Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and other calcium entry blockers

Diltiazem, as well as other calcium entry blockers, is widely prescribed for the treatment of various types of angina. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and of two other calcium entry blockers: verapamil and nifedipine. Although unrelated in their chemical structure, these three drugs have common features. They are highly lipophilic and have a large volume of distribution, are mainly cleared by metabolism and undergo an extensive first-pass extraction. On the other hand, as expected from their quite dissimilar structures, they have their own particular kinetic characteristics. For example, metabolism of diltiazem and verapamil gives rise to active metabolites; repeated administration influences the kinetic profile of verapamil but not those of diltiazem and nifedipine. Absorption, distribution and elimination of these three drugs are differently affected by age and pathological conditions. The possible drug interactions involving diltiazem and the other calcium entry blockers are discussed, particularly that with digoxin. Due to its large therapeutic index, there is no need for treatment monitoring of diltiazem. Nevertheless, this procedure may provide useful information for optimizing the dosage regimen of each patient as the pathological condition and drug therapy may be quite complex.

Calcium channel blockers: spectrum of side effects and drug interactions

Calcium antagonists are a chemically heterogenous group of agents with potent cardiovascular effects which are beneficial in the treatment of angina pectoris, arterial hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. The main side effects for the group are dose-dependent and the result of the main action or actions of the calcium antagonists, i.e. vasodilatation, negative inotropic effects and antiarrhythmic effects. Pronounced hypotension is reported for the main calcium antagonist drugs; verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. While conduction disturbances and bradycardia are seen more often after verapamil and diltiazem, tachycardia, headache and flush are more frequent after nifedipine. Constipation is relatively frequent after verapamil while nifedipine is reported to induce diarrhea in som patients. Idiosyncratic side effects are rare but have been reported from the skin, mouth, musculoskeletal system, the liver and the central nervous system. These side effects include urticarial rashes, gingival hyperplasia, arthralgia, hepathotoxicity and transistory mental confusion or akathisia. Verapamil, diltiazem and possibly also nifedipine have been reported to increase serum digoxin concentrations but the clinical relevance of these drug interactions are not clear. Furthermore, verapamil and diltiazem may potentiate the effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and verapamil may also potentiate the effects of neuromuscular blocking drugs. It is concluded that side effects after calcium antagonist drugs are mostly trivial and transient although they may sometimes be relatively common. Clinically relevant drug interactions are few. Judged from the point of efficacy and safety, calcium antagonists will have a major place in the future pharmacotherapy of several cardiovascular disorders.