New therapeutic agents in the management of hypertension: angiotensin II-receptor antagonists and renin inhibitors

Drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

Effective antihypertensive therapy has made a major contribution to the reductions in the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular disease that have been achieved since the 1960s. However, blood-pressure control with conventional drugs has not succeeded in reducing cardiovascular disease risks to levels seen in normotensive persons. Drugs that inhibit or antagonize components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are addressing this deficiency by targeting both blood pressure and related structural and functional abnormalities of the heart and blood vessels, thus preventing target-organ damage and related cardiovascular events.

Expression, secretion, and inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells

The purpose of this study was to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme is present in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells and which types of epithelial cells possess this enzyme. It is well known that serum promotes squamous differentiation of airway epithelial cell culture in vitro. We found that whole-cell homogenates of both basal (serum-untreated) and squamous-differentiated bronchial epithelial cells degraded hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine, a synthetic substrate for angiotensin-converting enzyme. Analysis of RNA expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) showed the presence of mRNA for angiotensin-converting enzyme in both types of cells. In addition, we found that squamous cells secreted the enzyme into the culture medium more than basal cells did. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (imidaprilat, enalaprilat) inhibited the enzyme activity in bronchial epithelial cells with an IC50 of 0.9-3.6 nM. Exogenously added bradykinin was degraded to bradykinin-(1-5), an inactive fragment, in the squamous cell cultures. Our data indicate the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells and also that the enzyme is secreted by squamous differentiated cells.

Dose-responsive antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, a new angiotensin II-receptor blocker

Predictable dose-related efficacy is considered to be an important attribute of any antihypertensive agent. To determine the magnitude of dose-responsive efficacy for valsartan, a highly selective angiotensin II-receptor blocker, we conducted an integrated analysis of efficacy data from nine double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel studies of similar design and of at least 4 weeks' duration. The intent-to-treat analysis included 4067 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension who had received valsartan (n = 2901) 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, or 320 mg once daily or placebo (n = 1166). Blood pressure was assessed at trough (24 hours after the last dose). In all nine studies, valsartan doses > or = 80 mg produced statistically significant reductions in supine or seated diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) and systolic blood pressure (SSBP) compared with placebo (P < 0.05). The integrated analysis demonstrated a clear increase in blood-pressure-lowering efficacy with increasing dose across the range 10 to 320 mg (placebo-subtracted mean changes from baseline to end point for valsartan 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 mg, respectively: SDBP, -0.8, -2.8, -2.6, -3.9, -5.1, and -6.4 mm Hg; SSBP, -1.3, -5.7, -5.3, -6.8, -8.6, and -9.0 mm Hg). The data demonstrate that valsartan provides dose-responsive antihypertensive efficacy across the therapeutic dose range, with clinically relevant blood-pressure lowering at doses > or = 80 mg once daily.

Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension

A total of 501 elderly patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive valsartan or lisinopril in this one year multi-center, double-blind, parallel group trial. Patients received valsartan 40 mg (n = 334) or lisinopril 2.5 mg (n = 167) daily for 2 weeks with subsequent titration (alone or in combination with hydroclorothiazide), depending on response to treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of patients with a response, defined as sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or drop of > or = 10 mmHg from baseline. A high percentage of patients responded to treatment in both valsartan and lisinopril groups: 80% for both groups at 12 weeks and 81% and 87%, respectively, at 52 weeks with no statistically significant difference between treatments (12 weeks, p = 0.925; 52 weeks, p = 0.148). More patients on lisinopril experienced drug-related cough (7.5% on valsartan, 17.4% on lisinopril). In 5.4% of lisinopril treated patients, cough led to discontinuation of therapy compared to 0.6% on valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg daily provides comparable short and long-term antihypertensive efficacy to lisinopril in elderly patients with a lower incidence of drug-related cough.

Valsartan. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension

Valsartan competitively and selectively inhibits the actions of angiotensin II at the AT1 receptor subtype which is responsible for most of the known effects of angiotensin II. In clinical trials in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension valsartan was as effective as losartan, lisinopril, enalapril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Addition of the latter reduced blood pressure in patients who did not respond sufficiently to valsartan monotherapy. Preliminary data also suggest valsartan may be effective in patients with severe essential hypertension. The drug was as effective as lisinopril as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension in patients with renal insufficiency and did not worsen renal function. Headache, dizziness and fatigue were the most common adverse events in placebo-controlled studies; the incidence of these adverse events was not significantly different between placebo and valsartan recipients. Compared with ACE inhibitors, valsartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of dry cough. Thus, valsartan is an effective treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and may be particularly useful in patients who experience persistent cough during ACE inhibitor therapy.

Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours

This study was done to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 320 mg over 24 hours using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A total of 217 adult outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (office mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] of > or = 95 to < or = 115 mm Hg) participated in this multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was done at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All valsartan doses produced significant decreases in average ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP over 24 hours compared with placebo. A trend to greater reductions compared with placebo was observed for doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater (80 mg, -6.61 mm Hg DBP, -11.04 mm Hg SBP; 160 mg, -5.51 mm Hg DBP, -10.61 mm Hg SBP; 320 mg, -8.44 mm Hg DBP, -14.34 mm Hg SBP) compared with valsartan 20 mg (-3.52 mm Hg DBP, -5.92 mm Hg SBP). Valsartan produced consistent reductions compared with placebo during both day (> 6 AM to < or = 10 PM) and night (> 10 PM to < or = 6 AM). However, in all groups, the circadian pattern of blood pressure over 24 hours was preserved and was similar to that observed at baseline (but shifted into the normotensive range in a parallel fashion). The data show that single daily doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater provide effective control of both DBP and SBP over a 24-hour period without loss of diurnal variation.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonism: losartan - sites and mechanisms of action

This review surveys the basic pharmacology of angiotensin II receptors and their antagonism; reviews the existing clinical experience with losartan, the first approved nonpeptide angiotensin II antagonist; suggests other possible clinical areas for angiotensin II receptor antagonism; and compares angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with angiotensin receptor antagonism.

Angiotensin receptors in cardiovascular diseases

1. Angiotensin II (AII) plays a major role in cardiovascular function via direct actions on the vasculature, kidney, adrenal, heart, brain and sympathetic nerves. The cellular effects of AII are extensive and encompass hypertrophy, hyperplasia and the deposition of extracellular matrix. 2. The actions of AII are mediated by the AT1 and AT2 membrane receptor subtypes, and additional forms of each subtype. Evidence is emerging that selective changes in AII receptor subtypes occur in cardiovascular diseases. 3. Thyroid dysfunction increased cardiac, liver and kidney AII receptor density but decreased adrenal gland receptor density. In the heart, there was a selective increase in AT2 receptor density. 4. Diabetes increased cardiac, liver and adrenal gland AII receptor densities but decreased kidney receptor density. 5. Hypertension increased AII receptor density in the heart and kidney. A corresponding increase in receptor mRNA was prevented by selective AT1 receptor antagonists. 6. The human heart contained AII receptors in all chambers; right atrial receptor density was increased in coronary artery bypass graft patients. 7. The presence of AII receptor changes in these models of cardiac hypertrophy and hypertension raises the possibility of using orally active, subtype-selective agonists and antagonists to treat particular forms of cardiovascular diseases.