Serum Adenosine Deaminase as a Useful Marker to Estimate Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

A crucial role of adenosine deaminase in regulating gluconeogenesis in mice

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) catalyzes the irreversible deamination of adenosine (ADO) to inosine and regulates ADO concentration. ADA ubiquitously expresses in various tissues to mediate ADO-receptor signaling. A significant increase in plasma ADA activity has been shown to be associated with the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we show that elevated plasma ADA activity is a compensated response to high level of ADO in type 2 diabetes mellitus and plays an essential role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Supplementing with more ADA, instead of inhibiting ADA, can reduce ADO levels and decrease hepatic gluconeogenesis. ADA restores a euglycemic state and recovers functional islets in db/db and high-fat streptozotocin diabetic mice. Mechanistically, ADA catabolizes ADO and increases Akt and FoxO1 phosphorylation independent of insulin action. ADA lowers blood glucose at a slower rate and longer duration compared to insulin, delaying or blocking the incidence of insulinogenic hypoglycemia shock. Finally, ADA suppresses gluconeogenesis in fasted mice and insulin-deficient diabetic mice, indicating the ADA regulating gluconeogenesis is a universal biological mechanism. Overall, these results suggest that ADA is expected to be a new therapeutic target for diabetes.

Increased levels of serum adenosine deaminase and increased risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Increased serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels have been shown to be involved in metabolic abnormalities and immune disequilibrium, which may in turn contribute to inflammatory diseases. This study aimed to determine whether increased serum ADA levels are related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This study was part of a series exploring the potential risks for DPN. All patients received DPN assessment based on neuropathic symptoms, neuropathic signs, and nerve conduction studies to calculate the composite Z score of nerve latency, amplitude and conduction velocity (NCV). DPN was confirmed by both at least a presentation of neuropathic symptoms/signs and an abnormal nerve conduction index. Serum ADA levels were also synchronously detected.

RESULTS

A total of 384 eligible patients with T2D were recruited for this study, and 24.5% (n=94) were determined to have DPN. Increases in serum ADA levels were closely associated with increases in composite Z score of latency (β=0.263, t=5.273, p<0.001) and decreases in composite Z score of amplitude (β=-0.126, t=-2.352, p=0.019) and NCV (β=-0.201, t=-3.841, p<0.001) after adjusting for other clinical covariates. Moreover, each 5 U/L increase in serum ADA levels was associated with a 1.781-fold increased adjusted odds ratio of having DPN (95% confidence interval: 1.271-2.495). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off value of serum ADA levels to discriminate DPN was ≥14.2 U/L (sensitivity=59.57%, specificity=75.52% and Youden index=0.351) after analysis by receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased serum ADA levels may be a potential risk factor for DPN in patients with T2D.

Serum adenosine deaminase levels are associated with diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetic patients

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this study, patients with T2D who had been screened for DKD were recruited. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 30 mg/g for 3 months were identified as having DKD. The prevalence of DKD was 13.3%, and the range of serum ADA levels was 4-37 U/L. Serum ADA levels were positively associated with cystatin C levels and UACR (r = 0.295 and r = 0.302, respectively, both P < 0.05) and negatively associated with eGFR (r = -0.342, P < 0.05). The proportion of participants with DKD increased significantly from 3.8% in the first tertile (T1) to 13.6% in the second tertile (T2) and 25.9% in the third tertile (T3) of ADA (P for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for clinical risk factors for DKD via multiple logistic regression, the corresponding odds ratios (ORs) of DKD for the participants in T2 and T3 vs those in T1 of ADA were 5.123 (1.282-20.474) and 10.098 (1.660-61.431), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value of ADA to indicate DKD was 10 U/L. Its corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 75.5 and 56.4%, respectively. Our results demonstrated that serum ADA levels were closely associated with DKD and partly reflect the risk of DKD in patients with T2D.

The relationship between adenosine deaminase and heart rate-corrected QT interval in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Prolonged heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval may reflect poor prognosis of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels are related to hyperglycemia, insulin resistance (IR) and inflammation, which may participate in diabetic complications. We investigated the association of serum ADA levels with prolonged QTc interval in a large-scale sample of patients with T2D.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 492 patients with T2D were recruited. Serum ADA levels were determined by venous blood during fasting. QTc interval was estimated from resting 12-lead ECGs, and prolonged QTc interval was defined as QTc > 440 ms.

RESULTS

In this study, the prevalence of prolonged QTc interval was 22.8%. Serum ADA levels were positively associated with QTc interval (r = 0.324, P < 0.0001). The proportion of participants with prolonged QTc interval increased significantly from 9.2% in the first tertile (T1) to 24.7% in the second tertile (T2) and 39.0% in the third tertile (T3) of ADA (P for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for other possible risk factors by multiple linear regression analysis, serum ADA level was still significantly associated with QTc interval (β = 0.217, t = 3.400, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female (OR 5.084, CI 2.379-10.864, P < 0.001), insulin-sensitizers treatment (OR 4.229, CI 1.290-13.860, P = 0.017) and ADA (OR 1.212, CI 1.094-1.343, P < 0.001) were independent contributors to prolonged QTc interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum ADA levels were independently associated with prolonged QTc interval in patients with T2D.