Arterial and venous thromboses in patients with idiopathic (immunological) thrombocytopenia: a possible contributing role of cortisone-induced hypercoagulable state

The immune thrombocytopenia paradox: Should we be concerned about thrombosis in ITP?

Despite the predisposition to bleeding, patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may also have an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, which can contribute to significant morbidity. The risk of thrombosis increases with age and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. This narrative review explores the multifactorial nature of thrombosis in ITP, focusing on new pathological mechanisms, emerging evidence on the association between established treatments and thrombotic risk, the role of novel treatment approaches, and the challenges in assessing the balance between bleeding and thrombosis in ITP. The review also explores the challenges in managing acute thrombotic events in ITP, since the platelet count does not always reliably predict either the risk of bleeding or thrombosis and antithrombotic strategies lack specific guidelines for ITP. Notably, second-line therapeutic options, such as splenectomy and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), exhibit an increased risk of thrombosis especially in older individuals or those with multiple thrombotic risk factors or previous thrombosis, emphasizing the importance of careful risk assessment before treatment selection. In this context, it is important to consider second-line therapies such as rituximab and other immunosuppressive agents, dapsone and fostamatinib, which are not associated with increased thrombotic risk. In particular, fostamatinib, an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has promisingly low thrombotic risk. During the current era of the emergence of several novel ITP therapies that do not pose additional risks for thrombosis, it is critical to outline evidence-based strategies for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in ITP patients.

Risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombotic events in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Although bleeding is one of the main symptoms of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), risk factors for bleeding have yet to be fully established. Low platelet count (PC; <20-30 × 109 /L) is generally indicative of increased risk of bleeding. However, PC and bleeding events cannot be fully correlated; many other patient- and disease-related factors are thought to contribute to increased bleeding risk. Furthermore, even though ITP patients have thrombocytopenia and are at increased risk of bleeding, ITP also carries higher risk of thrombotic events. Factors like older age and certain ITP treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk. Women's health in ITP requires particular attention concerning haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Management of bleeding/thrombotic risk, and eventually antithrombotic therapies in ITP patients, should be based on individual risk profiles, using a tailored, patient-centric approach. Currently, evidence-based recommendations and validated tools are lacking to support decision-making and help clinicians weigh risk of bleeding against thrombosis. Moreover, evidence is lacking about optimal PC for achieving haemostasis in invasive procedures settings. Further research is needed to fully define risk factors for each event, enabling development of comprehensive risk stratification approaches. This review discusses risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombosis risk in adults with primary ITP.

Addressing thrombosis concerns in immune thrombocytopenia: the role of fostamatinib in immune thrombocytopenia management

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a disease that commonly presents with an increased risk of bleeding, can also paradoxically produce an increased risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of thromboembolism can be associated with patient-related factors (e.g. co-morbidities, age and history of thrombosis), disease-related factors (e.g. a greater proportion of younger, more reactive platelets, and the presence of microparticles and pro-inflammatory cytokines) and treatment-related factors (e.g. splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and IVIg).

AREAS COVERED

Aspects of the pathophysiology of ITP and the effects of treatment are discussed with emphasis on individualizing treatment based on the patient's thromboembolic risk, treatment options and preferences.

EXPERT OPINION

An increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ITP has led to the development of new agents such as fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Further research into the factors contributing to the risks for bleeding and thromboembolic events can contribute to the development of more specific therapies for ITP and allow greater individualization of therapy based on each patient's medical history and clinical status.

Hyperlipidemia in immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune hemorrhagic disease characterized by low platelet count and bleeding manifestations. However, some patients also suffered from atherosclerosis or even infarction. Apart from activated platelets, lipid metabolism takes a large part in the formation of atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome. The lipid metabolic state in ITP patients is still unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 302 hospitalized ITP patients in our cohort, comparing their blood lipids, bleeding symptoms, metabolic diseases and treatment responses.

RESULTS

We found a high proportion of ITP patients suffered from hyperlipidemia, and other metabolic diseases including cardiovascular or cerebral atherosclerosis or infarction, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Hyperlipidemia was associated with severe bleeding and treatment refractoriness in ITP. Statins could alleviate thrombocytopenia and bleeding severity, and facilitate ITP treatment, while improving hyperlipidemia in ITP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study demonstrated that lipid metabolism might play an indispensable role in ITP pathogenesis and development.

