Clinical Pharmacist-Led Impact on Inappropriate Albumin Use and Costs in the Critically Ill

Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

Clinical pharmacy is a fast-growing discipline in Europe, ensuring optimisation and a guarantee of safety in therapeutic management. Within a hospital the intensive care unit (ICU) typically admits the most severely ill patients who require expensive medications. These patients may be at risk for potentially serious adverse events, especially when medication errors occur. This study aims to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical care and service within ICUs. A systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 methodology was conducted to identify pharmacoeconomic studies published from 2017 to 2021 in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Science Direct. A qualitative methodological assessment of the studies was made using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) grid. Among the 525 articles identified from the databases, 11 were selected. Clinical benefits were mostly measured in terms of a reduction in the risk of adverse events related to care and reductions in the duration of mechanical ventilation and in-ICU and in-hospital length-of-stays. No impact on the mortality rate was demonstrated. All studies reported cost-benefit ratios ranging from €2.48 to €24.20 per €1 invested. The avoided costs per patient ranged from €29.73 to €194.24 per day of hospitalisation. The mean CHEERS compliance score was 63%±17%, demonstrating the heterogeneous quality of these analyses. International pharmacoeconomic evaluations on the impact of the clinical pharmacist operating in the ICU revealed both economic and clinical benefits for the patient. Larger randomised studies are required to confirm the major role of the pharmacist in the ICU.

Assessment of Albumin Usage Patterns and Appropriateness in a Comprehensive Cancer Centre: A retrospective study in Jordan

Objectives

Albumin is commonly used for various indications; however, there is conflicting data regarding its appropriate use in different clinical cases. This study aimed to determine the pattern and appropriateness of albumin use among cancer patients at the King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult cancer patients who were prescribed albumin between January 2019 and July 2020 in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Data collected included demographics, prescribing services, indications and dosing regimens. A literature review was performed using PubMed to assess the appropriateness of albumin indications and dosing regimens against current guidelines, drug information resources and the package insert.

Results

Albumin was prescribed to 1,361 patients during the study period. Each patient received an average of 74.4 ± 89 g of albumin for an average of 2.6 ± 1.8 days. Albumin use was deemed appropriate in 69% of the patients. The critical care service accounted for the highest albumin consumption, with 37% of prescriptions for septic shock. Inappropriate use of albumin was most prevalent in the medical solid tumour services (40.8% of prescriptions), primarily for edema (28%).

Conclusion

To the best of the author's knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate albumin use in a large cohort of oncology patients. Approximately one-third of the albumin prescriptions were considered inappropriate. Continuous education on appropriate usage and regular evaluations of guideline adherence are essential to ensure proper utilisation of albumin in cancer care.

Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline From the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Albumin is used commonly across a wide range of clinical settings to improve hemodynamics, to facilitate fluid removal, and to manage complications of cirrhosis. The International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines developed guidelines for the use of albumin in patients requiring critical care, undergoing cardiovascular surgery, undergoing kidney replacement therapy, or experiencing complications of cirrhosis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Cochairs oversaw the guideline development process and the panel included researchers, clinicians, methodologists, and a patient representative. The evidence informing this guideline arises from a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews, in which multiple databases were searched (inception through November 23, 2022). The panel reviewed the data and formulated the guideline recommendations using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The guidelines were revised after public consultation.

RESULTS

The panel made 14 recommendations on albumin use in adult critical care (three recommendations), pediatric critical care (one recommendation), neonatal critical care (two recommendations), cardiovascular surgery (two recommendations), kidney replacement therapy (one recommendation), and complications of cirrhosis (five recommendations). Of the 14 recommendations, two recommendations had moderate certainty of evidence, five recommendations had low certainty of evidence, and seven recommendations had very low certainty of evidence. Two of the 14 recommendations suggested conditional use of albumin for patients with cirrhosis undergoing large-volume paracentesis or with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Twelve of 14 recommendations did not suggest albumin use in a wide variety of clinical situations where albumin commonly is transfused.

INTERPRETATION

Currently, few evidence-based indications support the routine use of albumin in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. These guidelines provide clinicians with actionable recommendations on the use of albumin.

Improving appropriate use of intravenous albumin: results of a single-centre audit and multifaceted intervention

BACKGROUND

Intravenous albumin has limited indications supported by randomised controlled trials, yet it is often prescribed for indications not supported by evidence.

