Dalteparin: a low-molecular-weight heparin

A review on multifaceted biomedical applications of heparin nanocomposites: Progress and prospects

Advances in polymer-based nanocomposites have revolutionized biomedical applications over the last two decades. Heparin (HP), being a highly bioactive polymer of biological origin, provides strong biotic competence to the nanocomposites, broadening the horizon of their applicability. The efficiency, biocompatibility, and biodegradability properties of nanomaterials significantly improve upon the incorporation of heparin. Further, inclusion of structural/chemical derivatives, fractionates, and mimetics of heparin enable fabrication of versatile nanocomposites. Modern nanotechnological interventions have exploited the inherent biofunctionalities of heparin by formulating various nanomaterials, including inorganic/polymeric nanoparticles, nanofibers, quantum dots, micelles, liposomes, and nanogels ensuing novel functionalities targeting diverse clinical applications involving drug delivery, wound healing, tissue engineering, biocompatible coatings, nanosensors and so on. On this note, the present review explicitly summarises the recent HP-oriented nanotechnological developments, with a special emphasis on the reported successful engagement of HP and its derivatives/mimetics in nanocomposites for extensive applications in the laboratory and health-care facility. Further, the advantages and limitations/challenges specifically associated with HP in nanocomposites, undertaken in this current review are quintessential for future innovations/discoveries pertaining to HP-based nanocomposites.

Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians

Venous thromboembolism is a common condition affecting 7.1 persons per 10,000 person-years among community residents. Incidence rates for venous thromboembolism are higher in men, African-Americans, and increase substantially with age. It is critical to treat deep venous thrombosis at an early stage to avoid development of further complications, such as pulmonary embolism or recurrent deep venous thrombosis. The target audience for this guideline is all clinicians caring for patients who have been given a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The target patient population is patients receiving a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Proximal deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement for oncologic indications

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer who undergo surgery about the hip are at increased risk for the development of deep vein thrombosis. We implemented a program of chemical and mechanical prophylaxis to prevent this problem. This study was performed to assess the effectiveness of that program.

METHODS

Eighty-seven consecutive patients with an active malignant tumor who underwent hip replacement surgery at our institution over a two-year period were included in the study. All patients were treated with intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Seventy-eight patients received anticoagulants, and nine did not. Postoperative surveillance for proximal deep vein thrombosis was routinely performed on all patients with duplex Doppler ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Four patients had proximal deep vein thrombosis, and one patient, who did not receive anticoagulation, had a nonfatal pulmonary embolism. The use of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) was associated with a 4% rate of proximal deep vein thrombosis (three of seventy-eight patients). Proximal deep vein thrombosis developed in three of eight patients with pelvic disease, one of nineteen patients with femoral disease, and zero of sixty patients with hip disease (p < 0.00001). The prevalence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was significantly higher (p < 0.02) following replacements in patients with sarcoma (three of twenty-one) than it was after replacements in patients with carcinoma (zero of fifty-seven) or hematologic malignant disease (one of nine). On multivariate analysis, only the location of the disease (the pelvis, femur, or hip) was found to be independently significant for an association with deep vein thrombosis. A wound complication developed in four of twenty-one patients with sarcoma and no patient with carcinoma or hematologic malignant disease (p < 0.001). The pathologic type was the only factor studied that was independently significant for an association with wound complications on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of proximal deep vein thrombosis in patients who had undergone hip replacement for oncologic indications was low when the use of an intermittent pneumatic compression device was supplemented with prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Life-Threatening Hemorrhage After Dalteparin Therapy in a Patient with Impaired Renal Function

