Economic Analysis and Patient Satisfaction Associated With Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Predicting Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay and Identifying Risk Factors Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Supervised Machine Learning Methodology

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition that arises as a result of trauma or injury to the ankle and often progresses to chronic pain and loss of function that may require surgical intervention. Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has emerged as a means of operative treatment for end-stage ankle OA. Increased hospital length of stay (LOS) is a common adverse postoperative outcome that increases both the complications and cost of care associated with arthroplasty procedures. The purpose of this study was to employ four machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict LOS in patients undergoing TAA using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. The ACS-NSQIP database was queried to identify adult patients undergoing elective TAA from 2008 to 2018. Four supervised ML classification algorithms were utilized and tasked with predicting increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Among these variables, female sex, ASA Class III, preoperative sodium, preoperative hematocrit, diabetes, preoperative creatinine, other arthritis, BMI, preoperative WBC, and Hispanic ethnicity carried the highest importance across predictions generated by 4 independent ML algorithms. Predictions generated by these algorithms were made with an average AUC of 0.7257, as well as an average accuracy of 73.98% and an average sensitivity and specificity of 48.47% and 79.38%, respectively. These findings may be useful for guiding decision-making within the perioperative period and may serve to identify patients at increased risk for a prolonged LOS.

The association of ASA score and outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to evaluate the relationship between American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score and postoperative outcomes following TAA.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2007 to 2020 to identify 2210 TAA patients. Patients were stratified into low (n = 1328; healthy/mild systemic disease) or high (n = 881; severe/life-threatening systemic disease) ASA score cohorts.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in complications, readmission, or reoperation rate based on ASA score. Increased ASA score was significantly associated with longer length of stay (low = 1.69 days, high = 1.98 days; p < .001) and higher rate of adverse discharge (low = 95.3 %, high = 87.4 %; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Higher ASA scores (3 and 4) were statically significantly associated with increased length of stay and non-home discharge disposition. These findings are valuable for physicians and patients to consider prior to TAA given the increased utilization of resources and cost associated with higher ASA scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Complications, Readmissions, and Reoperations in Outpatient vs Inpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has primarily been performed in the inpatient setting. However, with the advent of fast-tracked joint arthroplasty protocols, TAA has slowly been shifting to the outpatient setting. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate outcomes of outpatient TAA and compare them to inpatient TAA.

Methods

A literature search was performed on October 23, 2023, in the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on outcomes of outpatient TAA or compared outcomes between outpatient and inpatient TAA. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were calculated using a random effects model. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS criteria.

Results

12 studies were included, with 4 outpatient-only and 8 outpatient-inpatient comparative studies. Patients in the outpatient group were relatively younger, had a lower body mass index, and had fewer comorbidities relative to the inpatient group. For outpatient vs inpatient TAA, the pooled complication rate was 2.6% vs 3.6%, readmission rate was 2.5% vs 4%, and reoperation rate was 3.6% vs 5.5%. We found significantly lower odds of complications (OR = 0.47, CI: 0.26-0.85; P = .01), readmissions (OR = 0.63, CI: 0.54-0.74; P < .00001), and reoperations (OR = 0.66, CI: 0.46-0.95; P = .03) in the outpatient vs inpatient group.

Conclusion

Although this analysis is limited by the dominance of data included from a single study, we found that outpatient TAA was generally performed on lower-risk patients and was associated with lower rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared with inpatient TAA.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background

Joint replacement procedures have traditionally been performed in an inpatient setting to minimize complication rates. There is growing evidence that total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can safely be performed as an outpatient procedure, with the potential benefits of decreased health care expenses and improved patient satisfaction. Prior studies have not reliably made a distinction between outpatient TAA defined as length of stay <1 day and same-day discharge. The purpose of our study was to compare a large volume of same-day discharge and inpatient TAA for safety and efficacy.

Methods

Patients undergoing TAA at our US-based institution are part of an institutional review board-approved registry. We queried the registry for TAA performed by the single highest-volume surgeon at our institution between May 2020 and March 2022. Same-day discharge TAA was defined as discharge on the day of the procedure. Patient demographics, baseline clinical variables, concomitant procedures, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared after 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Multivariable models were created for comparison with the matched cohort outcome comparison analysis.

Results

Our same-day discharge group was younger (median 58 vs 67 years; P < .001), with proportionally fewer females (36.4% vs 51.4%; P = .044) and lower Charlson Comorbidity Indices (median 1 vs 3; P < .001) than the inpatient group. At a median follow-up of 1 year, after matching by age, sex, CCI, and ASA score, there was no difference in complications (P = .788), reoperations (P = .999), revisions (P = .118), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores between the 2 groups. Multivariable analyses performed demonstrated no evidence of association between undergoing same-day discharge TAA vs inpatient TAA and reoperation, revision, complication, or 1-year PROMIS scores (P > .05).