AIM

To reduce unnecessary transfusion of albumin.

INTERVENTIONS

Under the leadership of a multidisciplinary quality improvement team, evidence-based recommendations were disseminated in tandem with a new electronic order set, an educational strategy, qualitative interviews with prescribers and a return policy change to reduce wastage.

IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION

Interventions were introduced in a staggered fashion. The primary outcome, appropriate use of albumin, was monitored and quantified using pre-intervention and post-intervention audits. Process measures included statistical process run charts of monthly usage of 5% and 25% albumin and wastage. Data on length of stay (hospital and intensive care), new inpatient starts on kidney replacement and mortality were collected as balancing measures.

RESULTS

Appropriate albumin usage based on indication increased from 30% to 50% (p<0.0001). There was significantly less overall albumin usage in the post-intervention period compared with the pre-intervention period (negative coefficient, p<0.0001), driven by a major reduction in the utilisation of the 5% formulation (p<0.0001). Overall albumin usage was significantly lower in the post-intervention period, decreasing from 800 to 450 vials per month. The intervention resulted in significantly less wastage (negative coefficient, p=0.017). Mortality, length of stay and new starts on kidney replacement therapy remained constant throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Improved prescribing of albumin was achieved with a multifaceted approach. Substantial and sustained reductions in usage were achieved without negatively impacting patient-important outcomes. The estimated annual savings for the purchase cost of albumin was CAN $300 000. We provide a structured process for other organisations to optimise their use of albumin.

Intravenous albumin utilization audit at a large community hospital

BACKGROUND

There is a literature gap in terms of albumin utilization practices.

METHODS/MATERIALS

We conducted a single-center retrospective observational electronic audit of adult admitted patients who received one or more vials of albumin (5% or 25%) between September 1, 2019 and August 31, 2020 at a large community hospital. The Research Ethics Board approval was obtained. Utilization data identified through the laboratory information system were independently adjudicated by two reviewers and resolved by consensus as appropriate-acceptable, appropriate-may be acceptable, or inappropriate. The primary objective of this audit is to determine the proportion of 5% and 25% intravenous albumin infusions meeting a priori appropriateness criteria for indication. Secondary outcomes include determining the patterns of practice surrounding intravenous albumin use: patient demographics, most responsible diagnosis, location at time of order, clinical outcomes of albumin recipients, and types, volumes, and cost of albumin infused.

RESULTS

The mean total albumin administered was 569.2 mL across 456 total recipients (58% male) with a 29% appropriateness rate. This cohort had an in-hospital mortality rate of 38%, with an average of 6 days from first dose of albumin to death. The mean length of stay was 14 days, with a mean intensive care length of stay of 8 days. The purchase cost of inappropriately transfused albumin was CAD $65,538.

CONCLUSION

Based on a lack of or an unacceptable indication provided, 71% of patients were inappropriately transfused. Albumin use deviating from guideline recommendations may be contributing to increased healthcare costs, pressure on limited supply, and potential patient harm.

Economic evaluations of adult critical care pharmacy services: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the extent and type of evidence available regarding economic evaluations of adult critical care pharmacy services in the context of UK practice.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in eight electronic databases and hand searching of full-text reference lists. Of 2409 journal articles initially identified, 38 were included in the final review. Independent literature review was undertaken by two investigators in a two-step process against the inclusion and exclusion criteria; title and abstract screening were followed by full-text screening. Included studies were taken from high-income economy countries that contained economic data evaluating any key aspect of adult critical care pharmacy services. Grey literature and studies that could not be translated into the English language were excluded.

RESULTS

The majority were before-and-after studies (18, 47%) or other observational studies (17, 45%), and conducted in North America (25, 66%). None of the included studies were undertaken in the UK. Seven studies (18%) included cost-benefit analysis; all demonstrated positive cost-benefit values for clinical pharmacist activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Further high-quality primary research focussing on the economic evaluation of UK adult critical care pharmacy services is needed, before undertaking a future systematic review. There is an indication of a cost-benefit value for critical care pharmacist activities. The lack of UK-based economic evaluations is a limitation to further development and standardisation of critical care pharmacy services nationally.