Primary Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in a Patient with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura is an autoimmune hematological disorder characterized by low platelet level due to its destruction through autoimmune antibodies. Cerebral venous thrombosis is a serious condition defined by a thrombosis in the cerebral venous sinuses that occurs mostly in the presence of a hypercoagulable state. Hemorrhage and thrombosis are processes with a paradoxical etiology; thus, the association between these two conditions seems to be extremely rare. Case Presentation. We herein report a case of a 19-year-old female with a chief compliant of generalized tonic-clonic episode, severe headache, and blurred vision. Physical examination was significant for a bilateral Babinski's sign and severe bilateral papilledema. Laboratory workup, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were normal except for severe thrombocytopenia. Magnetic resonance venography was diagnostic for cerebral venous thrombosis. Her past medical history was significant for immune thrombocytopenic purpura that was treated with prednisolone 40 mg per day which posed a therapeutic challenge. High-dose prednisolone and platelet transfusion were initiated; enoxaparin was administrated and switched to warfarin after stabilization of platelet count. The patient was neurologically intact after 14 days of appropriate treatment and was on follow-up. Many hypotheses were suggested to explain the unexpected thrombotic events in a patient with immune thrombocytopenic purpura which were related to the disease etiology or treatment, taking into account common risk factors (such as age, obesity, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, splenectomy, and oral contraceptive agents).

Conclusion

The association between immune thrombocytopenic purpura (which is a major risk factor for bleeding) and cerebral venous thrombosis ( which is caused by a thromboembolic event )has carried a major challenge to the management plan. We believe that immune thrombocytopenic purpura and its treatment methods should be taken into consideration as risk factors for thromboembolic phenomenon.

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura as a Hemorrhagic Versus Thrombotic Disease: An Updated Insight into Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a blood disorder characterized by a low platelet count of (less than 100 × 109/L). ITP is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the platelets and their precursors become targets of a dysfunctional immune system. This interaction leads to a decrease in platelet number and, subsequently, to a bleeding disorder that can become clinically significant with hemorrhages in skin, on the mucous membrane, or even intracranial hemorrhagic events. If ITP was initially considered a hemorrhagic disease, more recent studies suggest that ITP has an increased risk of thrombosis. In this review, we provide current insights into the primary ITP physiopathology and their consequences, with special consideration on hemorrhagic and thrombotic events. The autoimmune response in ITP involves both the innate and adaptive immune systems, comprising both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Thrombosis in ITP is related to the pathophysiology of the disease (young hyperactive platelets, platelets microparticles, rebalanced hemostasis, complement activation, endothelial activation, antiphospholipid antibodies, and inhibition of natural anticoagulants), ITP treatment, and other comorbidities that altogether contribute to the occurrence of thrombosis. Physicians need to be vigilant in the early diagnosis of thrombotic events and then institute proper treatment (antiaggregant, anticoagulant) along with ITP-targeted therapy. In this review, we provide current insights into the primary ITP physiopathology and their consequences, with special consideration on hemorrhagic and thrombotic events. The accumulated evidence has identified multiple pathophysiological mechanisms with specific genetic predispositions, particularly associated with environmental conditions.

Pre-operative serum inflammation-based scores in patients with pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

Full blood count (FBC) and serum inflammation-based scores reflect systemic inflammation and predict outcomes in cancer, but little is known in pituitary adenomas (PAs). We aimed to characterise FBC and inflammation-based scores in PA patients and investigate their usefulness in predicting challenging disease course.

METHODS

We studied 424 PA patients first operated at our centre with available pre-operative biochemical data. Patients with infection, malignancies, autoimmune or haematological conditions were excluded. Inflammation-based scores studied: Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Neutrophil-Platelet Score (NPS), Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS).