Dalteparin and other low-molecular-weight heparins are frequently used for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and for other indications. Unlike unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin is mainly cleared through the kidney; therefore, it can accumulate in patients with impaired renal function, increasing the risk of hemorrhage. An 84-year-old woman with chronic renal failure was hospitalized because of stenosis of a femorofibular bypass in her right leg. Peripheral transluminal angioplasty was performed successfully. Later the same day, Doppler sonography revealed deep vein thrombosis of the left lower leg. Treatment with dalteparin was started. The patient was discharged home 3 days later, with dalteparin to be continued at home. One day later, the patient was rehospitalized because of a pronounced hematoma on her flank. Her hemoglobin level had dropped to 5.5 g/dl. Treatment with dalteparin was stopped, and protamine 2500 U and two transfusions of packed red blood cells were administered. Treatment with UFH and oral anticoagulants were started because of a persistent risk for venous thrombosis. Thereafter, the patient's hemoglobin level remained stable, and no further bleeding episodes occurred. As long as systematic studies of the efficacy and safety of dalteparin in patients with severe renal impairment are lacking, dalteparin should be avoided or used only with close monitoring of antifactor Xa activity in these patients. As an alternative, UFH can be used because monitoring of UFH is well established and easier than it is with dalteparin. Renal impairment does not notably influence the short elimination half-life of UFH, which unlike that of dalteparin or other low-molecular-weight heparins allows for rapid dosage adjustments to prevent hemorrhage.

The therapeutic potential of novel anticoagulants

Conventional anticoagulant therapy has been based on indirect inhibition of coagulation factors with heparin and warfarin. These agents display liabilities prompting the development of new anticoagulants over the last two decades. The first to be developed was a series of low molecular weight heparins(LMWHs). Their favourable pharmacokinetic profiles and risk/benefit ratios led to widespread use in Europe and, more recently, approval for their use in the USA. Paralleling the development of LMWHs has been the pursuit of a different strategy focused on direct rather than indirect inhibition of enzymes in the coagulation cascade. In contrast to heparin, LMWHs, or other glycosaminoglycans, direct inhibitors exert their effects independent of either antithrombin III (ATIII) or heparin cofactor II (HCII) and more effectively inhibit clot-bound thrombin or FXa. Highly potent, selective (versus other serine proteases)direct thrombin and FXa inhibitors have been identified and isolated from natural sources, such as leeches, ticks and hookworms. The recombinant forms and analogues of the senatural proteins have been produced using molecular biology techniques, i.e., rHirudin, Hirulogs, recombinant tick anticoagulant peptide (rTAP), recombinant antistasin (rATS) and recombinant nematode anticoagulant peptide-5 (rNAP-5). The design of novel structures or the modification of existing chemicals has led to the synthesis of many non-peptide, low molecular weight inhibitors of thrombin and FXa. Some of them are orally active and may be suitable for long-term clinical use. In addition, considerable progress has been made in developing specific TF/VIIa complex inhibitors. The anticoagulation properties of the new agents are being characterised in experimental studies. Some of them have been advanced to large scale clinical trials and their effectiveness, and sometimes relative ineffectiveness,in arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders has been demonstrated. They are being tested for their potential as new antithrombotic agents that act via direct enzyme inhibition. Thus,the clinician should in future be able to target different thrombotic conditions with proven, specific anticoagulant interventions.

Treatment of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a synthesis of the evidence published in systematic literature reviews

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the methodology and cumulative evidence presented in systematic reviews of clinical trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

We reviewed all systematic reviews of clinical trials published until March 2002. Fourteen systematic literature reviews were published between 1994 and 2000. Deficiencies in methodological quality were common, particularly in the description of search strategies, assessment of clinical trial quality, and methods used to combine results.

RESULTS

Results of reviews indicate that LMWH is superior to UFH for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, particularly in reducing mortality. Patients with isolated deep venous thrombosis or deep venous thrombosis with concomitant pulmonary embolism seemed to have similar benefit. However, the benefits of LMWH over UFH were smaller in magnitude in reviews that included more recent clinical trials.