Albumin administration in internal medicine: A journey between effectiveness and futility

Albumin is the most abundant circulating protein and provides about 70% of the plasma oncotic power. The molecule also carries many other biological functions (binding, transport and detoxification of endogenous and exogenous compounds, antioxidation, and modulation of inflammatory and immune responses). Hypoalbuminemia is a frequent finding in many diseases, representing usually only a biomarker of poor prognosis rather than a primary pathophysiological event. Despite that, albumin is prescribed in many conditions based on the assumption that correction of hypoalbuminemia would lead to clinical benefits for the patients. Unfortunately, many of these indications are not supported by scientific evidence (or have been even disproved), so that a large part of albumin use is nowadays still inappropriate. Decompensated cirrhosis is the clinical area where albumin administration has been extensively studied and solid recommendations can be made. Besides prevention and treatment of acute complications, long-term albumin administration in patients with ascites has emerged in the last decade has a potential new disease-modifying treatment. In non-hepatological settings, albumin is widely used for fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses, with no clear superiority over crystalloids. In many other conditions, scientific evidence supporting albumin prescription is weak or even absent. Thus, given its high cost and limited availability, action is needed to avoid the use of albumin for inappropriate and futile indications to ensure its availability in those conditions for which albumin has been demonstrated to have a real effectiveness and an advantage for the patient.

Machine learning-based prediction of low-value care for hospitalized patients

Objective

Low-value care (i.e., costly health care treatments that provide little or no benefit) is an ongoing problem in United States hospitals. Traditional strategies for reducing low-value care are only moderately successful. Informed by behavioral science principles, we sought to use machine learning to inform a targeted prompting system that suggests preferred alternative treatments at the point of care but before clinicians have made a decision.

Methods

We used intravenous administration of albumin for fluid resuscitation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients as an exemplar of low-value care practice, identified using the electronic health record of a multi-hospital health system. We divided all ICU episodes into 4-h periods and defined a set of relevant clinical features at the period level. We then developed two machine learning models: a single-stage model that directly predicts if a patient will receive albumin in the next period; and a two-stage model that first predicts if any resuscitation fluid will be administered and then predicts albumin only among the patients with a high probability of fluid use.

Results

We examined 87,489 ICU episodes divided into approximately 1.5 million 4-h periods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 for both prediction models. The positive predictive value was 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.23) for the single-stage model and 0.22 (0.20, 0.23) for the two-stage model. Applying either model in a targeted prompting system could prevent 10% of albumin administrations, with an attending physician receiving one prompt every 4.2 days of ICU service.

Conclusion

Prediction of low-value care is feasible and could enable a point-of-care, targeted prompting system that offers suggestions ahead of the moment of need before clinicians have already decided. A two-stage approach does not improve performance but does interject new levers for the calibration of such a system.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Peripheral Venous Access for Chronic Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral venous access (PVA) is recommended as a first-line vascular approach for therapeutic plasmapheresis with centrifugation methods but not filtration, which usually requires high blood flow. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) with PVA, using ultrasound guidance and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), i.e., PVA-RCA-DFPP in patients undergoing chronic DFPP. Secondly, we assessed the number of central venous catheters (CVCs) avoided.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study evaluated 22 adult patients on chronic DFPP to perform PVA-RCA-DFPP. They were classified into 3 groups: successful (i.e., completion of sessions with PVA), primary failure (i.e., no sessions completed), secondary failure (i.e., ≥1 session with PVA completed but secondary return with CVC or arteriovenous fistula).

RESULTS

Among the 22 patients included (64% men), 7 patients (32%) were classified as primary failures (2 patient refusals, 5 inadequate PVAs), 1 patient (5%) as a secondary failure (due to uncomfortable venipunctures), and 14 patients (64%) as successful. In the successful group including 12 patients treated for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 2 patients for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (2 patients), 116 sessions were performed, with a median treated plasma volume of 4.3 L [IQR 3.6-4.6] (45 mL/kg) for a median duration of 134 min [IQR 122-144], and a median blood flow of 94 mL/min [IQR 87-103]. For the CIDP group, 90% of sessions achieved a plasma volume >1 TPV, and for the FH group 91% of sessions achieved an LDLc reduction >60%. Eleven sessions out of 116 (9%) were interrupted, mostly due to PVA dysfunction (5/11) and circuit clotting (4/11). Session interruptions decreased significantly between each patient's first and following sessions (29% to 7%, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Chronic PVA-RCA-DFPP can be performed safely and efficiently, avoiding the use of CVCs.

