Correlation of Different Methods of Measuring Pronation of the First Metatarsal on Weightbearing CT Scans

Trends in the Use of Weightbearing Computed Tomography

Background: This review aimed to critically appraise the most recent orthopedic literature around cone beam weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), summarizing what evidence has been provided so far and identifying the main research trends in the area. Methods: This scoping review was performed on studies published between January 2013 and December 2023 on the Pubmed database. All studies (both clinical and nonclinical) in which WBCT had been used were critically analyzed to extract the aim (or aims) of the study, and the main findings related to the role of this imaging modality in the diagnostic pathway. Results: Out of 1759 studies, 129 were selected. One hundred five manuscripts (81%) dealt with elective orthopedic conditions. The majority of the analyses (88 studies; 84%) were performed on foot and ankle conditions, while 13 (12%) studies looked at knee pathologies. There was a progressive increase in the number of studies published over the years. Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (22 studies; 25%) and Hallux Valgus (19 studies; 21%) were frequent subjects. Twenty-four (19%) manuscripts dealt with traumatic conditions. A particular interest in syndesmotic injuries was documented (12 studies; 60%). Conclusions: In this review, we documented an increasing interest in clinical applications of weightbearing CT in the orthopedic field between 2013 and 2023. The majority of the analyses focused on conditions related to the foot and the ankle; however, we found several works investigating the value of WBCT on other joints (in particular, the knee).

Preoperative Degenerative Changes at the Tibial Sesamoid-Metatarsal Joint in Hallux Valgus: Association With Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes After Modified Lapidus Procedure

Background

Degenerative changes at the sesamoid-metatarsal joints (SMJs) may be a source of pain following hallux valgus surgery. The aims of this study were to describe degenerative changes at the SMJs on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans and, secondarily, investigate their association with 1-year patient-reported outcome scores following a modified Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus. We hypothesized that reduced joint space in the SMJs would correlate with worse patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

Fifty-seven hallux valgus patients who underwent a modified Lapidus procedure had preoperative and minimum 5-month postoperative WBCT scans, and preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference, and pain intensity scores were included. Degenerative changes at the SMJs were measured using distance mapping between the sesamoids and first metatarsal head on preoperative and postoperative WBCT scans. The minimum and average distances between the first metatarsal head and tibial sesamoid (tibial-SMJ) for each patient preoperatively and postoperatively were measured. Sesamoid station was measured on WBCT scans using a 0 to 3 grading system. Linear regression was used to investigate the correlations between minimum preoperative and postoperative tibial-SMJ distances and 1-year postoperative PROMIS scores.

Results

The median minimum and average tibial-SMJ distances increased from 0.82 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0.40-1.03 mm) and 1.62 mm (IQR 1.37-1.75 mm) preoperative to 1.09 mm (IQR 0.96-1.23 mm) and 1.73 mm (IQR 1.60-1.91 mm) postoperative (P < .001 and P < .001), respectively. In a subset of patients with complete sesamoid reduction, we found an association between preoperative minimum tibial-SMJ distance and 1-year postoperative PROMIS PF scores (coefficient 7.2, P = .02).

Conclusion

Following the modified Lapidus procedure, there was a statistically significant increase in the tibial-SMJ distance. Additionally, in patients with reduced sesamoids postoperatively, reduced preoperative tibial-SMJ distance correlated with worse PROMIS PF scores.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Diagnostic applications and benefits of weightbearing CT in the foot and ankle: A systematic review of clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Foot and ankle weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging has emerged over the past decade. However, a systematic review of diagnostic applications has not been conducted so far.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines after Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration. Studies analyzing diagnostic applications of WBCT were included. Main exclusion criteria were: cadaveric specimens and simulated WBCT. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 78 studies were eligible for review. Diagnostic applications were identified in following anatomical area's: ankle (n = 14); hindfoot (n = 41); midfoot (n = 4); forefoot (n = 19). Diagnostic applications that could not be used on weightbearing radiographs (WBRX) were reported in 56/78 studies. The mean MINORS was 9.8/24 (range: 8-12).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic applications of WBCT were most frequent in the hindfoot, but other areas are on the rise. Post-processing of images was the main benefit compared to WBRX based on a moderate quality of the identified studies.