Effect of 3.2 vs. 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on anti-Xa levels for patients on therapeutic low molecular weight heparin

In this study, we compared the effect of sodium citrate, a sample collection variable, on the anti-Xa levels of patients (n = 28) on dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin. The median anti-Xa level for 3.2% sodium citrate was 0.235 U/ml while the median level for 3.8% sodium citrate was 0.230 U/ml. We conclude that different sodium citrate concentrations give statistically equivalent anti-Xa levels for the same samples. This conclusion is in contrast to the findings of the effect of sodium citrate concentration on International Normalized Ratio (INR) and activated partial-thromboplastin time (aPTT). In accordance with previous recommendations, we advocate the exclusive use of 3.2% sodium citrate in an effort to standardize coagulation testing.

Outpatient therapy with low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: a review of efficacy, safety, and costs

PURPOSE

To summarize the evidence comparing the efficacy, safety, and costs of outpatient and inpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

We searched the literature through March 2002 for studies comparing outpatient and inpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin, and for studies addressing the costs of low molecular weight heparin use in any setting. We included studies with comparison groups or decision analyses.

RESULTS

Eight studies (three randomized trials and five cohort studies) compared outpatient use of low molecular weight heparin with inpatient use of unfractionated heparin in 3762 patients. The incidence of recurrent deep venous thrombosis was similar in the two groups (median, 4% [range, 0% to 7%] vs. 6% [range, 0% to 9%]), as was major bleeding (median, 0.5% [range, 0% to 2%] vs. 1% [range, 0% to 2%]). Use of low molecular weight heparin was associated with shorter hospitalization (median, 2.7 days [range, 0.03 to 5.1 days] vs. 6.5 days [range, 4 to 9.6 days]) and lower costs (median difference, 1600 dollars). Comparisons of outpatient and in-hospital use of low molecular weight heparin reported no difference in outcomes, but there were savings in hospitalization costs. Low molecular weight heparin was also found to be more cost saving and cost-effective than unfractionated heparin, with savings of 0% to 64% (median, 57%).

CONCLUSION

The evidence indicates that outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin is likely to be efficacious, safe, and cost-effective.

Cutaneous dalteparin reactions associated with antibodies of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

To report widespread cutaneous lesions due to low-molecular-weight heparin therapy associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but without evidence of thrombocytopenia, and to review previously reported cases of skin reactions related to heparin therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 59-year-old white man with a subtotally resected glioblastoma developed febrile neutropenia and pneumonia secondary to chemotherapy. The development of an upper extremity thrombosis, following insertion of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter, was treated with subcutaneous dalteparin. Cutaneous lesions developed distant from the site of injection. The diagnosis of HIT was confirmed despite stable platelet counts. Dalteparin therapy was discontinued immediately, and anticoagulation was maintained with warfarin. The skin lesions resolved without further complications.

DISCUSSION

Numerous cases of heparin-induced cutaneous reactions have been reported. The majority of these describe a local reaction at the heparin injection site with or without associated thrombocytopenia. The case presented here is unique in that the observed skin reaction was distant to the injection site and occurred without thrombocytopenia, but with detectable heparin-dependent antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a skin reaction is a rare complication of heparin therapy, it can be a clinical indicator of HIT despite normal platelet counts. Patients who develop skin lesions should have their heparin therapy discontinued and a diagnosis of HIT investigated.

Characteristics of the hemostatic action of KFA-1411, an inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa (FXa), in humans and various animals