Expert perspectives for the pharmacist on facilitating and improving the use of albumin in cirrhosis

PURPOSE

Albumin, the most abundant and arguably most important protein in the human body, plays a unique role in decompensated cirrhosis because its structure and function are quantitatively and qualitatively affected. A literature review was performed to provide insights into albumin use. The manuscript was developed using a multidisciplinary approach; 2 hepatologists, a nephrologist, a hospitalist, and a pharmacist, who are all members of or work closely with the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, collaborated to write this expert perspective review.

SUMMARY

Cirrhosis represents the potential end in the spectrum of all chronic liver diseases. Decompensated cirrhosis, defined by the overt manifestation of liver failure (eg, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), is the inflection point associated with increased mortality. Human serum albumin (HSA) infusion serves an important role in the treatment of advanced liver disease. The benefits of HSA administration in patients with cirrhosis are widely accepted, and its use has been advocated by several professional societies. However, inappropriate HSA use can lead to significant adverse patient events. This paper discusses the rationale for the administration of HSA in the treatment of complications of cirrhosis, analyzes the data on the use of HSA in cirrhosis, and streamlines practical recommendations set forth in published guidance.

CONCLUSION

Use of HSA in clinical practice needs to be improved. The objective of this paper is to empower pharmacists to facilitate and improve the use of HSA in patients with cirrhosis at their practice sites.

The Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Implemented Protocol on Albumin Utilization and Cost in an Intensive Care Unit in Egypt

Introduction: Albumin is an expensive non-blood plasma substitutes with limited availability that has been reported to be inappropriately used in healthcare settings. Hence, interventions are recommended to control its misuse.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist implemented dispensing protocol on optimization of albumin use in an intensive care unit (ICU).

Design: A retrospective prospective 3-phase interventional study was conducted in an ICU in a tertiary Egyptian hospital over a period of 2 years.

Methods: The study included three phases; a preparation phase where a local albumin dispensing protocol and a restriction dispensing form were prepared by clinical pharmacists and was approved by the local Drugs and Therapeutics Committee, a retrospective pre-implementation phase in which the medical records of all ICU patients receiving albumin were evaluated for appropriateness of albumin use according to the developed protocol, and a prospective implementation phase where the dispensing protocol and restriction dispensing form were applied. The pattern of albumin consumption and cost were recorded and compared between the retrospective and prospective phases.

Results: In the retrospective phase, 190 ICU patients received albumin of whom 83.6% was considered inappropriate indications for albumin compared to only 44 patients in the prospective phase of whom 16% was considered inappropriate (p-value &lt;0.001). Clinical pharmacists’ interventions significantly decreased the inappropriate albumin consumption from 4.7 vials/patient in the retrospective phase to 2.7 vials/patient in the prospective phase (p-value &lt;0.001) with a total cost savings of 313,900 Egyptian Pounds (19,930 US Dollars).

Conclusion: The current study showed that clinical pharmacists’ interventions led to a significant control on albumin use and consequently reduced the cost associated with its consumption.

Utilization of pharmacists in physician assistant didactic curricula in the United States

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective was to describe the percentage of physician assistant (PA) programs who utilize pharmacists to lecture on pharmacology/pharmacotherapeutics content. Secondary objectives were to describe the percentage of pharmacology/pharmacotherapeutics lectures pharmacists deliver, the percentage of programs who employ a full-time pharmacist to coordinate the Pharmacology/Pharmacotherapeutics courses, and the inclusion of pharmacists in other courses in the curricula.

METHODS

This was a prospective, cross-sectional, cohort survey. All PA programs listed on the Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant (ARC-PA) website with an available email address for the Director of Pre-Clinical Education/Didactic Education, Academic Coordinator, or Chair/Director were recruited for the study. A link to an online survey was distributed to each program. The survey collected data on program characteristics as well as utilization of pharmacists in the curriculum. Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 187 programs receiving the survey, 66 completed the survey (35%). Eighty-three percent of programs reported that pharmacists were utilized to deliver pharmacology/pharmacotherapeutics content. For those programs who utilize pharmacists, 80% reported pharmacists teach more than 75% of the lectures. Twenty-three (35%) programs reported having a full-time pharmacist on faculty to coordinate these courses. Almost half of respondents also commented that pharmacists were involved in other courses in the curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 80% of programs responding to the survey utilize pharmacists to deliver pharmacology/pharmacotherapeutics content. Studying the utilization of pharmacists and their impact in other health sciences curricula is warranted.

