Gastric ulcer perforation associated with the use of injectable ketorolac

A Case of Allergic Urticaria After Ophthalmic Nepafenac Use

A 21-year-old male patient with no history of systemic disease or drug use presented to our clinic with redness and pain in the right eye. Best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Inflamed pinguecula was observed on slit-lamp examination and the patient was prescribed ophthalmic nepafenac eye drops. After instilling the drops that day and the next day, the patient presented again due to pruritus and rash. Upon consultation with the dermatology department, the patient was diagnosed with drug-induced allergic urticaria and the nepafenac drops were discontinued. Although urticaria has been reported as a side effect after systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, such a reaction has not been reported with an ophthalmic NSAID and ours is the first reported case of urticaria following ophthalmic nepafenac use. This unique case highlights the fact that ophthalmologists must also keep urticaria in mind as a potential side effect when prescribing this drug.

Effects of ketorolac tromethamine on erythropoietin levels in Sprague Dawley rats

Ketorolac tromethamine (KT) is a potent analgesic, most often used in its injectable form postoperatively. Similar to other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), it inhibits prostaglandin (PG) synthesis. Prostaglandins have been shown to be involved in the regulation of renal function as well as erythropoietin (Ep) production. The intent of this study was to determine the effect of KT on plasma Ep levels in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Twenty rats received either 15 mg/kg/d or the KT vehicle IM for 5d. Blood samples (1 ml) were collected via tail vein each day of treatment. Plasma Ep levels were significantly higher in the KT rats than normal controls with the greatest difference occurring on d4 of treatment (70.1 ± 10.8 vs 30.9 ± 10.84 mU/ml, p < 0.01). This change in Ep corresponded with a significant reduction in hematocrit (KT, 29.5 ± 2.2 vs C, 40.8 ± 2.2%, p< 0.01). Presence of fecal blood was noted in the KT treated rats. A similar second experiment was designed to determine if blood loss was the cause of altered Ep production. In this experiment controls (HC) were bled via tail vein, to match the hematocrits of KT treated animals. Repeated administration of KT led to a steady reduction in hematocrit. When compared, hematocrit matched animals showed no difference in plasma Ep levels on all days of treatment (KT, 48.0 ± 4.9 vs HC, 44.6 ± 3.1 mU/ml, N.S.). In conclusion, repeated administration of KT showed no impairment of Ep production and release in response to reduced hematocrit, suggesting that in this instance, prostaglandin inhibition plays a minimal role in Ep production or release.

NSAID gastropathy and enteropathy: distinct pathogenesis likely necessitates distinct prevention strategies

The mechanisms underlying the ability of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to cause ulceration in the stomach and proximal duodenum are well understood, and this injury can largely be prevented through suppression of gastric acid secretion (mainly with proton pump inhibitors). In contrast, the pathogenesis of small intestinal injury induced by NSAIDs is less well understood, involving more complex mechanisms than those in the stomach and proximal duodenum. There is clear evidence for important contributions to NSAID enteropathy of enteric bacteria, bile and enterohepatic recirculation of the NSAID. There is no evidence that suppression of gastric acid secretion will reduce the incidence or severity of NSAID enteropathy. Indeed, clinical data suggest little, if any, benefit. Animal studies suggest a significant exacerbation of NSAID enteropathy when proton pump inhibitors are co-administered with the NSAID. This worsening of damage appears to be linked to changes in the number and types of bacteria in the small intestine during proton pump inhibitor therapy. The distinct mechanisms of NSAID-induced injury in the stomach/proximal duodenum versus the more distal small intestine likely dictate distinct strategies for prevention.

