A Case-Control Study of 3D vs 2D Weightbearing CT Measurements of the M1-M2 Intermetatarsal Angle in Hallux Valgus

Development and validation of a fully automated tool to quantify 3D foot and ankle alignment using weight-bearing CT

INTRODUCTION

Foot and ankle alignment plays a pivotal role in human gait and posture. Traditional assessment methods, relying on 2D standing radiographs, present limitations in capturing the dynamic 3D nature of foot alignment during weight-bearing and are prone to observer error. This study aims to integrate weight-bearing CT (WBCT) imaging and advanced deep learning (DL) techniques to automate and enhance quantification of the 3D foot and ankle alignment.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who underwent a WBCT of the foot and ankle were retrospectively included. After training and validation of a 3D nnU-Net model on 45 cases to automate the segmentation into bony models, 35 clinically relevant 3D measurements were automatically computed using a custom-made tool. Automated measurements were assessed for accuracy against manual measurements, while the latter were analyzed for inter-observer reliability.

RESULTS

DL-segmentation results showed a mean dice coefficient of 0.95 and mean Hausdorff distance of 1.41 mm. A good to excellent reliability and mean prediction error of under 2 degrees was found for all angles except the talonavicular coverage angle and distal metatarsal articular angle.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this study introduces a fully automated framework for quantifying foot and ankle alignment, showcasing reliability comparable to current clinical practice measurements. This operator-friendly and time-efficient tool holds promise for implementation in clinical settings, benefiting both radiologists and surgeons. Future studies are encouraged to assess the tool's impact on streamlining image assessment workflows in a clinical environment.

Role of lateral soft tissue release in percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether lateral soft tissue release (LSTR) is required as part of percutaneous hallux valgus (PHV) surgery. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess whether LSTR reduces the risk of recurrence of hallux valgus deformity. The secondary aims were to assess if LSTR increases the risk of complications, improves the clinical outcome and leads to a greater radiographic correction.

METHODS

We performed a PRISMA-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, pooling clinical papers reporting results after PHV surgery into two categories (PHV with (Group 1, G1) and without LSTR (Group 2, G2)) and comparing them. Data regarding the study design, demographics, the surgical procedure and the clinical and radiological outcome were extracted and compared. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were selected (G1:594 feet; G2:553 feet). The pooled proportion of recurrence at a minimum 21-month follow-up (2%, 95%CI 0-3 vs 2%, 95%CI 0-5; p = 0.70) did not differ in the two groups. Similarly, the pooled proportion of complications (27%, 95%CI 17-38 vs 25%, 95%CI 12-37; p = 0.79) was similar. The pre- (p = 0.23) and post-operative AOFAS scores (p = 0.16), the pre-(HVA: p = 0.23) (IMA: p = 0.94) and post-operative radiological angles (HVA: p = 0.47) (IMA: p = 0.2) and the methodological quality of studies (p = 0.2) did not differ either between G1 and G2.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that LSTR performed during percutaneous HV surgery reduces the risk of recurrence of the deformity at a mean 4-year follow-up nor improves the clinical and radiological outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Reliability of Cone Beam Weightbearing Computed Tomography Analysis of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Positioning and Comparison to Weightbearing X-Ray Measurements

BACKGROUND

The current reference standard for postoperative evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) positioning, weightbearing radiography (WBXR), is subject to technical bias. Weightbearing cone beam computed tomography (WBCT) enables visualization of the foot's complex 3-dimensional (3D) structure under standing load. To date, no WBCT-based system for TAA positioning has been validated. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess TAA positioning using WBCT 3D models and (2) evaluate the agreement levels between 2 raters and thus evaluate the intermethod reliability with respect to WBXR.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Two raters independently created a 3D WBCT model using dedicated software and recorded the following measurements: α angle, tibiotalar surface angle (TSA), hindfoot angle (HFA), tibiotalar ratio (TTR), β angle, γ angle, and Φ angle. Measurements were repeated 2 months apart in similar, independent fashion and compared to WBXR. Interobserver, intraobserver, and intermethod agreements were calculated.

RESULTS

All 7 measurements showed good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.85-0.95). The intermethod (WBCT vs WBXR) agreement showed good agreement for the γ angle (ICC 0.79); moderate agreement levels for the α angle, TSA angle, β angle, and TTR (ICC 0.68, 0.69, 0.70, and 0.69, respectively); poor agreement for the HFA (ICC 0.25); and negative agreement for the φ angle (ICC -0.2).

CONCLUSION

Position analysis of TAA using WBCT demonstrated good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement and can be reliably used. Additionally, a negative to moderate agreement between standard WBCT and standard WBXR was found.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study.