Evaluation of albumin use in a community hospital setting: A retrospective study looking at appropriate use and prescribing patterns

PURPOSE

Albumin has been shown to be safe and effective in clinical practice for a wide variety of indications. The purpose of this medication use evaluation is to quantify the use of albumin in the community hospital setting based on indication and prescribing department.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective, single-center, chart review over a 6-month period of 186 patients aged 18 and older who were treated with IV human albumin 5% or 25% at a single 202-bed community hospital setting from February 1, 2020, to August 1, 2020. A chart review was completed for each patient and the data collected included date of albumin administration, the ordering provider, the specialty of the provider, the indication for albumin as stated in the order, patient notes, crystalloid therapy use prior to albumin, albumin strength, the presence of acute or chronic renal, hepatic or respiratory disorders, and lab values denoting renal and hepatic function. Appropriate albumin use was determined utilizing criteria which included FDA labeled indications, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, and existing literature.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients received albumin 5% or 25% IV solution at least once during the study period. The study population was 52.2% female, and the average age was 68 years. Of the patients selected for the study, 23 (11.6%) had chronic hepatic disease, and 37 (18.7%) had chronic renal disease. The top indications for which albumin was administered were sepsis or septic shock (25.3%), hypotension or hypovolemia (19.4%), intra-dialytic hypotension (13.4%), fluid support in surgery (10.8%), and nephrosis or nephropathy (10.8%). The departments with highest albumin use during this study period were critical care (41%), nephrology (28%), and surgery (17%). Overall, albumin was used for an appropriate indication in 126 out of 186 patients (67.7%).

CONCLUSION

We found that albumin was most utilized for sepsis and septic shock, hypovolemia and hypotension, and intradialytic hypotension in our community hospital setting and it was most frequently ordered by critical care, nephrology, and surgical departments. Further research could determine if this trend is seen in other community hospital settings.

Albumin for cirrhosis-related complications

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper was to discuss the limitations of the studies serving as the evidence for recommendations in clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin use for cirrhosis-related complications, review relevant studies published since the guidelines and suggest directions for future investigations.

COMMENT

There are no recent comprehensive clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin. Instead, more recent albumin guidelines reflect areas of specialty practice such as those by American and European associations for the study of the liver and liver disease. Studies published since the guidelines are useful for helping to define the most appropriate indications for albumin with respect to cirrhosis-related complications, as well as directions for future research.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Albumin has a long history of attempts to define appropriate uses by meta-analysis, but given the high cost and episodic shortages of albumin, there is a need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials using current state-of-the-art care evaluating the use of albumin to prevent or treat cirrhosis-related complications.

Clinical Pharmacist–Led Impact on Inappropriate Albumin Utilization and Associated Costs in General Ward Patients

Background:

Inappropriate albumin use in clinical practice remains problematic. Health-systems face continued challenges in promoting cost-appropriate use.

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of a clinical pharmacist–led intervention strategy targeting inappropriate albumin use in general ward patients.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study evaluated all adult (≥18 years) general ward patients administered ≥1 dose of albumin at a university medical center over a 2-year period. The intervention consisted of a clinical pharmacist–led strategy intervening on all albumin orders not in accordance with institutional guidelines. The primary end point was to compare inappropriate albumin utilization before and after implementation. Secondary end points compared the rates of inappropriate albumin use adjusted for hospital admission and patient-days as well as associated costs by appropriateness between study periods.

Results:

A total of 4420 patients were screened, with 1971 (44.6%) patients meeting inclusion criteria. The clinical pharmacist strategy significantly reduced inappropriate albumin (grams) utilization by 86.0% ( P < 0.001). A 7-fold reduction of inappropriate albumin administered adjusted for the number of patient admissions was found from the preimplementation period following clinical pharmacist intervention strategy implementation (415.3 ± 83.2 vs 57.5 ± 34.2 g per 100 general ward hospital admissions, respectively; P < 0.001). Also, the adjusted inappropriate albumin rate was reduced from 62.2 ± 12.3 to 8.6 ± 5.2 g per 100 patient-days in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively ( P < 0.001). Annual cost savings were $421 455 overall, with $341 930 resulting from mitigation of inappropriate use.

Conclusion and Relevance:

Clinical pharmacist–led interventions significantly reduced inappropriate albumin use and costs in hospitalized patients.