This study examined a low-molecular-weight factor-Xa inhibitor, KFA-1411 (3-[N-(3-amidinophenyl)-N-[N-[4-[1-(1-iminoethyl)piperidin-4- yl]phenyl]carbamoylmethyl]aminomethyl]phenoxyacetic acid monosulfonate-dihydrate). KFA-1411 selectively inhibited FXa among the serine proteases in the human blood-coagulation cascade with a Ki value of 1.73 nM, (selectivity ratio, 15000 versus its action on thrombin). The anticoagulant action of KFA-1411 in human plasma almost equaled that of the selective thrombin inhibitor, argatroban. KFA-1411 did not inhibit platelet aggregation at the concentration at which it showed an anticoagulant action. In contrast, argatroban, heparin, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; dalteparin) inhibited thrombin-induced platelet aggregation at concentrations lower than those needed for their anticoagulant actions. The FXa-inhibiting action of KFA-1411 differed among animal species, the maximum effect being seen in humans, followed by monkeys and rabbits, with rats and mice showing about one-tenth the potency seen in humans. A species variation was also observed among the values obtained for KFA-1411 in respect of anticoagulant activity in plasma (monkeys again being closest to humans). These results indicate that KFA-1411 may exhibit antithrombotic efficacy without an unwanted platelet-related action in the future treatment of various thrombotic diseases. The experimental model of monkeys is recommended for estimation of the clinical effects and safety of KFA-1411 in humans.

Risk stratification in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with special focus on recent guidelines

Patients with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation (non-Q-wave) myocardial infarction are a heterogeneous group with respect to their risk of developing clinically significant adverse events such as subsequent myocardial infarction and death. Recent guidelines promote risk stratification of these patients, targeting high-risk patients for maximal antithrombotic and antiischemic therapy and low-risk patients for early discharge. We reviewed current and future modalities for risk stratification of patients and the predictive value of these methods in context with available pharmacologic agents. Unfortunately, most of the data identifying a particular pharmacologic regimen as beneficial in high-risk patients are retrospectively derived from large trials. Until prospective studies that use markers to guide therapy are available, clinicians should be familiar with the use of these risk markers and their application to the role of a given management strategy, including pharmacologic therapy.

The effects of danaparoid, dalteparin and heparin on tissue factor-induced experimental disseminated intravascular coagulation and bleeding time in the rat

Danaparoid and heparin, on the basis of anti-activated factor X (anti-FXa) activity, were equipotent in accelerating the rate of interaction of FXa and antithrombin III. In rat tissue factor-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) models, an intravenous administration of danaparoid inhibited the decrease in plasma fibrinogen and platelet counts and the increase in serum fibrinogen degradation products. Expressed on the basis of anti-FXa activity, these effects were comparable with those of dalteparin and heparin. In rat mesenteric small artery and vein, less bleeding was observed after intravenous administration of danaparoid than after dalteparin or heparin. Danaparoid did not affect adenosine diphosphate- or collagen-induced platelet aggregation, and showed weaker inhibitory effects on aggregation induced by thrombin, or collagen + thrombin, than did dalteparin or heparin. These findings suggest that danaparoid may be useful for the prevention of DIC and has less tendency to cause bleeding than dalteparin or heparin, probably as a result of its weaker ability to inhibit platelet aggregation.

Interventional therapy for pulmonary embolism

Venous thromboembolism is a common cause of death. Acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is life-threatening and may require vigorous more invasive treatment. Several risk factors are related to increased incidence of massive PE. Anticoagulation is the most traditional treatment for PE but may not suffice in cases of massive PE. Systemic thrombolytic therapy, catheter-directed thrombolysis, percutaneous embolectomy, and more recently, percutaneous thrombus fragmentation techniques with a multitude of devices are now available to treat the most severe cases of massive PE. Successful treatment of PE includes implementation of a treatment protocol and the use of associated techniques and devices.

Prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases during pregnancy with dalteparin

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a prophylactic dose of dalteparin, 5000 IU daily, and if the adjusted-weight dalteparin therapeutic dose of 100 IU/kg twice daily are appropriate in pregnancy.