Distribution, prevalence, and impact on the metatarsosesamoid complex of first metatarsal pronation in hallux valgus

BACKGROUND

Previous simulated weight-bearing CT (WBCT) studies classifying first metatarsal (M1) pronation suggested a high prevalence of M1 hyper-pronation in hallux valgus (HV). These findings have prompted a marked increase in M1 supination in HV surgical correction. No subsequent study confirms these M1 pronation values, and two recent WBCT investigations suggest lower normative M1 pronation values. The objectives of our WBCT study were to (1) determine M1 pronation distribution in HV, (2) define the hyperpronation prevalence compared to preexisting normative values, and (3) assess the relationship of M1 pronation to the metatarso-sesamoid complex. We hypothesized that the M1 head pronation distribution would be high in HV.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 88 consecutive feet with HV in our WBCT dataset and measured M1 pronation with the Metatarsal Pronation (MPA) and α angles. Similarly, using two previously published methods defining the pathologic pronation threshold, we assessed our cohort's M1 hyper-pronation prevalence, specifically (1) the upper value of the 95% confidence interval (CI95) and (2) adding two standard deviations at the mean normative value (2 SD). Sesamoid station (grading) was assessed on the coronal plane.

RESULTS

The mean MPA was 11.4+/-7.4 degrees and the α angle was 16.2+/-7.4 degrees. According to the CI95 method, 69/88 HV (78.4%) were hyperpronated using the MPA, and 81/88 HV (92%) using the α angle. According to the 2 SD method, 17/88 HV (19.3%) were hyperpronated using the MPA, and 20/88 HV (22.7%) using the α angle. There was a significant difference in MPA among sesamoid gradings (p = 0.025), with a paradoxical decrease in MPA when metatarsosesamoid subluxation was increased.

CONCLUSION

M1 head pronation distribution in HV was higher than in normative values, but threshold change demonstrated contradictory hyper-pronation prevalences (85% to 20%), calling into question the previously reported high prevalence of M1 hyper-pronation in HV. An increase in sesamoid subluxation was associated with a paradoxical decrease in M1 head pronation in our study. We suggest that a greater understanding of the impact of HV M1 pronation is warranted before routine M1 surgical supination is recommended for patients with HV.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Sesamoid View Weightbearing Radiography vs Weightbearing Computed Tomography in the Measurement of Metatarsal Pronation Angle

BACKGROUND

First metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) is increasingly relevant in the management of hallux valgus and is assessed on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and sesamoid-view weightbearing radiography (WBR). The purpose of this study is to compare MPA measured by WBCT against WBR to determine if any systematic discrepancy in MPA measurement exists between the 2 modalities.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with 55 feet were included for study. MPA was measured in all patients by 2 independent readers on both WBCT and WBR with an appropriate washout period between measurement modalities. Mean MPA by WBCT and WBR were analyzed; interobserver reliability was calculated with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value.

RESULTS

Mean MPA as measured by WBCT was 3.7 ± 7.9 degrees (95% CI, 1.6-5.9; range -11.7 to 20.5). Mean MPA measured on WBR was 3.6 ± 8.4 degrees, (95% CI, 1.4-5.8; range -12.6 to 21.4). There was no difference in MPA as measured by WBCT compared to WBR (P = .529). Interobserver reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.994 for WBCT and 0.986 for WBR.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of first MPA by WBCT and WBR was not significantly different. In our cohort of patients with and without forefoot pathology, we found that either sesamoid view weightbearing radiographs or weightbearing CT can be used reliably to measure first MPA and will generate similar values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature

Weight bearing CT (WBCT) of the lower extremity is gaining momentum in evaluation of the foot/ankle and knee. A growing number of international studies use WBCT, which is promising for improving our understanding of anatomy and biomechanics during natural loading of the lower extremity. However, we believe there is risk of excessive enthusiasm for WBCT leading to premature application of the technique, before sufficiently robust protocols are in place e.g. standardised limb positioning and imaging planes, choice of anatomical landmarks and image slices used for individual measurements. Lack of standardisation could limit benefits from introducing WBCT in research and clinical practice because useful imaging information could become obscured. Measurements of bones and joints on WBCT are influenced by joint positioning and magnitude of loading, factors that need to be considered within a 3-D coordinate system. A proportion of WBCT studies examine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for different radiological measurements in the knee or foot with reproducibility generally reported to be high. However, investigations of test-retest reproducibility are still lacking. Thus, the current ability to evaluate, e.g. the effects of surgery or structural disease progression, is questionable. This paper presents an overview of the relevant literature on WBCT in the lower extremity with an emphasis on factors that may affect measurement reproducibility in the foot/ankle and knee. We discuss the caveats of performing WBCT without consensus on imaging procedures and measurements.

Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform Fixation

Background:

The modified Lapidus procedure (first metatarso-cuneiform fusion) is a powerful technique for correcting triplanar deformity in hallux valgus. Although traditionally fixed with cross-screws (CS), growing awareness of intercuneiform stability and pronation deformity has led to fixation using a plate and first metatarsal–second cuneiform (1MT-2C) screw fixation (PS). We investigated Lapidus patient cohorts using CS vs PS fixation to understand patient-reported outcomes, angular and rotational correction, and complication rates.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed cases of modified Lapidus for hallux valgus by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into CS or PS groups according to fixation. All patients had preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and minimum 12 months of follow-up. PROMIS scores in 6 key domains were compared within and between groups. Radiographic assessment of hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle were performed on pre- and postoperative XR. Pronation of the first ray was measured on pre- and postoperative weightbearing computed tomography.

Results:

We compared 42 patients with PS fixation to 43 with CS fixation. Both groups had significant improvement in hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle (P < .001), with no difference between groups. PS patients experienced a greater correction of first metatarsal pronation, an average reduction of 11 degrees, compared to 8 degrees in the CS group (P < .039). Both cohorts experienced improvement in PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical function. There were no differences in PROMIS score improvements between the cohorts. The CS group started weightbearing at 6 weeks vs 3.6 weeks for the PS group. Complication and revision rates were similar.

Conclusion:

A plate and 1MT-2C screw fixation provides safe, robust fixation of Lapidus procedure and prevents instability through the intercuneiform joint. We observed similar improvement in PROMIS compared with patients treated with cross-screws. Complications did not increase despite the PS group weightbearing much earlier. PS patients achieved greater first ray rotational correction.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison between Weightbearing-CT semiautomatic and manual measurements in Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

Radiographic measurements are an essential tool to determine the appropriate surgical treatment and outcome for Hallux Valgus (HV). HV deformity is best evaluated by weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). The objective was (1) to assess the reliability of WBCT computer-assisted semi-automatic imaging measurements in HV, (2) to compare semi-automatic with manual measurements in the setting of an HV, and (3) to compare semi-automatic measurements between HV and control group.

METHODS

In this retrospective IRB (ID# 201904825) approved study, we assessed patients with hallux valgus deformity. The sample size calculation was based on the hallux valgus angle (HVA). Thus to obtain the 0.8 power, including 26 feet with HV in this study, was necessary. Our control group consisted of 19 feet from 19 patients without HV. Raw multiplanar data was evaluated using software CubeVue®. In the axial plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and interphalangeal angle (IPA) were measured. The semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the Bonelogic®Software. Inter-rater reliabilities were performed using ICC. Agreement between methods was tested using the Bland-Altman plots. The difference between Patologic and Control cases using semi-automatic measurements was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Alpha risk was set to 5% (α = 0.05). P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Reliabilities utilizing ICC were over 0.80 for WBCT manual measurements and WBCT semi-automatic readings. Inter and intraobserver agreement for Manual and Semi-automatic WBCT measurements demonstrated excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Semi-automatic measurements are reproducible and comparable to measurements performed manually. The software differentiated pathological from non-pathological conditions when subjected to semi-automatic measurements. The development of advanced semi-automatic segmentation software with minimal user intervention is essential for the establishment of big data and can be integrated into clinical practice, facilitating decision-making.

Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle in Hallux Valgus Deformity. Fact or Fiction? A 3-Dimensional Weightbearing CT Assessment

BACKGROUND

The Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle (DMAA) was previously described as an increase in valgus deformity of the distal articular surface of the first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus (HV). Several studies have reported poor reliability of this measurement. Some authors have even called into question its existence and consider it to be the consequence of M1 pronation resulting in projection of the round-shaped lateral edge of M1 head.Our study aimed to compare the DMAA in HV and control populations, before and after computer correction of M1 pronation and plantarflexion with a dedicated weightbearing CT (WBCT) software. We hypothesized that after computerized correction, DMAA will not be increased in HV compared to controls.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study including 36 HV and 20 control feet. In both groups, DMAA was measured as initially described on conventional radiographs (XR-DMAA) and WBCT by measuring the angle between the distal articular surface and the longitudinal axis of M1. Then, the DMAA was measured after computerized correction of M1 plantarflexion and coronal plane rotation using the α angle (3d-DMAA).

RESULTS

The XR-DMAA and the 3d-DMAA showed higher significant mean values in HV group compared to controls (respectively 25.9 ± 7.3 vs 7.6 ± 4.2 degrees, P < .001, and 11.9 ± 4.9 vs 3.3 ± 2.9 degrees, P < .001).Comparing a small subset of precorrected juvenile HV (n=8) and nonjuvenile HV (n=28) demonstrated no significant difference in the measure DMAA values. On the other hand, the α angle was significantly higher in the juvenile HV group (21.6 ± 9.9 and 11.4 ± 3.7 degrees; P = .0046).

