Current status and future perspectives of oral HPV testing in the diagnosis and monitoring of oropharyngeal cancer. A review

HPV16 status in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is an important prognostic factor. Its determination, based on immunistochemical analysis of p16 oncoprotein requires an invasive biopsy. Thus, alternative methods are being sought. Determining oral HPV16 status appears to be a promising alternative. However, it is not used routinely. This prompted us to perform a systematic literature review enabling us to evaluate the diagnostic and predictive ability of this approach. Thirty-four relevant studies were finally selected. For determination of HPV status in OPC, the calculated average sensitivity and specificity for oral sampling was 74% and 91%, respectively, with p16 tumour tissue marker being the gold standard. The method appears to be valuable in monitoring treatment response as well as the biological activity of the tumour, enabling early detection of persistent or relapsing carcinoma sufficiently long before its clinical and/or radiological manifestation. It can also contribute to identification of the primary tumour in cases of metastases of unknown origin. Last but not least, the screening HPV oral testing would help to identify individuals with persistent HPV oral infection who are at increased risk of development of OPC.

What is the future of treatment de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer? A review of ongoing clinical trials

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in incidence in recent decades. With higher cure rates in younger populations, long-term survivors may live with acute- and long-term toxicity, leading to increased interest in de-escalation treatment strategies for HPV-related OPSCC. Herein, we have examined the current landscape of clinical trials in this context.

Methods

A review of active clinical trials related to de-escalation of HPV-associated OPSCC treatment was performed using the clinicaltrials.gov database from inception to January 2022. A search using the key words "oropharyngeal cancer" and "HPV" was completed. Three investigators independently reviewed each trial, with any discrepancies settled by a fourth. Data collected from each study included study phase, study design, primary, and secondary endpoints, and de-escalation treatment strategies. A final 24 articles were selected for full text review.

Results

Many trials (n=19, 79%) were non-randomized, and most studies employed a phase II design (n=14, 58%). Only 13% (n=3) were randomized trials, and 8% (n=2) included a phase III component. The most frequent primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (n=9, 37.5%). With regards to the identified de-escalation strategies, all the studies (n=24) had at least one component assessing changes in RT dose/fractionation and/or a reduction in RT volumes. A smaller percentage of trials assessed surgical interventions (n=9, 37.5%) and/or changes in systemic therapy (n=8, 33.3%).

Conclusion

A small number of randomized trials are underway, and a transition to more randomized phase III trials in the future will be important to change clinical practice.

Impact of AJCC 8th edition staging system and definitive treatment choice on the prognosis of complete responders with p16+ and p16− oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of overall survival (OS) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who achieved complete response (CR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of OPSCC patients who achieved CR from a single academic medical center. Associations between OS, AJCC 8th edition staging system, definitive treatment choice, smoking history, and p16 status were assessed.

RESULTS

p16+ status was associated with favorable prognosis for CR (p < 0.001) but not non-CR (p = 0.67) patients. For early stage, p16+ OPSCC patients who achieved CR, surgery + adjuvant radiation (RT) treatment was more durable compared to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT), particularly in smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

Curative intent treatment choice and smoking history has an impact on the long-term OS of the CR p16+ OPSCC cohort. Prospective studies to define the optimal multi-modality treatment option to manage p16+ OPSCC patients is needed.

Treatment de-escalation for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) related oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) carries a better prognosis compared with HPV-counterparts, thereby pushing the adoption of de-intensification treatment approaches as new strategies to preserve superior oncologic outcomes while minimizing toxicity. We evaluated the effect of treatment de-intensification in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional and distant control (LRC and DM) by selecting prospective or retrospective studies, providing outcome data with reduced intensification versus standard curative treatment in HPV+ OPC patients, with a systematic analysis till September 2020. The primary outcome of interest was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, LRC, and DM expressed as HR. A total of 55 studies (from 1393 screened references) were employed for quantitative synthesis for 38 929 patients. Among n = 48 studies with data available, de-intensified treatments reduced OS in HPV+ OPCs (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; p < 0.01). In de-escalated treatments, PFS was also decreased (HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.65-2.69; p < 0.01). Compared with standard treatments, reduced intensity approaches were associated with reduced locoregional and distant disease control (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.75-3.59; p < 0.01; and HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.9; p < 0.01). Chemoradiation improved survival in a definitive curative setting compared with radiotherapy alone (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75; p < 0.01). When adjuvant treatments were compared, standard and de-escalation strategies provided similar OS. In conclusion, in patients with HPV+ OPC, de-escalation treatments should not be widely and agnostically adopted in clinical practice, as therein lies a concrete risk of offering a sub-optimal treatment to patients.

Effectiveness of reduced- versus standard-dose radiotherapy on survival and radiation-associated toxicity in patients with human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the review is to investigate overall survival in patients with human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) comparing standard- versus reduced-dose radiotherapy.Introduction: The improved survival of patients with HPV+ compared to HPV- (HPV negative) OPSCC has raised the question regarding reducing the total radiation treatment dose delivered to patients with HPV+ OPSCC. A de-escalated radiotherapy protocol may provide equal oncological benefit with reduced adverse events/toxicity.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

We will include any adult patients aged 18 years or older who have undergone curative intent treatment for HPV+ OPSCC. These patients can be of any stage at the time treatment is initiated. Exclusion criteria will include pre-clinical or animal-based studies, patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma lesions of the oropharynx, primary lesions in other head and neck sites, or if treatment is palliative in nature.

