Composite Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Surface Epithelial-Stromal Neoplasm of the Ovary

Neuroendocrine Marker Expression in Primary Non-neuroendocrine Epithelial Tumors of the Ovary: A Study of 551 Cases

Expression of neuroendocrine (NE) markers in primary ovarian non-NE epithelial tumors has rarely been evaluated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of the most widely used NE markers in these neoplasms and to determine any prognostic significance of NE marker expression. The cohort consisted of 551 primary ovarian tumors, including serous borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinomas, high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), clear cell carcinomas, endometroid carcinomas, mucinous borderline tumors, and mucinous carcinomas. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 on tissue microarray. Positivity for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 was most frequently observed in mucinous tumors (48.7%, 26.0%, 41.5%, and 100%, respectively). The positivity for these NE markers was mostly restricted to nonmucinous elements distributed throughout the tumor. The mucinous borderline tumor and mucinous carcinomas groups had similar proportions of positivity (mucinous borderline tumor: 53%, mucinous carcinomas: 39%). In the other tumor types, except for HGSC, there was only focal expression (5%-10%) or negativity for NE markers. HGSC showed high CD56 expression (in 26% of cases). Survival analysis was only performed for CD56 in HGSC as this was the only group with sufficient positive cases, and it showed no prognostic significance. Except for mucinous tumors, expression of NE markers in non-NE ovarian epithelial tumors is low. CD56 expression in HGSC occurs frequently but is without diagnostic or prognostic value.

An Ovarian Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Accompanied by Clear Cell Carcinoma with Specific High Level of AFP: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare histological subtype of ovarian cancer. A few cases have been reported in the literature with extreme invasiveness and a poor prognosis. However, there still have not been accepted criteria for diagnosis and treatment of LCNEC. Here we report an unmarried 37 year-old woman who was diagnosed with LCNEC associated with clear cell carcinoma and the tumor index was manifested with a specific increase of AFP. The case received six courses of etoposide and carboplatin chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy after primary curative surgery. However, she relapsed within 6 months after surgery and metastasized rapidly to distant organs despite combined chemotherapy of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bevacizumab, and died 18 months after primary surgery. This is the first reported case of LCNEC manifested with a specific increase of AFP and characteristically metastasized to the spine as recurrence. Reviewing our case as well as previously reported cases, LCNEC present with aggressive malignancy and vulnerable to distant metastasis through a hematogenous approach, we conjectured that adding Bevacizumab in primary chemotherapy may be beneficial to extend disease-free survival. But so far there is no recommendation of this regimen for treatment of LCNEC in current guidelines. Further research is needed to confirm this view so as to find the best treatment of LCNEC and improve the prognosis of these patients.

Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes Between Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Ovary and High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Owing to its extremely low incidence and the paucity of relevant reports, there is currently no recognized first-line treatment strategy for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and there are no statistics related to prognosis derived from large samples. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics, outcomes, and independent predictors of survival for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and compare them with those of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma or high-grade serous ovarian cancer from 1988 to 2015. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were compared between the groups. Propensity-score matching, Cox risk regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the data.

Results

In total, 23,917 women, including 23,698 (99.1%) diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and 219 (0.9%) diagnosed with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, were identified. Age >77 years, diagnosis before 2003-2010, and advanced-stage disease were more common in patients with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma than in those with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Women with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (54.8% vs. 81.9%) but more likely to receive radiotherapy (3.2% vs. 1.5%; both P<0.001) than women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Stage, chemotherapy, and tumor size were independent predictors of overall survival, and the risk of death was greater in the advanced stage than in the early stage (P=0.047). Chemotherapy and tumor size were also independent predictors of cancer-specific survival. Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were significantly low for ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma than for more malignant high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Conclusions

Compared to patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, those with ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma presented more often with advanced-stage disease and had decreased overall and cancer-specific survival rates.

