Immunohistochemical Detection of Cancer-Testis Antigen PRAME

PRAME expression in melanoma is negatively regulated by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation

Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenase-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are emerging melanoma biomarkers. We observed an inverse correlation between PRAME expression and 5hmC levels in benign nevi, melanoma in situ, primary invasive melanoma, and metastatic melanomas via immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence: nevi exhibited high 5hmC and low PRAME, whereas melanomas showed the opposite pattern. Single-cell multiplex imaging of melanoma precursors revealed that diminished 5hmC coincides with PRAME upregulation in premalignant cells. Analysis of TCGA and GTEx databases confirmed a negative relationship between TET2 and PRAME mRNA expression in melanoma. Additionally, 5hmC levels were reduced at the PRAME 5' promoter in melanoma compared to nevi, suggesting a role for 5hmC in PRAME transcription. Restoring 5hmC levels via TET2 overexpression notably reduced PRAME expression in melanoma cell lines. These findings establish a function of TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in regulating PRAME expression and demonstrate epigenetic reprogramming as pivotal in melanoma tumorigenesis.

Teaser

Melanoma biomarker PRAME expression is negatively regulated epigenetically by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation.

Performance of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry for metastatic melanoma in cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) has been introduced as a new melanoma marker and potential target for immunotherapy. While PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) is well documented in surgical pathology, similar data in cytology are limited. Metastatic melanoma is frequently diagnosed via cytology samples in which IHC plays an important role. We aimed to accordingly evaluate the performance of PRAME IHC in diagnosing metastatic melanoma in cytology samples relative to other commonly used melanoma markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 156 archival cytology cases, of which 93 were melanoma cases and 63 nonmelanoma cases (controls). All cases underwent PRAME IHC staining on cell blocks. Nuclear staining of PRAME was evaluated using a quantitative and qualitative scale. Other melanocytic IHC stain results (SOX10, S-100, Melan-A, and HMB45) were also documented.

RESULTS

PRAME was detected in tumor cells in 86% of melanoma cases, which was significantly lower than SOX10 (100%) (p < .01), and similar to HMB45 (84%) and Melan-A (82%). S-100 had the lowest sensitivity of 71%. In comparison to other types of melanomas, spindle cell melanoma exhibited higher negativity for PRAME IHC (4/10 = 40%). PRAME was also expressed in some nonmelanocytic malignancies including carcinoma (5/22 = 23%), sarcoma (5/15 = 33%), and hematologic malignancies (1/9 = 11%). Overall, PRAME showed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 70%, and negative predictive value of 92% for metastatic melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

PRAME is a useful marker for the diagnosis of melanoma in cytology material, but it is less sensitive than SOX10. PRAME is also expressed in other nonmelanocytic tumors which limits its specificity.

Estrogen Receptor Expression in DICER1-related Lesions is Associated With the Presence of Cystic Components

DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome results from pathogenic variants in DICER1 and is associated with a variety of benign and malignant lesions, typically involving kidney, lung, and female reproductive system. Over 70% of sarcomas in DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome occur in females. Notably, pediatric cystic nephroma (pCN), a classic DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome lesion, shows estrogen receptor (ER) expression in stromal cells. There are also renal, hepatic, and pancreatic lesions unassociated with DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome that have an adult female predominance and are characterized/defined by ER-positive stromal cells. Except for pCN, the expression of ER in DICER1-associated lesions remains uninvestigated. In the present study, ER expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 89 cases of DICER1-related lesions and 44 lesions lacking DICER1 pathogenic variants. Expression was seen in stromal cells in pCN and pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) types I and Ir, whereas anaplastic sarcoma of kidney and PPB types II and III were typically negative, as were other solid tumors of non-Müllerian origin. ER expression was unrelated to the sex or age of the patient. Expression of ER showed an inverse relationship to preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression; as lesions progressed from cystic to solid (pCN/anaplastic sarcoma of kidney, and PPB types I to III), ER expression was lost and (PRAME) expression increased. Thus, in DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome, there is no evidence that non-Müllerian tumors are hormonally driven and antiestrogen therapy is not predicted to be beneficial. Lesions not associated with DICER1 pathogenic variants also showed ER-positive stromal cells, including cystic pulmonary airway malformations, cystic renal dysplasia, and simple renal cysts in adult kidneys. ER expression in stromal cells is not a feature of DICER1 perturbation but rather is related to the presence of cystic components.

