A comparison of the biological activity of 2 formulations of enoxaparin in 12 healthy volunteers

Bioequivalence of a biosimilar enoxaparin (Cloti-Xa™) and its innovator (Clexane® ): A single-dose, randomized, double-blind, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover, balanced study in healthy human subjects

Currently, several biosimilars of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) with differing potencies are being developed and marketed globally. Thus, it is important that the potency of each biosimilar LMWH be compared with its innovator's molecule. The present study aimed to determine the bioequivalence of biosimilar (Cloti-Xa™) and innovator (Clexane® ) formulations of enoxaparin sodium (40 mg/0.4 ml) in healthy human volunteers. It was conducted as a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover, balanced, pharmacodynamic study (NCT05265676). The participants were sequentially and randomly administered subcutaneous injections of Cloti-Xa™ (test) and Clexane® (reference), separated by a one-week washout period. To assess the Anti-Xa & Anti-IIa activities, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) release and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), blood samples were obtained at various timepoints upto 24 h after the drug administration. Bioequivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% CI for the test to reference ratio of the population is within 80%-125% for each of the Ln-transformed values of Amax and AUECt for Anti-Xa and Anti-IIa. TFPI and aPTT data were submitted as supportive evidence. The study sample consisted of twenty-four male participants. The 90% CIs of Amax and AUECt for Anti-Xa activity were 105.50%-113.90% and 103.97%-112.08%, and for Anti-IIa activity were 106.56%-117.90% and 107.35%-124.86%, respectively. In addition, the 90% CI of the ratio of Anti-Xa/Anti-IIa activity falls within the acceptance criteria. TFPI and aPTT profiles were similar for both products. No serious adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusively, the results showed that Cloti-Xa™ and Clexane® are bioequivalent and well-tolerated.

Characterization of the antithrombotic fingerprint of the branded and copies of the low-molecular-weight enoxaparin using thrombin generation assay

BACKGROUND

The patent protection of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) expired, so the definition of criteria for the biological similarity between LMWH copies and the original product is a real need.

AIM

The present in vitro study compared copies and branded enoxaparin using the specific anti-Xa activity and the calibrated automated thrombogram assay.

METHODS

Samples of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from 15 healthy volunteers were spiked with branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) or its copies (Cutenox, Dilutol, Enoxa, Fibrinox, Loparin, Lupenox, Novex, Noxprin, and Versa). The specific anti-Xa activity was measured in PPP, and thrombin generation was assessed in PPP and PRP in the presence of tissue factor or pancreatic cancer cells BXPC3.

RESULTS

The anti-Xa activity of enoxaparin copies ranged from 0.072 to 0.088 IU/μg, being lower as compared to the branded enoxaparin (0.095 anti-Xa IU/μg). The potency of each copy to inhibit thrombin generation varied in the 3 experimental systems. The presence of platelets or pancreatic cancer cells BXPC3 in human plasma induced significant modifications in the inhibitory efficiency of enoxaparin copies on thrombin generation, which distinguished them from the branded product.

CONCLUSION

Enoxaparin copies showed significant variability regarding their inhibitory potency on thrombin generation. Platelets and cancer cells significantly increased the variability of the antithrombotic efficiency of the copies as compared to the branded enoxaparin. The present study underlines the need for the elaboration of additional functional criteria to evaluate the global antithrombotic capacity of enoxaparin copies in order to evaluate their potential sameness with the branded drug.