Diagnostic Values of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors for Acute Joint Bleeding in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

How to assess, detect, and manage joint involvement in the era of transformational therapies: Role of point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Patients with haemophilia experience recurring hemarthroses, mainly involving knees, elbows and ankles, which lead to haemophilic arthropathy, the major chronic complication of haemophilia. With new approaches to haemophilia treatment leading to fewer joint bleeds and, in some cases, no bleeding events, assessing whether current outcome assessment tools provide adequate sensitivity and specificity for management and care of patients with haemophilia is needed.

METHODS

An overview of current imaging tools for monitoring joint health, novel osteochondral damage and synovial proliferation biomarkers, and the relationship between assessments for functionality and imaging modalities is provided. Usefulness and sensitivity of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to complement other assessments and use of ultrasound to monitor haemophilic arthropathy are also examined.

RESULTS

This review provides rationale for haemophilia teams to move beyond traditional outcomes in joint imaging, as well as guidance and evidence on assessment of joint health for potential new treatment modalities, such as gene therapy. The role of POCUS in the existing paradigm for haemophilia care and management along with the use of ultrasound as a complement to other outcome assessment tools are also discussed. Finally, the clinical effects of subclinical bleeding on joint function are described, to motivate screening for synovial proliferation.

CONCLUSION

POCUS can facilitate the early detection of joint damage and can monitor disease progression while providing insights into the efficacy of treatment regimens, and should be considered as an essential assessment tool for managing the care of patients with haemophilia.

Absence of Effect of Emicizumab on D-Dimer Concentrations in Adult Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

The D-dimer (DD) assay is an essential biological test for the diagnosis and monitoring of thrombotic conditions. DD testing is usually not performed as part of the routine laboratory management of patients with hemophilia (PWH). There is an increasing concern about the risk of thrombotic complications in PWH, which is likely related to age, cardiovascular risk factors, invasive thrombogenic procedures, over-correction of Factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX, or administration of new therapeutic agents mimicking FVIII or rebalancing coagulation.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study sought to assess the basal DD levels in PWH treated prophylactically with FVIII, and to evaluate potential changes after switching to emicizumab.

METHOD

Patients over 18 years of age treated with emicizumab within a single center over the period 2017-2022 were included in the study.

RESULT

DD levels were measured in 40 adult PWH (37 severe/ three moderate / two with FVIII inhibitor) with a median age of 46 years (range: 19-82; Q1-Q3: 30,25-56,5), before and at least 3 months after emicizumab initiation. No significant changes were revealed, with DD median values of 257 ng/mL (range: 250-2876; Q1-Q3: 250-493,5) before and 250 ng/mL (range: 50-6205; Q1-Q3: 250-380,25) after the switch (p  =  0.9).

CONCLUSION

Most adult PWH on prophylaxis using FVIII display DD levels within the normal range, which remain unchanged after switching to emicizumab. In view of these reassuring results, monitoring of DDs at the start of emicizumab treatment does not appear necessary but could be considered when combined with other bypassing agents or high dose FVIII.

Increased endoglin levels correlated with angiogenesis-associated angiopoietin-2 in haemophilia patients

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia is a bleeding disorder that occurs due to the deficiency of coagulation factors, and the angiogenesis process is an important process underlying the pathophysiology of haemophilic arthropathy. The role of the new adipocytokine endoglin (ENG) in patients with haemophilia is not yet known.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between ENG protein and angiogenesis-related cytokines in patients with haemophilia for the first time.

METHODS

Plasma protein levels and mRNA expressions of ENG and various angiogenesis-associated cytokines were compared in blood samples collected from 28 patients with haemophilia A or B and 29 healthy volunteers. The relationship between the cytokines and ENG were determined by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Plasma ENG levels and angiogenic markers were found to be significantly higher in patients with haemophilia compared to controls. Real-time PCR studies showed that mRNA expressions of ENG, vascular endothelial growth factor A, hypoxia-inducible factor A, and prostaglandin E2 increased in patients with haemophilia. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between ENG and angiopoietin-2 levels in the haemophilia group. Besides, a significant decrease in annexin-V binding to platelets in haemophilia patients compared to control was found to be related to the bleeding profiles in the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study determined that ENG protein may be involved in the formation of angiogenesis in haemophilia patients and its effects may be related to angiogenetic marker angiopoietin-2 in this process. Our findings contribute to the literature during the determination of target proteins in haemophilia treatment.