RESULTS

Cushing's disease patients had more platelets, leucocytes, neutrophils and monocytes, and higher NLR, NPS and SII. Serum inflammation-based scores didn't differ among non-Cushing PA subtypes. The glucocorticoid excess severity influenced leucocyte, eosinophil, basophil and platelet counts, and GPS in Cushing's disease. Patients with functioning non-Cushing PAs with suprasellar extension, cavernous sinus invasion and hypopituitarism had GPS ≥ 1, while NPS ≥ 1 was associated with suprasellar extension. More invasive and difficult to treat corticotrophinomas were associated with fewer platelets pre-operatively (< 299.5 × 10⁹/L predicting multimodal treatment). Non-functioning PA patients who suffered apoplexy had more leucocytes, neutrophils and monocytes, higher GPS ≥ 1 and fewer platelets; re-operated cases had fewer lymphocytes, higher NLR and PLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum inflammation-based scores may predict invasive/refractory PAs: GPS and PNI in non-functioning and functioning non-Cushing PAs; NPS in functioning non-Cushing PAs; NLR and PLR in non-functioning PAs. Platelets < 299.5 × 10⁹/L predict multimodal treatment in Cushing's disease. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Thrombosis in immune thrombocytopenia - current status and future perspectives

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder in which a combination of defective platelet production and enhanced clearance leads to thrombocytopenia. The primary aim for therapy in patients with this condition is the prevention of bleeding. However, more recently, increased rates of venous and arterial thrombotic events have been reported in ITP, even in the context of marked thrombocytopenia. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, aetiology and management of thrombotic events in these patients. We consider the impact of ITP therapies on the increased thrombotic risk, in particular the use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), as well as factors inherent to ITP itself. We also discuss the limited evidence available to guide clinicians in the treatment of these complex cases.

Why thromboembolism occurs in some patients with thrombocytopenia and treatment strategies

Platelets play such an important role in the process of thrombosis that patients with thrombocytopenia generally have an increased risk of bleeding. However, abnormal thrombotic events can sometimes occur in patients with thrombocytopenia, which is unusual and inexplicable. The treatments for thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism are usually contradictory. This review introduces the mechanisms of thromboembolism in patients with different types of thrombocytopenia and outlines treatment recommendations for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. According to the cause of thrombocytopenia, this article addresses four etiologies, including inherited thrombocytopenia (Myh9-related disease, ANKRD26-associated thrombocytopenia, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, Bernard-Soulier syndrome), thrombotic microangiopathy (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, hemolytic uremic syndrome, Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation), autoimmune-related thrombocytopenia (immune thrombocytopenic purpura, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus), and acquired thrombocytopenia (Infection-induced thrombocytopenia and drug-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). We hope to provide more evidence for clinical applications and future research.

Platelet activation and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation in immune thrombocytopenia: is there an association?

No biological predictors for the increased risk of thrombosis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have been identified. The aim of the study was to investigate platelet and neutrophil activation as well neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation in 63 ITP patients and 30 healthy volunteers. Platelet and neutrophil activation was assessed during steady state using flow cytometry analysis, and NETs were evaluated by quantitation of cell free DNA (cfDNA), and citrullinated histone-3-DNA (CitH3-DNA). Patient platelets and neutrophils showed increased CD62 and CD11b expression compared to controls (p = .038, and p = .022, respectively). In patients, platelet activation inversely correlated with platelet count and platelet size (p < .001), and positively correlated with neutrophil degranulation (p = .024). More NET formation, both CitH3-DNA (p = .025) and cfDNA(p < .001), were present in ITP patients compared to controls. CitH3-DNA inversely correlated with CD62 expression on platelets (p = .042), but higher levels of cfDNA were observed in individuals with classical cardiovascular risk factors for thrombosis, and in those with a previous history of thrombotic events. In this disease, the increased platelet activation and plasma NET levels seem to be separable processes that associate (either positively or inversely in the case of CitH3-DNA or platelet degranulation, respectively) to platelet mass.

Platelet-bound C4d, low C3 and lupus anticoagulant associate with thrombosis in SLE

Background

Low C3 and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) are known risk factors for thrombosis in SLE. We evaluated the association between C4d products deposited on platelets (PC4d) and thrombosis in SLE. Antiphosphatidyl serine/prothrombin (PS/PT) complex antibody was also evaluated as an alternative to LAC.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional analysis of 149 consented patients with SLE (mean age: 47±1 years, 86% female) classified with (n=16) or without (n=133) thrombotic events in the past 5 years. Abnormal PC4d (≥20 units) was measured using flow cytometry. LAC and C3 were measured using dilute Russell’s viper venom time (>37 s) and immunoturbidimetry, respectively. Anti-PS/PT antibody status (IgG) was measured by immunoassay. Statistical analysis consisted of logistic regression and calculation of OR estimates with 95% CI.

