Benefits of pharmacist intervention in the critical care patients with infectious diseases: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The importance of optimising antimicrobial therapy is highlighted in the hospital intensive care unit (ICU) patients. But roles of ICU pharmacists are still in its infancy in China.

OBJECTIVES

This study's objective was to evaluate the values of clinical pharmacist interventions in the antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) on ICU patients with infections.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical pharmacist interventions in the antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in critically ill patients with infections.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2019, a propensity score matching retrospective cohort research was conducted on critically ill patients with infectious illnesses. The trial was split into groups that received pharmacist assistance and those who did not. Baseline demographics, pharmacist actions, and clinical results were compared between the two groups. Factors influencing mortality were demonstrated using univariate analysis and bivariate logistic regression. The State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China monitored the exchange rate between the RMB and the US dollar and also gathered the charges of the agents as an economic indicator.

RESULTS

Out of the 1523 patients who were evaluated, 102 critically ill patients with infectious diseases were included in each group after matching. The top five prescription regimens adjusted were settled by sickness progression, microbiological results, de-escalation, drug withdrawal, and therapeutic drug monitoring suggestions. The pharmacist exposure group's antibiotic use density (AUD) decreased significantly (p = 0.018) compared to the control group, going from 241.91 to 176.64 defined daily doses/100 bed days. Following pharmacist interventions, the AUD proportion for carbapenems dropped from 23.7 to 14.43%, while for tetracyclines, it dropped from 11.5 to 6.26%. In the group exposed to the pharmacist, the median cost of antibiotics decreased significantly from $836.3 to $362.15 per patient stay (p < 0.001), and the median cost of all medications dropped from $2868.18 to $1941.5 per patient stay (p = 0.06). RMB was converted into US dollars according to the current exchange rate. According to univariate analyses, pharmacist interventions did not differ between the groups that survived and died (p = 0.288).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that antimicrobial stewardship had a significant financial return on investment without raising the mortality rate.

Beyond the Prescription Pad: Clinical Pharmacists as Integral Members of Cardiology Care Teams, A Comprehensive Review of Their Expanding Roles and Contributions

In recent years, the role of clinical pharmacists in cardiology care teams has evolved significantly. Traditionally known for their expertise in medication management, clinical pharmacists are now being recognized as integral members of interdisciplinary teams in cardiology settings. This review article aims to explore the expanding roles and contributions of clinical pharmacists in cardiac care, going beyond their traditional responsibilities. It examines their involvement in patient care, medication therapy management, collaborative decision-making, patient education, and research activities. By highlighting the value they bring to the table, this article emphasizes the need for incorporating clinical pharmacists as vital team members in cardiology care.

The participation of clinical pharmacists in the treatment of patients with central nervous system infection can improve the effectiveness and appropriateness of anti-infective treatments: a retrospective cohort study

Background: Central nervous system infection (CNSI) treatment in hospital neurosurgery emphasizes the importance of optimizing antimicrobial therapy. Timely and appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment is critical for managing patients with bacterial meningitis. Objectives: To evaluate the activities of clinical pharmacists in the anti-infective treatment of patients with CNSI in neurosurgery. Method: A single-center retrospective cohort study was carried out from January 2021 to March 2023 at a tertiary teaching hospital in China. The study sample included a group that received pharmacy services and a group that did not. In the pharmacy services group, the anti-infective treatment plan was led and developed by pharmacists. Pharmaceutical care, including medication therapy and all CNSI treatment regimens, was administered in daily unit rounds by pharmacists. Baseline demographics, treatment outcomes, and rational use of antibiotics were compared between the two groups, and the impact of a antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program was evaluated. Results: Of the 306 patients assessed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 151 patients were included, and 155 patients were excluded due to abnormal data and missing information on antibiotic costs or antimicrobial use. Eventually, 73 were included in the pharmacy services group and 78 in the group without pharmacist participation. The antibiotic use density (AUD) of the pharmacy services group decreased from 167.68 to 127.63 compared to the group without pharmacist participation. After the pharmacist services, the AUD for linezolid decreased from 9.15% to 5.23% and that for miscellaneous agents decreased from 17.91% to 6.72%. The pharmacy services group had better improvement (p < 0.05) and a significantly higher score for the rational use of antibiotics (p < 0.05) than the group without pharmacist participation. Conclusion: The clinical pharmacist services evaluation results demonstrated an essential role of clinical pharmacist-led AMS programs in the effective and appropriate use of anti-infective treatments in neurosurgery with patients with CNSI.