The puzzle of gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas: State of the art and future directions

Primary gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinomas (gNECs) are a heterogeneous spectrum of rare and highly aggressive neoplasms, accounting for about 2% of all gynecologic malignancies, which mostly resemble the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines, their management poses a noteworthy clinical challenge. Currently, cumulative data retrieved from the management of SCLC and from retrospective studies supports a multimodality strategy, based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor and recurrences are extremely frequent. Hence, there is an urgent need for novel treatment options and promising molecular targets. Recently, there has been an increasing interest on the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in the recurrent setting. However, only scant evidence exists and there is still a long road ahead. A solid collaboration between gynecologists and oncologists worldwide is required to improve the treatment of these puzzling tumors.

Primary pure large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary: A rare case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), or ovarian non-small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, which is a newly described tumour in the classification of primary ovarian neoplasms by the World Health Organization, is a rare entity that is frequently associated with a surface epithelial and germ cell neoplasm component. Few cases have been reported in the literature, and only 18 primary pure ovarian LCNEC cases have been reported so far, including our 1 case. Ovarian LCNEC is a highly aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis even at an early stage.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report a case of a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman who complained of abdominal pain. CT examination revealed a mass in the right adnexial region and CA125 level was elevated.

DIAGNOSIS

She underwent a exploratory laparotomy, and diagnosed as LCNEC histopathologically.

INTERVENTIONS

Cytoreductive surgery was administered to the patient, and had accepted 5 cycles of chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and cisplatin.

OUTCOMES

Follow-up for 12 months showed no clinical or radiological evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This case is 1 of the ovarian LCNEC which is a rare and extremely malignant tumor. Diagnosis requires histopathology and immunohistochemistry. The treatment includes primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy.

Gynecologic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A review

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are rare, aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms within the neuroendocrine cell lineage spectrum. This manuscript provides a detailed review of published literature on LCNEC of gynecological origin. We performed a PubMed search for material available on gynecologic LCNEC. We analyzed 104 unique cases of gynecologic LCNECs, of which 45 were cervical primary, 45 were ovarian, 13 were uterine, and 1 was vaginal. A total of 45 cases of cervical LCNEC were identified with a median age of 36 years. Median overall survival was 16 months. We identified 45 ovarian LCNEC cases in the published literature with a median age of 54 years. Median overall survival was 8 months. 13 LCNEC cases of uterine origin were identified; 12 out of 13 were of endometrial origin and the median age was 71 years. The majority of patients presented with Stage III/IV disease (stages I-IV were 31%, 8%, 38%, and 23%, respectively). Gynecologic LCNEC is an aggressive malignancy. Our current understanding of the disease biology is very limited. Efforts are required to better understand the genomic and molecular characterizations of gynecological LCNEC. These efforts will elucidate the underlying oncogenic pathways and driver mutations as potential targets.

Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary with cancerous peritonitis: case report and review of the literature

Background

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a very rare ovarian neoplasm that has a poor clinical outcome even in the early stage, and there is as yet no established treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy has been used to determine the possibility of primary optimal cytoreductive surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. However, the role of diagnostic laparoscopy is still unclear in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma due to its rarity.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old woman with abdominal distention was referred to our hospital. She was strongly suspected of having advanced ovarian cancer because of a huge pelvic mass, massive ascites, and their appearance on medical imaging. However, cytological examinations from ascitic fluid by abdominal paracentesis did not show any malignant cells. She underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the possibility of primary optimal cytoreductive surgery, and only tissue sampling was performed for pathological diagnosis because of the countless disseminated lesions of various sizes in the intraperitoneal organs. The patient had no postoperative complications, leading to the early start of postoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

To date, there have been no systematic reviews that focused on determining the treatment strategy using laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy can be helpful to determine the optimal treatment, including primary debulking surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or best supportive care, assisting in decision-making particularly for patients with advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with carcinomatous peritonitis.

