Left atrial appendage closure in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

Background

Interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) effectively prevents thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients. Impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases not only the thromboembolic risk but also the complication rates of cardiac interventions. The LAAC procedure’s benefit in patients with an impaired LVEF, therefore, has yet to be investigated.

Methods

LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomized registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAC in Germany. Procedure was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was one year. In the sense of an as-treated analysis, patients with started procedure and documented LVEF were selected from the whole database.

Results

619 patients from 37 centers were categorized into one of three groups: LVEF > 55% (56%), 36–55% (36%), and ≤ 35% (8%). Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity increased with LVEF reduction (p < 0.001 for trend). CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4.3, 4.8, and 5.1 (p < 0.001), and HAS-BLED score was 3.7, 4.1, and 4.2 (p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.9%), rates of intra-hospital MACCE (0.5%), and other major complications (4.2%) were low (each p = NS). Kaplan–Meier estimation showed a decrease in survival free of stroke with LVEF reduction during one-year follow-up (89.3 vs. 87.0 vs. 79.8%; p = 0.067), a trend which was no longer evident after adjustment for relevant confounding factors. Rates of non-fatal strokes (0.4 vs. 1.1 vs. 0%) and severe bleedings (0.7 vs. 0.0 vs. 3.1%) were consistently low across all groups (each p = NS).

Conclusions

LVEF reduction neither influenced the procedural success nor the effectiveness and safety of stroke prevention by LAAC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02230748

Graphic abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01627-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The neuropeptide galanin promotes an anti-thrombotic phenotype on endocardial endothelial cells from heart failure patients

Thromboembolic complications are a significant cause of mortality and re-hospitalization in heart failure (HF) patients. One source of thrombi is the ventricular endocardial surface that becomes increasingly pro-thrombotic as HF progresses. Anticoagulation comes with bleeding risks so identifying therapeutic agents for improving cardiac endothelial health are of critical clinical importance. Endocardial endothelial cells are closely apposed to cardiac sympathetic nerves. In HF, cardiac sympathetic nerves are dysregulated and promote disease progression. Whether endocardial endothelial health and function is impacted by sympathetic dysregulation in HF is unknown. Also unexplored is the impact of neuropeptides, such as galanin and neuropeptide Y (NPY), co-released from sympathetic nerve terminals, on endothelial health. In this study we examined the effect of sympathetic nerve-released neurotransmitters and neuropeptides on the procoagulant phenotype of cultured human endocardial endothelial cells from HF patients. As a functional readout of procoagulant state we examined thrombin-mediated von Willebrand factor (vWF) extrusion and multimer expression. We demonstrate that vWF extrusion and multimer expression is promoted by thrombin, that isoproterenol (a beta-adrenergic receptor agonist) augments this effect, whereas co-treatment with the beta-blockers propranolol and carvedilol blocks this effect. We also show that vWF extrusion and multimer expression is attenuated by treatment with the neuropeptide galanin, but not with NPY. Our results are consistent with a protective role of beta-blockers and galanin on endocardial endothelial health in heart failure. Improving endothelial health through galanin therapy is a future clinical application of this study.

Coexisting Cardiac and Hematologic Disorders

Patients with concomitant cardiac and hematologic disorders presenting for noncardiac surgery are challenging. Anemic patients with cardiac disease should be approached in a methodical fashion. Transfusion triggers and target should be based on underlying symptomatology. The approach to anticoagulation management in patients with artificial heart valves, cardiac devices, or severe heart failure in the operative setting must encompass a complete understanding of the rationale of a patient's therapy as well as calculate the risk of changing this regimen. This article focuses common disorders and discusses strategies to optimize care in patients with coexisting cardiac and hematologic disease.