Conclusion

In our system of health care, with appropriate patient selection, same-day discharge following TAA can be a safe alternative to inpatient TAA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) as a Rising Alternative to Inpatient TAA: A Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can safely be performed as an outpatient procedure, with the benefit of decreased health care expenses and improved patient satisfaction. The purpose of our study was to compare readmissions, arthroplasty failures, infections, and annual trends between outpatient and inpatient TAA using a large publicly available for-fee database.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Database was queried to identify outpatient and inpatient TAA-associated claims for several payer types from January 2010 to October 2021. Preoperative patient characteristics and annual trends were compared for inpatient and outpatient TAA. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes were used to identify infections and arthroplasty failures. Complications rates were compared after matching patients by age, gender, and the following comorbidities: diabetes, smoking, congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN), obesity, and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RESULTS

A total of 12 274 patients were included in the final exact-matched analysis for complications, with 6137 patients in each group. Outpatients had a significantly lower rate of readmission within 90 days (2.6% vs 4.0%, P < .001), arthroplasty failure (4.1% vs 6.9%, P < .001), and infection (2.4% vs 3.1%, P = .015). Among database enrollees, outpatient TAA has risen in proportion to inpatient TAA from 2019 to 2021.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient TAA had lower rates of risk-adjusted readmission, arthroplasty failure, and infection compared to inpatient TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative database study.

Utilization, Complications, and Costs of Inpatient versus Outpatient Total Elbow Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although total hip and knee arthroplasty have largely moved to the outpatient setting, total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains a predominantly inpatient procedure. Currently, evidence on the safety and potential cost savings of outpatient TEA is limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the costs and complications associated with performing TEA in the inpatient versus outpatient setting.

METHODS

We identified patients who received elective TEA using the Truven Health MarketScan database. Outcomes of interest were 90-day complication rate, readmission rate, and procedure costs in the inpatient and outpatient settings. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis to assess how patient comorbidities and surgical setting influenced complications and readmission rates. The median cost per patient was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

We identified 307 outpatient and 414 inpatient TEA procedures over a 9-year period. Elixhauser comorbidity scores were higher for the inpatient cohort. The incidence of surgical complications was significantly higher in the inpatient than the outpatient cohort (27% vs 9%). The odds of 90-day readmissions were similar in the 2 groups (37% vs 25%). In terms of cost, the median inpatient TEA was more expensive than outpatient TEA ($26 817 vs $18 412). However, the median cost for occupational therapy within 90 days of surgery was higher for outpatient TEA patients ($687 vs $571).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that surgeons can consider a transition toward outpatient TEA for patients without significant comorbidities, as this will substantially reduce health care costs.

The Impact of Hospital Size and Teaching Status on Outcomes Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty

The popularity and utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) as treatment for ankle arthritis has increased exponentially from 1998 to 2012. Overall the outcomes have improved for TAA with the introduction of new-generation implants and this has increased the focus on optimizing other variables affecting outcomes for TAA. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of hospital characteristics and teaching status on outcomes for TAA. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2002 to 2012 using the ICD-9 procedure code for TAA. The primary outcomes evaluated included: in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges, discharge disposition, perioperative complications, and patient demographics. Analyses were carried out based on hospital size: small, medium, and large; and teaching status: rural nonteaching, urban nonteaching, and urban teaching. A total weighted national estimate of 16,621 discharges for patients undergoing TAA was reported over the 10-year period. There were significant differences in length of stay and total charges between all hospitals when comparing location and teaching status; however, no significant differences were noted for in-hospital mortality. Rural, nonteaching hospitals had higher odds of perioperative complications. There were also significant differences in length of stay and total charges when comparing hospital sizes. Overall, there is no increased risk of mortality after TAA regardless of hospital size or setting. However, rural hospitals had increased rates of perioperative complications compared to urban hospitals. Our analyses demonstrated important factors affecting cost and resource utilization for TAA, clearly additional work is needed to optimize this relationship, especially in the upcoming bundled payment models.

The Rise of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Use: A Database Analysis Describing Case Volumes and Incidence Trends in the United States Between 2009 and 2019

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthrodesis has been the mainstay treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. The popularity of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been on the rise due to improved implant design and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe the basic epidemiology and trends of annual procedure volumes and incidence in the general American population as well as in different population subgroups from 2009 to 2019. We hypothesize that the incidence of TAA has significantly risen while the median length of hospital stay has decreased nationwide.

METHODS

The IBM MarketScan database was queried for patients who underwent TAA from January 2009 to December 2019 based on Current Procedural Terminology coding. Population estimates from the US Census Bureau were used to calculate the annual incidence of TAA. Procedural volume and incidence were calculated for annual sums, gender, age subgroups, inpatient and outpatient TAA, as well as in four statistical geographic regions in the United States. Median length of hospital stay was calculated and trended annually for inpatient TAA.

RESULTS

A total of 41,060 primary TAAs were identified in the database from 2009 to 2019, in which 52.5% were performed in males. Annual volumes increased by 136.1%, from 2180 to 5147 procedures nationwide. Incidence reported per 100 000 population increased by 120.8%. Both inpatient and outpatient procedures have increased, by 242.5% and 86.6%, respectively. Median length of hospital stay decreased from 3 days in 2009 to 1 day in 2019 and did not differ between genders. Growth in incidence was demonstrated in males and females above the age of 54 years with the largest growth in annual incidence found between 65 and 74 years. Incidence rose in the South and West of the United States by 111.8% and 136.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that annual volumes and incidence rates of primary TAA has increased between 2009 and 2019. Although both inpatient and outpatient surgery have become more frequent, inpatient volumes and incidence have increased almost 3 times more than those of outpatient surgery. Length of hospital stay decreased over the study years. When adjusted for the same study period, the cumulative annual growth rates of TAA were found to be 2 times greater than total knee arthroplasty and 3.6 times greater than total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective database review.