Pathological features, clinical presentations and prognostic factors of ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and review of published literature

Background

There is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the prognostic factors for ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), a rare type of tumor. The objective of the present study is to present the case of a recent encounter of pure ovarian LCNEC and perform a brief review to summarize the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of 57 cases of LCNEC patients that have been previously reported.

Method: case presentation

Eligible studies were searched for online and 57 cases with clear follow-up data were found to have been reported. We present the 58th case, which is of a 70-year-old woman with stage IIIc primary pure LCNEC of the ovary. The initial symptom of this patient was abdominal distension (more than 2 months). A recent ultrasound test showed a solid-cystic mass occupying the pelvic and abdominal cavity. She received two courses of cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy. No signs of nonclinical or radiological evidence of disease recurrence was found at follow-up examinations during the first 3 months after operation. A retrospective review of these 58 cases was conducted and survival curves were estimated. Using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Conclusion

The patients included were aged between 18 and 80 years. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed that the median overall survival was 10.000 months, while 26 (44.83%) patients died within 12 months. We compared the overall mean survival time of all patients with that of stage I patients (42.418 vs 42.047 months), which suggests that ovarian LCNEC has a very poor prognosis even at stage I. Mean survival was longer for patients who had undergone postoperative chemotherapy than for those without postoperative chemotherapy (48.082 vs 9.778 months). A small series, such as this, does not provide adequate data to establish a firm correlation between the postoperative chemotherapy and prognosis (p = 0.176). In our review of 58 cases with ovarian LCNEC, prognosis was unfavorable in most cases. Given the rarity of LCNEC, it is highly recommended that a global medical database of ovarian LCNEC and a standard system of diagnosis and treatment is established.

Pure Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Ovary with Metastasis to Cervix: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature

Ovarian Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a recently described rare entity, which even more rarely occurs in a 'pure' form without any associated surface epithelial-stromal or germ cell component. Cervix metastasis of ovarian LCNEC has not been reported previously. We report here a case of ovarian LCNEC in a 35-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and amenorrhea. Grossly the left ovary showed a solid cystic tumour measuring 6 cm in diameter. Histological examination showed a pure LCNEC without any associated component, confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Metastatic tumour deposits with numerous lymphovascular emboli were identified in the cervix. A comprehensive review of literature along with the various differential diagnosis is discussed.

Neuroendocrine tumours of the female genital tract: a case-based imaging review with pathological correlation

Background

Both primary and secondary gynaecological neuroendocrine (NE) tumours are uncommon, and the literature is scarce concerning their imaging features.

Methods

This article reviews the epidemiological, clinical and imaging features with pathological correlation of gynaecological NE tumours.

Results

The clinical features of gynaecological NE tumours are non-specific and depend on the organ of origin and on the extension and aggressiveness of the disease. The imaging approach to these tumours is similar to that for other histological types and the Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Staging System also applies to NE tumours. Neuroendocrine tumours were recently divided into two groups: poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NECs include small cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, while NETs account for typical and atypical carcinoids. Cervical small cell carcinoma and ovarian carcinoid are the most common gynaecological NE tumours. The former typically behaves aggressively; the latter usually behaves in a benign fashion and tends to be confined to the organ.

Conclusion

While dealing with ovarian carcinoids, extra-ovarian extension, bilaterality and multinodularity raise the suspicion of metastatic disease. NE tumours of the endometrium and other gynaecological locations are very rare.

Teaching Points

• Primary or secondary neurondocrine (NE) tumours of the female genital tract are rare.

• Cervical small cell carcinoma and ovarian carcinoids are the most common gynaecological NE tumours.

• Cervical small cell carcinomas usually behave aggressively.

• Ovarian carcinoids tend to behave in a benign fashion.

• The imaging approach to gynaecological NE tumours and other histological types is similar.