METHOD

Anti-Xa activity levels were used to assess prophylactic (33 women) and therapeutic (15 women) dalteparin dosage throughout pregnancy. Analysis of variance was used and P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the prophylactic group, anti-Xa activity levels did not vary significantly throughout pregnancy (P=0.15). The initial dalteparin dose was modified on the first anti-Xa activity measurement in eight women, whose weight was statistically different from those remaining on the initial dose (P<0.001). The adjusted-weight therapeutic dalteparin dose induced adequate anti-Xa activity levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin, 5000 IU daily, is suitable for most pregnant women and does not need to be modified in the third trimester. A therapeutic dalteparin dose adjusted according to pregnancy weight is appropriate.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: proposed revisions. International Cardiology Forum

BACKGROUND

In 1994, the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research issued clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. In the past 5 years, rapid progress has been made in the management of patients with unstable coronary syndromes, yet current guidelines do not necessarily reflect these advances.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An international forum of cardiology investigators reviewed existing guidelines and discussed areas in which the diagnosis and treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction should be modified. It was agreed that there is sufficient evidence to recommend the following changes: (1) use of serum cardiac markers should be expanded to include troponin I and T levels as diagnostic and prognostic tools; (2) low-molecular-weight heparins should replace unfractionated heparin as antithrombotic agents; (3) new classes of antiplatelet agents are recommended in addition to aspirin; and (4) the use of cholesterol-lowering drugs is appropriate in the long-term management of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from clinical trials within the last 5 years requires that significant changes be made to existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The recommendations detailed should be considered in the creation and implementation of updated guidelines.

Newer antithrombotic strategies in the initial management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To review the place in therapy of currently available antithrombotic agents in the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, that is, unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Recommendations are made based on currently available data.

DATA SOURCE

English-language clinical studies, position statements, and review articles pertaining to the management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave MI with currently available products.

STUDY SELECTION

Selection of prospective clinical studies was limited to those focusing on the management of the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, unstable angina, and non-Q-wave MI.

DATA SYNTHESIS

It has yet to be determined which combination of agents (dalteparin, enoxaparin, lepirudin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban) and procedural strategies most significantly reduces mortality and serious events in these patients. The relevant pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and risk-stratifying procedures are reviewed in context with information from clinical studies regarding currently available agents for the management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of new therapeutic classes and agents are available for the treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave MI. Although the diagnoses of unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI identify risk, treatment decisions are often based on the presence or absence of ST-segment elevations. Limited prospective evidence delineates the proper utilization of resources to best manage these patients. Efforts should be aimed at identifying particular patients who will best benefit from recently available therapies.

Natural products with hypoglycemic, hypotensive, hypocholesterolemic, antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic activities

This article reviews compounds of botanical origin which are capable of lowering plasma levels of glucose and cholesterol and blood pressure, as well as compounds inhibiting atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Hypoglycemic natural products comprise flavonoids, xanthones, triterpenoids, alkaloids, glycosides, alkyldisulfides, aminobutyric acid derivatives, guanidine, polysaccharides and peptides. Hypotensive compounds include flavonoids, diterpenes, alkaloids, glycosides, polysaccharides and proteins. Among natural products with hypocholesterolemic activity are beta-carotene, lycopene, cycloartenol, beta-sitosterol, sitostanol, saponin, soybean protein, indoles, dietary fiber, propionate, mevinolin (beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor) and polysaccharides. Heparins, flavonoids, tocotrienols, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), garlic compounds and fungal proteases exert antithrombotic action. Statins and garlic compounds also possess antiatherosclerotic activity.

Heritable coagulopathies in pregnancy

Heritable coagulopathies are leading causes of maternal thromboembolism and are associated with an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common of these disorders are antithrombin III deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance resulting from the factor V Leiden mutation, elevated prothrombin activity associated with a mutation in the prothrombin gene, and hyperhomocystinemia. The maternal risk of a thromboembolic episode is increased by a factor of eight in the presence of any of these heritable states. In addition, the relative risk for a stillbirth in the presence of one of these disorders is 3.6. These conditions are also associated with intrauterine growth retardation and preeclampsia. Proper management of heritable coagulopathies during pregnancy is essential to reduce the risk of these serious sequelae. Patients with newly diagnosed deep-vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli should be treated with therapeutic levels of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, followed by subsequent prophylactic heparin therapy. All patients with a history of thromboembolism before pregnancy or evidence of any of these coagulopathies may be offered prophylactic therapy with low molecular weight heparin. Patients with antithrombin III deficiency should receive full therapeutic heparin therapy for the entire pregnancy, irrespective of their thromboembolic history. Postpartum therapy with either heparin or warfarin is required in all cases.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe the various heritable coagulopathies that can complicate pregnancy, to state the potential adverse effects of heritable coagulopathies in pregnancy, and to explain the management of heritable coagulopathies during pregnancy.

