our intervention also demonstrated a trend towards decrease in minor complications but did not achieve statistical significance p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary presurgical education is a beneficial adjunct in the care of patients with orofacial clefts and maxillary hypoplasia undergoing maxillary advancement with a RED.

A decade of clinical research on clinical characteristics, medical treatments, and surgical treatments for individuals with craniofacial microsomia: What have we learned?

AIM

This article provides a review of a decade of clinical research studies on clinical features, medical interventions, and surgical interventions for individuals with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). We also provide recommendations for future clinical research.

METHOD

A systematic search of literature was conducted in Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid. All publications from 2010 to 2020 that included at least 10 individuals with CFM were considered relevant for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 articles were included. In the past decade, many new studies on CFM have been published providing more insight on the diagnosis and management of patients with CFM. This review encompasses findings on the clinical difficulties patients with CFM encounter, including the craniofacial and extracraniofacial characteristics of patients with CFM and its related clinical consequences on breathing, feeding, speech, and hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of large multicenter studies have been published in recent years, providing new insights in the clinical consequences of CFM. The phenotypic variety between patients with CFM makes patient-specific treatment tailored to individual needs essential. The research and development of clinical care standards might be challenging because of the heterogeneity of CFM. Future research on clinical and patient-reported outcomes can help identify optimal treatment strategies. Cooperation between craniofacial centers, using uniform registration and outcome measurement tools, could enhance research and future care for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Examining the Role of Early Diagnostic Imaging for Craniosynostosis in the Era of Endoscopic Suturectomy: A Single Institution Experience

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic suturectomy is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in children between 1 and 4 months of age. This study sought to characterize the role played by diagnostic imaging in facilitating early surgical management with endoscopic suturectomy. The authors also characterized the overall diagnostic utility of imaging in patients assessed for abnormal head shape at their institution, regardless of surgical status. A retrospective cohort of children diagnosed with single-suture synostosis undergoing either primary endoscopic suturectomy or open calvarial reconstruction at the authors' institution from 1998 to 2018 was first reviewed. Of 132 surgical patients, 53 underwent endoscopic suturectomy and 79 underwent open repair. There was no difference in the proportion of endoscopic and open surgery patients imaged preoperatively before (24.5% versus 35.4%; P = 0.24) or after (28.3% versus 25.3%; P = 0.84) craniofacial assessment. Stratifying by historical epoch (1998-2010 versus 2011-2018), there was also no difference found between preoperative imaging rates (63.6% versus 56.4%; P = 0.35). In another cohort of 175 patients assessed for abnormal head shape, 26.9% were imaged to rule out craniosynostosis. Positive diagnostic imaging rates were recorded for suspected unicoronal (100%), metopic (87.5%), lambdoidal (75.0%), sagittal (63.5%), multi-suture (50%), and bicoronal (0%) synostosis. The authors conclude that the use of diagnostic imaging at their institution has not increased despite higher utilization of endoscopic suturectomy and need for expedient identification of surgical candidates. However, their results suggest that imaging may play a greater diagnostic role for suspected bicoronal, sagittal, and multi-sutural synostosis among sutural subtypes of synostosis.

Multidisciplinary Care of Neurosurgical Patients with Genetic Syndromes

Neurosurgical patients with genetic syndromes often receive care from multidisciplinary teams. Successful models range from multiple providers in one clinic space seeing a patient together to specialists located at different institutions working together. Collaboration and bidirectional communication are key. Multidisciplinary care improves outcomes and patient satisfaction. Choosing the goal of the clinic, using ancillary staff, and obtaining institutional buy-in are important initial first steps to establishing a multidisciplinary team clinic. Multidisciplinary teams can leverage technology to expand care via telehealth in multidisciplinary clinics and more vitally communication between providers on the team.