Prognostic impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas has only rarely been described. However, in our consultancy experience, we have been pointed at a case of neuroendocrine relapse in a patient with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma where retrospectively, a minor neuroendocrine component in the primary tumor could be detected. Hypothesizing that immunohistochemical evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation might be more frequent in ovarian carcinoma than suspected by morphology, we immunophenotyped the tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a cohort of 178 high-grade serous carcinomas for chromogranin and synaptophysin expression. Synaptophysin expression was found in 12 (6.7 %) out of 172 patients, and chromogranin A expression was seen in 36 (20.7 %) out of 174 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that carcinomas with synaptophysin expression of >20 % of positive cells (n = 4) had a significantly shorter survival time than those with 0-20 % of positive cells (p < 0.0001). Synaptophysin expression remained a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR = 10.82, 95 % confidence interval 3.10-37.71, p < 0.0001), independently of age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. A trend toward shorter survival was seen in patients with tumors that expressed chromogranin, irrespective of the amount of positive cells (p = 0.173). A neuroendocrine differentiation is important to keep in mind when a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary is detected in regional or temporal connection with an ovarian carcinoma. A minor neuroendocrine component in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas might imply a dismal prognosis.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary: a case report and a brief review of the literature

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNC) of the ovary, or ovarian undifferentiated non-small cell carcinoma of neuroendocrine type, is a rare entity that is frequently associated with ovarian surface epithelial tumors. Few cases have been reported in the literature. LCNC is an aggressive tumor with tendency to present at advanced stages and to cause death after a short postoperative duration. We report three cases of LCNC diagnosed histopathologically. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for chromogranin A, NSE, CD56, and pancytokeratin. The patients were treated postoperatively with combination chemotherapy. Due to the rarity of LCNC, the general consensus on standard therapy is not established. Although most patients are at stage I, the biological aggressiveness and poor prognosis of the tumors have been reported in previous reports despite extensive surgery and chemotherapy.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Ovary and Its Skin Metastases: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the gynaecological organs affects the uterine cervix and ovary. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary is extremely rare, and prognosis is quite poor even when diagnosed at an early stage. These tumours respond poorly to standard chemotherapy regimens. The clinical observation of skin metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer is relatively uncommon, occurring in only 3.5% of patients. These lesions are observed mostly in skin of the abdominal wall adjacent to the primary ovarian tumours. Metastatic skin lesions on extremities are much more rare; it is reported that only 12% of epithelial ovarian carcinoma skin metastases occur on the limbs. Skin metastasis due to large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary has not been previously reported. We report the case of a large cell neuroendocrine tumour of the ovary with skin metastases on extremities appearing two months after surgery in a 68-year old woman.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary: A pathologic entity in search of clinical identity

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the ovary is a rare diagnosis and only a few dozen cases have been reported in the literature. It is characterized by large pleiomorphic cells with large round or oval nuclei, presence of mitoses and staining for neuroendocrine (NE) markers such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, neuron specific enolase. This editorial gives a brief overview of this histologic type of ovarian carcinomas. LCNEC of the ovary is a pathologic entity that may not be diagnosed purely on clinical grounds due to the similarity of its clinical features with those of the more common epithelial ovarian cancers. Nevertheless the diagnosis is worth-making from a practical point of view in order to consider treatments tailored towards the NE component if it is dominant or it becomes dominant during the natural evolution of the disease. Establishment of an international tumor registry with an accompanying tumor tissue bank of ovarian LCNEC could be a means of obtaining further knowledge on clinical characteristics and advance research on this rare entity. This will further inform on treatment strategies and could identify future molecular treatment targets.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract: select topics

Tumors of the diffuse neuroendocrine cell system (DNES) may arise in any component of the gynecologic tract, including the vulva, vagina, cervix, endometrium, and ovary. Overall such tumors in the gynecologic tract are rare, constituting only 2% of gynecologic cancers, comprising a spectrum of tumors of variable biologic potential. Due to the rarity of such tumors, pathologists experience may be limited and these may present diagnostic challenges. Currently the nomenclature employed is still that of the pulmonary classification systems, carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma that broadly correlates to low/grade 1, intermediate/grade 2, and high grade/grade 3 of the WHO gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors classification. Furthermore in keeping with the lung, proliferative rate is assessed based on mitotic index rather than Ki-67 staining. In this review we cover select neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract.

