Albumin administration in internal medicine: A journey between effectiveness and futility

Albumin is the most abundant circulating protein and provides about 70% of the plasma oncotic power. The molecule also carries many other biological functions (binding, transport and detoxification of endogenous and exogenous compounds, antioxidation, and modulation of inflammatory and immune responses). Hypoalbuminemia is a frequent finding in many diseases, representing usually only a biomarker of poor prognosis rather than a primary pathophysiological event. Despite that, albumin is prescribed in many conditions based on the assumption that correction of hypoalbuminemia would lead to clinical benefits for the patients. Unfortunately, many of these indications are not supported by scientific evidence (or have been even disproved), so that a large part of albumin use is nowadays still inappropriate. Decompensated cirrhosis is the clinical area where albumin administration has been extensively studied and solid recommendations can be made. Besides prevention and treatment of acute complications, long-term albumin administration in patients with ascites has emerged in the last decade has a potential new disease-modifying treatment. In non-hepatological settings, albumin is widely used for fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses, with no clear superiority over crystalloids. In many other conditions, scientific evidence supporting albumin prescription is weak or even absent. Thus, given its high cost and limited availability, action is needed to avoid the use of albumin for inappropriate and futile indications to ensure its availability in those conditions for which albumin has been demonstrated to have a real effectiveness and an advantage for the patient.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Peripheral Venous Access for Chronic Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral venous access (PVA) is recommended as a first-line vascular approach for therapeutic plasmapheresis with centrifugation methods but not filtration, which usually requires high blood flow. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) with PVA, using ultrasound guidance and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), i.e., PVA-RCA-DFPP in patients undergoing chronic DFPP. Secondly, we assessed the number of central venous catheters (CVCs) avoided.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study evaluated 22 adult patients on chronic DFPP to perform PVA-RCA-DFPP. They were classified into 3 groups: successful (i.e., completion of sessions with PVA), primary failure (i.e., no sessions completed), secondary failure (i.e., ≥1 session with PVA completed but secondary return with CVC or arteriovenous fistula).

RESULTS

Among the 22 patients included (64% men), 7 patients (32%) were classified as primary failures (2 patient refusals, 5 inadequate PVAs), 1 patient (5%) as a secondary failure (due to uncomfortable venipunctures), and 14 patients (64%) as successful. In the successful group including 12 patients treated for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 2 patients for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (2 patients), 116 sessions were performed, with a median treated plasma volume of 4.3 L [IQR 3.6-4.6] (45 mL/kg) for a median duration of 134 min [IQR 122-144], and a median blood flow of 94 mL/min [IQR 87-103]. For the CIDP group, 90% of sessions achieved a plasma volume >1 TPV, and for the FH group 91% of sessions achieved an LDLc reduction >60%. Eleven sessions out of 116 (9%) were interrupted, mostly due to PVA dysfunction (5/11) and circuit clotting (4/11). Session interruptions decreased significantly between each patient's first and following sessions (29% to 7%, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Chronic PVA-RCA-DFPP can be performed safely and efficiently, avoiding the use of CVCs.

Expert perspectives for the pharmacist on facilitating and improving the use of albumin in cirrhosis

PURPOSE

Albumin, the most abundant and arguably most important protein in the human body, plays a unique role in decompensated cirrhosis because its structure and function are quantitatively and qualitatively affected. A literature review was performed to provide insights into albumin use. The manuscript was developed using a multidisciplinary approach; 2 hepatologists, a nephrologist, a hospitalist, and a pharmacist, who are all members of or work closely with the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, collaborated to write this expert perspective review.

SUMMARY

Cirrhosis represents the potential end in the spectrum of all chronic liver diseases. Decompensated cirrhosis, defined by the overt manifestation of liver failure (eg, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), is the inflection point associated with increased mortality. Human serum albumin (HSA) infusion serves an important role in the treatment of advanced liver disease. The benefits of HSA administration in patients with cirrhosis are widely accepted, and its use has been advocated by several professional societies. However, inappropriate HSA use can lead to significant adverse patient events. This paper discusses the rationale for the administration of HSA in the treatment of complications of cirrhosis, analyzes the data on the use of HSA in cirrhosis, and streamlines practical recommendations set forth in published guidance.

CONCLUSION

Use of HSA in clinical practice needs to be improved. The objective of this paper is to empower pharmacists to facilitate and improve the use of HSA in patients with cirrhosis at their practice sites.

Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The use of low-value care (LVC) is a persistent problem that calls for knowledge about strategies for de-implementation. However, studies are dispersed across many clinical fields, and there is no overview of strategies that can be used to support the de-implementation of LVC. The extent to which strategies used for implementation are also used in de-implementing LVC is unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to (1) identify strategies for the de-implementation of LVC described in the scientific literature and (2) compare de-implementation strategies to implementation strategies as specified in the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) and strategies added by Perry et al. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted according to recommendations outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. Four scientific databases were searched, relevant articles were snowball searched, and the journal Implementation Science was searched manually for peer-reviewed journal articles in English. Articles were included if they were empirical studies of strategies designed to reduce the use of LVC. Two reviewers conducted all abstract and full-text reviews, and conflicting decisions were discussed until consensus was reached. Data were charted using a piloted data-charting form. The strategies were first coded inductively and then mapped onto the ERIC compilation of implementation strategies.

RESULTS

The scoping review identified a total of 71 unique de-implementation strategies described in the literature. Of these, 62 strategies could be mapped onto ERIC strategies, and four strategies onto one added category. Half (50%) of the 73 ERIC implementation strategies were used for de-implementation purposes. Five identified de-implementation strategies could not be mapped onto any of the existing strategies in ERIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar strategies are used for de-implementation and implementation. However, only a half of the implementation strategies included in the ERIC compilation were represented in the de-implementation studies, which may imply that some strategies are being underused or that they are not applicable for de-implementation purposes. The strategies assess and redesign workflow (a strategy previously suggested to be added to ERIC), accountability tool, and communication tool (unique new strategies for de-implementation) could complement the existing ERIC compilation when used for de-implementation purposes.

Albumin for cirrhosis-related complications

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper was to discuss the limitations of the studies serving as the evidence for recommendations in clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin use for cirrhosis-related complications, review relevant studies published since the guidelines and suggest directions for future investigations.

COMMENT

There are no recent comprehensive clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin. Instead, more recent albumin guidelines reflect areas of specialty practice such as those by American and European associations for the study of the liver and liver disease. Studies published since the guidelines are useful for helping to define the most appropriate indications for albumin with respect to cirrhosis-related complications, as well as directions for future research.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Albumin has a long history of attempts to define appropriate uses by meta-analysis, but given the high cost and episodic shortages of albumin, there is a need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials using current state-of-the-art care evaluating the use of albumin to prevent or treat cirrhosis-related complications.