Venous thromboembolism in the intensive care unit

Venous thromboembolic disease has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. This article reviews the salient features of venous thromboembolism as they pertain to the critically ill. Emphasis is placed on identifying risk factors, diagnostic strategies, prophylaxis, and treatment of this disorder. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, both being manifestations of the same disease processes, are considered together in this discussion of venous thromboembolism.

Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the characteristics and clinical efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Adverse effects, dosing, and cost issues are also discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1984-October 1997) was used to identify pertinent French and English literature, including clinical trials and reviews on LMWHs and their use in DVT.

STUDY SELECTION

Trials comparing dalteparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin, and nadroparin with UFH were selected. As studies were numerous, only randomized trials including more than 50 patients were reviewed. Moreover, all patients studied had a first episode of symptomatic DVT confirmed by objective tests (i.e., venography, duplex ultrasonography, impedance plethysmography). Clinical efficacy and safety of LMWHs were assessed in these trials.

DATA EXTRACTION

Results pertaining to venographic assessment, recurrent thromboembolism, total mortality, and bleeding complications were extracted from the selected studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Compared with UFH, LMWHs have a longer plasma half-life, better subcutaneous bioavailability, more predictable anticoagulant response, and require less intense laboratory monitoring. Most trials demonstrate comparable effects on thrombus extension and incidence of recurrent thromboembolism. Compared with UFH, LMWHs do not alter total mortality. Although animal trials predict a lower hemorrhagic potential for LMWHs, the incidence of bleeding complications is generally similar to that observed with UFH. Outpatient management of DVT with LMWHs has shown comparable safety and efficacy with inpatient UFH use but a shorter hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Because LMWHs are as safe and as effective as UFH, and because of their more convenient method of administration, they can be considered valuable alternatives for the treatment of DVT. Savings generated by less intensive laboratory monitoring and the possibility of early hospital discharge and outpatient therapy may outweight the higher acquisition cost of LMWHs.

Low-molecular-weight heparins for acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To review published literature regarding the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for the acute coronary syndromes of unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

A MEDLINE search (January 1986-August 1997) was performed to identify all pertinent articles. Selected references from these articles and abstracts of recent clinical trials were also included.

DISCUSSION

LMWHs have several distinct advantages over standard unfractionated heparin (UFH). These advantages include convenient once- or twice-daily standardized administration without the need for activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring. While the use of LMWHs as prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism is fairly well-established, the use of LMWHs for treating acute myocardial ischemia is evolving. Published studies and abstracts have shown LMWHs to be as effective as or more effective than UFH in preventing death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent ischemia in patients with unstable angina or acute MI. The comparative incidence of bleeding between LMWHs and UFH is controversial, with some studies reporting lower or similar rates of bleeding with LMWHs, while one study demonstrated a higher bleeding rate than with UFH. The cost-effectiveness of using LMWHs over UFH for acute coronary syndromes also remains to be established.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWHs appear to be as effective as, and potentially more effective than, UFH in preventing complications of acute coronary syndromes. However, further studies are needed to better define the comparative bleeding risks of LMWHs and UFH. This, plus the lack of published peer-reviewed trial results and pharmaco-economic analyses, preclude the recommendation of routinely using LMWHs for treating unstable angina and acute MI at this time.