Mucosal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the head and neck regions in Japanese patients: a distinct clinicopathological entity

Backgrounds

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is well-known as a lung cancer subtype. This study assessed the prevalence of head and neck mucosal LCNEC (M-LCNEC).

Methods

M-LCNEC was studied clinically, histologically and immunohistochemically.

Results

Of 814 surgically resected cases of mucosal head and neck carcinoma, only eight cases (0.98%; all men, mean age 64.6 years) were rediagnosed as M-LCNEC. They occurred in the oropharynx (n=3), larynx (n=4) and hypopharynx (n=1). Seven of the cases had regional lymph node metastases and four resulted in death. Histologically, M-LCNEC had a sheet-like trabacular organoid growth pattern of relatively large basaloid cells in which central necrosis, rosette formation, peripheral palisading and high mitotic figures were evident. M-LCNEC was immunopositive for two or three neuroendocrine markers (CD56, chromogranin-A and synaptophysin). All cases showed high proliferative activity.

Conclusion

M-LCNEC in the head and neck regions is a distinct histopathological entity whose positivity for neuroendocrine markers makes its diagnosis important. As about half of the patients died of the disease, M-LCNEC has a relatively poor prognosis.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the head and neck

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma that usually occurs in the lung. Although rare in the head and neck, salivary and mucosal subtypes are recognized. This article describes their characteristic light microscopic and immunohistochemical features and highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis, management and prognostic implications.

Clinical features of ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: Four case reports and review of the literature

The objective of the present study was to present 4 recently encountered ovarian large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) cases, and to evaluate their clinicopathological features in the context of the previously reported 29 LCNEC cases. First, we described the clinical features of 4 recently encountered cases. Routine H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin A were performed on sections of both the LCNEC and epithelial carcinoma components. Clinical data for the total of 33 LCNEC cases were summarized, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was estimated. Our cases were observed in women aged 42-81 years. One case is clinically classified as FIGO stage IV with multiple metastases, and the others are classified as FIGO stages Ic, IIc and IIIb by post-surgical findings. Pathological features, assessed by H&E staining, were similar to lung LCNEC, and at least one neuroendocrine marker was positive staining in both LCNEC and the epithelial component. One case was pure type LCNEC and the others were mixed carcinoma. Paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was performed for all cases and 3 of the 4 treatments were effective. The prognoses of our cases were as follows: 1 in stage Ic died from the disease after only 2 months, but the others survived, with or without recurrence, for 32-64 months, whereas the total 5-year survival of the 33 LCNEC cases was 34.9%. In summary, our 3 LCNEC cases revealed ordinary chemo-sensitivity, resulting in a better prognosis than those previously described, apart from 1 case which exhibited aggressive behavior. For the future, a retrospective survey to elucidate the prognostic factors and prospective clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of treatment modalities of ovarian LCNEC are necessary, particularly for aggressive LCNEC cases.

Monoclonality of composite large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and mucinous epithelial tumor of the ovary: a case study

A rare case of mixed carcinoma of the ovary is reported, composed of a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and a mucinous borderline endocervical tumor. The large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was composed of solid nests, sheets, and trabeculae of medium to large-sized cells, and was positive for synaptophysin. The mucinous epithelial tumor varied in appearance from a borderline to an intraepithelial carcinoma, and showed sparsely scattered immunoreactivity for chromogranin-A. Using an X-chromosome clonality assay, these 2 components showed patterns of monoclonality. These results suggest that the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma may have arisen from the mucinous epithelial tumor.