PRAME expression and its prognostic significance in invasive breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a carcinoma testis antigen expressed in numerous tumour types. The aim of this study was to assess PRAME expression in different surrogate subtypes of breast carcinoma and its correlation with other prognostic factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 220 cases of invasive breast carcinoma were selected and categorized according to ER, PgR, HER2 status, and Ki67 proliferation index in luminal A like, luminal B HER2+ like, luminal B HER2- negative like, HER2 positive like and triple-negative or basal-like. All cases were examined for PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

RESULTS

A PRAME-high profile was detected in 53 (24,1 %) of all examined breast carcinoma samples. A significantly higher expression of PRAME was detected in HER2-positive carcinomas (50 %) and TN breast carcinomas (40,54 %) compared to ER-positive (luminal-like) subtype of breast carcinomas (3,38 % luminal A and 15,38 % luminal B). Percentage of PRAME positive tumour cells showed positive correlation with tumor size, Ki67 proliferation index, HER2 status, nuclear grade, TILs and presence of metastasis, and negative correlation with ER status and disease-free survival (DFS).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that HER2 positive and TN breast carcinomas more commonly express PRAME than ER positive carcinomas and that PRAME expression shows positive correlation with certain prognostic factors, however PRAME wasn't revealed as an independent prognostic factor in our study. The importance of PRAME expression in breast carcinoma lies in its potential use as an immunotherapeutic target, particularly in patients with limited therapeutic options.

Expression of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, a Cancer/Testis Antigen, in Carcinoma In Situ of the Urinary Tract

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary tract comprises 1-3% of all urothelial malignancies and is often a precursor to muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to examine the expression profiles of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer/testis antigen, and assess its diagnostic and therapeutic applications in CIS, given that its expression in UC has been minimally studied and has not yet been analyzed in CIS. We selected consecutive patients with CIS who underwent biopsy and/or transurethral tumor resection at the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital. Immunohistochemical staining for PRAME and p53 was performed. Overall, 53 patients with CIS (6 females and 47 males) were included. Notably, PRAME expression was observed in 23 of the 53 patients (43.4%), whereas it was absent in the non-neoplastic urothelial epithelium. Furthermore, no correlation was found between PRAME expression and aberrant p53 expression. Therefore, PRAME expression may serve as a useful marker for CIS of the urinary tract. Furthermore, PRAME may be a candidate for the novel therapeutic target for standard treatment-refractory CIS patients.

PRAME-negativity in sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features supports classification as an indolent lesion

BACKGROUND

Some dysplastic nevi, termed sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features, may have florid fibroplasia associated with features that cause melanoma to be a prominent consideration in the differential diagnosis. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been shown to be a useful marker in the distinction of melanoma and nevus. PRAME expression in such sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features has not been evaluated to our knowledge.

METHODS

Thirty-two sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features were stained with PRAME IHC, with positive labeling defined as staining of >75% of the cytomorphologically atypical lesional cells.

RESULTS

All 32 cases had variable cytologic atypia, bridging of elongated rete, fibroplasia, and a vertically oriented trizonal appearance. Some cases (23/32) had centrally located flattening of the rete ridge pattern bilaterally flanked by fibroplasia associated with elongated rete. PRAME labeling was negative (<1% labeling) in 28/32 cases. Four cases, also interpreted as having negative labeling with PRAME, showed only weak nuclear positivity of <50% of the melanocytes within the pseudomelanomatous foci. p16 staining was positive in 28/28 lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Rare sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features (4/32; ~13%) had weak PRAME labeling of 25%-50% of atypical foci. Twenty-eight of 32 lesions had virtually no labeling with PRAME. PRAME results support classifying sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features as indolent lesions.

Immunohistochemistry for PRAME in Dermatopathology

ABSTRACT

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a tumor-associated antigen first identified in a melanoma patient and found to be expressed in most melanomas as well as in variable levels in other malignant neoplasms of epithelial, mesenchymal, or hematolymphoid lineage. Detection of PRAME expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue is possible by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with commercially available monoclonal antibodies. In situ and invasive melanoma frequently show a diffuse pattern of nuclear PRAME immunoreactivity which contrasts with the infrequent and typically nondiffuse staining seen in nevi. In many challenging melanocytic tumors, results of PRAME IHC and other ancillary tests correlate well, but not always: The tests are not interchangeable. Most metastatic melanomas are positive for PRAME, whereas nodal nevi are not. Numerous studies on PRAME IHC have become available in the past few years with results supporting the value of PRAME IHC as an ancillary tool in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions and providing insights into limitations in sensitivity and specificity as well as possible pitfalls that need to be kept in mind by practicing pathologists.