Day case ankle arthroplasty: are they safe and cost effective? A single-centre case-control study

BACKGROUND

Most patients who have an ankle replacement in the United Kingdom stay in hospital for 2-4 days. This study looked at the safety & cost-effectiveness of a day case ankle replacement pathway.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study looking at day case pathway for ankle replacements set up in collaboration with anaesthetists, nurses and physiotherapists. Patients practiced mobilization with crutches before surgery. Patients were discharged home with enough analgesia, and reviewed within 2-5 days of discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty ankle replacements done between November 2017 and November 2019 were reviewed with a mean follow up of 38.4 months. None of these patients required to be readmitted within the first 28 days. No complications were related to the surgery being done as day case. Except one, all patients described the experience as excellent or good.

CONCLUSION

Per case the cost savings are estimated to be £880 in comparison to 20 matched inpatient ankle replacements. We conclude that ankle replacements can be safely carried out as day case with appropriate patient selection, pre-operative education and a multi-disciplinary approach.

Nationwide Analysis of Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis in Medicare Patients: Trends, Complications, and Cost

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of end-stage ankle arthritis consists of either ankle arthrodesis (AA) or total ankle replacement (TAR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate utilization trends in TAR and AA and compare cost and complications.

METHODS

Medicare patients with the diagnosis of ankle arthritis were reviewed. Patients undergoing surgical intervention were split into AA and TAR groups, which were evaluated for trends as well as postoperative complications, revision rates, and procedure cost.

RESULTS

A total of 673 789 patients were identified with ankle arthritis. A total of 19 120 patients underwent AA and 9059 underwent TAR. While rates of AA remained relatively constant, even decreasing, with 2080 performed in 2005 and 1823 performed in 2014, TAR rates nearly quadrupled. Average cost associated with TAR was $12559.12 compared with $6962.99 for AA (P < .001). Overall complication rates were 24.9% in the AA group with a 16.5% revision rate compared with 15.1% and 11.0%, respectively, in the TAR group (P < .001). Patients younger than 65 years had both higher complication and revision rates.

DISCUSSION

TAR has become an increasingly popular option for the management of end-stage ankle arthritis. In our study, TAR demonstrated both lower revision and complication rates than AA. However, TAR represents a more expensive treatment option.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Same-day discharge arthroplasty has a higher overall complications rate than fast-track arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Published studies have reported many inconsistent results regarding the comparison of same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and inpatient TJA. More notably, many recent studies comparing same-day discharge TJA with fast-track TJA presented higher rates of complications for same-day discharge TJA, which raises concerns about the safety of same-day discharge TJA.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to June 2020 for studies comparing mortality, readmission, and complications in same-day discharge and inpatient total hip or knee arthroplasty. Studies that used inpatient TJA as the control could be further divided into fast-track inpatient TJA (length of stay [LOS] ≤ 2 days) and traditional inpatient TJA (no restrictions on LOS). Relative risks were pooled to compare the outcomes of the same-day discharge group and the control group.

RESULTS

According to selection criteria and quality assessment, 14 studies including 222,766 cases were identified. There was no significant difference in the risk of mortality (RR = 1.42, CI [0.67, 3.01]) or readmission (RR = 0.93, CI [0.79, 1.10]) between same-day discharge TJA and inpatient TJA. Compared with fast-track TJA, the rate of overall complications in same-day discharge TJA was significantly higher (RR = 1.67, CI [1.45, 1.93]), while the rates of overall complications were similar between same-day discharge and traditional inpatient TJA (RR = 0.83, CI [0.67, 1.03]).

CONCLUSION

The overall safety of same-day discharge TJA is satisfactory; however, more complications were detected in same-day discharge TJA than that in fast-track TJA. Complications in same-day discharge TJA might be underestimated in some previous studies taking long-staying inpatient TJA as control. Being more cautious about complications is necessary in the care of same-day discharge TJA, and extensive prospective studies are needed to explore the optimized option that weighs both cost and complications.

Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts.

METHODS

The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use.

DISCUSSION

Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; systematic review.

The Safety Profile of Same-Day Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty

There has been significant change in the health care policy in the United States in recent years with an increasing focus on health care costs and patient satisfaction. One strategy of cost containment is to transition outpatient surgery away from high cost hospital environments. Total ankle arthroplasty has begun the evolution to outpatient settings; however, there is limited published literature on the results of outpatient total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The purpose of the present study was to review the safety profile of same day outpatient TAA at an ambulatory surgery center. A review of consecutive patients who underwent same day outpatient TAA for end-stage ankle arthritis with a minimum of 12 months' follow-up was performed. The primary outcomes assessed were the incidence of perioperative adverse medical events, hospital admissions related to the procedure, and postoperative complications (minor and major). Univariate analyses were performed. Fifty-one patients who underwent same-day TAA between June 2016 and July 2018 were included; mean follow-up was 20.7 months (± 7.6). The mean age at time of surgery was 56.5 years (± 7.2), with a mean body mass index of 30.4 (± 5.3). Overall, there were no perioperative adverse medical events or hospital admissions related to the procedure. Five minor complications (9.8%) and 7 major (13.7%) were recorded. Of the major complications, only 1 required TAA revision. Implant survivorship during the most recent follow-up was 98%. The present study suggests that TAA can be performed safely in an outpatient ambulatory setting. Additional comparative studies with larger TAA cohorts and patient reported outcomes are warranted.