Person-Centered Models for Cardiovascular Care: A Review of the Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability in the United States and globally. Disease burden continues to escalate despite technological advances associated with improved life expectancy and quality of life. As a result, longer life is associated with multiple chronic cardiovascular conditions. Clinical guidelines provide recommendations without considering prevalent scenarios of multimorbidity and health system complexities that affect practical adoption. The diversity of personal preferences, cultures, and lifestyles that make up one's social and environmental context is often overlooked in ongoing care planning for symptom management and health behavior support, hindering adoption and compromising patient outcomes, particularly in groups at high risk. The purpose of this scientific statement was to describe the characteristics and reported outcomes in existing person-centered care delivery models for selected cardiovascular conditions. We conducted a scoping review using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2010 to 2022. A range of study designs with a defined aim to systematically evaluate care delivery models for selected cardiovascular conditions were included. Models were selected on the basis of their stated use of evidence-based guidelines, clinical decision support tools, systematic evaluation processes, and inclusion of the patient's perspective in defining the plan of care. Findings reflected variation in methodological approach, outcome measures, and care processes used across models. Evidence to support optimal care delivery models remains limited by inconsistencies in approach, variation in reimbursement, and inability of health systems to meet the needs of patients with chronic, complex cardiovascular conditions.

The Role of Clinical Pharmacists in Improving Quality of Care in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evaluation of Patients’ and Physicians’ Satisfaction

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and complex disease that requires a multidisciplinary team, including clinical pharmacists, to improve the quality of care and patient outcome. This present study aimed to assess the satisfaction of patients with IBD and physicians regarding clinical pharmacist interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings. Methods: A survey-based study was performed between 1 March and 1 August 2022 in a tertiary care IBD center. Two different questionnaires were distributed among patients and physicians focusing on satisfaction with the clinical pharmacist services. Patient demographics were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results of the survey. Results: A total of 108 patients with IBD and 23 physicians participated in this study. Among study participants, Crohn’s disease (CD) accounted for 64.8% of the total participants, while 35.2% of patients had ulcerative colitis (UC). Regarding the patient survey, most patients were extremely satisfied with clinical pharmacists’ services, during which the majority strongly agreed or agreed that they were satisfied with the counseling session. However, five patients were unsure about the amount of time spent with the clinical pharmacist. There were no patients dissatisfied with any of the services. Finally, two physicians were not sure regarding clinical pharmacists monitoring patients’ responses in of terms of toxicity and adverse effects. Conclusions: the current study illustrates patients’ and physicians’ high satisfaction with clinical pharmacists’ services in outpatient and inpatient settings. The findings of this study as well as previous studies necessitate expanding the clinical pharmacist services in the gastroenterology field.

Economic Impact of Ambulatory Clinical Pharmacists in an Advanced Heart Failure Clinic

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacists play pivotal roles in multidisciplinary heart failure (HF) teams through the management of HF pharmacotherapy, but no study has examined the economic impact of HF ambulatory clinical pharmacists in an advanced HF clinic.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the economic impact of HF ambulatory clinical pharmacist interventions in an advanced HF clinic using a cost-benefit analysis.

METHODS

This prospective observational study detailed HF ambulatory clinical pharmacist interventions over 6 months in an advanced HF clinic in a single-center tertiary teaching hospital. The economic impact of the interventions was estimated based on the indirect cost savings with pharmacist interventions and direct cost savings recommendations. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to assess the cost of delivering the interventions compared with the benefits generated by clinical pharmacists. Results were reported as a benefit-cost ratio and net benefits.

