Evaluation of Hindfoot Alignment After Fixed- and Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Prostheses

Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement with Preoperative Varus Deformity

Historically, coronal plane deformities of greater than 10° to 15° have been deemed contraindications for total ankle replacement (TAR). However, recent studies show satisfactory results in TAR with severe preoperative varus deformity. When correctly applying ancillary procedures, preoperative varus deformity can be structurally corrected, resulting in similar clinical scores to those obtained with "regular TAR." However, complications and revisions appear to increase with increasing deformity. Unfortunately, results of TAR in varus ankles consist of heterogeneous data (eg, with regards to prosthetic brands, bearing-types, duration of follow-up, and ancillary procedures) precluding strict conclusions. This could be solved by an international consensus group.

Current Trends in Total Ankle Replacement

Ankle arthritis can result in significant pain and restriction in range of motion. Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a motion-preserving surgical option used as an alternative to total ankle arthrodesis to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. There are several generations of TAR techniques based on component design, implant material, and surgical technique. With more recent TAR implants, an attempt is made to minimize bone resection and mirror the native anatomy. There are more than 20 implant devices currently available. Implant survivorship varies among prosthesis types and generations, with improved outcomes reported with use of the more recent third- and fourth-generation ankle implants. Pre- and postoperative assessments of TAR are primarily performed by using weight-bearing radiography, with weight-bearing CT emerging as an additional imaging tool. Preoperative assessments include those of the tibiotalar angle, offset, and adjacent areas of arthritis requiring additional surgical procedures. US, nuclear medicine studies, and MRI can be used to troubleshoot complications. Effective radiologic assessment requires an understanding of the component design and corresponding normal perioperative imaging features of ankle implants, as well as recognition of common and device-specific complications. General complications seen at radiography include aseptic loosening, osteolysis, hardware subsidence, periprosthetic fracture, infection, gutter impingement, heterotopic ossification, and syndesmotic nonunion. The authors review several recent generations of TAR implants commonly used in the United States, normal pre- and postoperative imaging assessment, and imaging complications of TAR. Indications for advanced imaging of TAR are also reviewed. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Developing a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A scoping review and report from the OMERACT 2022 foot and ankle special interest group session

OBJECTIVES

Foot and ankle involvement is common in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, yet high-quality evidence assessing the effectiveness of treatments for these disorders is lacking. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Foot and Ankle Working Group is developing a core outcome set for use in clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in this area.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed to identify outcome domains in the existing literature. Clinical trials and observational studies comparing pharmacological, conservative or surgical interventions involving adult participants with any foot or ankle disorder in the following rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) were eligible for inclusion: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthropathies, crystal arthropathies and connective tissue diseases. Outcome domains were categorised according to the OMERACT Filter 2.1.

RESULTS

Outcome domains were extracted from 150 eligible studies. Most studies included participants with foot/ankle OA (63% of studies) or foot/ankle involvement in RA (29% of studies). Foot/ankle pain was the outcome domain most commonly measured (78% of studies), being the most frequently specified outcome domain across all RMDs. There was considerable heterogeneity in the other outcome domains measured, across core areas of manifestations (signs, symptoms, biomarkers), life impact, and societal/resource use. The group's progress to date, including findings from the scoping review, was presented and discussed during a virtual OMERACT Special Interest Group (SIG) in October 2022. During this meeting, feedback was sought amongst delegates regarding the scope of the core outcome set, and feedback was received on the next steps of the project, including focus group and Delphi methods.

CONCLUSION

Findings from the scoping review and feedback from the SIG will contribute to the development of a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in RMDs. The next steps are to determine which outcome domains are important to patients, followed by a Delphi exercise with key stakeholders to prioritise outcome domains.

Definitions and Measurements of Hindfoot Alignment and Their Biomechanical and Clinical Implications

This article presents a critical review of the past and the current state of the art in defining and measuring hindfoot, ankle, and subtalar alignment. It describes the transition occurring at present from two-dimensional to three-dimensional (3D) alignment measurements, which accompany the emergence of new, functional, high-resolution imaging modalities such as the weight-bearing cone-beam computerized tomography (CT) imaging. To ease and enhance the transition and acceptability of 3D alignment measurements, new acceptable standards for different clinical application are highly desirable.