Safety and Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a surgical procedure commonly reserved for patients suffering from symptomatic end-stage ankle arthritis. As the number of TAAs increases, so does the associated economic burden. Given these economic constraints, there has been interest in the feasibility of outpatient TAA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and satisfaction of patients undergoing outpatient TAA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient TAA from July 2018 to June 2019. Inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing a primary TAA in the outpatient setting. This was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery or within 12 hours of surgery. All surgeries were completed by a single experienced surgeon through an anterior approach using the Cadence Total Ankle System. Prior to surgery, all patients received a popliteal nerve block. Patients were then discharged home with oral analgesic and a popliteal nerve catheter, which they removed after 48 hours. The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain control, which was measured using a numeric scale. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. A review of the current literature was then completed to supplement our results.

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients were included in our analysis. In terms of the primary outcome, the average numeric scale score was 1.98, indicating excellent pain control. Additionally, nearly all 41 patients stated they were very satisfied with their postoperative pain control regimen. In terms of secondary outcomes, the majority of patients stated they were satisfied with discharge on the same day as surgery. There were no readmissions or major complications in our outpatient TAA cohort. When asked if they would recommend the care they experienced to a friend with the same condition, 95% of patients said that they would recommend this care pathway. Our literature review included 5 original studies, which were all retrospective level IV studies. These studies uniformly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of outpatient TAA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrate the outpatient TAA is associated with excellent pain control using a multidisciplinary pain approach. The use of standardized outpatient postoperative pathways was effective in preventing readmissions and complications, while still resulting in high patient satisfaction scores. A review of the literature complemented our results, as there are largely no significant differences between outpatient and inpatient TAA.Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Outpatient total ankle replacement

INTRODUCTION

Since the development of the last generation of implants total ankle replacements (TAR) is becoming more and more popular in patients and in specialized surgeon teams, the trend for outpatient surgery is growing, and protocols now are well established for hip or knee replacement. We adapted a protocol for outpatient TAR and hypothesized that it could be performed safely as standard procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients among 141 TAR were treated with our outpatient protocol relying on three fundamentals: bleed control, pain control, and autonomy. They received 1 g of tranexamic acid before surgery, and after discard from post-operative care unit, they were operated under long-lasting nerve block precociously relayed by oral NSAIDs and had an immediate full weight-bearing authorization at discharge.

RESULTS

No patients we readmitted for an acute care following TAR, especially for haematoma or uncontrolled pain. Mean VAS was < 1 before discharge from post-operative care unit and < 2 until day 90. One patient had a delayed wound healing treated surgically at day 30 without implant revision.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient TAR is possible and safe if a risk management process is used, and the three basic principles for outpatient procedures are respected: bleed control, pain control, and patient autonomy. We consider now this modality as a routine.

Complications Associated with Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Outpatient orthopedic surgery is gradually becoming the standard across the country, as it has been found to significantly lower costs without compromising patient care. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are largely what have made this transition possible by providing patients excellent pain control in the immediate postoperative period. However, with the increasing use of PNBs, it is important to recognize that they are not without complications. Although rare, these complications can cause patients a significant amount of morbidity. It is important for surgeons to know the risks of peripheral nerve blocks and to inform their patients.

Complication Rates Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Inpatient versus Outpatient Populations: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is used as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis for adults with severe ankle arthritis. Numerous orthopedic centers have entered the healthcare market offering fast-tracked joint replacement protocols, meanwhile, TAA has been excluded from these joint centers, and is primarily performed in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study is to examine short-term complications in the inpatient and outpatient settings following TAA using a systematic review and quantitative analysis. We considered all studies examining short-term complications following TAA performed in the inpatient versus outpatient setting occuring within 1 year of the index operation. We summarized data using a pooled relative risk and random effects model. A pooled sensitivity analysis was performed for studies with data on complication rates for inpatient or outpatient populations, which did not have a control group. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Nine studies were included in the quantitative analysis, with 4 studies in the final meta-analysis. Subjects undergoing inpatient surgery experienced a 5-times higher risk of short-term complications compared to the outpatient group (risk ratio 5.27, 95% confidence interval 3.31, 8.42). Results did not change after sensitivity analysis (inpatient weighted mean complication rate: 9.62% vs outpatient weighted mean 5.02%, p value <.001). The overall level of evidence of included studies was level III, with a moderate to high risk of bias. Outpatient TAAs do not appear to pose excess complication risks compared to inpatient procedures, and may therefore be a reasonable addition to experienced centers that have established a fast-track outpatient total joint protocol.

Overnight Admission After Total Ankle Replacement: Is It Safe?

To evaluate readmission, complication, and nonscheduled contact rates to the out-patient clinic within the first 3 months following total ankle replacement in patients planned for overnight admission. Data were collected retrospectively on all patients treated during the period the December 11, 2015 to the December 1, 2019 with 3 months of follow-up for all patients. In the study 116 patients were included. No difference in patient characteristics, readmission rates, complication rates or number of nonscheduled contacts to the outpatient clinic was found between patients discharged after 1 day when compared to those admitted >1 day. Around 58.6% was discharged as planned. The overall readmission and complication rates were 2.6% and 6.0% respectively, 20.7% had a nonscheduled contact to the out-patient clinic. No differences in prevalence of the different complications, reasons for readmission or reasons for contact to the out-patient clinic were found between overnight admission and inpatient admission. Total ankle placement with overnight admission is safe, but patient selection with a thorough plan for analgesics after discharge and optimal cast appliance is necessary.

Outpatient lower extremity fracture surgery: should we be concerned?