Immunohistochemical expression of PRAME in 485 cases of epithelial tubo-ovarian tumors

Preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer/testis antigen selectively expressed in somatic tissues and various solid malignant tumors and is associated with poor prognostic outcome. Our research aimed to comprehensively compare its expression in a large cohort of tubo-ovarian epithelial tumors and examine its correlation with our clinico-pathologic data, as well as to assess its potential use in diagnostics and therapy.We examined 485 cases of epithelial tubo-ovarian tumors including 107 clear cell carcinomas (CCC), 52 endometroid carcinomas (EC), 103 high grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 119 low grade serous carcinomas (LGSC)/micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors (mSBT), and 104 cases of mucinous carcinomas (MC)/mucinous borderline tumors (MBT). The immunohistochemical analysis was performed using TMAs.The highest levels of expression were seen in EC (60%), HGSC (62%), and CCC (56%), while expression in LGSC/mSBT (4%) and MC/MBT (2%) was rare. The clinico-pathologic correlations and survival analysis showed no prognostic significance.The results of our study showed that PRAME is neither prognostic nor a suitable ancillary marker in the differential diagnosis of tubo-ovarian epithelial tumors. Nevertheless, knowledge about the PRAME expression may be important concerning its potential predictive significance, because targeting PRAME as a potential therapeutic option is currently under investigation.

PRAME immunohistochemistry in soft tissue tumors and mimics: a study of 350 cases highlighting its imperfect specificity but potentially useful diagnostic applications

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is currently used in pathology for the assessment of melanocytic neoplasms; however, knowledge of its expression patterns in soft tissue tumors is limited. PRAME immunohistochemistry (clone QR005) was assessed on whole tissue sections of 350 soft-tissue tumors and mimics (> 50 histotypes). PRAME immunoreactivity was evaluated as follows: 0 "negative" (0% positive cells); 1+ (1-25% positive cells); 2+ (26-50% positive cells); 3+ (51-75% positive cells), and 4+ "diffuse" (> 75% positive cells). PRAME was expressed in 111 lesions (0 benign, 6 intermediate malignancy, and 105 malignant), including fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (2/4, 0 diffuse), NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm (2/4, 0 diffuse), atypical fibroxanthoma (1/7, 0 diffuse), Kaposi sarcoma (1/5, 0 diffuse), myxoid liposarcoma (11/11, 9 diffuse), synovial sarcoma (11/11, 6 diffuse), intimal sarcoma (7/7, 5 diffuse), biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (3/3, 1 diffuse), angiosarcoma (10/15, 6 diffuse), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (9/12, 4 diffuse), pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (2/3, 2 diffuse), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (2/6, 0 diffuse), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (7/7, 4 diffuse), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2/12, 1 diffuse), leiomyosarcoma (2/15, 1 diffuse), clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (1/10, 0 diffuse), low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (1/5, 0 diffuse), Ewing sarcoma (2/10, 1 diffuse), CIC-rearranged sarcoma (8/8, 4 diffuse), BCOR-sarcoma (2/5, 1 diffuse), melanoma (20/20, 14 diffuse), and thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (5/5, all diffuse). All tested cases of spindle cell lipoma, dedifferentiated/pleomorphic liposarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, solitary fibrous tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, nodular fasciitis, myxofibrosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, atypical vascular lesion, hemangioma, lymphangioma, vascular malformation, papillary endothelial hyperplasia, GIST, gastrointestinal clear-cell sarcoma, malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor, neurofibroma, schwannoma, granular cell tumor, alveolar soft part sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, myoepithelioma, ossifying fibromyxoid tumor, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, PEComa, dermatofibroma, pleomorphic dermal sarcoma, and chordoma were negative. PRAME shows imperfect specificity in soft-tissue pathology but may serve as a diagnostic adjunct in selected differential diagnoses that show contrasting expression patterns.

Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of PRAME in distinguishing primary cutaneous melanomas from benign melanocytic lesions

PRAME is a novel immunohistochemical marker that aids the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Diffuse PRAME positivity suggests melanoma, whereas benign naevi are negative or only weakly positive. However, the factual diagnostic accuracy of PRAME is not well established. Moreover, some studies have suggested that the threshold of 3+/50% positive cells may be more useful in practice than the most widely used cut-off (4+/75% of positive cells). Hence, we performed a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and optimal threshold for PRAME in distinguishing benign melanocytic proliferations from melanomas. Twenty-six studies were enrolled into the meta-analysis. A total of 2915 melanocytic lesions were analysed. The optimal threshold for PRAME positivity was estimated at 3.11, which translates into 3+ in practice. Sensitivity and specificity calculated from SROC at the 3+ threshold were 0.735 (0.631-0.818) and 0.915 (0.834-0.958), respectively, compared to 0.679 (0.559-0.957) and 0.957 (0.908-0.981) at the 4+ cut-off. In subgroup analysis, the spitzoid subgroup was characterised by the lowest sensitivity and diagnostic odds ratio of PRAME. Our findings indicate that PRAME immunohistochemistry may serve as an ancillary marker to support the diagnosis of melanoma. Nevertheless, the accuracy of PRAME may be lower in spitzoid neoplasms. Our meta-analysis suggests that the 3+/50% threshold might be more useful in practice than the 4+/75% cut-off, as it shows higher sensitivity with retained satisfactory specificity.

Metastatic melanoma and rare melanoma variants: a review

The histopathological diagnosis of melanoma is fraught with potential pitfalls. In the setting of cutaneous metastatic melanoma, it is important to recognise the various histological patterns that can be encountered from the more common to the rare, including epidermotropic, folliculotropic, naevoid, and blue naevus-like. In addition, melanoma is notorious for phenotypic plasticity. Thus, there are many different subtypes and cytomorphological variations that can be difficult to recognise as melanoma, particularly in the recurrent or metastatic setting. Select melanoma variants including primary dermal, clear cell, plasmacytoid, signet ring cell, small cell, myxoid, rhabdoid, and dedifferentiated melanoma will be discussed, in addition to composite melanocytic neoplasms. This review is intended to remind the practitioner of key concepts of metastatic disease and select rare melanoma variants, while providing practical guidelines for accurate diagnosis.

Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Precursors Reveals Reactivation of IGFBP2 during Pathogenesis

Elucidating the earliest pathogenic steps in cancer development is fundamental to improving its early detection and prevention. Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), a highly aggressive cancer, mostly originates from the fallopian tube epithelium through a precursor stage, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). In this study, we performed spatial transcriptomic analysis to compare STICs, carcinoma, and their matched normal fallopian tube epithelium. Several differentially expressed genes in STICs and carcinomas were involved in cancer metabolism and detected in a larger independent transcriptomic dataset of ovarian HGSCs. Among these, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP2) was found to undergo DNA hypomethylation and to be increased at the protein level in STICs. Pyrosequencing revealed an association of IGFBP2 expression with the methylation state of its proximal enhancer, and 5-azacytidine treatment increased IGFBP2 expression. In postmenopausal fallopian tubes, where most STICs are detected, IGFBP2 immunoreactivity was detected in all 38 proliferatively active STICs but was undetectable in morphologically normal tubal epithelia, including those with TP53 mutations. In premenopausal fallopian tubes, IGFBP2 expression was limited to the secretory epithelium at the proliferative phase, and estradiol treatment increased IGFBP2 expression levels. IGFBP2 knockdown suppressed the growth of IGFBP2-expressing tubal epithelial cells via inactivation of the AKT pathway. Taken together, demethylation of the proximal enhancer of IGFBP2 drives tumor development by maintaining the increased IGFBP2 required for proliferation in an otherwise estrogen-deprived, proliferation-quiescent, and postmenopausal tubal microenvironment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Molecular studies of the earliest precursor lesions of ovarian cancer reveal a role of IGFBP2 in propelling tumor initiation, providing new insights into ovarian cancer development.

PRAME Expression in Cancer. A Systematic Immunohistochemical Study of >5800 Epithelial and Nonepithelial Tumors