Topical ophthalmic NSAIDs: a discussion with focus on nepafenac ophthalmic suspension

The removal of diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution as a viable pharmaceutical entity in September 1999 from the US market spurred considerable interest in the general safety and effectiveness of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs for treatment of anterior segment inflammation. In late 1999 the use of topical ocular NSAIDs declined in the US as a result of incidents involving corneal melts and toxicity surrounding use of generic diclofenac. However, since the removal of diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution from the marketplace, ophthalmic NSAIDs have regained use as viable pharmacotherapeutic entities. Moreover, several new ophthalmic NSAID products have recently been introduced for commercial use in the US including the novel chemical entity nepafenac. The purpose of this report is to revisit the use of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs for the treatment of surgically induced anterior segment inflammation with a particular focus on nepafenac. Nepafenac is unique among ophthalmic NSAIDs in that it is a prodrug deaminated to amfenac, a highly effective non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor. In the case of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs, practitioners should carefully weigh the cost-benefit of implementing “highly potent” new drug products because perturbations in pharmacodynamic response due to the inherent novelty in terms of chemical designs may outweigh the demonstrated replicative pharmacologic action of all topical ophthalmic NSAIDs.

Fatal adverse reaction to ketorolac tromethamine in asthmatic patient

A case of an asthmatic woman who collapsed within a few minutes after intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine (KT) injection is reported. Autopsy findings revealed anatomic evidence of a recent asthma attack. KT was found to be present in the blood at a concentration within the therapeutic range and consistent with the administered dose. Based on the timing of the collapse in relation to the KT administration, death was attributed to an adverse reaction to KT, resulting in acute bronchospasm and cardiac arrest, with asthma as an underlying contributing factor. In this case, asthma alone was not responsible for the death of the patient but only a contributing factor. Physicians have to be aware that in asthmatic patients bronchospasm can be induced by drugs among which aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as KT are the most common; therefore, death may have an iatrogenic cause. The paper also describes the pathogenic mechanism of an adverse reaction to such drugs and analytical methods for the isolation and detection of KT in postmortem blood.

Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for their analgesic, antipyretic, and antiinflammatory properties, and aspirin is increasingly employed in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke. Despite undisputed therapeutic efficacy for these indications, all NSAIDs impart a considerable risk of peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A growing body of evidence supports an association between non-aspirin NSAIDs and acute coronary syndromes, and an expanding understanding of the gastroduodenal effects of aspirin, COX-2 selective agents, clopidogrel, and Helicobacter pylori synergism fuel controversies in NSAID use. In this review, we discuss risk stratification of patients taking NSAIDs and the appropriate application of proven gastro-protective strategies to decrease the incidence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage based upon an individualized assessment of risk for potential toxicities. Prevention of NSAID-related gastropathy is an important clinical issue, and therapeutic strategies for both the primary and secondary prevention of adverse events are continually evolving.

Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself?

Except in rare cases, the stomach can withstand exposure to highly concentrated hydrochloric acid, refluxed bile salts, alcohol, and foodstuffs with a wide range of temperatures and osmolarity. This is attributed to a number of physiological responses by the mucosal lining to potentially harmful luminal agents, and to an ability to rapidly repair damage when it does occur. Since the discovery in 1971 that prostaglandin synthesis could be blocked by aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there has been great interest in the contribution of prostaglandins to gastric mucosal defense. Prostaglandins modulate virtually every aspect of mucosal defense, and the importance of this contribution is evident by the increased susceptibility of the stomach to injury following ingestion of an NSAID. With chronic ingestion of these drugs, the development of ulcers in the stomach is a significant clinical concern. Research over the past two decades has helped to identify some of the key events triggered by NSAIDs that contribute to ulcer formation and/or impair ulcer healing. Recent research has also highlighted the fact that the protective functions of prostaglandins in the stomach can be carried out by other mediators, in particular the gaseous mediators nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide. Better understanding of the mechanisms through which the stomach is able to resist injury in the presence of luminal irritants is helping to drive the development of safer anti-inflammatory drugs, and therapies to accelerate and improve the quality of ulcer healing.

The CINOD, AZD3582, exhibits an improved gastrointestinal safety profile compared with naproxen in healthy volunteers

COX-inhibiting nitric oxide donators (CINODs) are a new class of drugs in development for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. They comprise a COX-inhibiting moiety linked to a nitric-oxide-donating component and are designed to provide an innovative mechanism of action of balanced COX inhibition and controlled nitric oxide donation. Through these pathways, CINODs should provide analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy, while offering gastrointestinal safety through the tissue-protective effects of nitric oxide donation. AZD3582 [4-(nitrooxy)butyl-(2S)-2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)propanoate] is the first agent in the CINOD class to enter extensive clinical development. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that AZD3582 has a superior gastrointestinal safety profile to naproxen, while demonstrating analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy. In healthy human volunteers, AZD3582 caused little gastrointestinal damage compared with equimolar doses of naproxen. Studies to evaluate the longer-term gastrointestinal safety of AZD3582, alongside its efficacy in alleviating chronic and acute pain, are ongoing.