PURPOSE

With rising healthcare costs and insurance push against non-emergent hospital admission, lower extremity fracture treatment is shifting toward outpatient procedures over inpatient hospitalizations. This study compares outcomes for fractures treated as inpatient versus outpatient.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of lower extremity fracture patients. We collected demographics, injury information, hospital course, and complication data. Length of stay was categorized as "inpatient" and "outpatient" based a 24-h hospital stay cutoff. Data analysis included differences between cohorts with regards to readmissions and complications.

RESULTS

We identified 229 patients who met inclusion criteria. Inpatient versus outpatient status was predictive of in-hospital complications; however, inpatient versus outpatient status did not predict 1-year readmission.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient surgery is safe and effective. As the population increases and ages, low-risk surgeries should be considered for outpatient rather than inpatient stays to lower costs, save resources, and reduce complications.

Unplanned Emergency Visits and Admissions After Orthopaedic Ambulatory Surgery in the First 2 Years of Operation of a University Ambulatory Surgery Center

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgeries have increased in recent decades to help improve efficiency and cost; however, there is a potential need for unplanned postoperative admission, clinic visits, or evaluation in the emergency department (ED).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to determine the frequency, reasons, and factors influencing hospitalizations, return to clinic, and/or ED encounters within 24 hours of ambulatory surgery. The time frame for data collection was the first 2 years of operation of a university sports medicine ambulatory surgery center (ASC). We hypothesized that the percentage of encounters would be low and primarily because of pain or postoperative complication.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing ambulatory surgery at an ASC during the first 2 years of its operation (November 2016 to October 2018). Data including age, sex, Current Procedural Terminology code, procedure performed, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, body mass index, medical history, and tobacco use were collected. Patients seeking care in the ED, inpatient, or outpatient setting within the first 24 hours after surgery were identified and the reasons for these encounters were categorized into 1 of 3 groups: (1) medical complication, (2) postoperative pain, or (3) other postoperative complication. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors for these encounters.

RESULTS

A total of 4650 sports medicine procedures were performed at the university ASC during the study period. A total of 35 patients (0.75%) sought additional care within 24 hours of surgery. Medical complications were the primary reason for seeking care (n = 16; 45.7%). Patients who sought treatment within 24 hours of surgery tended to be older, had more medical comorbidities, and were more likely to have undergone upper extremity (particularly shoulder) procedures. In the multivariable analysis, patients with higher ASA scores were more likely to seek additional care (P < .005) and there was a trend toward increased risk of seeking additional care with upper extremity surgery (P = .077).

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic procedures performed in an ASC result in a relatively low percentage of patients seeking additional care within the first 24 hours after surgery, consistent with other reports in the literature. Upper extremity procedures, particularly those of the shoulder, may carry an increased risk of requiring medical treatment within 24 hours of surgery. Even in the first 2 years of operation of a university-based ASC, low rates of postoperative complications and unplanned admissions can be maintained.

Economic Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of Short-Stay Versus Inpatient Total Ankle Replacement Surgery

BACKGROUND

We aimed to perform an economic analysis and compare the clinical outcomes between inpatient and short-stay designation total ankle replacement (TAR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 178 consecutive patients undergoing primary inpatient versus short-stay designation TAR during the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. Patient demographics, concomitant procedures, perioperative complications, patient-reported outcomes, and perioperative costs were collected.

RESULTS

The mean age of our cohort was 62.5 ± 9.6 years (range, 30-88 years), with a significant difference in age (64.1 vs 58.5 years) (P = .005) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.3 ± 1.9 vs 2.3 ± 1.4; P = .002) for the inpatient and short-stay designation groups, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 29.6 ± 11.8 months (range, 12-52.3 months), there was no difference in complications between groups (P = .97). The inpatient designation TAR group had a worse baseline Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) function score (76.1; 95% CI, 70.5-81.6) than the short-stay designation TAR group (63.9; 95% CI, 52.5-75.3) while achieving similar final postoperative SMFA function scores for the inpatient (55.2; 95% CI, 51.1-59.2) and short-stay (56.2; 95% CI, 48.2-64.2) designation TAR groups (P > .05). However, the inpatient designation TAR group showed a significantly greater mean improvement in SMFA function score (20.9; 95% CI, 19.4-22.4) compared with the short-stay designation TAR group (7.7; 95% CI, 3.7-11.1) (P = .0442). The total direct cost was significantly higher for the inpatient designation group ($15 340) than the short-stay designation group ($13 002) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

While inpatient designation TARs were more comorbid, short-stay designation TARs were associated with a 15.5% reduction in perioperative costs, comparable complication rates, and similar final postoperative patient-reported outcome scores compared with inpatient TARs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Day-case pelvic osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip

PURPOSE

In this article we report the results of a pilot study analysing the implications of performing pelvic osteotomies for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) as a day case. We assess the advantages of performing paediatric pelvic osteotomies as day-case procedures from a financial perspective and from an in-patient bed resource point of view.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study analysing Salter and Pemberton pelvic osteotomies performed for DDH over a three-year period from 1st January 2017 to 30th September 2019. All patients residing within 50 km of the hospital were eligible for day-case procedures. All other cases were performed as in-patients. A detailed financial costing analysis was performed and the in-patient resources utilized were documented and compared between the two models of care.

RESULTS

In total, 84 Salter and Pemberton osteotomies were performed between 1st January 2017 to 30th September 2019. Of these cases, 35 were performed as day-case procedures. A total reduction in 70 in-patient bed days was reported. Total costs for a single in-patient requiring two nights of admission amounted to €5,752, whereas the discharge cost of a day case was reported at €2,670. The savings made by our institution amounted to €3,082 per day case. A total saving of €102,696 was made over three years. In all, seven day-case patients re-attended due to inadequate pain control. They required overnight admission and were discharged uneventfully the following day.

