Nodes, paranodes and neuropathies

This review summarises recent evidence supporting the involvement of the specialised nodal and perinodal domains (the paranode and juxtaparanode) of myelinated axons in the pathology of acquired, inflammatory, peripheral neuropathies.The identification of new target antigens in the inflammatory neuropathies heralds a revolution in diagnosis, and has already begun to inform increasingly targeted and individualised therapies. Rapid progress in our basic understanding of the highly specialised nodal regions of peripheral nerves serves to strengthen the links between their unique microstructural identities, functions and pathologies. In this context, the detection of autoantibodies directed against nodal and perinodal targets is likely to be of increasing clinical importance. Antiganglioside antibodies have long been used in clinical practice as diagnostic serum biomarkers, and associate with specific clinical variants but not to the common forms of either acute or chronic demyelinating autoimmune neuropathy. It is now apparent that antibodies directed against several region-specific cell adhesion molecules, including neurofascin, contactin and contactin-associated protein, can be linked to phenotypically distinct peripheral neuropathies. Importantly, the immunological characteristics of these antibodies facilitate the prediction of treatment responsiveness.

Molecular mimicry in Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharides: contribution of gastrointestinal infections to autoimmunity

Molecular mimicry of host structures by the saccharide portion of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of the gastrointestinal pathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pylori is thought to be associated with the development of autoimmune sequelae. C. jejuni, a leading cause of gastroenteritis, is the most common antecedent infection in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an inflammatory neuropathy. Chemical analyses of the core oligosaccharides of neuropathy-associated C. jejuni strains have revealed structural homology with human gangliosides. Serum antibodies against gangliosides are found in one third of GBS patients but are generally absent in enteritis cases. Collective data suggest that the antibodies are induced by antecedent infection with C. jejuni, and subsequently react with nerve tissue causing damage. The O-chains of most H. pylori strains express Lewis blood group antigens which are thought to have a role in camouflage of the bacterium as these antigens are also present on human gastric epithelial cells. In chronic H. pylori infections, bacterial expression of Lewis antigens is suggested to be involved in the induction of autoantibodies against the Lewis antigen-expressing gastric proton pump. Many aspects of the autoimmune mechanisms in C. jejuni -associated GBS and H. pylori -induced atrophic gastritis remain unclear, such as the involvement of T cells and the role of host factors.

Autoantibodies associated with peripheral neuropathy

High titers of serum antibodies to neural antigens occur in several forms of neuropathy. These include neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, inflammatory polyneuropathies, and paraneoplastic neuropathies. The antibodies frequently react with glycosylated cell surface molecules, including glycolipids, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans, but antibodies to intracellular proteins have also been described. There are several correlations between antibody specificity and clinical symptoms, such as anti-MAG antibodies with demyelinating sensory or sensorimotor neuropathy, anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies with motor nerve disorders, antibodies to gangliosides containing disialosyl moieties with sensory ataxic neuropathy and Miller-Fisher syndrome, and antibodies to the neuronal nuclear Hu antigens with paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy. These correlations suggest that the neuropathies may be caused by the antibodies, but evidence for a causal relationship is stronger in some examples than others. In this review, we discuss the origins of the antibodies, evidence for and against their involvement in pathogenic mechanisms, and the implications of these findings for therapy.

Variability in the binding of anti-MAG and anti-SGPG antibodies to target antigens in demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia

Densitometry of immunostained Western blots or thin layer chromatograms and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to compare the relative strengths of IgM binding to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), P0 glycoprotein, peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP-22), sulfate-3-glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and other potential target antigens in a series of eleven patients with sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia. The IgM from all patients exhibited reactivity with both MAG and SGPG, and there was a statistically significant correlation between the overlay assays and ELISAs for measuring the strength of IgM binding to MAG and to SGPG. However, the data revealed variations in the relative strengths with which the antibodies bound to the potential target antigens and heterogeneity in their fine specificities. First, there was a poor correlation between the strength of binding to MAG and to SGPG, respectively. Second, reactivity with MAG or SGPG in a few of the patients was only detected by one of the two assay systems. Third, about one-third of the patients' IgM absolutely required the sulfate on SGPG for reactivity, whereas the others retained some reactivity after removal of the sulfate. Fourth, IgM from two of the patients exhibited unusually strong reactivity with the proteins of compact myelin, P0 and PMP22. These relative differences in strengths of antibody binding to the potential antigens were compared with the patients' clinical presentations and with their responses to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in a clinical trial in which they participated. For the most part, these variations did not correlate with clinical presentation, which was relatively homogeneous in this series of patients. However, an inverse relationship was noted between degree of reactivity to MAG by ELISA and response to IVIg. Two of the patients who responded had only mild elevations of IgM antibodies to nerve glycoconjugates and exhibited some unusual immunochemical and clinical characteristics in comparison to the other patients. The results demonstrate differences in the relative strengths with which anti-MAG and anti-SGPG IgM antibodies from different patients bind to potential neural target antigens which may affect pathogenic mechanisms and response to therapy.