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for ophthalmic use: a safety review

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used agents that despite chemically heterogeneity, share similar therapeutic properties and adverse effects. Topical ophthalmic NSAIDs are limited to the relatively water soluble phenylacetic and phenylalkanoic acids as well as indole derivatives, which are more suitable for ophthalmic use. Topical ophthalmic NSAIDs are commonly used in the treatment of post-operative inflammation following cataract extraction and various surgical refractive procedures. They are also used in the prevention and treatment of cystoid macular oedema and for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Absorption of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs through the nasal mucosa results in systemic exposure and the occurrence of adverse systemic events, including exacerbation of bronchial asthma. Local irritant effects of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs include conjunctival hyperaemia, burning, stinging and corneal anaesthesia. A more serious complication involves the association of topical ophthalmic NSAIDs with indolent corneal ulceration and full-thickness corneal melts. Analysis of NSAID-associated corneal events implicates the now defunct generic dicolfenac product, diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution as the agent primarily responsible. However, these events generated a renewed interest in the safety of ophthalmic NSAIDs and a scrutiny of the pharmacology regarding NSAID action in the eye. An elucidation of possible pharmacodynamic explanations of NSAID-induced corneal injury includes the role of epithelial hypoxia, which not only appears to aid in determining the metabolic destination of arachidonate, it may play a key role in orchestrating a novel inflammatory response unrelated to prostanoid formation. The use of NSAIDs under conditions of corneal hypoxia may therefore not only result in a disappointing therapeutic response, it may result in a paradoxical inflammatory exacerbation. Other potential mechanisms include the relationship between NSAIDs and corneal matrix metalloproteinase and direct toxicity due to cytotoxic excipients such as surfactants, solubilisers and preservatives found in topical NSAID ophthalmic preparations. In general, ophthalmic NSAIDs may be used safely with other ophthalmic pharmaceuticals; however, concurrent use of agents known to adversely effect the corneal epithelium, such as gentamicin, may lead to increased corneal penetration of the NSAID. The concurrent use of NSAIDs with topical corticosteorids in the face of significant pre-existing corneal inflammation has been identified as a risk factor in precipitating corneal erosions and melts and should be undertaken with caution. Until clinical evidence dictates otherwise, data supporting theories of potential pharmacodynamic mechanisms of NSAID injury do not alter the favorable benefit-risk ratio of ophthalmic NSAID use when employed in an appropriate and judicious manner.

Pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), even in the era of selective COX-2 inhibitors, remains limited by the ability of these agents to cause gastroduodenal ulceration and bleeding. This damage is caused mainly through the ability of these agents to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, which has a negative impact on several components of mucosal defence. Many NSAIDs also have topical irritant effects on the epithelium which may be particularly important in the production of small intestinal injury. While the presence of acid in the lumen of the stomach may not be a primary factor in the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy it can make an important contribution to the chronicity of these lesions and to bleeding by impairing the restitution process, interfering with haemostasis and inactivating several growth factors that are important in mucosal defence and repair. Through better understanding of the pathogenesis of ulcers induced by NSAIDs, some new approaches to the development of more effective and safer anti-inflammatory drugs have been taken in recent years.

How do NSAIDs cause ulcer disease?

Gastroduodenal ulceration and bleeding are the major limitations to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The development of safer NSAIDs or of effective therapies for the prevention of the adverse effects of existing NSAIDs requires a better understanding of the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced ulcer disease. NSAIDs can cause damage to the gastroduodenal mucosa via several mechanisms, including the topical irritant effect of these drugs on the epithelium, impairment of the barrier properties of the mucosa, suppression of gastric prostaglandin synthesis, reduction of gastric mucosal blood flow and interference with the repair of superficial injury. The presence of acid in the lumen of the stomach also contributes to the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced ulcers and bleeding, by impairing the restitution process, interfering with haemostasis and inactivating several growth factors that are important in mucosal defence and repair. In recent years, a fuller understanding of the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced ulcer disease has facilitated some new, very promising approaches to the development of stomach-sparing NSAIDs.

Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The safety of low-dose daily aspirin therapy in the gastrointestinal tract is uncertain. Our objectives were to evaluate the long-term effects of very low daily aspirin doses in the gastrointestinal tract and effects on platelet-derived serum thromboxane levels in volunteers.

METHODS

Subjects were randomized to receive 10 mg (n = 8), 81 mg (n = 11), or 325 mg (n = 10) aspirin daily for 3 months. Before administration of aspirin, all subjects underwent gastroduodenoscopy, and most underwent proctoscopy for assessment of mucosal injury and prostaglandin content. After 1.5 and 3 months, subjects again underwent gastroduodenoscopy and, at 3 months, another proctoscopy.

RESULTS

Each aspirin dose (even 10 mg) significantly reduced gastric mucosal prostaglandin levels, to approximately 40% of the baseline value. All three doses also induced significant gastric injury, and 325 mg caused duodenal injury. Three subjects developed gastric ulcers, 1 while taking 10 mg/day of aspirin. Furthermore, aspirin at 81 mg/day and 325 mg/day (but not 10 mg/day) significantly reduced duodenal mucosal prostaglandin levels to approximately 40% of the baseline value. Only 325 mg of aspirin per day significantly reduced rectal mucosal prostaglandin levels to approximately 60% of the baseline value. Serum thromboxane levels were inhibited 62%, 90%, and 98% with 10, 81, and 325 mg of aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings explain aspirin's predominant gastric toxicity and question the safety of even 10 mg of aspirin daily.

Intravenous analgesia

Pain and its treatment are known to have adverse effects on the organism, including deterioration in myocardial, diaphragmatic, and small bowel function. The provision of adequate intravenous analgesia, and the choice of agent, can ameliorate or exacerbate these manifestations of the stress response. The choice of agent, opioid or non-opioid, has in some respects become more difficult as more information has become available regarding the merits and adverse effects of each. Increased awareness of the frequency of hypoxemia secondary to the opioids' ability to cause an obstructive sleep apnea picture, and the cost efficiency of ketorolac through a reduction in opioid toxicity, contrast with recent studies which suggest that the gastrotoxic and nephrotoxic effects of ketorolac may occur earlier than previously suspected. The suitability of using the dissociative anesthetic agent ketamine in critically ill patients remains to be proven. Ketamine provides intense analgesia at subanesthetic doses. Its centrally mediated sympathomimetic action encourages hemodynamic stability, and it is relatively devoid of respiratory depressant activity. Increasing experience with ketamine outside the operating room has resulted in its successful use in cases of severe bronchospasm and status epilepticus.

Clinical implications of ketorolac for postoperative analgesia

Ketorolac is the only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in widespread clinical use that is available in an injectable form. Though similar to aspirin and ibuprofen, it is much more potent. In fact, it is potent enough to be useful for postsurgical pain either alone or in combination with other pain relief strategies. For many types of pain, ketorolac is comparable in potency with opioids though the mechanism by which it relieves pain is significantly different. Ketorolac has a much longer duration than morphine or meperidine but has a slower onset. Though we sometimes perceive NSAIDs as almost harmless, ketorolac is a potent drug and, like other potent drugs, has the potential to produce potent adverse effects including organ disfunction and allergic reaction. Risk factors for these adverse effects are well understood, allowing the clinician to plan the ketorolac use safely. Well planned patient selection and ketorolac administration can improve patient care by reducing opioid side effects and improving analgesia while speeding patient recovery and PACU discharge times.

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.