METHODS

A three-step search strategy will be conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion through MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, Scopus, and gray literature sources. These articles will be assessed against our inclusion and exclusion criteria at a title and abstract level, as well as at full-text level. Remaining studies will be critically appraised based on their trial design. Data extraction will occur for all studies and, where possible, will be pooled with statistical meta-analysis.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021252161.

Oncologic outcomes of human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx carcinoma treated with surgery alone: A 12-institution study of 344 patients

BACKGROUND

The oncologic outcomes of surgery alone for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition (AJCC 7th) pN2a and pN2b human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) are not clear.

METHODS

The authors performed a 12-institution retrospective study of 344 consecutive patients with HPV+OPSCC (AJCC 7th pT0-3 N3 M0) treated with surgery alone with 6 months or more of follow-up using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 2-year outcomes for the entire cohort were 91% (182 of 200) disease-free survival (DFS), 100% (200 of 200) disease-specific survival (DSS), and 98% (200 of 204) overall survival (OS). The 18 recurrences within 2 years were 88.9% (16 of 18) local and/or regional recurrences and 11.1% (2 of 18) distant metastases. Recurrences were not significantly associated with smoking, pT stage, or pN stage. The 16 patients with locoregional recurrences within 2 years all underwent successful salvage treatments (median follow-up after salvage: 13.1 months), 43.8% (7 of 16) of whom underwent salvage surgery alone for a 2-year overall salvage radiation need of 4.5% (9 of 200). The 2-year outcomes for the 59 evaluable patients among the 109 AJCC 7th pT0-2 N2a-N2b patients with 1 to 3 pathologic lymph nodes (LNs) were as follows: local recurrence, 3.4% (2 of 59); regional recurrence, 8.4% (5 of 59); distant metastases, 0%; DFS, 88.1% (52 of 59); DSS, 100% (59 of 59); OS, 96.7% (59 of 61); and salvage radiation, 5.1% (3 of 59).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful selection, surgery alone for AJCC 7th pT0-T2N0-N2b HPV+OPSCC with zero to 3 pathologic LNs without perineural invasion, extranodal extension, or positive margins results in high DFS, DSS, OS, and salvage treatment success. Because of the short-term follow-up, these data support further investigation of treatment de-escalation in this population.

Rate of locoregional recurrence among patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with known HPV status: a systematic review

Background: We aimed to review systematically the literature on locoregional recurrence rates in patients with HPV-positive and -negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched using key words such as human papillomavirus, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with local, regional, and locoregional recurrence.Results: Nine studies (2974 patients with known HPV-status, 59% HPV-positive) were included. Among the HPV-positive and -negative patients, 69% and 58% had lymph node metastasis at diagnosis. At a median time to recurrence ranging from 8.4 to 13.2 months among the included studies, we found that a weighted average of 9% and 26% for HPV-positive and -negative patients experienced locoregional recurrence. Overall, the median follow-up time ranged from 21 to 83 months among the included studies.Conclusion: Recurrence rates for HPV-positive and -negative OPSCC patients were 9% and 26%, respectively, equating to an almost three times higher rate of locoregional recurrence among HPV-negative patients compared to HPV-positive patients.

The relationship between HPV status and chemoradiotherapy in the locoregional control of penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare, aggressive malignancy often associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The practice of a personalized risk-adapted approach is not yet established. This study is to assess the relationship between HPV tumor status and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in PeCa locoregional control (LRC).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with HPV status who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and treated with surgical resection between 1999 and 2016. The relationship between tumor/treatment characteristics and LRC were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (UVA and MVA, respectively). Time-to-event outcomes were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared via log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were identified. The median follow-up was 36.6 months. Patients were primarily HPV-negative (HPV-) (n = 28, 55%), and pathologic node positive (pN+) (55%). The 2 year LRC rate was 54%. pN+ patients had a significantly lower 2 year LRC (37 vs. 81%, p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of pN+ patients (n = 28), there was a LRC benefit associated with the addition of CRT (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.70, p = 0.012) and HPV-positive (HPV+) disease (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.039-0.80, p = 0.024) using MVA. HPV+ patients treated with CRT had improved 2 year LRC compared to HPV- patients (83 vs. 38%, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant CRT and HPV+ disease independently predicted for improved LRC in pN+ PeCa. In HPV+ PeCa, the LRC benefit was primarily observed in patients treated with adjuvant CRT. Prospective investigation of HPV+ and CRT is required to further delineate their roles in optimizing PeCa treatment.

p16INK4a : A surrogate marker of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of p16^INK4a and the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the nasal vestibule.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed from 1995 to 2014 were included in this study. Assessment of p16^INK4a and HPV-DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed and analyzed with respect to baseline, clinicopathological, and outcome parameters. The p16^INK4a positivity was defined as unequivocal nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of ≥70% of the cells, whereas 50%-69% was considered to be a "borderline" result.

RESULTS

There were 46 patients with SCCs of the nasal vestibule, of whom 31 (67.4%) were available for p16^INK4a and 30 (65.2%) for analysis of HPV. Expression of p16^INK4a was present in 19.4% and showed coincidence with high-risk HPV (P < .001). Neither p16^INK4a nor HPV-DNA had significant impact on outcome.

CONCLUSION

Significant immunoreactivity for p16^INK4a was present in about one-fifth of the samples and figured as a surrogate marker of high-risk HPV infection. There was no influence on outcome.