RESULTS

HF ambulatory clinical pharmacists made a total of 2,361 provider-accepted interventions over 6 months. Overall, the 3 most common intervention types were medication reconciliation (28.7%), dose change (20.8%), and addition of medication (12.3%). Anticoagulation (21.2%) was the most common intervened class of medication, followed by sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (12.3%) and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (9.2%). The total net benefits were $55,553.24 over 6 months and the benefit-cost ratio was 1.55.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The addition of cardiology clinical pharmacists to an advanced HF clinic may be financially justified and cost-beneficial.

The Questions on Everyone's Mind: What is and Why Do We Need Preventive Cardiology?

Despite being largely preventable, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be the leading source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While the past few decades have seen a substantial reduction in ASCVD mortality, much of this is due to significant improvements in treatment of already manifest disease, with its attendant morbidity and impact on quality of life. Moreover, evidence now suggests that ASCVD mortality in the United States has hit a nadir and is likely to start increasing again. It is now time to shift our attention from intervention to prevention. In this review, we explore the tremendous opportunity to define and implement the discipline of preventive cardiology.

Significant hospitalization cost savings to the payer with a pharmacist-led mobile health intervention to improve medication safety in kidney transplant recipients

This was an economic analysis of a 12-month, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial in adult kidney recipients 6 to 36 months posttransplant (NCT03247322). All participants received usual posttransplant care, while the intervention arm received supplemental clinical pharmacist-led medication therapy monitoring and management, via a smartphone-enabled mHealth app, integrated with risk-based televisits. Hospitalization charges were captured from the study institution accounts payable and non-study institution hospitalization charges were estimated using multiple imputation. Multivariable modeling was used to assess the impact of the intervention on charges. The intervention significantly reduced rates of hospitalization (1.08 per patient-year in the control arm vs 0.65 per patient-year in the intervention arm, p = .007). The control arm had estimated hospitalization costs of $870,468 vs $390,489 in the intervention arm. Modeling demonstrated a 49% lower hospitalization charge risk in the intervention arm (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91; p = .022). From a payer or societal perspective, the net estimated cost savings, after accounting for intervention delivery costs, was $368,839, with a return on investment (ROI) of $4.30 for every $1 spent. These results demonstrate that a mHealth-enabled, pharmacist-led intervention significantly reduced hospitalization costs for payers over a 12-month period and has a positive ROI.

Optimizing sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A collaborative clinical practice statement

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a debilitating disease that is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and societal costs. The past three decades have brought about significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF, and a corresponding reduction in morbidity and mortality. However, the progress to improve clinical outcomes in real-world settings has stalled in recent years, largely due to underutilization of guideline directed medical therapies (GDMT). The discovery of significant cardio-renal protection from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has ushered in a new treatment paradigm for HFrEF management with SGLT2i therapy becoming an essential component of GDMT. Our Preventive Cardiology and Heart Failure services have established an innovative, multi-disciplinary, collaborative protocol to optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors and facilitation SGLT2i use in patients with HFrEF. The goal of this collaboration is to enhance utilization and safety of SGLT2i for HFrEF management by circumventing medication access issues, the major obstacle to therapy initiation. Within this protocol, our heart failure providers identify patients for the addition of SGLT2i to a background of heart failure GDMT. The patient is then referred to preventive cardiology where the team performs a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment, optimizes cardiovascular risk factors, and initiates SGLT2i with an emphasis on medication access, cost minimization, and mitigation of potential side effects. The heart failure team assumes responsibility for modification of heart failure-based therapies, and the preventive team manages diabetes, lipid, and metabolic-based therapies. The patient is followed by both cardiology services in a structured fashion, comparing outcome measures at regular intervals and utilizing our patient registry and bio-repository. This clinical practice statement provides a detailed evidentiary review on the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2i, outlines the rational for creation of a collaborative protocol, details a structured program that may serve as a template for enhanced heart failure management in other health systems, and addresses challenges encountered and recommendations for use.

Methods used to attribute costs avoided from pharmacist interventions in acute care: A scoping review

PURPOSE

Cost-avoidance studies are common in pharmacy practice literature. This scoping review summarizes, critiques, and identifies current limitations of the methods that have been used to determine cost avoidance associated with pharmacists' interventions in acute care settings.