CONCLUSION

Day-case pelvic osteotomies significantly reduce the number of in-patient bed days used in an elective paediatric orthopaedic setting. Significant financial savings in excess of €3,000 per case are possible. The introduction of day-case pelvic osteotomy procedures can significantly improve the cost-effectiveness of managing DDH provided there are clear protocols in place with close clinical follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A propensity score-matched analysis comparing outpatient and short-stay hospitalization to standard inpatient hospitalization following total ankle arthroplasty

Background

Given the trend toward value-based care, there has been increased interest in minimizing hospital length of stay (LOS) after orthopedic procedures. Outpatient total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become more popular in recent years; however, research on surgical outcomes of this procedure has been limited. This study sought to employ large sample, propensity score-matched analyses to assess the safety of outpatient and short-stay discharge pathways following TAA.

Methods

The ACS NSQIP database was used to identify 1141 patients who underwent primary and revision TAA between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was used to match patients based on several factors, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and several comorbidities. The incidence of various 30-day complications was compared between the short and standard LOS groups to assess for any differences in short-term outcomes.

Results

A total of 892 patients were included in the final propensity score-matched analysis, with 446 patients in each group. The short LOS group had a significantly lower rate of medical complications (0.2% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.006) and non-home discharge (1.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in operative complications (0.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.107), unplanned readmission (0.4% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.451), reoperation (0.2% vs. 0.4%, p > 0.999), return to the OR (0.2% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.374), or mortality (0.7% vs. 0.0%, p > 0.249) between the short and standard LOS groups.

Conclusions

Outpatient and short-stay hospitalization had comparable safety to standard inpatient hospitalization after TAA. Outpatient or short-stay TAA should be considered for patients with low risk of short-term complications.

Incidence and predictors of early complications following primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) offers an effective option for end-stage osteoarthritis. The incidence and preoperative risk factors for early adverse events (AEs) following primary and revision TAA may be useful information for providers.

METHODS

A large database was queried from 2010 to 2016 to identify 905 patients of whom 818 underwent primary TAA (90.4%) and 87 underwent revision TAA (9.6%). Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital length of stay were analyzed as risk factors for reported 30-day AEs.

RESULTS

The overall AE rate was 5.5% (50/905) for the entire cohort. AEs occurred more frequently for revision TAA (9/87) than primary TAA (41/818) cases (OR 2.43, p=0.022). Age (OR 1.03, p=0.045), BMI (OR 1.04, p=0.046), and revision TAA (OR 2.56, p=0.002) were independent risk factors for 30-day AEs in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, higher BMI, and revision cases are associated with a higher risk of AEs.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Concepts and Application to Total Shoulder Replacement

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) focuses on optimizing each element on a treatment pathway and encouraging the patient to actively engage in his or her recovery and rehabilitation. It requires collaboration across a multidisciplinary team and has been successful in improving patient outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and costs for a wide range of surgical procedures, including musculoskeletal surgeries such as total hip and total knee replacement.

PURPOSE

To examine the application of ERAS concepts to total shoulder replacement (TSR) surgery.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England on LOS for TSR surgery were examined, and a review of literature on the use of ERAS concepts in TSR was undertaken.

RESULTS

Analysis of HES data suggested scope for improvement in reducing LOS. A review of the literature found some evidence of the use of ERAS concepts, particularly in multimodal pain management.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research is now required for ERAS procedure-specific components for TSR surgery.

Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Ambulatory Setting: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction is a common problem that may be definitively treated with the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). The preponderance of available data on IPP surgery derives from institutional studies, most notably from academic centers or large single-surgeon series, where the majority of procedures are performed in a hospital setting. Because insurance companies and health systems look to reduce health care costs, IPP surgery in outpatient freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) is becoming more prevalent.

AIM

To review the utility of surgery in an ASC setting and to explore its role in the modern practice of urology, focusing on IPP implantation.

METHODS

A critical review was performed of the literature on ambulatory surgery, with specific focus on IPP surgery, using the PubMed database. Key search terms and phrases included erectile dysfunction, penile prosthesis, ambulatory surgery, ambulatory surgery center, outpatient surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measure was the use of IPP implantation in an ASC.

RESULTS

In contemporary surgical practice, the implementation of ambulatory surgery in free-standing centers is increasing. The principal benefits include reducing cost and improving efficiency. Studies on the modern use of IPPs support the prospect of implantation in an ambulatory setting, which can achieve similar outcomes to surgeries classically performed in the inpatient hospital setting. Novel approaches to anesthesia, surgical, and nursing care have revolutionized IPP surgery so that it can now be safely and effectively performed in the ambulatory setting.

CONCLUSION

The role of ambulatory IPP implantation has increased, with the majority of cases being performed outside the hospital. Although there will always be a need for hospital-based surgery, such as significant medical comorbidities, more studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of ambulatory surgery are needed. For those men who would otherwise be candidates for ambulatory surgery but whose insurance mandates hospital-based treatment, such studies proving utility, safety, and reduced cost could inspire policy change and broaden the ambulatory practice of IPP surgery. Segal RL, Siegelbaum MH, Lerner BD, et al. Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Ambulatory Setting: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:338-347.

Can the introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduce the variation in length of stay after total ankle replacement surgery?