Primary pure large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary

We report a case of a 73-year-old female with a rare simultaneous occurrence of three tumors: ovarian carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, and breast carcinoma. The ovarian tumor was a primary pure large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Grossly, the left ovary was enlarged by a solid tumor that measured 9 x 7 x 7 cm. Histologically, the tumor consisted of large cells with irregular hyperchromatic nuclei and a moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm. In some areas, the tumor cells were arranged in solid sheets; however, the predominant pattern was cribriform and solid-alveolar, with palisaded tumor cells located peripherally. The tumor cells showed multiple mitotic figures (up to 43 mitoses/10 HPF). Large areas of tumor necrosis were found. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for EMA, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, and CEA. Cytokeratin 20 was positive focally. Primary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary is a rare tumor. To the best of our knowledge, only 4 cases of a pure tumor of this type have been reported to date.

Ovarian nonsmall cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases

Nonsmall cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NSCNEC) of the ovary is a rare and aggressive tumor commonly associated with other surface epithelial and germ cell neoplasms. In this study, we present the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 11 such cases seen at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in a 16-year period (1990 to 2005). Patients ranged in age from 22 to 63 years (mean 46.7). The most common presentation was abdominal/pelvic pain (6 cases), followed by ascites (2 cases), pelvic mass, vaginal bleeding, and abdominal bloating (1 case each). Tumors were mostly unilateral, cystic, or solid/cystic and ranged in size from 5 to 26 cm (mean 16.2). In 8 cases, NSCNEC was associated with other epithelial neoplasms, including mucinous neoplasms of low malignant potential, mucinous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, mixed endometrioid and mucinous carcinoma, and a high-grade carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In 2 cases, the tumor was associated with a mature cystic teratoma; one of them also containing an invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. A single case was associated with a benign ovarian cyst. The latter case had a dermoid cyst in the contralateral ovary. NSCNEC represented anywhere from 10% to 90% of the ovarian tumor. Microscopically, the neuroendocrine component was usually composed of large and/or intermediate oval to round cells. In 2 cases, the intermediate cells were intermixed with small cells. Three cases had also spindle cells. The neoplastic cells were mostly arranged in a solid pattern, nests, or trabeculae. All tumors had a brisk mitotic activity. Immunoperoxidase studies for keratin cocktail, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, CAM 5.2, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, NSE, CD56, and c-kit were performed and the cases stained as follows: keratin cocktail 6/6, CK7 4/5, CK20 3/5, CAM 5.2 3/3, chromogranin A 8/11, synaptophysin 9/9, NSE 1/1, CD56 4/8, and c-kit 5/7. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, 4 cases were stage I tumors, 3 cases were stage III tumors, and 4 cases were stage IV tumors. Seven patients were treated with total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by chemotherapy. One patient had a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with omentectomy and appendectomy followed by chemotherapy; 1 patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy with right salpingo-oophorectomy followed by chemotherapy; one had a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by chemotherapy, and one had a right salpingo-oophorectomy with appendectomy followed by chemotherapy. Five patients died of disease at 2, 3, 9, 20, and 36 months. One patient is alive with disease at 8 months and 5 are alive without evidence of disease at 11, 28, 37, 66, and 68 months. Four of 5 patients who died of disease had either stage III or IV tumors and 3 of 5 patients who are alive without evidence of disease have stage I tumors. In summary, ovarian NSCNEC is an aggressive tumor with a tendency to present at advanced stage and cause death within a mean of 17 months after diagnosis; however, some patients, particularly those with stage I disease and/or those who have received platinum-based therapy, may have a more favorable prognosis.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary is a recently described tumour entity that is now included in the WHO classification of primary ovarian neoplasms. Although mostly in stage I at diagnosis, this tumour shows an aggressive clinical behaviour with subsequent metastases and mean survival is less than one year. In addition to the neuroendocrine carcinoma, most cases also have a malignant surface epithelial tumour component. I here report a 64-year-old woman who was operated on for a right-sided ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma without a surface epithelial component, which constitutes only the second reported tumour of this "pure" kind. Histological and immunohistochemical findings are described and a review of the literature is presented. The patient was treated postoperatively with chemotherapy. She developed bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis that responded well to treatment with steroids. There have been no signs of local tumour recurrence or metastases at follow-up examinations during the first 9 months after the operation.