METHODS

An Embase and MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies that estimated cost avoidance from pharmacist interventions in acute care settings. We included studies with human participants and articles published in English from July 2010 to January 2021, with the intent of summarizing the evidence most relevant to contemporary practice.

RESULTS

The database search retrieved 129 articles, of which 39 were included. Among these publications, less than half (18 of 39) mentioned whether the researchers assigned a probability for the occurrence of a harmful consequence in the absence of an intervention; thus, a 100% probability of a harmful consequence was assumed. Eleven of the 39 articles identified the specific harm that would occur in the absence of intervention. No clear methods of estimating cost avoidance could be identified for 7 studies. Among all 39 included articles, only 1 attributed both a probability to the potential harm and identified the cost specific to that harm.

CONCLUSION

Cost-avoidance studies of pharmacists' interventions in acute care settings over the last decade have common flaws and provide estimates that are likely to be inflated. There is a need for guidance on consistent methodology for such investigations for reporting of results and to confirm the validity of their economic implications.

Inclisiran: A Novel Agent for Lowering Apolipoprotein B-Containing Lipoproteins

ABSTRACT

Hypercholesterolemia is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, efforts to lower apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in plasma are the centerpiece of strategies for cardiovascular prevention and treatment in primary and secondary management. Despite the importance of this endeavor, many patients do not achieve appropriate low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals, even among those who have experienced atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The development of new LDL-C-lowering medications with alternative mechanisms of action will facilitate improved goal achievement in high risk patients. Inclisiran is a novel small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA)-based drug that is experimental in the US and approved for clinical use in the EU. It lowers LDL-C and other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by reducing production of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9), a protein that normally contributes to LDL-receptor (LDLR) degradation, thereby increasing LDLR density and recycling in hepatocytes. Although the lipid-lowering efficacy of inclisiran is comparable to results achieved with PCSK9-blocking monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9i) (alirocumab and evolocumab), there are several important differences between the two drug classes. First, inclisiran reduces levels of PCSK9 both intracellularly and extracellularly by blocking translation of and degrading PCSK9 messenger RNA. Second, the long biological half-life of inclisiran produces sustained LDL-C-lowering with twice yearly dosing. Third, although PCSK9i drugs are proven to reduce ASCVD events, clinical outcomes trials with inclisiran are still in progress. In this manuscript, we review the clinical development of inclisiran, its mechanism of action, lipid-lowering efficacy, safety and tolerability, and potential clinical role of this promising new agent.

Comprehensive Care Models for Cardiometabolic Disease

Purpose of Review

The high burden of cardiovascular disease and the simultaneous obesity pandemic is placing an extraordinary strain on the health care system. In the current siloed care model, patients with cardiometabolic disease receive only fractionated care from multiple specialists, leading to insufficient treatment, higher costs, and worse outcomes.

Recent Findings

The imminent need for a new care model calls for the creation of a distinct cardiometabolic specialty in conjunction with a cardiometabolic outpatient clinic dedicated to the comprehensive cardiometabolic care. The cardiometabolic clinic would consist of a diverse range of professionals relevant to comprehensive treatment.

Summary

The outpatient clinic we envision here would facilitate an interdisciplinary collaboration between specialists and deliver prevention-focused treatment to patients at risk/established cardiometabolic disease.

Real-world utilization of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic preventive cardiology practice

Objective

To determine the real-world use of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic Preventive Cardiology Clinic.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients seen in our Center for Preventive Cardiology (CPC) and who received a new prescription, according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications, for one of the following pharmacotherapies with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications from May 2019 to May 2020: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Treatment endpoints were prescription patterns, medication access, patient out-of-pocket expenses, medication tolerability, and clinical cardiovascular events while on these therapies.

