Acute respiratory distress syndrome after aprotinin infusion

Aprotinin and similar protease inhibitors as drugs against influenza

Efforts to develop new antiviral chemotherapeutic approaches are focusing on compounds that target either influenza virus replication itself or host factor(s) that are critical to influenza replication. Host protease mediated influenza hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage is critical for activation of virus infectivity and as such is a chemotherapeutic target. Influenza pathogenesis involves a "vicious cycle" in which host proteases activate progeny virus which in turn amplifies replication and stimulates further protease activities which may be detrimental to the infected host. Aprotinin, a 58 amino acid polypeptide purified from bovine lung that is one of a family of host-targeted antivirals that inhibit serine proteases responsible for influenza virus activation. This drug and similar agents, such as leupeptin and camostat, suppress virus HA cleavage and limit reproduction of human and avian influenza viruses with a single arginine in the HA cleavage site. Site-directed structural modifications of aprotinin are possible to increase its intracellular targeting of cleavage of highly virulent H5 and H7 hemagglutinins possessing multi-arginine/lysine cleavage site. An additional mechanism of action for serine protease inhibitors is to target a number of host mediators of inflammation and down regulate their levels in virus-infected hosts. Aprotinin is a generic drug approved for intravenous use in humans to treat pancreatitis and limit post-operative bleeding. As an antiinfluenzal compound, aprotinin might be delivered by two routes: (i) a small-particle aerosol has been approved in Russia for local respiratory application in mild-to-moderate influenza and (ii) a proposed intravenous administration for severe influenza to provide both an antiviral effect and a decrease in systemic pathology and inflammation.

A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 1: in major surgery

Systemic haemostatic agents play an important role in the management of blood loss during major surgery where significant blood loss is likely and their use has increased in recent times as a consequence of demand for blood products outstripping supply and the risks associated with transfusions. Their main application is as prophylaxis to reduce bleeding in major surgery, including cardiac and orthopaedic surgery and orthotopic liver transplantation. Aprotinin has been the predominant agent used in this setting; of the other antifibrinolytic agents that have been studied, tranexamic acid is the most effective and epsilon-aminocaproic acid may also have a role. Eptacog alfa (recombinant factor VIIa) has also shown promise. Tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid and eptacog alfa are generally well tolerated; however, when considering the methods to reduce or prevent blood loss intra- and postoperatively, the benefits of these agents need to be weighed against the risk of adverse events. Recently, concerns have been raised about the safety of aprotinin after an association between increased renal dysfunction and mortality was shown in retrospective observational studies and an increase in all-cause mortality with aprotinin relative to tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid was seen after a pre-planned periodic analysis of the large BART (Blood conservation using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial) study. The latter finding resulted in the trial being halted, and aprotinin has subsequently been withdrawn from the market pending detailed analysis of efficacy and safety results from the study. Part 1 of this benefit-risk review examines the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of systemic haemostatic agents commonly used in surgery, and provides individual benefit-risk profiles that may assist clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological therapy in this setting.

Acute pulmonary capillary leak syndrome during elective surgery under general anesthesia

A 75-year-old previously healthy man presented for elective resection of rectal cancer under general anesthesia. Six days before the operation, he had a high-grade fever, and elevated leukocyte count and C-reactive protein concentration, but this was resolved by an intravenous antibiotic. His condition was well controlled before the operation. Soon after the operation started, severe hypoxemia emerged, with low arterial pressure. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy demonstrated a massive amount of plasma-like edema fluid; the total amount of suctioned fluid was approximately 800 ml at the end of the surgery. This acute pulmonary edema appeared to be due to increased permeability rather than pulmonary congestion as indicated by chest radiography, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, echocardiogram, and the protein-rich edema fluid. Elevated concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8, in both plasma and the pulmonary edema fluid, suggested a possible role of systemic and pulmonary inflammation in the development of this acute pulmonary capillary leak. According to the "two-hit" hypothesis, the bacterial infection preceding the operation may have primed the immune cells, and the following surgical stress may have then triggered rapid progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome. We should keep in mind that, especially following sepsis, sudden massive pulmonary capillary leak can occur during elective surgery, even though the patient's condition is well controlled.