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is considered a useful marker in the differential diagnosis between malignant melanoma and its melanocytic mimics. Recently PRAME expression was documented in nonmelanocytic tumors, but much of the data are based on mRNA studies. This investigation evaluated PRAME expression in the spectrum of normal tissues and >5800 human tumors using immunohistochemistry and EP461 monoclonal antibody. In normal tissues, PRAME was expressed in the testis and proliferative endometrium. In tumors, PRAME was variably expressed in malignancies of different lineages. Among epithelial tumors, >50% of PRAME-positive lesions were found among endometrial carcinomas (82%), uterine serous carcinomas (82%), uterine carcinosarcomas (60%), ovarian clear cell carcinomas (90%), ovarian serous carcinomas (63%), adenoid cystic carcinomas (81%), seminomas (78%), thymic carcinomas (75%), and basal cell carcinomas (62%). In mesenchymal and neuroectodermal malignancies, PRAME was frequently expressed in synovial sarcoma (71%), myxoid liposarcoma (76%), neuroblastoma (61%) and metastatic melanoma (87%). Also, PRAME was consistently expressed in 4 melanomas that lacked all melanoma markers including S100 protein and SOX10 but harbored typical for melanoma BRAF or NRAS driver mutations. However, strong and diffuse PRAME immunoreactivity was seen in many types of nonmelanocytic poorly differentiated carcinomas and sarcomas. Based on this study, PRAME is a relatively unspecific immunohistochemical marker, which limits its use in diagnostic surgical pathology. However, immunohistochemistry is a reliable and unexpensive method useful in detecting PRAME-positive malignancies for potential immunotherapy.

POU2F3 in SCLC: Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis With a Focus on Its Diagnostic Utility in Neuroendocrine-Low SCLC

INTRODUCTION

POU2F3 is a recent marker of a small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) subtype related to chemosensory tuft cells (SCLC-P). The characteristics of SCLC-P have not been fully defined, and the data on POU2F3 expression in other lung tumors are scarce.

METHODS

We screened 254 SCLC for POU2F3 expression and comprehensively analyzed histopathologic, genomic, and clinical characteristics of POU2F3-positive tumors. We also explored POU2F3 expression in other major lung cancer types (n = 433) and a targeted set of potential diagnostic mimics of SCLC (n = 123).

RESULTS

POU2F3 was expressed in 30 of 254 (12%) SCLC and was strongly associated with low expression of standard neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, INSM1). Notably, POU2F3 was expressed in 75% of SCLC with entirely negative or minimal neuroendocrine marker expression (15/20) and was helpful in supporting the diagnosis of SCLC in such cases. Broad targeted next-generation sequencing revealed that SCLC-P (n = 12) exhibited enrichment in several alterations, including PTEN inactivation, MYC amplifications, and 20q13 amplifications, but similar rates of RB1 and TP53 alterations as other SCLC (n = 155). Beyond SCLC, POU2F3 expression was exclusively limited to large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (12%) and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort of SCLC-P clinical samples to date, where we describe the diagnostic utility of POU2F3 in a challenging subset of SCLC with low or absent expression of standard neuroendocrine markers. The distinct genomic alterations in SCLC-P may offer a novel avenue for therapeutic targeting. The role of POU2F3 in a narrow subset of other lung cancer types warrants further study.

PRAME protein expression in DICER1-related tumours

DICER1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant tumour predisposition syndrome usually affecting persons under 30 years of age. Many of the associated benign and malignant lesions occur almost exclusively in DICER1 syndrome. One such tumour, pituitary blastoma (pitB), overexpresses PRAME 500x above control levels. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is expressed in malignancies that are not DICER1-related (e.g. melanoma). To address whether PRAME expression is part of the DICER1 phenotype, or simply a feature of pitB, a series of 75 DICER1-mutated specimens and 33 non-mutated specimens was surveyed using immunohistochemistry for PRAME, together with EZH2, which complexes with PRAME. In DICER1-mutated specimens, positive staining for PRAME was only seen in malignant tumours; 7 of 11 histological types and 34/62 individual tumours were positive, while non-tumourous lesions were always negative. Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) showed a continuum in staining, with type I lesions being PRAME negative (n = 7) but all type II and type III lesions PRAME positive (n = 7). Similarly, cystic nephroma (CN) was negative (n = 8), with anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney being positive (n = 2). However, one atypical CN with mesenchymal cell proliferation was PRAME-positive. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with DICER1 pathogenic variants (PVs) was positive for PRAME (5/6), but the same tumour type without DICER1 PVs was also positive (9/15). Staining for EZH2 corresponded to that seen with PRAME, validating the latter. This study leads us to conclude that (1) PRAME expression occurs in two-thirds of DICER1-related malignancies; (2) PRAME may be a marker for the progression that certain DICER1-related lesions are thought to undergo, such as PPB and CN; and (3) PRAME expression in some tumours, such as RMS, appears to be an intrinsic feature of the tumour, rather than specifically related to DICER1 PVs. Therapy directed against PRAME may offer novel treatment options in patients with the DICER1 syndrome.