Results

Of the 2390 patients seen in our CPC clinic over the observation period, 532 (22.3%) had already started and 291 (12.2%) were newly initiated on pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications with a median treatment duration of 9.1 months. Of these, 291 patients (for a total of 320 separate drug orders) – 93 (29.1%) were prescribed PCSK9i, 131 (40.9%) EPA, 46 (14.4%) SGLT2i, and 50 (15.6%) GLP-1 RA. Nearly 80% of cases required some form of provider intervention post-prescription (authorization, appeal, financial assistance, and/or side effect management). A total of 70% of adult patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and with an HgbA1C >7% were treated with a SGLT2i and/or GLP-1 RA – either initiated prior to or during the study period. Median monthly drug cost for the total cohort was reduced from $595.00 pre-insurance approval to $70.50 post-insurance approval, to $7.00 post-financial assistance intervention. The medications were well tolerated with any side effect occurring in 28.3%, and discontinuation due to side effects in 5.8% of cases. Clinical cardiovascular events occurred in 2.7%, of which 1.9% was due to ASCVD and 0.8% to hospitalization for heart failure. Differences in medication access, cost, tolerability and clinical cardiovascular events varied widely between the medication classes.

Conclusions

Initiation and management of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in a real-world setting requires substantial provider intervention, a workflow amenable to a multi-disciplinary approach which allows for high rates of medication access and cost minimization, and low rates of medication side effects and clinical cardiovascular events.

•

Over 12 months, PCSK9i, EPA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA where prescribed in 291 patients.

•

Nearly 80% of cases required some form of provider intervention post-prescription.

•

Multi-disciplinary efforts reduced median monthly patient cost from $595 to $7.

•

Cost was the leading factor for medication non-adherence.

•

Drugs with new CV indications were well tolerated with low rates of CV events.

JCL Roundtable: Lipid clinic operations

Until 1990, lipid clinics in the United States existed only in academic medical centers, generally in close relationship with laboratory-based research programs. The advent of statin therapy, the success of major clinical trials to prevent or stabilize atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and organizational efforts highlighted by regional Lipid Disorders Training Centers and the newly formed National Lipid Association boosted the formation of lipid clinics and preventive cardiology clinics in private and academic settings. This roundtable discussion with 4 experts examines multiple aspects of lipid clinic operations: obtaining referrals, adapting to either the academic or community setting, organizing a team of providers, incorporating diet and lifestyle counseling as well as medication, establishing the pharmacist role, and gaining financial stability. Some issues are as yet unsettled, including the subspecialty home of lipidology, if any, and the diagnostic and management boundaries of practical lipid clinics. Achieving official recognition as a subspecialty has taken some steps forward but remains a challenge. Opportunities for advocacy need to be seized.

Preventive cardiology as a dedicated clinical service: The past, the present, and the (Magnificent) future

•

Ischemic cardiovascular disease continues to be most common cause of death after age 55 everywhere in the world.

•

As the average person is exposed over life to a variety of artery-damaging insults it is easy to predict that this trend will continue for decades.

•

We face an unprecedented opportunity to consolidate, strengthen, and broaden the effort to prevent cardiovascular events, both ischemic and non ischemic.

•

This effort requires professional lifestyle counseling, dietary interventions, use of natural supplements, pharmacotherapy, and efficient cross-referral strategies.

•

The nascent subspecialty of preventive cardiology must reach uniformity in protocols of care, and must develop a system of training and certification for the next generation of expert providers.

Improving adherence to cardiovascular guidelines: realistic transition from paper to patient

Introduction: The emphasis on clinical trials to inform evidence-based medicine remains paramount within the cardiovascular community. Although such high-quality evidence is often translated into national and international guidelines, there exists a large gap between guideline development and guideline implementation into daily clinical practice.Areas covered: This article outlines barriers that impede guideline adherence and possible strategies to overcome such barriers. Barriers intrinsic and extrinsic to clinicians are discussed. The structured process of guideline implementation including guideline adoption, diffusion, and dissemination is discussed. Lastly, the authors review in detail the current and potential future elements of guideline diffusion and dissemination.Expert opinion: Improving guideline adherence remains challenging as it requires understanding of and navigation through various barriers. However, further research specific to cardiovascular medicine guidelines is necessary to better understand the objective effectiveness of various strategies employed by guideline writers and medical societies to improve adherence. The cost-effectiveness of nationwide dissemination strategies in improving guideline adherence and patient outcomes is also necessary but is largely unknown.