Management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy in persons with haemophilia

Introduction

The SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus‐induced infection (COVID‐19) can be associated with a coagulopathy mainly responsible for pulmonary microvasculature thrombosis and systemic thromboembolic manifestations. The pathophysiology and management of the COVID‐19 coagulopathy are likely more complex in patients with inherited bleeding diseases such as haemophilia. These individuals might indeed present with both bleeding and thrombotic complications and require simultaneous antithrombotic and haemostatic treatments.

Objective

We propose practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of COVID‐19 coagulopathy in persons with haemophilia.

Results

Continuation of regular haemostatic treatment is recommended for ambulatory patients. For patients requiring hospital admission and on replacement therapy with factors VIII or IX concentrates, prophylaxis with concentrates should be intensified according to the risk of bleeding complications and associated with prophylactic doses of LMWH. For patients on nonreplacement therapy, emicizumab should be continued and possibly combined with factor VIII and prophylactic doses of LMWH depending on the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. Dose escalation of LMWH tailored to the risk of thrombosis can be employed but not supported by evidence.

Conclusions

These practical recommendations are based on the current literature on COVID‐19 with its impact on haemostasis, indications and modalities for thromboprophylaxis mainly in nonhaemophilic patients and how that is likely to affect persons with haemophilia in different circumstances. They will need to be tailored to each patient's clinical status and validated in future studies.

Biomarkers and immunological parameters in haemophilia and rheumatoid arthritis patients: a comparative multiplexing laboratory study

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia (HA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients may develop joint damage caused by recurrent joint bleedings in HA or by chronic inflammation in RA. Only few data exist for biomarker studies in these patients.

AIM

The objective of the present study is to assess a large array of biomarkers in peripheral blood samples obtained from HA patients without or with arthropathy and to compare pattern to RA patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

A panel of biomarkers was assessed in 129 men (40 HA patients without arthropathy, 23 HA patients with arthropathy, 23 RA patients and 43 control subjects). 37 different biomarkers (cytokines, angiogenesis-related proteins) were analysed using a multiple analyte profiling technology and supplemented by acute phase proteins, coagulation and immunological parameters.

RESULTS

Evidence for systemic inflammation was obtained by increased acute phase reactants in all patient groups. 13 or 14 from 42 soluble parameters demonstrated significant differences (p < .05) between HA patients without arthropathy and healthy controls, or between HA patients with arthropathy and healthy controls, respectively. Largely overlapping patterns were obtained except for interleukin-7 being increased in HA patients without arthropathy and being decreased in HA in the presence of arthropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to data supporting systemic inflammation, we provide evidence for a common biomarker profile in HA patients and RA patients compared to healthy controls. A distinctive biomarker profile for HA patients with arthropathy did not appear except for interleukin-7 demonstrating specific changes depending on the absence or presence of arthropathy in HA patients.

The Progression of Hemophilic Arthropathy: The Role of Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A and B are X-linked congenital bleeding disorders characterized by recurrent hemarthroses leading to specific changes in the synovium and cartilage, which finally result in the destruction of the joint: this process is called hemophilic arthropathy (HA). This review highlights the most prominent molecular biomarkers found in the literature to discuss their potential use in the clinical practice to monitor bleeding, to assess the progression of the HA and the effectiveness of treatments.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed on PubMed and Embase, from 3 to 7 August 2020. Study selection and data extraction were achieved independently by two authors and the following inclusion criteria were determined a priori: English language, available full text and articles published in peer-reviewed journal. In addition, further articles were identified by checking the bibliography of relevant articles and searching for the studies cited in all the articles examined.

RESULTS

Eligible studies obtained at the end of the search and screen process were seventy-three (73).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the surge of interest in the clinical use of biomarkers, current literature underlines the lack of their standardization and their potential use in the clinical practice preserving the role of physical examination and imaging in early diagnosis.