NSAIDs, gastrointestinal injury, and cytoprotection

Gastrointestinal toxicity caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the most frequent drug side effect in the United States. NSAIDs are implicated in the development of complicated peptic ulcer disease and injury to the small bowel and colon. NSAIDs interfere with prostaglandin-mediated epithelial defense mechanisms and also cause direct epithelial toxicity. Current and future approaches to the prevention and management of NSAID injury are reviewed.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: practical and theoretical considerations in their selection

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prescribed frequently for patients with painful musculoskeletal conditions: Each year, physicians write approximately 60 million NSAID prescriptions. Because of the magnitude of patient exposure, gastrointestinal and other side effects of NSAIDs are a significant clinical concern. The mechanism of action of NSAIDs is inhibition of cyclooxygenase with secondary inhibition of proinflammatory prostaglandins. This mechanism also accounts for gastrointestinal toxic side effects of NSAIDs. Two forms of cyclooxygenase, cox-1 and cox-2, appear to be differentially inhibited by NSAIDs. Because cox-1 is responsible for maintaining normal physiologic function in gastric mucosa and other tissue, "ideal" NSAIDs would suppress only cox-2. The design of future NSAIDs-related peptic ulceration is characterized by its location in the gastric antrum, asymptomatic nature, and ability to develop through both topical and systemic effects of NSAIDs. Major risk factors for patients with rheumatoid arthritis include age >60 years, magnitude of disability, concomitant use of corticosteroids, larger doses/longer duration of NSAID treatment, and a history of peptic ulcer disease. A prophylactic strategy includes the identification of high-risk patients and, if NSAIDs must be used, the addition of misoprostol.

Gastrointestinal complications associated with intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine therapy in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To report 3 cases of gastrointestinal (GI) complications associated with the use of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine therapy in elderly patients.

CASE SUMMARIES

In case 1, an 88-year-old woman was taken to surgery for the management of an acute abdomen and repair of a 2+ cm perforated prepyloric gastric ulcer. The patient had received a total 16 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The patient died after surgery from complications associated with bacterial and candidal sepsis, as well as acute renal failure. In case 2, an 80-year-old woman with no known history of GI problems developed a prepyloric gastric ulcer, which perforated and penetrated into the pancreas after the patient received 13 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The patient died from complications associated with candidal sepsis, peritonitis, and cardiopulmonary collapse. In case 3, an 85-year-old man with a history of a gastric ulcer developed GI bleeding after receiving a total of 9 doses of ketorolac 30 mg im. The bleeding was stabilized and the patient was discharged 12 days later in stable condition.

DISCUSSION

Ketorolac tromethamine is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with potent analgesic properties. We report 3 cases of GI complications associated with intramuscular ketorolac therapy in the elderly. A temporal relationship was established with the development of gastric ulceration in 2 patients and the recurrence of a gastric ulcer in the third patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that the manufacturer's guidelines be followed when ketorolac is used in elderly patients, and the drug should not be used in patients with a history of gastric ulcer disease. The use of misoprostol may be warranted as prophylactic therapy in high-risk patients who are receiving ketorolac.

Comparative analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia with ketorolac versus morphine after elective intraabdominal operations

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare analgesia and side effects produced by ketorolac and morphine during postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Fifty-one patients (ASA classes I and II) undergoing elective intraabdominal procedures were assigned to one of two groups. When postoperative pain first increased to 4/10 (by visual analog scale [VAS]), patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 (n = 25) received up to two intravenous (IV) boluses of 5 mg of morphine followed by IV morphine PCA, whereas those in Group 2 (n = 26) received up to two IV boluses of 30 mg ketorolac, then IV ketorolac PCA. Up to two rescue doses of morphine (5 mg per dose, subcutaneously) were given in either group when pain during deep inhalation exceeded 5/10 on VAS. Ten patients from Group 1 required rescue doses of morphine compared to 22 patients from Group 2 (P < 0.0011). Two and 16 patients from Groups 1 and 2, respectively, were withdrawn because of inadequate analgesia (P < 0.01). Mean pain scores were less in Group 1 than in Group 2 at each time, but only significantly so at 15 min (P < 0.0021), 30 min (P < 0.0336), and 24 h (P < 0.0358) after starting PCA. Time to acceptance of oral liquids was equivalent in Groups 1 and 2 (22 h and 21 h, respectively). IV ketorolac PCA, although well tolerated, has limited effectiveness as the sole postoperative analgesic after intraabdominal operations.