A review of aprotinin in orthotopic liver transplantation: can its harmful effects offset its beneficial effects?

Blood transfusion can adversely affect patient outcome and graft survival in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). With this respect, prophylactic aprotinin administration decreases blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the hemodynamic changes associated with graft reperfusion in patients undergoing OLT. However, data indicate limiting the use of aprotinin in OLT: (a) clinical, biological, echocardiographic, and postmortem findings recorded in patients with chronic liver disease or undergoing OLT suggest that a continuous prothrombotic state exists in these patients. Whether the inhibition of fibrinolysis associated with aprotinin therapy will expose some patients to untoward thrombosis is questionable; (b) aprotinin does not appear to alter postoperative outcome in patients undergoing OLT; (c) aprotinin decreases blood transfusion requirements only when surgery is associated with significant blood loss. However, at the present time, median transfusion requirements of 2 to 5 red blood cell units are required in OLT.

Forty Years of Clinical Aprotinin Use: A Review of 124 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Since its clinical introduction, the anaphylactic potential of aprotinin has been a major concern. World wide, its use is expanding so there is an increased chance that patients have reexposure from various sources. The risk of anaphylaxis is approximately 2.8% in reexposed patients. From 1963 to 2003, 124 cases of aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis were reported in 61 publications. Eleven patients died. The reexposure interval was less than 3 months in 72% (38 of 53 patients). This review looks at the profile of patients at risk so preventive measures may be taken. Past and future exposures have to be taken into account before any aprotinin administration.

Role of aprotinin in the management of patients during and after cardiac surgery

Management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery has evolved in recent years as more is understood about the physiological changes and responses that occur during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In particular, our understanding of the mechanisms involved in haemostasis and in the inflammatory response to bypass surgery, has allowed significant refinements in patient management. Improvements in the pharmacological conservation of blood loss have been striking, particularly with the development of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer). Aprotinin represents a significant improvement, especially for patients at high risk, since it reduces the need for allogeneic and (sometimes scarce) blood products. However, in view of its cost, making an appropriate selection of patients most at risk of serious blood loss is a major consideration in the use of aprotinin. While its mechanisms of action are not well understood, the use of aprotinin also appears to reduce inflammatory response to CPB.

[Allergic risk of aprotinin]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the risk of anaphylactic reaction with the administration of aprotinin, either by i.v. route or as a biological sealant application and to propose updated guidelines in accordance with current data of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Search in the Medline data base of articles in French, English and German, published since 1960, using following key words: aprotinin, allergy, anaphylaxis.

STUDY SELECTION

All categories of articles on this topic have been selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles have been analysed for history, incidence and mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions, symptomatology, factors of risk, diagnosis and precautions of use.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin is widely used for decreasing preoperative bleeding, especially in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. This heterologue protein can cause anaphylactic reactions in 0.5 to 5.8% of patients, depending of the inclusion criteria. They are mediated by IgG and IgE antibodies. Aprotinin has also a direct, non specific, histaminoliberation effect. The clinical presentation includes various degrees of severity, up to cardiac arrest. Documented factors of risk are a previous parotinin administration, 15 days to 6 months before, and intolerance to beef meat, white of egg, cheese and milk. The immediate biological diagnosis is obtained on assessing the degranulation of basophiles (histamine) and mastocytes (tryptase), as well as the concentration of anti-aprotinin antibodies (RAST IgE), with a test of inhibition. The secondary assessment, six weeks later, includes prick-tests and intradermoreactions if the former are negative. The mean precaution consists to search factors of risk at preanaesthetic assessment. The predictive value of systematic prick-tests has not yet been validated. Anti H1 and anti H2 premedication is inefficient. A test dose can trigger a severe reaction.

CONCLUSION

Considering a significant anaphylactic risk, aprotinin administration becomes only licit after a careful evaluation of the benefit-risk ratio.

Severe anaphylactic reaction after primary exposure to aprotinin

Aprotinin is widely used to prevent bleeding and reduce blood transfusions after open heart surgical procedures. Because it is a foreign protein, aprotinin has allergenic potential. We report a case of near-fatal anaphylactic reaction to primary aprotinin exposure in a child successfully treated using cardiopulmonary bypass support. The possibility of an allergic reaction must be considered whenever this drug is used.