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been successfully adopted across a range of procedures. This study explores whether there is scope to improve length of stay (LOS) for total ankle replacement surgery (TAR) in the UK by implementing ERAS pathways.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data (April 2015/March 2016) on LOS for TAR were analysed. A literature search was then carried out to examine whether there were any publications on outpatient TAR and/or the use of ERAS protocols.

RESULTS

Mean observed LOS was 3.3days (range 0-17.3) days. Case mix-adjusted expected LOS range was 2.0-5.7 days. It is likely that the wide observed LOS range is due to differences in local processes and pathways. Two papers were found by the literature search.

CONCLUSIONS

TAR should aim to be outpatient surgery as the literature, and data demonstrating scope for improvement in LOS, suggest this should be possible.

Quality Measures in Foot and Ankle Care

BACKGROUND

Quality measures may be operationalized in payment models or quality reporting programs to assess foot and ankle surgeons, but if existing measures allow accurate representation of a foot and ankle surgeon's practice is unclear.

METHODS

National quality measures databases, clinical guidelines, and MEDLINE/PubMed were systematically reviewed for quality measures relevant to foot and ankle care. Measures meeting internal criteria were categorized by clinical diagnosis, National Quality Strategy priority, and Donabedian domain.

RESULTS

Of 12 quality measures and 16 candidate measures, National Quality Strategy priorities most commonly addressed "Effective Clinical Care" (n = 19) and "Communication and Coordination of Care" (n = 6). Donabedian classifications addressed were process (n = 25) and outcome (n = 3). Diabetic foot care was most commonly addressed (n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Available foot and ankle quality measures are limited in number and scope, which may hinder appropriate assessment of care, analysis of trends, and quality improvement. Additional measures are needed to support the transition to a value-based system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Patient and Practice Trends in Total Ankle Replacement and Tibiotalar Arthrodesis in the United States From 2007 to 2013

INTRODUCTION

Both total ankle replacement (TAR) and tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA) are used in the surgical management of ankle arthritis. Over the past decade, TAR instrumentation, techniques, and implants have improved, making the procedure more reliable and reproducible, thus making TAR more common.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2013 was used to obtain data on patients elder than 50 years who underwent either TAR or TTA. Differences in temporal, demographic, and diagnosis trends between TAR and TTA were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2013, 15,060 patients underwent TAR and 35,096 underwent TTA. Patients undergoing TTA had significantly more comorbidities (2.17 versus 1.55; P < 0.001). The share of TAR performed increased significantly from 2007 (14%) to 2013 (45%) (P < 0.001). From 2007 to 2013, we found a 12-fold increase in the odds of having a TAR for patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis (P < 0.001), a 4.9-fold increase for those with primary osteoarthritis, and a 3.1-fold increase for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past decade, the frequency of TAR has increased, particularly in patients with posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis. Surgeons still perform TAR in healthier patients compared with TTA; however, because surgeons become more experienced with the technique, patients are undergoing TAR at a markedly higher rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: retrospective comparative study.

Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Postoperative Complications in Outpatient Versus Inpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Database Study

Ankle arthritis is a potentially debilitating disease, with approximately 50,000 cases diagnosed annually. One treatment option for these patients is total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). This procedure has historically been performed in the inpatient setting with a 1-2-night postoperative hospital stay. Outpatient surgeries are gaining popularity due to their cost effectiveness, decreased length of hospital stay, and convenience. Therefore it is important to evaluate the safety of specific procedures in the outpatient setting compared with the inpatient setting. This study evaluated the complication rates in inpatient versus outpatient TAA. It analyzed data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 591 patients who received TAA. Postoperative complication rates were compared between 66 outpatients and 535 inpatients. Frequencies of the following complications were analyzed: wound complications, pneumonia, hematologic complications (pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis), renal failure, stroke, and return to the operating room within 30 days. Unadjusted direct comparisons of the cohorts revealed higher complication rates in the inpatient cohort. Inpatients had higher rates of superficial surgical site infections, deep surgical site infections, number of organ/space surgical site infections, pneumonia occurrences, and return to the operating room, but these differences were not significant. These results showed no significant increase in complication rates in outpatients compared to inpatients. Our results suggest that inpatient and outpatient TAA show similar complication rates. This suggests that outpatient TAA is safe and may be a superior option for certain populations. Further investigation is warranted to verify these conclusions.

Optimizing Outpatient Total Ankle Replacement from Clinic to Pain Management

Outpatient total ankle arthroplasty is a potential significant source of cost savings. The ability to institute an effective outpatient total ankle program depends on appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience with total ankle replacement, addressing preoperative patient expectations, the involvement of an experienced multidisciplinary care team including experienced anesthesiologists, nurse navigators, recovery room nursing staff and physical therapists, and most importantly, such a program requires complete institutional logistical support.

Combined Popliteal Catheter With Single-Injection vs Continuous-Infusion Saphenous Nerve Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

The increasing scope and complexity of foot and ankle procedures performed in an outpatient setting require more intensive perioperative analgesia. Regional anesthesia (popliteal and saphenous nerve blocks) has been proven to provide satisfactory pain management, decreased postoperative opioid use, and earlier patient discharge. This can be further augmented with the placement of a continuous-flow catheter, typically inserted into the popliteal nerve region. This study investigated the use of a combined popliteal and saphenous continuous-flow catheter nerve block compared to a single popliteal catheter and single-injection saphenous nerve block in postoperative pain management after ambulatory foot and ankle surgery.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted using 60 patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery performed in an outpatient setting. Demographic data, degree of medial operative involvement, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification system, anesthesia time, and postanesthesia care unit time were recorded. Outcome measures included pain satisfaction, numeric pain scores (NPS) at rest and with activity, and opioid intake. Patients were also classified by degree of saphenous nerve involvement in the operative procedure, by the surgeon who was blinded to the anesthesia randomization.