Results

Abnormal PC4d (OR=8.4, 95% CI 2.8 to 24.8), low C3 (OR=9.5, 95% CI 3.0 to 30.3), LAC (OR=5.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 22.3) and anti-PS/PT IgG (OR=3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.7) status associated with thrombosis (p<0.05). Cumulatively, the presence of PC4d, low C3 and LAC abnormalities as a composite risk score was higher in the presence of thrombosis (1.93±0.25) than in its absence (0.81±0.06) (p<0.01). Each unit of this composite risk score yielded an OR of 5.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 10.7) to have thrombosis (p<0.01). The composite risk score with anti-PS/PT antibody status instead of LAC also associated with thrombosis (p<0.01).

Conclusion

A composite risk score including PC4d, low C3 and LAC was associated with recent thrombosis and acknowledges the multifactorial nature of thrombosis in SLE.

Prevalence and risk factors of deep venous thrombosis in patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis: one center data from China

Objective

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a severe complication in longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) patients. It may interfere with LETM treatment and delay the recovery of the spinal dysfunction. However, there is less data about the prevalence and risk factors of DVT in patients with LETM. We analyzed data retrospectively to ascertain the prevalence of DVT and the clinical risk factors for DVT.

Methods

Clinical data on 255 LETM patients were collected from medical records. All patients were performed color Doppler ultrasound(US) to screen DVT in both lower extremities when admitted. Clinical characteristics of LETM patients with DVT were compared with those without DVT using corresponding statistical methods. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors related to DVT.

Results

DVT were found in 11.8% patients with LETM. Univariate analysis showed that age, muscle force and elevated baseline D-dimer were risk factors for DVT. After multivariate logistic regression, age, dyslipidemia, segments of lesions, and elevated baseline D-dimer remained significant independent risk factors.

Conclusions

DVT is common in patients with LETM and related to patient’s age, dyslipidemia, segments of lesions, and elevated baseline D-dimer. Early recognition of DVT and thrombosis prophylaxis are appropriate in patients with LETM.

Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Following Immunoglobulin Treatment in Pediatric Patient With Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a widely used agent as the first choice of treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). IVIG has several side effects, but it is a relatively safe treatment. Life-threatening thrombosis has been reported in adults and rarely in children. We report a case of a 14-year-old boy with dural venous sinus thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after treatment with IVIG for ITP. The patient was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin and the symptoms were recovered. If a patient with ITP shows mental change or respiratory difficulty, we should consider thrombosis as well as hemorrhage.

Thrombotic risk in patients with immune thrombocytopenia and its association with antiphospholipid antibodies

Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) paradoxically have an increased risk of thrombosis. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been observed in a substantial proportion of ITP patients, but its clinical significance remains to be established. This study retrospectively investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of aPL in ITP patients and assessed the risk factors for thrombosis. One hundred and sixty-five subjects with ITP were included in the study and followed for a mean period of 63·4 months. Sixty-nine (41·6%) patients were positive for aPL at diagnosis, and their clinical characteristics and course of ITP were not different from those of aPL-negative patients. Twenty-one (12·7%) patients developed a thrombotic event during follow-up and the cumulative incidence rate ratio of aPL-positive to aPL-negative patients for thromboembolism was 3·15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·21-8·17] after adjusting for confounding factors. Lupus anticoagulant and hypertension were identified by Cox regression analysis as independent risk factors for thrombosis [hazard ratio (HR) 4·1, 95% CI 1·4-11·9, P = 0·009 and HR 5·6, 95% CI 1·9-15·8, P = 0·001, respectively]. Our results showed that a substantial proportion of ITP patients were aPL-positive, and that lupus anticoagulant and hypertension were independent risk factors for thrombosis. Detection of aPL can provide useful information for identifying patients at high-risk for developing thrombosis.