Medial malleolar osteotomy for the correction of tibiotalar varus deformity during total ankle arthroplasty: Results in 95 ankles

BACKGROUND

The importance of deformity correction before or during total ankle replacement (TAR) has been recognized for a long time. Our results of TAR, combined with medial malleolar lengthening osteotomy, for the reconstruction of osteoarthritic ankles with varus deformity are hereby reported.

METHODS

All ankles in which a medial malleolar osteotomy was performed during implantation of an ankle prosthesis during the period 1998-2018 were filtered out of our database. Preoperative coronal talar alignment was evaluated by measuring the angle between the tibial shaft and talar dome on the weightbearing mortise ankle radiograph. Patient-reported outcomes were measured with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed and the number of revisions per 100 observed component years was calculated for interprosthetic comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 95 TARs were included, consisting of the Alpha Ankle Arthroplasty (n = 22); Buechel-Pappas (n = 14) and the Ceramic Coated Implant Evolution (n = 59) prostheses. The preoperative average talar angle in these ankles was 12.4 degrees varus. In 33% (31/95) corrective procedures, in addition to the medial malleolar osteotomy, were performed. A reoperation rate of 44% (42/95) was found, including 28 revisions (revision rate 29% (4% septic; 25% aseptic) at an average follow-up of 5.9 years, resulting in a survival of 0.69 for the total cohort at 10 years of follow-up. At an average follow-up of 6.6 years the average FAOS scores were: FAOS_symptoms 66, FAOS_pain 73, FAOS_function 78, FAOS_sport 45 and FAOS_{quality of life} 56 respectively. The FAAM_adl score averaged 64.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cohort of TAR combined with medial malleolar osteotomy to date. A 29% revision rate at 5.9 years of average follow-up compares unfavorably with regular cohort studies and with most other results in varus-deformed ankles. Scores on the FAOS and FAAM are comparable to those obtained in regular cohorts with similar length of follow-up. TAR in varus-deformed ankles necessitating medial malleolar osteotomy has an even higher failure rate than regular TAR. Obtaining a stable prosthesis with a neutrally-aligned hindfoot at the end of the procedure is of paramount importance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The motion between components in a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement measured by cone-beam CT scanning

BACKGROUND

To measure the motion of polyethylene insert and implant components of mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) by cone-beam CT scanning.

METHODS

10 TAR patients with high amount of clinical motion after the CCI implant (Ceramic Coated Implant; Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) with average age at operation 64,3 years (range 47-84) and average clinical total range of motion 42 degrees (range 35-55) were included.

RESULTS

The average total range of motion between the insert and the tibial component was 0.8mm (range 0-2) in the coronal plane, and 2.9mm (range 1-6) in the sagittal plane. There was wide variation in the axial rotation measurements between the components.

CONCLUSION

We found measurable motion between the mobile-bearing insert and the tibial component in all planes. The relevance of this motion to the function and long-term survival of the TAR remains to be determined.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty With Valgus Deformity

BACKGROUND

A substantial coronal plane deformity is common in the context of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Recent literature shows a trend toward extending the indication of total ankle arthroplasty in increasingly severe coronal deformities, showing promising results when correct alignment is achieved. Nevertheless, the results of lateral transfibular total ankle replacement (LTTAR) in valgus has not been extensively studied. We aimed to evaluate if the outcomes of LTTAR in ankles with valgus deformity were similar to those with no major deformity at short-term follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 228 LTTARs. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the preoperative coronal plane tibiotalar angle (TTS): neutral (less than 10 degrees of coronal deformity, 209 patients) and valgus (above 10 degrees of valgus, 19 patients). Clinical evaluation was performed using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analog scale (VAS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) regarding its Physical and Mental Component Summary items. The radiographic evaluation considered anteroposterior and lateral ankle radiographs. Complications were also registered and classified as major or minor. The minimum follow-up was 2 years.

RESULTS

The average AOFAS, VAS, and SF-12 scores improved significantly postoperatively (P < .001), without differences between groups. At final radiographic follow-up, the valgus alignment group did not show significant differences with the neutral alignment group regarding TTS, lateral distal tibial angle, or anterior distal tibial angle (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

LTTAR in cases with valgus deformity achieved and maintained correction at short-term follow-up, as obtained in neutral alignment ankles. Clinical outcomes improved significantly regardless of preoperative valgus deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III, retrospective cohort study.