Ovarian neuroendocrine carcinoma, non-small cell type, associated with serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the non-small cell type of the ovary is a rare aggressive tumor, interestingly associated with either a surface epithelial tumor or teratoma.

CASE

A 71-year-old woman presented with a pelvic mass and underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pathology examination showed a 6.5 cm in greatest dimension ovarian tumor composed of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the non-small cell type and serous carcinoma. Immunohistochemical studies including keratin 7, WT-1, and neuroendocrine markers demonstrated differences in the two components. Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis using five polymorphic markers also showed a different pattern in the two components.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of an ovarian neuroendocrine carcinoma, non-small cell type, associated with a serous carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry and MSI are very helpful in making a definite diagnosis.

Ovarian carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation: Review of five cases referring to immunohistochemical characterization

AIM

To review five ovarian carcinomas with varying degrees of neuroendocrine differentiation (ND) using an immunohistochemical study focused on the relationship with morphological features.

METHODS

ND was immunohistochemically analyzed using 21 antibodies by an indirect immunoperoxidase method, and ploidy pattern was analyzed using paraffin sections.

RESULTS

The tumors were divided according to tumor cell size into 'small-sized' for case 1, 'intermediate-sized' for cases 2 and 3, and 'large-sized' for cases 4 and 5. Expressions of neuroendocrine markers and argyrophil reaction tended to be strengthened as tumor cell size increased. Cases 1, 2 and 3 showed diploid pattern and cases 4 and 5 showed aneuploid pattern.

CONCLUSION

ND of ovarian carcinomas is closely related to morphological features represented by the cell size. Therefore, ovarian carcinomas with ND should be defined because the disease entity is not successfully integrated irrespective of the highly malignant potential.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: case report and literature review

A 74-year-old male presented with a large polinodular mass in the neck. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) showed an undifferentiated large cell carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) showed a large parotid mass with multiple satelite nodules. The remaining radiological studies were normal. Radical parotidectomy was performed. The tumor was a large cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine features and positive immunostain for neuroendocrine markers. The patient received postoperative radiotherapy and was free of tumor eight months later. Only four cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the salivary gland have been communicated. All of them have involved the parotid gland. This tumor presents in elderly patients as a large infiltrating parotid mass. Fine needle aspiration cytology serves to recognize the carcinoma, but it fails in recognizing the neuroendocrine features of the tumor. The histopathological features of this tumor are the same as in other organs. Chromogranin and synaptophysin are useful immunohistochemical markers. A primary location of the tumor in another organ, specially the lung, should be ruled out. Surgery is the main treatment modality and can be complemented with postoperative radiotherapy. The prognosis seems to be poor. More studies are needed to better define the therapeutical alternatives and prognostic factors of these rare tumors.

Ovarian Non-Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Paraneoplastic Parathyroid Hormone-related Hypercalcemia

Ovarian tumors associated with hypercalcemia due to ectopic secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are extremely rare. A 33-year-old woman presented with a pelvic mass and profound hypercalcemia accompanied by an elevated serum level of PTH. Laparotomy demonstrated a left ovarian tumor that on histological examination was a neuroendocrine carcinoma of non-small cell type admixed with a component of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. After left salpingo-oophorectomy, the serum calcium and PTH levels normalized. The cells of the neuroendocrine carcinoma were positive for neuron-specific enolase, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and PTH. Hypercalcemia and elevated serum PTH levels recurred during tumor relapse, and the patient died of disease 6 months postoperatively. This is the eleventh case of neuroendocrine carcinoma of non-small cell type associated with surface epithelial neoplasm of the ovary, and the first such tumor to be associated with hypercalcemia.