CONCLUSION

Although the valgus deformity of M1 distal articular surface in HV is overestimated on conventional radiographs, comparing to controls showed that an 8.6 degrees increase remained after confounding factors' correction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

After pronation computerized correction, an increase in valgus of M1 distal articular surface was still present in HV compared to controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Association of First Metatarsal Pronation Correction With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if a postoperative decrease in first metatarsal pronation on 3-dimensional imaging was associated with changes in patient-reported outcomes as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity domains or recurrence rates in patients with hallux valgus (HV) who undergo a first tarsometatarsal fusion (modified Lapidus procedure).

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive HV patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent a modified Lapidus procedure had preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS scores and had first metatarsal pronation measured on preoperative and at least 5-month postoperative weightbearing CT scans were included. Multivariable regression analyses were used to investigate differences in the change in PROMIS domains preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively between patients with "no change/increased first metatarsal pronation" and "decreased first metatarsal pronation." A log-binomial regression analysis was performed to identify if a decrease in first metatarsal pronation was associated with recurrence of the HV deformity.

RESULTS

The decreased first metatarsal pronation group had a significantly greater improvement in the PROMIS physical function scale by 7.2 points (P = .007) compared with the no change/increased first metatarsal pronation group. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the decreased first metatarsal pronation group when compared to the no change/increased first metatarsal pronation group (risk ratio 0.25, P = .025).

CONCLUSION

Detailed review of this limited cohort of patients who underwent a modified Lapidus procedure suggests that the rotational component of the HV deformity may play an important role in outcomes and recurrence rates following the modified Lapidus procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Association Between Hindfoot Alignment and First Metatarsal Rotation

BACKGROUND

The association between forefoot and hindfoot position for planus and cavus feet is fundamental to the treatment of these deformities. However, no studies have evaluated the association between hindfoot alignment and first metatarsal (M1) axial rotation. Understanding this possible relationship may help to understand the deformity and improve patient care. The purpose of this study is to determine a correlation between hindfoot alignment and metatarsal rotation as assessed by weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent weightbearing plain radiography (WBPR) and WBCT between 2015 and 2018 were evaluated. Hindfoot alignment was measured with the calcaneal moment arm (CMA). M1 rotation was measured using the Kim and Saltzman angles. Patient subgroups were created according to the severity of valgus/varus hindfoot alignment. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for association between variables.

RESULTS

Among the 196 patient feet included in the study, the average CMA was 6.0 ± 16.2 mm. The average Kim and Saltzman angles were 7.7 ± 12.9 degrees and 2.8 ± 13.1 degrees, respectively. The average Meary angle was 182.0 ± 11.9 degrees. A moderately strong association was found between the CMA and the Saltzman (r = 0.641, P < .01) and Kim angles (r = 0.615, P < .01). Hindfoot valgus was associated with M1 pronation and hindfoot varus with M1 supination. Additionally, inverse relationships between the Meary angle and the Saltzman (r = -0.600, P < .01) and Kim angles (r = -0.529, P < .01) were identified.

CONCLUSION

In this well-defined cohort, we found substantial correlation between hindfoot alignment and M1 rotation. Hindfoot valgus was associated with M1 pronation, and hindfoot varus was associated with M1 supination. Surgeons correcting cavovarus/planovalgus deformities should be aware of this association and evaluate the need for first-ray derotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Correlation between indirect radiographic parameters of first metatarsal rotation in hallux valgus and values on weight-bearing computed tomography

PURPOSE

To verify if indirect radiographic signs of first metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correspond to weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) measurements.

METHODS

In this case-control retrospective study, we analyzed 26 hallux valgus (HV) feet and 20 controls through conventional radiograph (CR) and WBCT images. Two blinded orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons performed the measurements. Pronation classification (head roundness), head diameter (HD), traditional HV angles, arthritis, sesamoid positioning, and first metatarsal rotation angle (MRA) (alpha angle) were evaluated. Comparisons were performed by Student's T-test and a multivariate regression was executed. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean values were higher in HV patients than controls when evaluating MRA (11.51 [9.42-13.60] to 4.23 [1.84-6.62], 95%CI), HD (22.35 [21.52-23.18] to 21.01 [20.07-21.96]), and sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) (26.72 [24.09-29.34] to 4.56 [1.63-7.50]). The MRA had a low influence in head roundness classification (R²: 0.15). Changes in the pronation classification were explained chiefly by the sesamoid station (SS) (R²: 0.37), where stations 4 to 7 were found to be strong predictors of roundness classifications 2 and 3.

CONCLUSION

Indirect signs of metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correlate weakly with the alpha angle measured in WBCT. The presence of arthritis and sesamoids displacement might modify the perception of first head roundness. The influence of MRA in the classification was low, where SS from 4 to 7 was strong predictors of a higher pronation classification.