RESULTS

Patients in the dual-catheter group took significantly less opioid medication on the day of surgery and postoperative day 1 (POD 1) compared to the single-catheter group ( P = .02). The dual-catheter group reported significantly greater satisfaction with pain at POD 1 and POD 3 and a significantly lower NPS at POD 1, 2, and 3. This trend was observed in all 3 subgroups of medial operative involvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the single-catheter group reported more pain, less satisfaction with pain control, and increased opioid use on POD 1, suggesting dual-catheter use was superior to single-injection nerve blocks with regard to managing early postoperative pain in outpatient foot and ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Pain Management After Outpatient Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

The number of opioids prescribed and used has increased precipitously over the past 2 decades for a number of reasons and has led to increases in long-term dependency, opioid-related deaths, and diversion. Most studies examining the role of prescribing habits have investigated nonoperative providers, although there is some literature describing perioperative opioid prescription and use. There are no studies looking at the number of pills consumed after outpatient foot and ankle surgeries, nor are there guidelines for how many pills providers should prescribe. The purpose of this study was to quantify the number of narcotic pills taken by opioid-naïve patients undergoing outpatient foot and ankle surgeries with regional anesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients underwent outpatient foot and ankle surgeries under spinal blockade and long-acting popliteal blocks. Patients were given 40 or 60 narcotic pills, a 3-day supply of ibuprofen, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and antiemetics. Patients received surveys at postoperative day (POD) 3, 7, 14, and 56 documenting if they were still taking narcotics, the quantity of pills consumed, whether refills were obtained, their pain level, and their reason for stopping opioids.

RESULTS

Patients consumed a mean of 22.5 pills, with a 95% confidence interval from 18 to 27 pills. Numerical Rating Scale pain scores started at 4 on POD 3 and decreased to 1.8 by POD 56. The percentage of patients still taking narcotics decreased from 55% on POD 3 to 2.8% by POD 56. Five new prescriptions were given during the study, with 3 being due to side effects from the original medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving regional anesthesia for outpatient foot and ankle surgeries reported progressively lower pain scores with low narcotic use up to 56 days postoperatively. We suggest that providers consider prescribing 30 pills as the benchmark for this patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

A Review of Perioperative Complications of Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is commonly pursued for patients with painful arthritis. Outpatient TAA are increasingly common and have been shown to decrease costs compared to inpatient surgery. However, there are very few studies examining the safety of outpatient TAA. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 65 consecutive patients who received outpatient TAA to identify complication rates.

METHODS

The medical records of 65 consecutive outpatient TAA from October 2012 to May 2016 with a minimum 6-month follow-up were reviewed. All patients received popliteal and saphenous blocks prior to surgery and were managed with oral pain medication postoperatively. All received a STAR total ankle. Demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and perioperative complications including wound breakdown, infection, revision, and nonrevision surgeries were observed. Mean follow-up was 16.6 ± 9.1 months (range, 6-42 months).

RESULTS

There were no readmissions for pain control and 1 patient had a wound infection. The overall complication rate was 15.4%. One ankle (1.5%) had a wound breakdown requiring debridement and flap coverage. This patient thrombosed a popliteal artery stent 1 month postop. The 1 ankle (1.5%) with a wound infection occurred in a patient with diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and rheumatoid arthritis.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the safety of outpatient TAA. The combination of regional anesthesia and oral narcotics provided a satisfactory experience with no readmissions for pain control and 1 wound infection. The 1 wound breakdown complication (1.5%) was attributed to arterial occlusion and not outpatient management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Outpatient Management of Ankle Fractures

Interest in outpatient orthopedic surgery has been fueled by provider desire to control costs and development of rapid recovery protocols. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a commonly elected treatment strategy for ankle fracture that may be performed in an outpatient setting. Lessons on cost-savings of the outpatient model in orthopedics can be learned in total joint replacement and spine surgery. Moreover, in properly selected patients, outpatient ORIF has been shown to be comparably safe. Reasons for admission of the surgically managed patient with ankle fractures, including concern for surgical delay and additional social factors, warrant further investigation.

Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy can be successfully performed for uncomplicated appendicitis: A Southwestern Surgical Congress multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Many laparoscopic procedures are now performed on an outpatient basis. We hypothesize laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure.

METHODS

Seven institutions adopted a previously described outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy protocol for uncomplicated appendicitis. Patients were dismissed unless there was a clinical indication for admission. Patient demographics, success with outpatient management, time of dismissal, morbidity, and readmissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred six men and one hundred seventy women with a mean age of 35.4 years were included in the protocol. Seventy-eight patients (21%) had pre-existing comorbidities. 299 patients (80%) were managed as outpatients. There were no conversions to open appendectomy. Postoperative morbidity was 5%. The time of patient dismissals was evenly distributed throughout the day and night. Twelve patients (3%) required readmission. Outpatient follow-up occurred in 63% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

An outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy protocol was successfully applied at multiple institutions with low morbidity and low readmission rates. Application of this practice nationally could reduce length of stay and decrease overall health care costs for acute appendicitis.